Biomedical subjects

J C Galloway

Publications and source records attributed to J C Galloway.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Toy-oriented changes during early arm movements: hand kinematics.

UNLABELLED: In a recent cross-sectional study, we found that young infants changed their spontaneous arm movements in the presence of a toy, termed 'toy-oriented changes', in systematic ways beginning many weeks before their first consistent reaches [Bhat, A. N., Heathcock, J. H., & Galloway, J. C. (2005). Toy-oriented changes in hand and joint kinematics during the emergence of purposeful reaching. Infant Behavior and Development, 28(4), 445-465]. The purpose of the present study was to test specific hypotheses regarding toy-oriented changes in a longitudinal design. METHODS: Thirteen infants were observed every other week from 8 weeks of age up to the onset of reaching. At each session, hand and joint motions were observed with and without a toy present using a high-speed motion capture system. This paper focuses on the toy-oriented changes in hand variables. RESULTS: As predicted, infants displayed a meaningful pattern of toy-oriented changes, which systematically changed as infants approached the first week of reaching. During the Early phase (8-10 weeks before reaching), infants scaled down their movement length and speed in the presence of a toy. During the Mid phase (4-6 weeks before reaching), infants scaled up movement number and speed, increased movement smoothness, and decreased their hand-toy distance in the presence of a toy. During the Late phase (within 2 weeks of reaching), infants continued to change their hand's position to get closer to the toy and began contacting it. Interestingly, movement number and smoothness displayed similar developmental patterns, where movement length and speed displayed similar patterns. CONCLUSION: Toy-oriented adaptation of arm movements emerges in the first months of life and forms a complex, yet tractable continuum with purposeful reaching. These results provide a foundation to test more specific hypotheses of hand and joint coordination in both typically developing infants and those infants born at risk for coordination impairments.

Age Factors↗

PubMed2004

Shoulder and elbow joint power differ as a general feature of vertical arm movements.

Consistent patterns of joint power underlie coordinated lower extremity behaviors such as running and walking. Recent work found that shoulder and elbow power consistently differed during reaching movements in the horizontal plane. Moreover, joint power during horizontal reaching appears correlated with motor cortical activity. It is not known if the feature of differential joint power extends to vertical plane reaches or to reaches of different movement conditions. The purpose of this study was to test for differential shoulder and elbow power during the acceleratory and deceleratory phases of fast and normal speed vertical reaches in sitting and supine positions. Our results suggest that shoulder and elbow power typically differed both within and across conditions. First, shoulder power values were positive or negative dependent largely on movement direction and movement phase. That is, for each direction and phase, the shoulder either generated or absorbed energy independent of speed or body position. Second, and unexpectedly, reaches of certain condition combinations had similar shoulder power magnitudes across directions. In contrast, elbow power values for each direction varied between positive and negative values depending on phase, speed and position, and no two condition combinations overlapped across directions. Third, as target direction, movement phase and body position varied, shoulder power at fast and normal speeds were linearly correlated, as was shoulder power in sitting and in supine. In contrast, elbow power was linearly correlated only between speeds. These results join other studies to suggest that the neuromotor control of the shoulder may be less complex as compared to the elbow as a general feature of reaching movements. This differential control has important implications for the study of reaching impairments in neurorehabilitation populations, and provides a potentially important variable in the study of cortical firing patterns.

Acceleration↗

PubMed2000

Control of the wrist in three-joint arm movements to multiple directions in the horizontal plane.

In a reaching movement, the wrist joint is subject to inertial effects from proximal joint motion. However, precise control of the wrist is important for reaching accuracy. Studies of three-joint arm movements report that the wrist joint moves little during point-to-point reaches, but muscle activities and kinetics have not yet been described across a range of movement directions. We hypothesized that to minimize wrist motion, muscle torques at the wrist must perfectly counteract inertial effects arising from proximal joint motion. Subjects were given no instructions regarding joint movement and were observed to keep the wrist nearly motionless during center-out reaches to directions throughout the horizontal plane. Consistent with this, wrist muscle torques exactly mirrored interaction torques, in contrast to muscle torques at proximal joints. These findings suggest that in this reaching task the nervous system chooses to minimize wrist motion by anticipating dynamic inertial effects. The wrist muscle torques were associated with a direction-dependent choice of muscles, also characterized by initial reciprocal activation rather than initial coactivation to stiffen the wrist joint. In a second experiment, the same pattern of muscle activities persisted even after many trials reaching with the wrist joint immobilized. These results, combined with similar features at the three joints, such as cosine-like tuning of muscle torques and of muscle onsets across direction, suggest that the nervous system uses similar rules for muscles at each joint, as part of one plan for the arm during a point-to-point reach.

Arm↗