Biomedical subjects

J Blaine

Publications and source records attributed to J Blaine.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2001

Impact of psychosocial treatments on associated problems of cocaine-dependent patients.

A previous report from the National Institute on Drug Abuse Collaborative Cocaine Treatment Study (P. Crits-Christoph et al., 1999) found relatively superior cocaine and drug use outcomes for individual drug counseling plus group drug counseling compared with other treatments. Using data from that study, the authors examined the relative efficacy of 4 treatments for cocaine dependence on psychosocial and other addiction-associated problems. The 487 patients were randomly assigned to 6 months of treatment with cognitive therapy, supportive-expressive therapy, or individual drug counseling (each with additional group drug counseling), or to group drug counseling alone. Assessments were made at baseline and monthly for 6 months during the acute treatment phase, with follow-up visits at 9 and 12 months. No significant differences between treatments were found on measures of psychiatric symptoms, employment, medical, legal, family-social, interpersonal, or alcohol use problems. The authors concluded that the superiority of individual drug counseling in modifying cocaine use does not extend broadly to other addiction-associated problems.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2000

Concurrent and predictive validity of the Substance Dependence Severity Scale (SDSS).

This study investigated the concurrent and predictive validity of the Substance Dependence Severity Scale (SDSS), a clinician-administered interview designed to assess the severity and frequency of DSM-IV dependence symptoms for a range of substances. A total of 172 (107 males and 66 females) treated substance users participated in the study. Of those, 89% (n=153) received at least one follow-up interview within 1-6 months of an initial assessment. For alcohol, cocaine and heroin, convergent and discriminant validity was supported by significant relationships between SDSS scores at baseline and other baseline measures of substance use consequences, such as the Addiction Severity Index (ASI), as well as significant relationships between SDSS change scores from baseline to follow-up and change scores of other measures of consequences. SDSS scores were significantly associated with time to first post treatment use of alcohol, cocaine and heroin, although the nature of the associations was complex. Scale applications and areas for further study are discussed.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2000

Substance Dependence Severity Scale (SDSS): reliability and validity of a clinician-administered interview for DSM-IV substance use disorders.

No existing diagnostic interview assesses severity of dependence based on DSM-IV criteria across a range of substances. The Substance Dependence Severity Scale (SDSS) was designed to serve this purpose, consisting of substance-specific scales of both severity and frequency of DSM-IV criteria. This study investigated the reliability and validity of the SDSS. The test-retest reliability of the SDSS in 175 (112 male and 63 female) treated substance users ranged from good to excellent for alcohol, cocaine, heroin and sedatives (interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs)=0.75-0.88 for severity, 0.67-0.85 for frequency). Results for cannabis were lower, ranging from fair to good (ICCs=0.50-0.62). Results for joint rating and internal consistency reliability were comparable to test-retest findings. In addition to indicators of concurrent validity, scale applications are presented and discussed.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1999

Psychosocial treatments for cocaine dependence: National Institute on Drug Abuse Collaborative Cocaine Treatment Study.

BACKGROUND: This was a multicenter investigation examining the efficacy of 4 psychosocial treatments for cocaine-dependent patients. METHODS: Four hundred eighty-seven patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 manual-guided treatments: individual drug counseling plus group drug counseling (GDC), cognitive therapy plus GDC, supportive-expressive therapy plus GDC, or GDC alone. Treatment was intensive, including 36 possible individual sessions and 24 group sessions for 6 months. Patients were assessed monthly during active treatment and at 9 and 12 months after baseline. Primary outcome measures were the Addiction Severity Index-Drug Use Composite score and the number of days of cocaine use in the past month. RESULTS: Compared with the 2 psychotherapies and with GDC alone, individual drug counseling plus GDC showed the greatest improvement on the Addiction Severity Index-Drug Use Composite score. Individual group counseling plus GDC was also superior to the 2 psychotherapies on the number of days of cocaine use in the past month. Hypotheses regarding the superiority of psychotherapy to GDC for patients with greater psychiatric severity and the superiority of cognitive therapy plus GDC compared with supportive-expressive therapy plus GDC for patients with antisocial personality traits or external coping style were not confirmed. CONCLUSION: Compared with professional psychotherapy, a manual-guided combination of intensive individual drug counseling and GDC has promise for the treatment of cocaine dependence.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Cocaine-induced mood disorder: prevalence rates and psychiatric symptoms in an outpatient cocaine-dependent sample.

This paper attempts to examine and compare prevalence rates and symptom patterns of DSM substance-induced and other mood disorders. 243 cocaine-dependent outpatients with cocaine-induced mood disorder (CIMD), other mood disorders, or no mood disorder were compared on measures of psychiatric symptoms. The prevalence rate for CIMD was 12% at baseline. Introduction of the DSM-IV diagnosis of CIMD did not substantially affect rates of the other depressive disorders. Patients with CIMD had symptom severity levels between those of patients with and without a mood disorder. These findings suggest some validity for the new DSM-IV diagnosis of CIMD, but also suggest that it requires further specification and replication.

Adult↗

PubMed1998

Predictors of dropout from psychosocial treatment of cocaine dependence.

The current study assessed demographic, drug and psychiatric predictors of dropout in the pilot/training phase of a large, multi-site psychotherapy outcome study for patients with cocaine dependence. The different predictors of dropout were assessed throughout the phases of the study: screening, intake, stabilization and assessment phase, and following randomization to treatment. Results showed that (1) younger patients were less likely to keep their intake appointment. (2) Of the patients who had an intake visit, those who did not complete high school and with more days of cocaine use in the previous month were less likely to complete an initial stabilization and assessment phase requiring 1 week of abstinence from all drugs. A survival analysis was used to examine time to dropout for the 286 patients randomized to individual treatment. (3) Again, younger age was associated with dropout after randomization. (4) Drug use variables did not predict time to dropout. (5) Presence of any current Axis I disorder was associated with later dropout from treatment. Minority treatment information seekers and treatment initiators were less likely to go on to complete the full treatment program.

Adult↗

PubMed1998

Cocaine dependence with and without PTSD among subjects in the National Institute on Drug Abuse Collaborative Cocaine Treatment Study.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the prevalence of lifetime traumatic events and current symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among treatment-seeking cocaine-dependent outpatients and compared patients with and without PTSD on current substance use, psychopathology, and sociodemographic characteristics. METHOD: The subjects were 122 adult cocaine-dependent outpatients participating in a treatment outcome study of psychosocial therapy. In addition to standard self-report and interview measures of psychopathology and substance use, the subjects completed the Trauma History Questionnaire and the PTSD Checklist before entering treatment. RESULTS: These patients experienced a large number of lifetime traumatic events (mean = 5.7); men experienced more general disasters and crime-related traumas than women, and women experienced more physical and sexual abuse than men. According to self-report measures, 20.5% of the subjects currently met the DSM-III-R criteria for PTSD; the rate of PTSD was 30.2% among women and 15.2% among men. Patients with PTSD had significantly higher rates of co-occurring axis I and axis II disorders, interpersonal problems, medical problems, resistance to treatment, and psychopathology symptoms than patients without PTSD. Psychopathology symptoms represented the most consistent difference between the two groups and provided the best prediction of PTSD status in a logistic regression. However, the groups did not differ significantly in current substance use or sociodemographic characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: These findings underscore the value of screening substance abusers for PTSD, because it can identify a small but substantial number who might require additional treatment. Further studies of the relationship between PTSD and substance abuse appear warranted.

Adult↗

PubMed1998

The Addiction Severity Index as a screen for trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder.

OBJECTIVE: The Addiction Severity Index (ASI) includes items to assess patients' history of trauma (physical or sexual). The goal of this study was to assess the sensitivity and specificity of those questions in relation to the Trauma History Questionnaire (THQ), a more thorough measure of lifetime trauma and, in addition, to an actual posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) diagnosis. METHOD: At the start of treatment cocaine dependent outpatients (N = 110, 65.5% male) were assessed on the ASI, the THQ and a PTSD symptom checklist as part of a multisite clinical trial. RESULTS: Specificity of the ASI questions was higher than sensitivity for both sexual trauma (specificity = .96, sensitivity = .46) and physical trauma (specificity = .71, sensitivity = .50), while for PTSD the sensitivity of the ASI (.91) was higher than its specificity (.43). Other findings indicated that patients were more likely to report trauma on the THQ than on the ASI (which may be due to the self-report format of the THQ); that the ASI was better at assessing sexual than assessing physical trauma; and that the higher the number of ASI trauma items endorsed, the more likely was the PTSD diagnosis. Finally, PTSD patients had greater severity than non-PTSD patients on other ASI items (e.g., psychological severity, need for treatment). CONCLUSIONS: The ASI trauma questions show stronger utility as a screen for PTSD than for trauma. Results of the study are discussed in light of ways to modify the ASI to screen more accurately for trauma, clinical implications, and limitations of the study method.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1997

WHO Study on the reliability and validity of the alcohol and drug use disorder instruments: overview of methods and results.

The WHO Study on the reliability and validity of the alcohol and drug use disorder instruments in an international study which has taken place in centres in ten countries, aiming to test the reliability and validity of three diagnostic instruments for alcohol and drug use disorders: the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), the Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN) and a special version of the Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview schedule-alcohol/drug-revised (AUDADIS-ADR). The purpose of the reliability and validity (R&V) study is to further develop the alcohol and drug sections of these instruments so that a range of substance-related diagnoses can be made in a systematic, consistent, and reliable way. The study focuses on new criteria proposed in the tenth revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) and the fourth revision of the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-IV) for dependence, harmful use and abuse categories for alcohol and psychoactive substance use disorders. A systematic study including a scientifically rigorous measure of reliability (i.e. 1 week test-retest reliability) and validity (i.e. comparison between clinical and non-clinical measures) has been undertaken. Results have yielded useful information on reliability and validity of these instruments at diagnosis, criteria and question level. Overall the diagnostic concordance coefficients (kappa, kappa) were very good for dependence disorders (0.7-0.9), but were somewhat lower for the abuse and harmful use categories. The comparisons among instruments and independent clinical evaluations and debriefing interviews gave important information about possible sources of unreliability, and provided useful clues on the applicability and consistency of nosological concepts across cultures.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

Concordance of DSM-IV alcohol and drug use disorder criteria and diagnoses as measured by AUDADIS-ADR, CIDI and SCAN.

This study was designed to examine the agreement of DSM-IV alcohol and drug use disorder diagnoses generated by three WHO/NIH diagnostic instruments, the AUDADIS-ADR, the CIDI, and the SCAN. This substudy, conducted in three countries, Greece, Luxembourg, and the United States, was part of the larger joint project on diagnosis and classification of mental disorders and alcohol and drug-related problems, which was initiated to evaluate the cross-cultural applicability of the instruments and the criteria. Overall, concordance among the three assessments was good for alcohol and opiate dependence, fair to good for cocaine and sedative dependence, and low for amphetamine dependence. Cannabis dependence concordance was significantly more discrepant than any other substance. Agreement on abuse was low for all substances examined. In addition, the concordance of DSM-IV criteria for each substance was examined. Finally, reasons for discrepancies in responses among assessments were examined, based on discrepancy interview protocol methodology. Further investigation will help to refine these instruments in order to provide a more thorough understanding of alcohol and drug abuse diagnoses.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

Concordance between ICD-10 alcohol and drug use disorder criteria and diagnoses as measured by the AUDADIS-ADR, CIDI and SCAN: results of a cross-national study.

Agreement between the AUDADIS-ADR, CIDI and SCAN in case identification for ICD-10 alcohol and drug use disorders and diagnostic criteria was investigated in three countries, Luxembourg, Greece and the US. Overall, agreement for ICD-10 dependence diagnoses between the three instruments was fair to good for alcohol, opioids and cocaine, but generally lower for dependence diagnoses for other substance. In contrast, concordance between instruments for harmful use diagnoses was extremely poor for all substances. Implications of these major findings are discussed in terms of the relationship between prevalence, reliability and concordance and indications and cautions regarding cross-instrument comparisons.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

Nosological comparisons of alcohol and drug diagnoses: a multisite, multi-instrument international study.

International nosological research was conducted to determine cross-system agreement on alcohol and drug dependence and harmful use (abuse). ICD-10, DSM-IV and DSM-III-R diagnoses were compared in 1,811 subjects from a variety of treatment and other types of settings from 12 sites around the world. Three diagnostic instruments were used: the Alcohol Use Disorders and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule-Alcohol/Drug-Revised (AUDADIS-ADR), the composite international diagnostic interview (CIDI), and the schedules for clinical assessment in neuropsychiatry (SCAN). At seven of the study sites, two or more of these instruments were used. Results for dependence diagnoses showed excellent cross-system agreement across sites and instruments, especially for current diagnoses. Cross-system agreement for harmless use (abuse) was much lower and less consistent. Geographic location or culture appeared to have little influence on the results for either dependence or harmful use.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

The National Institute on Drug Abuse Collaborative Cocaine Treatment Study. Rationale and methods.

The National Institute on Drug Abuse Collaborative Cocaine Treatment Study is a large, multisite psychotherapy clinical trial for outpatients who meet the DSM-IV criteria for cocaine dependence. For 480 randomized patients, the outcomes of 4 treatments are compared for an 18-month period. All treatments include group drug counseling. One treatment also adds cognitive therapy, one adds supportive-expressive psychodynamic therapy, and one adds individual drug counseling; one consists of group drug counseling alone. In addition, 2 specific interaction hypotheses, one involving psychiatric severity and the other involving degree of antisocial personality characteristics, are being tested. This article describes the main aims of the project, the background and rationale for the study design, the rationale for the choice of treatments and patient population, and a brief description of the research plan.

Ambulatory Care↗

PubMed1997

A measure of readiness for substance abuse treatment. Psychometric properties of the RAATE-R interview.

The Recovery Attitude and Treatment Evaluator-Research (RAATE-R) scale is a structured interview that assesses readiness for substance abuse treatment in five subscales: resistance to treatment, resistance to continuing care, bio-medical acuity, psychological acuity, and environmental/ social problems. Psychometric properties, based on an interrater reliability analysis of 23 raters and administration of the scale to 116 cocaine-dependent outpatients, included high interrater reliability, high internal consistency, independence of subscales, and a factor structure that partially supports the scale's original design. The authors discuss limitations of these conclusions and the lack of concurrent validity with a self-report measure of therapy readiness.

Attitude to Health↗

PubMed1991

The CIDI-core substance abuse and dependence questions: cross-cultural and nosological issues. The WHO/ADAMHA Field Trial.

The CIDI is a fully standardised, structured interview for the assessment of psychiatric disorders according to DSM-III-R and proposed ICD-10 criteria. The development of this interview has been the collaborative effort of researchers from 18 sites around the world. In a field trial to test the cross-cultural acceptability and reliability of the questions, there was found to be high acceptance and excellent reliability for the substance use questions, problems with the lengthy alcohol section, and difficulties translating relevant substance use concepts into different languages. There is therefore room for further improvement in the substance-related questions. There proved to be differences between ICD-10 and DSM-III-R regarding substance abuse and dependence disorders.

Alcoholism↗

PubMed1984

Severity of psychiatric symptoms as a predictor of benefits from psychotherapy: the Veterans Administration-Penn study.

One hundred ten nonpsychotic opiate addicts were randomly assigned to receive paraprofessional drug counseling alone, counseling plus cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy, or counseling plus supportive-expressive psychotherapy. Patients were classified low-severity, mid-severity, or high-severity on the basis of the number and severity of their psychiatric symptoms. Overall, the addition of professional psychotherapy was associated with greater benefits than was drug counseling alone. Low-severity patients made considerable and approximately equal progress with added psychotherapy or with counseling alone. Mid-severity patients had better outcomes with additional psychotherapy than with counseling alone, but counseling did effect numerous significant improvements. High-severity patients made little progress with counseling alone, but with added psychotherapy made considerable progress and used both prescribed and illicit drugs less often.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1983

Psychotherapy for opiate addicts. Does it help?

Opiate addicts beginning a new treatment episode on a methadone maintenance program were offered random assignment to drug counseling alone or to counseling plus six months of either supportive-expressive psychotherapy or cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy. Sixty percent of patients meeting the study criteria expressed an interest and 60% of these actually became engaged. One hundred ten subjects completed the study intake procedure and kept three or more appointments within the first six weeks of the project. Measures including standardized psychological tests, independent observer ratings, and continuous records of licit and illicit drug use were done at baseline and seven-month follow-up. All three treatment groups showed significant improvement, but patients receiving the additional psychotherapies showed improvement in more areas and to a greater degree than those who received counseling alone, and with less use of medication. More than a third of opiate addicts in our treatment program thus both were interested in professional psychotherapy and apparently benefitted from it. Certain administrative procedures appear necessary to maximize the chances that psychotherapy can be used effectively with drug-addicted patients.

Adult↗

PubMed1983

Psychotherapy for opiate addicts.

An opportunity to receive a six-month course of professional psychotherapy in addition to paraprofessional counseling was offered to opiate addicts who were beginning a new treatment episode on a methadone maintenance program. The treatments offered were drug counseling alone (DC), counseling plus supportive-expressive psychotherapy (SE), or counseling plus cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy (CB). Sixty percent of patients meeting the study criteria expressed an interest in the psychotherapy program and 60% of these actually became engaged. One hundred and ten subjects completed the study intake procedure, were randomly assigned to one of the three treatment conditions and kept three or more appointments within the first six weeks of the project. A variety of outcome measures showed that patients in all three treatment groups improved. Patients receiving the additional psychotherapies improved in more areas and to a greater degree than those who received counseling alone. The specific improvements seen appear to be related to the focus of the therapy used. Patients with antisocial personality disorder, as defined by Research Diagnostic Criteria, did not benefit significantly from therapy, but those with depression did. Patients with high levels of psychiatric symptoms made many significant gains if they received additional therapy, but improved only in drug use if they received counseling alone. Patients in all three treatment groups having low levels of psychiatric symptoms improved significantly in many areas. We conclude that more than a third of opiate addicts in our treatment program are interested in psychotherapy and many of these can benefit from it. Certain administrative procedures appear necessary to maximize the chances that psychotherapy can be used effectively with drug addicted patients.

Adult↗