Chicken liver microsomal fractions show lactate and malate dehydrogenase activities which behave differently with respect to successive extractions by sonication in 0.15 M NaCl, 0.2% Triton X-100 and 0.15 M NaCl, respectively. The Triton X-100-treated pellet did not show malate dehydrogenase activity but exhibited a 10-fold increase in lactate dehydrogenase activity with respect to the sonicated pellet. Total extracted lactate and malate dehydrogenase activities were, respectively, 7.5 and 1.7 times higher than that in the initial pellet. Different isoenzyme compositions were observed for cytosoluble and microsomal extracted lactate and malate dehydrogenases. When the ionic strength (0-500 mM) or the pH values (6.1-8.7) of the media were increased, an efficient release of lactate dehydrogenase was found at NaCl 30-70 mM and pH 6.6-7.3. Malate dehydrogenase solubilization under the same conditions was very small, even at NaCl 500 mM, but it attained a maximum in the 7.3-8.7 pH range. Cytosoluble lactate dehydrogenase bound in vitro to 0.15 M NaCl-treated (M2) and sonicated (M3) microsomal fractions but not to the crude microsomal fraction (M1). Particle saturation by lactate dehydrogenase occurred with M2 and M3, which contained binding sites with different affinities. Cytosoluble malate dehydrogenase did not bind to M1, M2 and M3 fractions, however, a little binding was found when purified basic malate dehydrogenase was incubated with M2 or M3 fractions.

Animals↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Inactivation mechanism of low-KM rat liver mitochondrial aldehyde dehydrogenase by cyanamide in vitro.

The inactivation of low-KM rat liver mitochondrial aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) by the alcohol-sensitizing agent cyanamide (H2NCN) has been studied in vitro. The effect of the concentrations of NAD+ at different concentrations of catalase on the inactivation of ALDH by cyanamide (20 and 200 microM) in vitro point to an ALDH-NAD(+)-catalase complex prior to the binding to cyanamide to form the holoenzyme-inhibitor complex. Cyanamide itself could be responsible for the inactivation of ALDH. The possibility that both irreversibly inactivated ALDH and cyanamide remain free at the end of the inactivation process is discussed. The effects of pH and ionic strength on the inactivation process are also described. The pseudo-first order rate constants for inactivation of low-KM ALDH depends on both effects, suggesting that electrostatic forces are involved in the process and that a group with pK approximately 6.8, presumably a histidine residue, at the active site of ALDH could be involved. A representative equation for the inactivation process of low-KM ALDH by cyanamide in vitro has been fitted to experimental kinetic data, involving both catalase and inhibitor concentrations.

Aldehyde Dehydrogenase↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Comparative binding of lactate dehydrogenase to mitochondrial fractions.

Beef liver mitochondrial fraction showed LDH activity (1.76 +/- 0.25 U/g pellet). Sixty seven% of the initial mitochondrial pellet LDH activity (almost M4 isoenzyme) was released when suspended in NaCl 0.15 M. When the washed particles were sonicated in a 0.15 M NaCl medium, the solubilized LDH activity (all five isoenzymes as cytosoluble fraction) was 5-fold higher than the initial pellet activity. The different isoenzymatic composition of intramitochondrial and externally bound forms of the enzyme should be taken into account when investigating the physiological role of intramitochondrial LDH. Beef liver cytosoluble LDH (very little content of M4 isoenzyme) showed no affinity for the beef liver mitochondrial fraction but purified M4-LDH isoenzyme was able to bind to the particulate fraction from the same source. This suggests an isoenzyme specificity for the interaction. The maximum amount of cytosoluble LDH bound to the mitochondrial fraction depends on the enzyme and the particulate fraction source. Therefore, binding capacity to the mitochondrial fraction depends not only on the net charge of LDH isoenzymes, which play a predominant role in the binding, but also on individual characteristics of the LDH isoenzymes and mitochondrial fractions from different sources. This suggests that electrostatic forces are not the only ones involved in the binding process.

Animals↗