PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J Boyes

Publications and source records attributed to J Boyes.

14 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

GABA(B) receptors at glutamatergic synapses in the rat striatum.

Although multiple effects of GABA(B) receptor activation on synaptic transmission in the striatum have been described, the precise locations of the receptors mediating these effects have not been determined. To address this issue, we carried out pre-embedding immunogold electron microscopy in the rat using antibodies against the GABA(B) receptor subunits, GABA(B1) and GABA(B2). In addition, to investigate the relationship between GABA(B) receptors and glutamatergic striatal afferents, we used antibodies against the vesicular glutamate transporters, vesicular glutamate transporter 1 and vesicular glutamate transporter 2, as markers for glutamatergic terminals. Immunolabeling for GABA(B1) and GABA(B2) was widely and similarly distributed in the striatum, with immunogold particles localized at both presynaptic and postsynaptic sites. The most commonly labeled structures were dendritic shafts and spines, as well as terminals forming asymmetric and symmetric synapses. In postsynaptic structures, the majority of labeling associated with the plasma membrane was localized at extrasynaptic sites, although immunogold particles were also found at the postsynaptic specialization of some symmetric, putative GABAergic synapses. Labeling in axon terminals was located within, or at the edge of, the presynaptic active zone, as well as at extrasynaptic sites. Double labeling for GABA(B) receptor subunits and vesicular glutamate transporters revealed that labeling for both GABA(B1) and GABA(B2) was localized on glutamatergic axon terminals that expressed either vesicular glutamate transporter 1 or vesicular glutamate transporter 2. The patterns of innervation of striatal neurons by the vesicular glutamate transporter 1- and vesicular glutamate transporter 2-positive terminals suggest that they are selective markers of corticostriatal and thalamostriatal afferents, respectively. These results thus provide evidence that presynaptic GABA(B) heteroreceptors are in a position to modulate the two major excitatory inputs to striatal spiny projection neurons arising in the cortex and thalamus. In addition, presynaptic GABA(B) autoreceptors are present on the terminals of spiny projection neurons and/or striatal GABAergic interneurons. Furthermore, the data indicate that GABA may also affect the excitability of striatal neurons via postsynaptic GABA(B) receptors.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

A new monoclonal anti-CD7 antibody reactive on paraffin sections.

CBC.37 monoclonal antibody (mAb) was generated using balb/c mice immunized with CEM T cell line. It was selected because of its strong reactivity on T lymphocytes on paraffin tissue sections. The anti-CD7 specificity of CBC.37 mAb was assessed by immunohistochemistry, cross-blocking, and cross-immunoprecipitation experiments using CBC.37 and the anti-CD7 mAb DK24. CBC.37 mAb immunoprecipitated a 40-kDa protein. Cross-blocking and cross-immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated that the two antibodies recognized the same molecule. Immunostaining of a large number of reactive lymph nodes and B and T cell lymphomas confirms that CBC.37 mAb was directed against T cells. As expected, on reactive lymph nodes the staining pattern was comparable to that of CD3. Among the 110 T cell lymphomas examined, all T lymphoblastic lymphomas were positive (15+/15; 100%). As a result of the frequent loss of CD7 antigen, only 25+/95 (26%) of peripheral T cell neoplasms were found to be positive for CBC.37. A marked reduction in the number of CBC.37-positive T cells was observed in 7 of the 60 cases of benign inflammatory dermatoses studied (approximately 12%). CBC.37 was unreactive with all healthy and neoplastic non-lymphoid samples examined. Because the lack of CD7 expression in T cell lymphomas is of diagnostic value, CBC.37 mAb in association with other anti-T cell antibodies working on paraffin sections could be of particular value in asserting the diagnosis of T cell lymphomas in routine histopathology.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Stimulation of V(D)J recombination by histone acetylation.

V(D)J recombination assembles functional immunoglobulin and T cell receptor genes from individual gene segments [1]. A common recombination mechanism, initiated by the proteins RAG1 and RAG2 at conserved recombination signal sequences (RSSs), operates at all rearranging loci [2] [3]. It has been proposed that the key regulator of the reaction is 'accessibility' of the RSS within chromatin [4]. Recently, the packaging of RSSs into nucleosomes was shown to inhibit initiation of V(D)J recombination [5] [6]. Nevertheless, the tight tissue specificity of regulation cannot be explained by nucleosome-mediated repression alone because a significant fraction of RSSs would be predicted to lie in linker regions between nucleosomes. Therefore, some aspect of the regulation of the recombination reaction must rely on the disruption of higher-order chromatin structure. Here, we report that histone acetylation directly stimulates the recombination reaction in vivo in the correct cell- and stage-specific manner. Neither expression of RAG genes nor activity of RAG proteins was increased by acetylation. Furthermore, histone acetylation failed to overcome nucleosome-mediated repression of RSS recognition and cleavage in vitro. Our data suggest a role for histone acetylation in stimulating recombination in vivo through disruption of higher-order chromatin structures.

Acetylation↗
PubMed1998

Regulation of activity of the transcription factor GATA-1 by acetylation.

Modification of histones, DNA-binding proteins found in chromatin, by addition of acetyl groups occurs to a greater degree when the histones are associated with transcriptionally active DNA. A breakthrough in understanding how this acetylation is mediated was the discovery that various transcriptional co-activator proteins have intrinsic histone acetyltransferase activity (for example, Gcn5p, PCAF, TAF(II)250 and p300/CBP. These acetyltransferases also modify certain transcription factors (TFIIEbeta, TFIIF, EKLF and p53). GATA-1 is an important transcription factor in the haematopoietic lineage and is essential for terminal differentiation of erythrocytes and megakaryocytes. It is associated in vivo with the acetyltransferase p300/CBP. Here we report that GATA-1 is acetylated in vitro by p300. This significantly increases the amount of GATA-1 bound to DNA and alters the mobility of GATA-1-DNA complexes, suggestive of a conformational change in GATA-1. GATA-1 is also acetylated in vivo and acetylation directly stimulates GATA-1-dependent transcription. Mutagenesis of important acetylated residues shows that there is a relationship between the acetylation and in vivo function of GATA-1. We propose that acetylation of transcription factors can alter interactions between these factors and DNA and among different transcription factors, and is an integral part of transcription and differentiation processes.

3T3 Cells↗
PubMed1998

Perturbation of nucleosome structure by the erythroid transcription factor GATA-1.

The ability of transcription factors to gain access to their sites in chromatin requires the disruption or displacement of nucleosomes covering the promoter, signalled by the generation of a nuclease hypersensitive site. We characterise here the alterations in nucleosome structure caused by binding of the erythroid factor GATA-1 to a nucleosome carrying GATA-1 sites. DNase I and micrococcal nuclease probes show that GATA-1 binding causes extensive, cooperative breakage of the histone/DNA contacts to generate a complex very similar to that formed by the factor with free DNA. The only region which differs is confined to about 50 bp surrounding the nucleosome dyad axis which appears to be the domain of residual contact between the DNA and histone octamer. Despite considerable breakage of the histone/DNA contacts, the complex is completely stable in solution, and disruption of the nucleosome is entirely reversible: it is regenerated quantitatively upon removal of the transcription factor. Moreover, the histone 2A/2B component of the octamer does not exchange to external competitor. We suggest that formation of this complex may be a step in the generation of a fully hypersensitive site in vivo over regulatory elements containing GATA family binding sites.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Chromatin structure and gene expression.

It is now well understood that chromatin structure is perturbed in the neighborhood of expressed genes. This is most obvious in the neighborhood of promoters and enhancers, where hypersensitivity to nucleases marks sites that no longer carry canonical nucleosomes, and to which transcription factors bind. To study the relationship between transcription factor binding and the generation of these hypersensitive regions, we mutated individual cis-acting regulatory elements within the enhancer that lies between the chicken beta- and epsilon-globin genes. Constructions carrying the mutant enhancer were introduced by stable transformation into an avian erythroid cell line. We observed that weakening the enhancer resulted in creation of two classes of site: those still completely accessible to nuclease attack and those that were completely blocked. This all-or-none behavior suggests a mechanism by which chromatin structure can act to sharpen the response of developmental systems to changing concentrations of regulatory factors. Another problem raised by chromatin structure concerns the establishment of boundaries between active and inactive chromatin domains. We have identified a DNA element at the 5' end of the chicken beta-globin locus, near such a boundary, that has the properties of an insulator; in test constructions, it blocks the action of an enhancer on a promoter when it is placed between them. We describe the properties and partial dissection of this sequence. A third problem is posed by the continued presence of nucleosomes on transcribed genes, which might prevent the passage of RNA polymerase. We show, however, that a prokaryotic polymerase can transcribe through a histone octamer on a simple chromatin template. The analysis of this process reveals that an octamer is capable of transferring from a position in front of the polymerase to one behind, without ever losing its attachment to the DNA.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Tissue-specific factors additively increase the probability of the all-or-none formation of a hypersensitive site.

DNase I-hypersensitive sites lack a canonical nucleosome and have binding sites for various transcription factors. To understand how the hypersensitivity is generated and maintained, we studied the chicken erythroid-specific beta(A)/epsilon globin gene enhancer, a region where both tissue-specific and ubiquitous transcription factors can bind. Constructions containing mutations of this enhancer were stably introduced into a chicken erythroid cell line. We found that the hypersensitivity was determined primarily by the erythroid factors and that their binding additively increased the accessibility. The fraction of accessible sites in clonal cell lines was quantitated using restriction endonucleases; these data implied that the formation of each hypersensitive site was an all-or-none phenomenon. Use of DNase I and micrococcal nuclease probes further indicated that the size of the hypersensitive site was influenced by the binding of transcription factors which then determined the length of the nucleosome-free gap. Our data are consistent with a model in which hypersensitive sites are generated stochastically: mutations that reduce the number of bound factors reduce the probability that these factors will prevail over a nucleosome; thus, the fraction of sites in the population that are accessible is also diminished.

Animals↗
PubMed1992

Repression of genes by DNA methylation depends on CpG density and promoter strength: evidence for involvement of a methyl-CpG binding protein.

Repression of transcription from densely methylated genes can be mediated by the methyl-CpG binding protein MeCP-1 (Boyes and Bird, 1991). Here we have investigated the effect of methylation on genes with a low density of methyl-CpG. We found that sparse methylation could repress transfected genes completely, but the inhibition was fully overcome by the presence in cis of an SV40 enhancer. Densely methylated genes, however, could not be reactivated by the enhancer. In vitro studies showed that the sparsely methylated genes bound weakly to MeCP-1 and that binding interfered with transcription. In the absence of available MeCP-1, methylation had minimal effects on transcription. From these and other results we propose that sparsely methylated genes form an unstable complex with MeCP-1 which prevents transcription when the promoter is weak. This complex can be disrupted by a strong promoter, thereby allowing the methylated gene to be transcribed.

Animals↗
PubMed1991

DNA methylation inhibits transcription indirectly via a methyl-CpG binding protein.

We have studied the mechanism by which DNA methylation inhibits transcription both in cell-free nuclear extracts and in the living cell. Repression of transcription in vitro for four different promoters was shown to be an indirect effect. The mediator of repression had properties indistinguishable from those of a methyl-CpG binding protein (MeCP-1) that has been previously identified. Use of differentially methylated promoters and methylated competitors in transient transfection assays suggested that indirect repression via MeCP-1 also occurs in the living cell. This was supported by the fact that MeCP-1-deficient cells showed much reduced repression of methylated genes.

Animals↗
PubMed1990

High levels of de novo methylation and altered chromatin structure at CpG islands in cell lines.

CpG islands are normally methylation free in cells of the animal, even when the associated gene is transcriptionally silent. In mouse NIH 3T3 and L cells, however, over half of the islands are heavily methylated. Near identity of the methylated subset in the two cell lines suggested that methylation is confined to genes that are nonessential in culture. In agreement with this, islands at several tissue-specific genes, but not at housekeeping genes, have become methylated in many human and mouse cell lines. At the chromatin level, methylated islands are Mspl resistant compared with their nonmethylated counterparts. We suggest that mutation-like gene inactivation due to CpG island methylation is widespread in many cell lines and could explain the loss of cell type-specific functions in culture.

Animals↗