PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J C Heathcote

Publications and source records attributed to J C Heathcote.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Problems in interpreting laboratory tests. What do unexpected results mean?

It is always important that physicians not overreact to apparently abnormal laboratory values by undertaking inappropriate further investigations or clinical treatments. When confronted with unexpected differing test results from repeat testing in the same individual, physicians should be aware of explanations other than laboratory error and change in the patient's clinical status. While test-related variables may be factors, intraindividual biologic variation is much more common and may be the explanation for discrepant results. For this reason, physicians need to know which laboratory tests are associated with significant intraindividual biologic variation as well as the magnitude of possible changes. Age-associated physiologic changes may significantly alter certain laboratory values in the elderly without constituting a pathologic process. Laboratory values that may appear abnormal in 10% or more of the healthy elderly without necessarily representing a pathologic process include serum alkaline phosphatase, fasting blood glucose, 2-hour postprandial glucose, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, hemoglobin, and a normal serum creatinine level in the face of a markedly decreased creatinine clearance. To ensure proper assessment of the geriatic patient, the clinician needs to be aware of these age-related changes and possible effects on laboratory values. More clinical research is needed to establish appropriate reference ranges, especially for those over the age of 75 years.

Adolescent↗

The significance of matrix effects on the measurement of lactate dehydrogenase (LD) activity using Kodak dry slide technology in the Ontario Laboratory Proficiency Testing Program.

A recent lactate dehydrogenase (LD) survey of the Laboratory Proficiency Testing Program (LPTP) of Ontario showed interlaboratory coefficients of variation ranging from 6.5% to 40% for five lyophilized vials on the 12 Kodak analyzers. All the LPTP survey samples had similar protein and LD isoenzyme electrophoretic patterns which remained unchanged after reconstitution and storage for 5 days at 4 degrees C, although the total LD activities fell. Four Ektachem 700 analyzers were subsequently tested using LPTP material and no difference in LD activity between instruments or between two LD slide lot numbers was shown. Generation 9 slides gave higher LD activities than generation 10 on all the reconstituted lyophilized proficiency testing samples. There was no significant difference between slide generations when 19 liquid human sera were analyzed, indicating that the variability on LPTP samples was due to a matrix effect. Definition of the matrix effect of lyophilized proficiency testing material is essential before any proficiency testing program can use such material to reflect analytical performance on patient specimens.

Evaluation Studies as Topic↗