Biomedical subjects

J B Y So

Publications and source records attributed to J B Y So.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Endoscopic screening for gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Population endoscopic screening for gastric cancer is generally deemed not to be cost-effective except in Japan, where its prevalence is very high. However, in the absence of screening, patients present with advanced disease, and prognosis is poor. We conducted a cost utility analysis to determine whether endoscopic screening for stomach cancer in intermediate-risk population would be cost-effective and to better define the high-risk groups in the population who would benefit from such strategy. METHODS: Cost-effectiveness analysis was performed by using a Markov Model. Simulation was performed on Singapore (intermediate-risk) population and various high-risk subgroups. Comparison was made between 2-yearly endoscopic mass screening program versus no screening. Data sources were extracted from relevant studies published from 1980-2004 identified via systematic PUBMED search. Main outcome measures were deaths caused by stomach cancer averted, cost per life saved, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio expressed as cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) saved. RESULTS: Screening of high-risk group of Chinese men (age-standardized rate, 25.9/100,000) from 50-70 years old is highly cost-effective, with cost benefit of United States $26,836 per QALY. Screening this cohort of 199,000 subjects prevents 743 stomach cancer deaths and saves 8234 absolute life years. Cost of averting 1 cancer death is United States $247,600. Cost-effectiveness was most sensitive to incidence of stomach cancer and cost of screening endoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Screening of stomach cancer in moderate to high-risk population subgroups is cost-effective. Targeted screening strategies for stomach cancer should be explored.

Aged↗

PubMed2005

Periampullary diverticulum: a case of bleeding from a periampullary diverticulum.

INTRODUCTION: Duodenal diverticula are uncommon and usually asymptomatic. Complications like bleeding, perforation and biliary fistulae are rare. The management of a bleeding duodenal diverticulum can be challenging. With the improvement of endoscopic techniques, many of the cases reported in the literature were managed with endoscopic methods. We present a case report of bleeding duodenal diverticulum. CLINICAL FEATURES: The patient was treated successfully with endoscopic haemostasis during her first epidsode when she initially presented with bleeding duodenal diverticulum, but recurred after 2 months. TREATMENT: Despite initial endoscopic haemostasis during her second episode, she rebled after 2 days, necessitating surgical management. OUTCOME: After suture ligation of the ulcer, the patient recovered and there was no more recurrence. CONCLUSION: Periampullary diverticulum is a rare source of gastrointestinal bleeding, which can be challenging to diagnose and treat. A multidisciplinary approach encompassing radiology, endoscopy and surgery is most effective.

Aged↗

PubMed2001

Ondansetron in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study.

BACKGROUND: There is an increased incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of intravenous ondansetron, a 5-HT anatagonist, for prevention from PONV after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: Sixty-eight patients were entered into the study. Thirty-six patients were randomized to receive a single intravenous dose of 4 mg of ondansetron before extubation. Thirty-two patients received no prophylaxis. There were no differences in terms of sex ratio, age, ASA status, and duration of operation between the two study groups. Patients were interviewed by an independent observer to assess the postoperative pain and nausea using visual analog score. Patients' satisfaction scores to the procedure were measured. RESULTS: There was no complication in the series. Pain scores at 2 and 24 h after operation and analgesics consumption were not different between the two groups. For the patients who received ondansetron, the mean (SD) nausea score at 2 and 24 h was 1.5 (1.2) and 1.4 (1.4), respectively. The score for the control group was 1.4 (1.0) and 1.2 (0.5), respectively. There was also no difference in episodes of vomiting and usage of antiemetics between the two groups. Both groups were equally satisfied with the procedures. CONCLUSION: Routine use of ondansetron does not reduce the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

We report a case of laparoscopic cholecystectomy that was performed using a robotic surgical system. A 70-year-old woman underwent laparoscopic robotic cholecystectomy ZEUS, the robotic system used in our study, has three interactive robotic arms fixed to the side of the operating table. The arms are controlled by the surgeon, who sits at a remote computer console. The surgeon's movements can be scaled down, and tremor is filtered out. The robotic-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy was completed in 42 min. The time to set up the robot was 22 mins. All of the surgically reproducible robotic maneuvers were performed without any particular difficulty. The robotic movements were stable, accurate, and reliable, as well as easy to control with precision. Our preliminary experience indicates that robotic laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe and can be as fast as conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, further clinical applications of robotic surgery are needed to confirm this observation.

Aged↗