Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to J C Hoenninger.
Practical constraints make it difficult to build large-aperture echo-planar magnetic resonance (MR) imagers. The implementation of a pediatric imager and its performance are described. Spatial resolution and signal-to-noise levels comparable to those of 1982 state-of-the-art MR imagers have been achieved in imaging times of 0.05-0.15 seconds. T1 and T2 information are obtainable in the echo-planar mode. A major issue is that of chemical-shift displacements.
Section thickness in two-dimensional Fourier transform (FT) imaging is dependent on gradient strength and the shape of the radio-frequency pulses used to excite the nuclei. By manipulation of these parameters, it is possible to obtain 2.5-mm-thick sections in contiguous, multisection imaging. Because this method is efficient in imaging with long repetition times (TR), it effectively complements three-dimensional FT thin-section imaging techniques, which require imaging with short TRs. Fifteen double-echo, contiguous images of 0.9 X 0.9 X 2.5-mm resolution were obtained in 17.1 minutes for a TR of 2 seconds.
Differences in magnetic resonance (MR) imaging signal-to-noise (S/N) performance between saddle-shaped and solenoidal coils have been postulated. Each coil shape is tied to a particular magnetic field configuration, so that they are not typically interchangeable except in special situations. The solenoidal coil is predicted to have a two- to three-fold advantage over the saddle-shaped coil. Simple basic arguments raise a dispute with this assertion. Experiments show that both coils produce essentially equivalent S/N levels.
Spin-echo magnetic resonance (MR) imaging detects a variety of pathologic states with great sensitivity. A technique for producing multiple spin-echo images in multisection operation is presented. This method of intensity-image acquisition is compared with retrospective intensity-image synthesis from routine data sets. Both yield long echo time (TE) images with similar image contrast and comparable and often increased diagnostic utility. Technical and clinical considerations are addressed, including signal-to-noise levels, flow effects, and patient throughput.
Although cross-sectional magnetic resonance examination of the head and body is useful for screening large regions of tissue, subsectional regions of the head and body often need to be examined. Orthogonally directed, selectively irradiated planes with different flip angles produce a spatially limited signal region from which two- or three-dimensional volume images can be reconstructed. Images with limited fields-of-view can be acquired in reduced imaging time. We present a general description of this technique. These subsectional or "inner volume" images eliminate respiratory motion artifacts by excluding moving tissues from the imaged volume. A result of this technique is a high signal from rapid pulsatile blood flow, produced without cardiac gating the pulse sequence.
To determine whether hydrogen magnetic resonance imaging at 0.7 T provides added clinical value over imaging at 0.35 T, images of the heads of patients with various intracranial disorders were obtained at these field strengths. Measurements of tissue contrast (C), signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio, and T1 and T2 relaxation times were determined. For a given spin-echo sequence with equal imaging time, resolution, and data sampling window, the product C X S/N was somewhat lower for the lower field strength. Under conditions of imaging with equal chemical shift artifact, C X S/N at 0.35 T was equal to or greater than that measured at 0.7 T. With an increase in field strength, T1 of pathologic areas and surrounding normal tissues increased, resulting in a corresponding loss of absolute signal level and decrease in contrast. Lesions were equally well seen at both 0.35 T and 0.7 T. The increased T1 and decreased C X S/N for higher magnetic fields--when measured with a fixed imaging time, resolution, chemical shift, and sequence--suggest that such field strengths may not improve tissue contrast, diagnostic ability, or clinical throughput when compared with lower field strength systems.