PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J C Gerancher

Publications and source records attributed to J C Gerancher.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2000

Upper extremity nerve blocks.

Anatomy favorable to the application of regional blockade, the capacity to decrease latency and prolong blockade, and the opportunity to facilitate recovery and decrease costs create a constellation of factors that have the potential to make upper extremity blockade a tremendously rewarding application of modern regional anesthetic technique. These rewards can be realized by the motivated anesthesiologist and shared with patients, surgical colleagues, and hospital administrators.

Arm↗
PubMed2000

A modest proposal.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Analgesia, Epidural↗
PubMed1999

Determination of an effective dose of intrathecal morphine for pain relief after cesarean delivery.

UNLABELLED: Very small doses of intrathecal (i.t.) morphine (25-200 microg) have been used in an effort to provide effective postoperative pain relief while minimizing side effects after cesarean delivery. We performed a double-blinded study in 40 patients presenting for elective cesarean delivery in which i.t. morphine was administered along with oral hydrocodone/acetaminophen and other medications commonly administered after cesarean delivery. We administered i.t. morphine by up-down sequential allocation of doses. For the purposes of this study, adequate postoperative analgesia was defined as comfort not requiring i.v. morphine for 12 h after spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine, fentanyl, and morphine. In addition, a time and cost comparison was performed for study patients receiving intrathecal morphine compared with a historical group of patients receiving patient-controlled analgesia with i.v. morphine. We were unable to determine with meaningful precision a dose of i.t. morphine to provide analgesia in this context. However, very small doses of i.t. morphine combined with oral hydrocodone/acetaminophen and other medications commonly prescribed after cesarean delivery provided postoperative pain relief with no more time commitment than patient-controlled analgesia (148 +/- 61 vs 150 +/- 57 min) and with significantly less acquisition cost ($15.13 +/- $4.40 vs $34.64 +/- $15.55). IMPLICATIONS: When used along with oral analgesics, very small doses of spinal morphine provide adequate pain relief after cesarean delivery. Spinal anesthetics, oral analgesics, and other medications commonly prescribed to treat side effects after cesarean delivery contribute significantly to this analgesia. When small doses of spinal morphine are used in this setting, they provide adequate analgesia and patient satisfaction that is time- and cost-effective.

Acetaminophen↗
PubMed1998

0.125% ropivacaine is similar to 0.125% bupivacaine for labor analgesia using patient-controlled epidural infusion.

UNLABELLED: We compared the effects of 0.125% ropivacaine with 0.125% bupivacaine in laboring patients using patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA). Fifty-one ASA physical status I or II term parturients with functioning epidural catheters were randomized to receive ropivacaine or bupivacaine using a prospective, double-blind design. Basal infusions (6 mL/h) were supplemented with patient-controlled boluses (5 mL) every 10 min as required. For inadequate analgesia, patients were administered 10-mL boluses of study solution until comfortable. There were no differences in verbal pain scores, amount of local anesthetics used, sensory levels, motor blockade, labor duration, mode of delivery, side effects, or patient satisfaction between the two local anesthetics. We conclude that 0.125% ropivacaine and bupivacaine are clinically indistinguishable and are both highly effective for labor analgesia using PCEA. IMPLICATIONS: This study compared labor analgesia from 0.125% ropivacaine and 0.125% bupivacaine using patient-controlled epidural analgesia. We found no significant differences in local anesthetic use, analgesic characteristics, or side effects between 0.125% ropivacaine and 0.125% bupivacaine. We conclude that these two drugs are clinically indistinguishable at this concentration.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Epidural fentanyl produces labor analgesia by a spinal mechanism.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine if epidural fentanyl produces analgesia in laboring patients by a primary spinal or supraspinal action. METHODS: Fifty-four parturients were randomized to receive epidural 0.125% bupivacaine plus one of three treatments: epidural saline-intravenous saline, epidural fentanyl (20 microg/h)-intravenous saline, or epidural saline-intravenous fentanyl (20 microg/h). The study treatments were administered by continuous infusion, whereas epidural bupivacaine use was patient controlled. RESULTS: Epidural bupivacaine use was significantly reduced by epidural (11.5+/-4.6 ml/h) but not by intravenous fentanyl (15.9+/-4.5 ml/h) compared with saline control (16+/-5.9 ml/ h). Analgesia characteristics and side effects were similar among groups. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose epidural infusions of fentanyl produce labor analgesia by a primary spinal action.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

The effects of electrical stimulation at different frequencies on perception and pain in human volunteers: epidural versus intravenous administration of fentanyl.

The study was performed to determine whether epidural fentanyl produced segmental sensory changes to electrical stimulation at different frequencies. Eight healthy volunteers received fentanyl 1 microgram/kg both intravenously and epidurally in a randomized, double-blind, cross-over fashion. Perception thresholds and amount of current required to elicit a predetermined level of moderate pain (Cmp) at 5,250, and 2000 Hz stimulation were measured at ipsilateral dermatomes C2 and L2 at 0, 5, 15, 30, 45, and 60 min after injection. Perceptions to 5,250, and 2000 Hz stimulation were unaffected by either intravenous or epidural fentanyl (P > 0.08). Intravenous fentanyl increased Cmp at both 5 and 250 Hz at both dermatomes (P < 0.004) and thus did not produce segmental analgesia. In contrast, epidural fentanyl increased Cmp only at the L2 dermatome and only at 5 Hz (P = 0.005). We conclude that an epidural bolus of fentanyl results in segmental spinal analgesia to transcutaneous electrical stimulation only at specific frequencies. Furthermore, pain produced by stimulation at 5 Hz may have a different pharmacology than pain produced by 250 Hz stimulation.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Prospective examination of epidural catheter insertion.

BACKGROUND: Although it is generally accepted that inserting epidural catheters 3-4 cm into the epidural space minimizes complications, no prospective randomized examination of epidural catheter insertion length has been published. METHODS: Eight hundred healthy parturients requesting epidural analgesia were randomized to have open-tip epidural catheters inserted 2, 4, 6, or 8 cm within the epidural space. The incidences of intravenous cannulation, unilateral sensory analgesia, and subsequent catheter dislodgment were recorded. Catheter insertions that resulted in intravenous cannulation or unilateral analgesia were incrementally withdrawn and retested with additional local anesthetic to determine the effectiveness of epidural catheter manipulation. RESULTS: Epidural catheters inserted 8 cm within the epidural space were more likely to result in intravenous cannulation. Epidural catheters inserted 2 cm within the epidural space were less likely to result in unilateral sensory analgesia but were more likely to become dislodged. Twenty-three percent of epidural catheters inserted > 2 cm within the epidural space required manipulation. Epidural catheters inserted 2 or 4 cm required replacement more often than epidural catheters inserted 6 or 8 cm. Ninety-one percent and 50% of epidural catheters that resulted in unilateral sensory analgesia and intravenous cannulation, respectively, provided analgesia for labor and delivery after incremental withdrawal. CONCLUSIONS: Epidural catheters should be inserted either 2 cm when rapid labor is anticipated or 6 cm when prolonged labor or cesarean delivery is likely. Additionally, epidural catheters that result in intravenous cannulation or unilateral sensory analgesia can be manipulated effectively to provide analgesia for labor and delivery.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Oral clonidine prolongs lidocaine spinal anesthesia in human volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Premedication with oral clonidine may improve the quality and duration of lidocaine spinal anesthesia, but this effect has not been examined in a quantitative fashion. METHODS: Eight volunteers received 50 mg lidocaine (1.5% dextrose free) both with and without 0.2 mg oral clonidine 1.5 h before spinal anesthesia in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover fashion. Sensory block was assessed by pinprick, transcutaneous electric stimulation equivalent to surgical incision, and duration of tolerance to pneumatic thigh tourniquet. Motor block at the quadriceps and gastrocnemius muscles was assessed by isometric force dynamometry. Episodes of bradycardia, hypotension, and sedation were recorded. RESULTS: Regression of pinprick was unchanged with clonidine. However, duration of tolerance to electric stimulation was increased at the knee (28 +/- 24 min) and ankle (31 +/- 28 min) with clonidine (P < 0.05). The duration of tolerance to tourniquet-induced pain was increased with clonidine (14 +/- 12 min; P < 0.05). The duration of motor block was increased at the quadriceps (20 +/- 13 min) and gastrocnemius (33 +/- 24 min) muscle groups with clonidine (P < 0.05). Although clonidine decreased systolic blood pressure (13 +/- 4 mmHg, P < 0.003) and heart rate (13 +/- 5 beats/min; P = 0.02), no subjects had hypotension or bradycardia. The incidence of sedation was greater with clonidine than with plain lidocaine (50% vs. 0%, P < 0.04). DISCUSSION: Premedication with oral clonidine prolonged sensory and motor block from lidocaine spinal anesthesia. The exact mechanism whereby oral clonidine prolongs spinal anesthesia remains to be determined.

Administration, Oral↗