Biomedical subjects

J C Brooker

Publications and source records attributed to J C Brooker.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2003

Long-acting steroid injection after endoscopic dilation of anastomotic Crohn's strictures may improve the outcome: a retrospective case series.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Endoscopic balloon dilation of Crohn's strictures is widely practised, but may not result in long-term symptomatic benefit, leading to the need for repeat dilation or surgery. It is hypothesized that long-acting steroid injection into strictures after dilation may decrease the need for further stricture dilation and improve the outcome in symptomatic patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with Crohn's disease who have had balloon dilation and triamcinolone injection performed for symptomatic anastomotic strictures were identified from endoscopy records. Case notes were reviewed to determine outcomes. RESULTS: Fourteen patients underwent a total of 26 dilations, with triamcinolone injected (median dose 20 mg, 10-40 mg) in 20 of the procedures. Seven patients (50%) had sustained remission after a single dilation and steroid injection, with a median follow-up period of 16.4 months (range 13.2-22.0 months). Four patients (28.5%) required more than one dilation (median three dilations, range two to four) to control their symptoms, with a median follow-up period of 27.8 months (range 14-32.8 months). Endoscopic management failed in three patients (21.4 %), who were referred for surgery. There were no complications due to dilation or triamcinolone injection. CONCLUSIONS: Triamcinolone injection into the stricture after dilation is safe, easy to perform, and may be a useful adjunct in the management of anastomotic Crohn's strictures. These data will require further support through a randomized and controlled trial.

Aged↗

PubMed2003

Effect of real-time magnetic endoscope imaging on the teaching and acquisition of colonoscopy skills: results from a single trainee.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Most trainees have little concept of the loops that occur during colonoscopy, and have difficulty in appreciating the combination of withdrawal and torquing manoeuvres that are essential to achieving complete colonoscopy. Real-time magnetic endoscope imaging (MEI) allows visualization of shaft looping, and so makes intuitive the manoeuvres necessary to straighten the colonoscope shaft. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive routine colonoscopies were performed by a single trainee (with previous experience of 15 colonoscopies). Procedures were randomly assigned to be carried out either with the trainee viewing the MEI display, or without the MEI view, which was recorded throughout all examinations. RESULTS: In total, 71 procedures were performed. To assess the trend for learning, procedures were analysed in blocks of 24 consecutive examinations (periods 1 to 3). In the first 24 procedures (period 1), the number of attempts at straightening the colonoscope and duration of looping were significantly less, and the intubation time was shorter, for examinations performed with the MEI view. In periods 2 to 3, there was a continued trend towards improved performance, but without a significant difference between procedures performed with or without MEI. CONCLUSIONS: During training, real-time colonoscope imaging using MEI appears to enhance the endoscopist's appreciation of looping and improves the learning of the manoeuvres required to straighten the colonoscope shaft. A prospective, multicentre study assessing a larger number of trainees is needed to clarify these findings.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Endoscopic resection of large sessile colonic polyps by specialist and non-specialist endoscopists.

BACKGROUND: Patients with large sessile colonic polyps for which endoscopic resection might be feasible are often referred directly for operation. The aim of this study was to determine the outcome of patients with such polyps diagnosed by specialist and non-specialist colonoscopists. METHODS: Patients with large (greater than 2 cm) sessile polyps detected at colonoscopy from January 1995 to July 2000 were identified. Resection technique and clinical and endoscopic outcomes were recorded. Two of the colonoscopists (B.P.S., C.B.W.) are recognized as specialists. RESULTS: Some 130 polyps were identified, 100 detected by either of two specialist endoscopists (including 14 cancers) and 30 by 14 non-specialist endoscopists (including ten cancers). Endoscopic resection of benign polyps was attempted by experts in 80 (93 per cent) of 86 cases and by non-experts in 15 of 20 cases (P = 0.03), with successful management by endoscopy alone in 61 (76 per cent) of 80 and in six of 15 cases respectively (P = 0.01). Complications occurred following three polypectomies performed by an expert (bleeding, two; pain, one) and one by a non-expert (bleeding). The estimated end-cost of management by specialists was less than half of that by non-specialists. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic resection of large sessile colonic polyps is feasible in the majority of patients and should be considered as first-line therapy. Prompt referral to a specialist endoscopist may improve outcomes by avoiding operation or enabling complete excision at a single endoscopy session.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Patient pain during colonoscopy: an analysis using real-time magnetic endoscope imaging.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Colonoscopy is generally perceived as being a painful procedure. Contributory factors are: stretching of the colonic wall and mesenteric attachments from looping of the instrument shaft, overinsufflation, the degree of torque or force applied to the colonoscope shaft, and patient pain threshold. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of pain episodes experienced during diagnostic colonoscopy and the corresponding colonoscope configuration, utilizing real-time magnetic endoscope imaging (MEI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive outpatients undergoing colonoscopy were studied. Patients with previous colonic resections were excluded. Procedures were commenced with antispasmodics only, and patient sedation was self-administered whenever significant discomfort was experienced, using a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) syringe pump. All "demands" were correlated with the MEI record, which was subsequently analysed. RESULTS: A total of 650 demands were recorded in 102 patients. Seventy-seven percent of all demands occurred with the colonoscope tip in the sigmoid colon, 7 % in the descending colon, 6 % at the splenic flexure, 5 % in the transverse colon, and 4 % in the proximal colon. Ninety percent of all pain episodes coincided with either looping (79 %) or straightening of the colonoscope shaft (11 %); presumed overinsufflation being an infrequent cause of pain (9 %). Of the loops encountered during colonoscopy, the N-sigmoid spiral loop was associated with the majority of pain episodes (56 %). Looping was both more frequent ( P = 0.0002) and less well tolerated in women than in men ( P = 0.0140). CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to document pain at colonoscopy accurately. Looping, particularly in the variable anatomy of the sigmoid colon, is the major cause of pain, especially in women. Use of MEI may improve pain control by facilitating the straightening of loops within the sigmoid colon, and by enabling the endoscopist to target patient analgesia.

Analgesics↗

PubMed2001

Twin-endoscope scissors resection (T-ESR): a new minimally invasive technique for performing colonic mucosectomy.

BACKGROUND: Piecemeal resection is currently the safest method for the endoscopic removal of large sessile colonic polyps. However, this method has its limitations, including the quality of the specimen received for histopathology and the need for early follow-up due to the possibility of incomplete resection and recurrence. New methods enabling en bloc resection would be advantageous in these respects. METHODS: We developed a new technique that uses endoscopic scissors and two endoscopes to perform mucosal resection in a porcine model. So far, the technique has been evaluated in two animals. RESULTS: The resection of intact mucosal specimens measuring 1.5 x 1 cm and 2.2 x 3.5 cm was achieved, with no procedural or late hemorrhage and no clinical or radiological evidence of perforation. CONCLUSION: After further development and evaluation, this technique should be suitable for the resection of large sessile colonic polyps in humans.

Animals↗

PubMed2000

Effect of magnetic endoscope imaging on colonoscopy performance: a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy can be technically challenging because of unpredictable colonoscope looping. Without imaging, straightening the colonoscope is sometimes difficult since the endoscopist has to guess where the tip is. Magnetic endoscope imaging (MEI), a new non-radiographical technique for picturing the colonoscope shaft in real time, could facilitate loop straightening and thus improve performance. METHODS: We assessed trainees and endoscopists with much experience of routine outpatient colonoscopy. In group 1, trainees examined 113 consecutive patients. MEI views were recorded in all examinations, but procedures were randomised to be done by two trainees, either with the endoscopist and endoscopy assistants viewing the imager display (n=58), or without the imager view (n=55). In group 2, two skilled endoscopists were randomised (as with group 1) to undertake consecutive examinations (n=183) either with (n=92) or without (n=91) the MEI view. MEI views of all procedures were analysed retrospectively. FINDINGS: In both groups, intubation times were shorter (median 11.8 min [4.3-31.5] vs 15.3 min [4-67] [group 1]; 8.0 min [2.6-40.8] vs 9.3 min [2.5-52.6] [group 2]) and number of attempts at straightening the colonoscope fewer (median 5 [0-20] vs 12 [0-57] [group 1]; 7 [0-55] vs 10 [0-80] [group 2]), when the endoscopist was able to see the imager view. In group 1, colonoscopy completion rates were also higher (100% [58] vs 89% [49]) and duration of looping was reduced (median 3 min [0-18.8] vs 5.4 min [0-44.5]) when the imager could be seen. Abdominal hand pressure was more effective when the endoscopist and endoscopy assistant could see the imager view. INTERPRETATION: MEI significantly improves performance of colonoscopy, particularly when used by trainees, or by experts in technically difficult cases; loops were straightened or controlled effectively, resulting in quick intubation times and high completion rates.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2000

Magnetic imaging of colonoscopy: an audit of looping, accuracy and ancillary maneuvers.

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy is one of the most frequently performed outpatient examinations. However, the procedure is still technically challenging, largely due to unpredictable looping during insertion. The aims of this study were (1) to assess the frequency of loop formation and types of loop during colonoscopy, (2) to determine the accuracy of the endoscopist's assessment of the anatomic location of the endoscope tip and of the presence and type of endoscope loop formation, and (3) to determine the efficacy of abdominal compression and change in patient position in promoting colonoscope advancement. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing routine, day-case colonoscopy were studied using real-time, three-dimensional magnetic endoscope imaging. All examinations were performed by expert colonoscopists, blinded to the imager view. The endoscopist estimated the position of the colonoscope tip, assessed when and what type of loop had formed, and the efficacy of ancillary maneuvers such as hand pressure or patient position change. The magnetic imager view of each procedure was recorded and retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: One hundred complete colonoscopies were performed. Looping occurred in 91% with N-sigmoid (79%) and deep transverse (34%) being most common. Most loops (69%) were incorrectly diagnosed by the endoscopist. Atypical loops were more common in women than men (p = 0.025). The endoscopist's assessment of tip location was correct 85% of the time overall, but 100% in the cecum. Abdominal pressure was less effective (54 of 145 times, 37%) than patient position change (95 of 144 times, 66%) in promoting endoscope tip advancement. CONCLUSIONS: Looping occurs frequently during routine colonoscopy. Although the endoscopist's assessment of tip location is fairly accurate, the majority of colonoscope loops are incorrectly appreciated. Although used frequently, ancillary maneuvers (abdominal compression and patient position change) are effective in only 52% of attempts.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2000

A new variable stiffness colonoscope makes colonoscopy easier: a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy remains technically difficult in 10-20% of procedures due to variable colonic anatomy and fixation. The ability to vary endoscope shaft flexibility may help insertion to the caecum. METHODS: Consecutive patients attending for day case colonoscopy were randomised to examination with either the conventional Olympus CF200HL (200HL) or a new variable stiffness (VS) colonoscope. Intubation time, use of stiffening function, and patient pain scores were compared. RESULTS: Of 100 cases, 43 were performed with the 200HL and 57 with the VS. Four incomplete examinations occurred with the 200HL (two sigmoid fixations, two benign strictures) and two with the VS (one obstructing cancer, one fixed sigmoid). Changing to the paediatric scope was successful in all but one patient from each group (obstructive lesions). Stiff mode was applied 23 times in 18 patients and was effective in 15 of these. Intubation time was quicker with the VS (median 6 minutes 32 seconds) than with the 200HL (median 10 minutes 35 seconds) (p = 0.0005). Pain scores were less with the VS (median 7) than with the 200HL (median 24) (p = 0.0081). CONCLUSIONS: The variable stiffness colonoscope combines paediatric shaft characteristics with the ability to stiffen when needed. This instrument significantly reduces intubation time and patient discomfort. Further comparisons should be made with the newest colonoscopes which are less stiff.

Colonic Diseases↗