Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to J Bonneterre.
The present consensus manuscript defines evidence-based recommendations for state-of-the-art treatment of metastatic breast cancer depending on disease-associated and biologic variables.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine optimal adjuvant therapy between complete hormonal blockade in premenopausal patients with hormone receptor positive breast cancer and one to three positive nodes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We randomised 333 patients to receive either LHRH agonist (triptorelin 3.75 mg i.m., monthly) plus tamoxifen 30 mg/day for 3 years (TAM-LHRHa, n=164), or fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, epirubicin 50 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 every 21 days for six cycles, without any hormonal treatment (FEC50, n=169). RESULTS: The 7-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 76% with TAM-LHRHa, and 72% with FEC50 (P=0.13). The 7-year overall survival (OS) was 91% and 88%, respectively (P=0.20). The multivariate analysis confirmed that both treatments were not different for DFS and OS (P=0.83 and P=0.41, respectively). Amenorrhoea occurred in 64% of patients treated with FEC50; it was temporary in 58% of cases after hormonotherapy and in 31% after chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: In intermediate-risk breast cancer, complete hormonal blockade and chemotherapy provided similar outcomes. Hormonal treatment is an alternative to chemotherapy in hormone-sensitive patients, considering the preference of patients in terms of quality of life.
BACKGROUND: The purpose was to compare disease-free survival (DFS) between epirubicin-based chemoendocrine therapy and tamoxifen alone in one to three node-positive (N1-3), estrogen-receptor-positive (ER+), postmenopausal early breast cancer (EBC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed, retrospectively, 457 patients randomized in FASG 02 and 07 trials who received: tamoxifen alone (30 mg/day, 3 years); or FEC50 (fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, epirubicin 50 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2, six cycles every 21 days) plus tamoxifen started concurrently. Radiotherapy was delivered after the third cycle in FASG 02 trial, and after the sixth in FASG 07 trial. RESULTS: The 9-year DFS rates were 72% with tamoxifen and 84% with FEC50-tamoxifen (P = 0.008). The multivariate analysis showed that pathological tumor size >2 cm was an independent prognostic factor (P = 0.002), and treatment effects remained significantly in favor of chemoendocrine therapy (P = 0.0008). The 9-year overall survival rates were 78% and 86%, respectively (P = 0.11). In the multivariate model, there was a trend in favor of chemoendocrine therapy (P = 0.07). CONCLUSION: The addition of FEC50 adjuvant chemotherapy to tamoxifen significantly improves long-term DFS in N1-3, ER+ and postmenopausal women. Chemoendocrine therapy seems to be more effective than tamoxifen in terms of long-term survival.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare incidence and risk factors of left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) in early breast cancer patients receiving (E+) or not (E-) epirubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among eight FASG trials, 3577 assessable patients were analyzed retrospectively: 2553 received epirubicin, 662 received hormonotherapy alone and 362 had no systemic treatment. Chemotherapy was FEC regimen in 86% of cases (fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide). Epirubicin cumulative dose was < 300 mg/m2 in 1040 patients, 300-600 in 1155, > or = 600 in 279, followed by radiotherapy in 96% of cases. RESULTS: Twenty delayed LVD occurred: two in E- patients and 18 in E+ patients. In E+ patients, 14 patients normalized their cardiac function or did not require further investigations, one patient was stabilized with specific treatment, two patients worsened their functions and one died of congestive heart failure. The 7-year risk of LVD was 1.36% (95% CI 0.85-1.87) in E+ patients and 0.21% (95%CI: 0.00-0.52) in E- patients (P = 0.004). Two significant risk factors were identified: age > or = 65 years and body mass index > 27 kg/m2. CONCLUSION: After a long-term follow-up, epirubicin-related LVD risk was acceptable (1.36%) with one toxic death (0.04%). In 78% of cases, LVD were transient or well controlled.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate incidence and risk factors of secondary leukemia after adjuvant epirubicin-based chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among eight French Adjuvant Study Group trials, 3653 patients were assessable: 2603 received epirubicin; 682 received hormonotherapy; and 368 had no systemic treatment. Chemotherapy was FEC regimen in 85% of cases (fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, epirubicin 50, 75 or 100 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2, three or six cycles). Epirubicin cumulative dose was <300 mg/m2 in 1045 patients; 300-600 mg/m2 in 1187; and > or =600 mg/m2 in 286, followed by radiotherapy in 96% of cases. The median follow-up was 104 months. RESULTS: Eight cases of leukemia occurred in epirubicin-exposed patients and one in non-exposed patients. After 9 years, the risk of developing a leukemia was 0.34% (95% confidence interval 0.11-0.57) in epirubicin-exposed patients. In patients receiving chemotherapy, leukemia subtypes were: AML2 (two), AML3 (one), AML4 (three) and ALL (two). None of the classically recognized risk factors was significantly correlated with the occurrence of a leukemia. CONCLUSION: Irrespective of the dose, the incidence of secondary leukemia after adjuvant epirubicin-based chemotherapy was low. After a long follow-up, the benefit/risk ratio for early breast cancer patients remained in favor of epirubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy: eight cases (0.31%) occurred, and in some of them, treatment causality could be debatable.
BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to assess the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the FEC 100 compared with the FEC 50 in the FASG05 trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed using a multi-state Markov process model. Relevant clinical data introduced into the model were obtained from 10-year follow-up of the clinical trial FASG05. Survival curves for each health state were assessed by survival parametric model. The model allowed assessments from the start of adjuvant chemotherapy until death. The costs of adjuvant treatment and follow-up were estimated. The costs of recurrence were evaluated from the medical records of 146 patients. A prospective survey was performed on a cohort of 87 patients to quantify the resources external to the hospital (including cost of transportation). The inpatient costs were evaluated using the French diagnosis-related groups. The ambulatory costs were assessed using the French nomenclature. Costs were expressed in 2002 Euro (), according to the French societal perspective. The ICER assessed the cost of one additional life year saved. A discount rate of 5% per year was used for cost, and alternatively 0%, 3% and 5% for effectiveness. We validated the results with a probabilistic sensitivity analysis incorporating parametric and non-parametric bootstraps, and with the acceptability curves. RESULTS: The mean total discounting cost of adjuvant treatments was 11 465 for FEC 50 and 13 815 for FEC 100; the mean total discounting cost of recurrences was 14 636 and 13 503, respectively. According to the discount rate of effectiveness, the life expectancy was 16.5, 11.4 and 9.3 years for FEC 50 and 18.4, 12.5 and 10.2 years for FEC 100. The ICER (cost per life year saved) were 642, 1084 and 1460, respectively. The probability according to which FEC 50 is strictly dominated by FEC 100 was 0.15. CONCLUSION: The clinical benefit of FEC 100 generates a negligible cost increase when compared with FEC 50.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of early chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea (CIA) on disease-free survival and overall survival in premenopausal patients with receptor-positive early breast cancer treated with adjuvant chemotherapy without any hormonotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospectively, we reviewed data from 130 premenopausal patients with localized hormone-sensitive breast cancer. These patients were treated between 1985 and 1995 at the same institution. They all underwent a loco-regional treatment and adjuvant chemotherapy. Early CIA was defined as an amenorrhea arising during the first year following the beginning of chemotherapy. Predictors of early CIA were examined. The survival analyses were done using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox analysis. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 9 years. Mean age was 42.9 +/- 5 years. Ninety-two per cent of patients had histologically-proven positive axillary nodes. Adjuvant chemotherapy contained no anthracycline in 63%. Early CIA occurred during or after adjuvant chemotherapy in 57% of the patients. It was definitive in 91%. In our study, age was the only CIA predictor in univariate analysis. Women who experienced early CIA tend to have a longer disease-free survival, but the difference was not significant. This trend was lost in multivariate analysis, most probably due to the small sample size. The overall survival was not different. CONCLUSION: Although not statistically significant, our results on a very selected population of patients suggest that a chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea might have its own therapeutic effect besides the cytotoxic action of chemotherapy.
OBJECTIVE: To assess daily practice of 1000 sentinel node (SN) biopsies in breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Prospective review of 1000 consecutive sentinel node biopsies between February 2001 and June 2004. Analyses concerned technical aspects of sentinel node detection, pathologic results of the tumor and sentinel node, treatment and follow-up. RESULTS: Nine hundred and seventy-eight SN were detected (98.7%). In univariate analyses, age, pathologic tumor size (20 mm) and method of detection (blue dye or isotopic vs. combined) were statistically significant. One hundred and fifty-six cases (16%) underwent immediate axillary dissection (AD), whereas 116 (12%) had a delayed AD. There were 923 invasive or micro-invasive carcinoma with detected SN: 282 SN (30.5%) were involved, either with macrometastases (166) or with micrometastases (116), 34% had positive non-sentinel node. Age and metastasis size were predictive for AD involvement. Sixteen percent of micrometastatic SN had positive AD, there was no predictive factor for axillary involvement. After a median follow-up of 20 months, there were 4 axillary recurrences: 1 (0.1%) after negative SN without AD, 1 (0.1%) after positive SN with positive AD, 1 (4.3%) after micrometatastatic SN without AD, and 1 (8.3%) after macrometastatic SN without AD. There were 55 ductal carcinoma in situ and 54 micro-invasive cancer: positive SN (with negative AD) were detected in only 2 cases (2.3%). There were initially 112 ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed by percutaneaous biopsy, 25 of them (22%) had invasive disease on definitive histology. Among there, 12 had involved SN (with 4 positive AD). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: With a high detection rate and low recurrence rate, SN biopsy is considered in our institute as a reliable procedure and is used to evaluate regional nodal status of early breast cancer. Thus, 70% of AD can be omitted.
PURPOSE: The aim of this multicenter trial was to evaluate the role of ovarian suppression in patients with early breast cancer previously treated with local surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nine hundred and twenty-six premenopausal patients with completely resected breast cancer and either axillary node involvement or histological grade 2 or 3 tumors were randomized after surgery to adjuvant chemotherapy alone (control arm) or adjuvant chemotherapy plus ovarian suppression (ovarian suppression arm). Ovarian suppression was obtained by either radiation-induced ovarian ablation or triptorelin for 3 years. The analyses were performed with Cox models stratified by center. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 9.5 years. Mean age was 43 years. Ninety per cent of patients had histologically proven positive axillary nodes, 63% positive hormonal receptors and 77% had received an anthracycline-based chemotherapy regimen. Ovarian suppression was by radiation-induced ovarian ablation (45% of patients) or with triptorelin (48%). At the time of randomization, all patients had regular menses or their follicle-stimulating hormone and estradiol levels indicated a premenopausal status. The 10-year disease-free survival rates were 49% [95% confidence interval (CI) 44% to 54%] in both arms (P = 0.51). The 10-year overall survival rates were 66% (95% CI 61% to 70%) for the ovarian suppression arm and 68% (95% CI 63% to 73%) for the control arm (P = 0.19). There were no variations in the treatment effect according to age, hormonal receptor status or ovarian suppression modality. However, in patients <40 years of age and with estrogen receptor-positive tumors, ovarian suppression significantly decreased the risk of recurrence (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this trial, after at least 10 years of follow-up, do not favor the use of ovarian suppression after adjuvant chemotherapy. The potential beneficial effect in younger women with hormono-dependent tumors should be further assessed.
The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of docetaxel plus epirubicin (ET) and of 5-fluorouracil plus epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (FEC) as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. A total of 142 patients (intent-to-treat (ITT)) with at least one measurable lesion were randomised to receive docetaxel 75 mg m(-2) plus epirubicin 75 mg m(-2) or 5-fluorouracil 500 mg m(-2) plus epirubicin 75 mg m(-2) and cyclophosphamide 500 mg m(-2) intravenously once every 3 weeks for up to eight cycles. Prophylactic granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor was only permitted after the first cycle, if required. Per-protocol analysis (n=132) gave an overall response rate for ET of 63.1% (95% confidence interval (CI), 50-78%) and for FEC 34.3% (95% CI, 23-47%) after a median seven and six cycles, respectively. Intent-to-treat population (n=142) gave an overall response rate for ET of 59% (95% CI, 47-70%) and for FEC 32% (95% CI, 21-43%) after a median seven and six cycles, respectively. The median response duration for ET was 8.6 months (95% CI, 7.2-9.6 months) and for FEC 7.8 months (95% CI, 6.5-10.4 months). The median time to progression (ITT) for ET was 7.8 months (95% CI, 5.8-9.6 months) and for FEC 5.9 months (95% CI, 4.6-7.8 months). After a median follow-up of 23.8 months, median survival (ITT) for ET and FEC were 34 and 28 months, respectively. Nonhaematologic grade 3-4 toxicities were infrequent in both arms. Haematologic toxicity was more common with ET and febrile neutropenia was reported in 13 patients (18.6%) in the ET group. Two deaths in the ET group were possibly related to study treatment. In conclusion, both ET and FEC were associated with acceptable toxicity. ET is a highly active first-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer.
PURPOSE: To compare fotemustine and dacarbazine (DTIC) in terms of overall response rate (ORR) as primary end-point and overall survival, duration of responses, time to progression, time to occurrence of brain metastases (BM), and to assess safety and quality of life in patients with disseminated cutaneous melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received either intravenous fotemustine 100 mg/m2 weekly for 3 weeks or DTIC 250 mg/m2/d for 5 consecutive days every 4 weeks (two cycles). Nonprogressive patients received a maintenance treatment every 4 weeks (fotemustine 100 mg/m2 or DTIC 250 mg/m2 for 5 days). RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-nine patients were randomly assigned to fotemustine or DTIC arms. The best ORR was higher in the fotemustine arm than in the DTIC arm in the intent-to-treat population (n=229; 15.2% v 6.8%; P=.043) and in full analysis set (n=221) (15.5% v 7.2%; P=.053). Similar median durations of responses (5.8 months with fotemustine v 6.9 months with DTIC) and time to progression (1.8 v 1.9 months, respectively) were observed. In patients without BM at inclusion, the median time to BM was 22.7 months with fotemustine versus 7.2 months with DTIC (P=.059). Median survival was 7.3 months with fotemustine versus 5.6 months with DTIC (P=.067). The main toxicity was grade 3 to 4 neutropenia (51% with fotemustine v 5% with DTIC) and thrombocytopenia (43% v 6%, respectively). No significant difference was noted for quality of life between arms. CONCLUSION: ORR was higher in the fotemustine arm compared to the DTIC arm in first-line treatment of disseminated melanoma. A trend in favor of fotemustine in terms of overall survival and time to BM was evidenced.
The aim of this study was to assess the validity of the French version of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G), and to compare its psychometric properties with those of two other cancer-specific quality of life questionnaires, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life - Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and Functional Living Index - Cancer (FLIC). Two hundred and twenty three patients with breast or colorectal cancer completed the FACT-G questionnaire in French followed by (in random order) the QLQ-C30 and FLIC. An additional 87 patients with head and neck (H&N) cancer completed the FACT-H&N followed by the QLQ-C30 and H&N-Besançon. The French version of FACT-G was internally consistent, and its reproducibility was excellent. FACT-G Physical Well-Being and global scores correlated with all QLQ-C30 subscales. There was evidence of discriminant validity. Compared with the other tools, FACT-G included a statistically significantly higher proportion of items patients considered to be confusing or upsetting. Patients with breast or colorectal cancer expressed a preference for QLQ-C30. Use of the specific H&N additional items increased the responsiveness to change of FACT-G. The French version of FACT-G is valid and has psychometric properties similar to those of FLIC and QLQ-C30.
PURPOSE: To develop a population pharmacokinetic model of vinorelbine administered by short intravenous infusion in metastatic breast cancer patients. METHODS: Vinorelbine was administered as infusions of 5-10 min at 15, 20 or 25 mg/m(2) to 30 patients. Blood samples were collected over 18 h. Plasma concentrations of vinorelbine were determined by HPLC. Population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using a nonlinear mixed effects modeling method. RESULTS: Vinorelbine concentration-time profiles were best described by a three-compartment open model. Plasma clearance (CL) was high and positively related to lean body weight (LBW) and body surface area (BSA) or to a combination of height and body weight (BW). Elevated serum alkaline phosphatases had a negative effect on CL. Typical population estimates of CL and central distribution volume (V(1)) were 74.2 l/h and 7.8 l, respectively. The interindividual population coefficients of variation for CL and V(1) were 17.0% and 32.0%, respectively. The stability and predictive performance of the final population pharmacokinetic model were assessed using 200 bootstrap samples of the original data. CONCLUSION: This study identified combined effects of BSA and serum alkaline phosphatases on clearance. These results partly support the conventional dose adjustment of vinorelbine based on BSA, but suggest dose modification in cases of extreme values of serum alkaline phosphatases.
PURPOSE: The pharmacokinetics of ftorafur, 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and uracil were investigated in order to built a population pharmacokinetic model for the anticancer drug UFT, administered with leucovorin and vinorelbine. METHODS: A total of 31 patients with metastatic breast cancer were treated with escalating oral doses of UFT (300 to 500 mg per day) plus leucovorin (90 mg per day) in combination with intravenous vinorelbine (15 to 25 mg/m(2)). Concentration-time data were obtained on days 1, 8, 15 and 21 of cycle 1. RESULTS: Of the 31 patients treated, 30 were available for the pharmacokinetic analysis. Ftorafur, 5FU and uracil appeared rapidly in plasma and showed large interpatient variations. Ftorafur concentrations were higher than those of 5FU and uracil. AUC significantly increased between day 1, and days 8, 15 and 21. Ftorafur C(max) and AUC values were proportional to UFT dose, whereas C(max) and AUC values of 5FU and uracil were not linearly related to UFT dose. The pharmacokinetics of ftorafur were ascribed to a two-compartment open model in which 5FU was produced from the central compartment. The absorption and exponential distribution rate constants were assumed equal. The effect of uracil on 5FU elimination was straightforward, since no reasonable curve-fitting could be obtained for 5FU data when this covariate was not taken into account. The uracil concentration inducing a 50% reduction in 5FU elimination was 2.67 micro mol.l(-1). This result confirms the important role played by uracil as a competitive inhibitor of 5FU catabolism. CONCLUSION: A pharmacokinetic model for ftorafur and 5FU was developed and should be useful to further study drug interactions and establish dosing guidelines.
INTRODUCTION: Melanoma frequency increases. Conventional antitumoral treatments fail. Gene therapy for metastatic melanoma is studied in 17 phase I-II clinical trials. ACTUALITES ET POINTS FORTS: Sixteen use cytokine genes. These studies are heterogenous as far as methodology is concerned. Gene therapy clinical tolerance is acceptable. Security is rarely discuted. In these studies overall response rate is 8%, with histological complete responses. PERSPECTIVES: Presently, three new studies are opened in United States.
We present an initial survival analysis and an update of the safety data of the North American and Tamoxifen or Arimidex Randomized Group Efficacy and Tolerability (TARGET) double-blind, randomised, multicentre studies which compared anastrozole with tamoxifen as first-line treatment in postmenopausal patients with oestrogen receptor and/or progesterone receptor-positive (ER+/PR+) or receptor-unknown advanced breast cancer (ABC). At a median follow-up of 43.7 months, 56.0% of patients in the anastrozole group and 56.1% of patients in the tamoxifen group had died. The proportion of patients dead at 2 years was 31.1 and 32.0% in the anastrozole and tamoxifen groups, respectively. In the ER+/PR+ subgroup, 55.1 and 55.9% of patients had died and median time to deaths (TTD) were 40.8 and 41.3 months in the anastrozole and tamoxifen groups, respectively. Both agents remained well tolerated, with fewer reports of vaginal bleeding (anastrozole versus tamoxifen, 1.0% versus 2.5%) and thromboembolic events (anastrozole versus tamoxifen, 5.3% versus 9.0%) in the anastrozole group versus the tamoxifen group. Hot flushes and vaginal dryness were reported marginally less in the tamoxifen group compared with the Anastrozole group. Although no improvement in survival was observed, the favourable profile of anastrozole with respect to efficacy (TTP) and tolerability [Cancer 92 (2001) 2247] support the use of anastrozole in advance of tamoxifen as the first-line therapy choice in postmenopausal women with ABC.
Anastrozole ('Arimidex') is indicated for the treatment of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Combined analysis of two international randomised, double-blind trials (n=1021) showed that in patients with hormone receptor-positive tumours, first-line treatment with anastrozole significantly prolonged the time to progression (TTP) compared with tamoxifen (median TTP: 10.7 versus 6.4 months, respectively; P=0.022). Second-line tamoxifen following anastrozole, or vice versa, in this trial population was unblinded. The treatments were crossed over and then efficacy was assessed using a questionnaire. Of 511 patients randomised to anastrozole, 137 (26.8%) received second-line tamoxifen. Questionnaire data were available for 119 patients; 58 (48.7%) gained clinical benefit (CB=complete+partial response (CR+PR)+(stable disease (SD) >/=24 weeks)), while 12 (10.1%) had an objective response (OR=CR+PR). Of 510 patients randomised to tamoxifen, 134 (26.3%) received second-line anastrozole. Questionnaire data from 95 patients showed that 54 (56.8%) gained CB and 7 of the patients gaining CB (7.4%) had an OR. Previous studies showed anastrozole is effective after first-line tamoxifen. These data show that the sequential administration of first-line anastrozole followed by tamoxifen provides effective use of these drugs in the treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer.