Biomedical subjects

J B Maintz

Publications and source records attributed to J B Maintz.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2001

Automated topographical cell proliferation analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cell proliferation is often studied using the incorporation of bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU). Immunohistochemical staining is then used to detect BrdU in the nucleus. To circumvent the observer bias and labor-intensive nature of manually counting BrdU-labeled nuclei, an automated topographical cell proliferation analysis method is developed. METHODS: Sections stained with fluorescein-labeled anti-BrdU and counterstained with To-Pro-3 are scanned using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). For every point in the image, the nucleus density of BrdU-labeled nuclei and the total nucleus density of the neighborhood of that point are calculated from the BrdU and the To-Pro-3 signal, respectively. The ratio of these densities gives an indication of the amount of cell proliferation at that point. The automated measure is validated by comparing it with the ratio of BrdU-stained nuclei to the total number of nuclei obtained from a manual count. RESULTS: A positive correlation is found between the automated measure and the ratios calculated from the manual counting (r = 0.86, P < 0.001). Calculating the topographical cell proliferation using the automated method is faster and does not suffer from interobserver variability. CONCLUSIONS: Automated topographical cell proliferation analysis is a fast method to objectively find differences in cell proliferation within a tissue. This can be visualized by a topographical map that corresponds to the tissue under study.

Animals↗

PubMed2000

Retrospective shading correction based on entropy minimization.

Shading is a prominent phenomenon in microscopy, manifesting itself via spurious intensity variations not present in the original scene. The elimination of shading effects is frequently necessary for subsequent image processing tasks, especially if quantitative analysis is the final goal. While most of the shading effects may be minimized by setting up the image acquisition conditions carefully and capturing additional calibration images, object-dependent shading calls for retrospective correction. In this paper a novel method for retrospective shading correction is proposed. Firstly, the image formation process and the corresponding shading effects are described by a linear image formation model, which consists of an additive and a multiplicative parametric component. Secondly, shading correction is performed by the inverse of the image formation model, whose shading components are estimated retrospectively by minimizing the entropy of the acquired images. A number of tests, performed on artificial and real microscopical images, show that this approach is efficient for a variety of differently structured images and as such may have applications in and beyond the field of microscopical imaging.

Alloys↗

PubMed2000

Image registration by maximization of combined mutual information and gradient information.

Mutual information has developed into an accurate measure for rigid and affine monomodality and multimodality image registration. The robustness of the measure is questionable, however. A possible reason for this is the absence of spatial information in the measure. The present paper proposes to include spatial information by combining mutual information with a term based on the image gradient of the images to be registered. The gradient term not only seeks to align locations of high gradient magnitude, but also aims for a similar orientation of the gradients at these locations. Results of combining both standard mutual information as well as a normalized measure are presented for rigid registration of three-dimensional clinical images [magnetic resonance (MR), computed tomography (CT), and positron emission tomography (PET)]. The results indicate that the combined measures yield a better registration function does mutual information or normalized mutual information per se. The registration functions are less sensitive to low sampling resolution, do not contain incorrect global maxima that are sometimes found in the mutual information function, and interpolation-induced local minima can be reduced. These characteristics yield the promise of more robust registration measures. The accuracy of the combined measures is similar to that of mutual information-based methods.

Entropy↗

PubMed1998

A survey of medical image registration.

The purpose of this paper is to present a survey of recent (published in 1993 or later) publications concerning medical image registration techniques. These publications will be classified according to a model based on nine salient criteria, the main dichotomy of which is extrinsic versus intrinsic methods. The statistics of the classification show definite trends in the evolving registration techniques, which will be discussed. At this moment, the bulk of interesting intrinsic methods is based on either segmented points or surfaces, or on techniques endeavouring to use the full information content of the images involved.

Abdomen↗

PubMed1997

Integration of functional and anatomical brain images.

This article concerns the integration of functional and anatomical volumetric brain images. Integration consists of two steps: matching or registration, where the images are brought into spatial agreement, and fusion or simultaneous display where the registered multimodal image information is presented in an integrated fashion. Approaches to register multiple images are divided into extrinsic methods based on artificial markers, and intrinsic matching methods based solely on the patient related image data. The various methods are compared by a number of characteristics, which leads to a clear preference for one class of intrinsic methods, viz. voxel-based matching. Furthermore, two- and three-dimensional techniques to display multimodality image information are outlined.

Brain↗

PubMed1996

Comparison of edge-based and ridge-based registration of CT and MR brain images.

In modern medicine, several different imaging techniques are frequently employed in the study of a single patient. This is useful, since different images show complementary information on the functionality and/or structure of the anatomy examined. This very difference between modalities, however, complicates the problem of proper registration of the images involved, and rules out the most basic approaches--like direct grey value correlation--to achieve registration. The observation that some common structures will always exist is supportive of the statement that registration may be feasible using edges or ridges present in the images. The existence of such structures defined in the binary sense is questionable, however, and their extraction from images requires a segmentation by definition. In this paper we propose to use fuzzy edgeness and ridgeness images, thus avoiding the need for segmentation and using more of the available information from the original images. We will show that such fuzzy images can be used to achieve accurate registration. Several ridgeness and edgeness computing operators were compared. The best registration results were obtained using a gradient magnitude operator.

Algorithms↗

PubMed1992

Geometry driven multimodality matching of brain images.

Clinical diagnosis, as well as therapy planning and evaluation, are increasingly supported by multimodal images. There are many instances desiring integration of the information obtained by various imaging devices. This paper describes a new approach to match images of different modalities. Differential operators are used in combination with Gaussian blurring to extract geometric features from the images that correspond to similar structures. The resulting 'feature' images may be used with existing matching techniques that minimize the distance between the features in the images to be matched. Our first application of this new approach concerns matching of MRI and CT brain images. The so-called L upsilon upsilon operator produces a ridge-like feature image from which in CT and MRI the center curve of the cranium is easily extracted. First results of this operator's performance in matching tasks are shown. Another promising operator is the 'umbilicity' operator, which is presented in combination with SPECT images.

Brain↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Registration, segmentation, and visualization of multimodal brain images.

This paper gives an overview of the studies performed at our institute over the last decade on the processing and visualization of brain images, in the context of international developments in the field. The focus is on multimodal image registration and multimodal visualization, while segmentation is touched upon as a preprocessing step for visualization. The state-of-the-art in these areas is discussed and suggestions for future research are given.

Brain↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Comparison and evaluation of retrospective intermodality brain image registration techniques.

PURPOSE: The primary objective of this study is to perform a blinded evaluation of a group of retrospective image registration techniques using as a gold standard a prospective, marker-based registration method. To ensure blindedness, all retrospective registrations were performed by participants who had no knowledge of the gold standard results until after their results had been submitted. A secondary goal of the project is to evaluate the importance of correcting geometrical distortion in MR images by comparing the retrospective registration error in the rectified images, i.e., those that have had the distortion correction applied, with that of the same images before rectification. METHOD: Image volumes of three modalities (CT, MR, and PET) were obtained from patients undergoing neurosurgery at Vanderbilt University Medical Center on whom bone-implanted fiducial markers were mounted. These volumes had all traces of the markers removed and were provided via the Internet to project collaborators outside Vanderbilt, who then performed retrospective registrations on the volumes, calculating transformations from CT to MR and/ or from PET to MR. These investigators communicated their transformations again via the Internet to Vanderbilt, where the accuracy of each registration was evaluated. In this evaluation, the accuracy is measured at multiple volumes of interest (VOIs), i.e., areas in the brain that would commonly be areas of neurological interest. A VOI is defined in the MR image and its centroid c is determined. Then, the prospective registration is used to obtain the corresponding point c' in CT or PET. To this point, the retrospective registration is then applied, producing c" in MR. Statistics are gathered on the target registration error (TRE), which is the distance between the original point c and its corresponding point c". RESULTS: This article presents statistics on the TRE calculated for each registration technique in this study and provides a brief description of each technique and an estimate of both preparation and execution time needed to perform the registration. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that retrospective techniques have the potential to produce satisfactory results much of the time, but that visual inspection is necessary to guard against large errors.

Brain↗