PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J Carsley

Publications and source records attributed to J Carsley.

10 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Hepatitis A vaccination during an outbreak among gay men in Montréal, Canada, 1995-1997.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate an intervention designed to curtail an outbreak of hepatitis A among gay men, especially the young and sexually active, by promoting their free vaccination. DESIGN: The study analysed routine passive surveillance data, carried out questionnaire and serological surveys of vaccinees, and surveys among the target population in non-clinical venues. SETTING AND INTERVENTION: 15 000 free doses of hepatitis A vaccine were made available through clinics with large gay clienteles, or at gay events, and advertised by various means, in Montréal, Canada, from August 1996 to November 1997. Simultaneous vaccination against hepatitis B (always free for gay men) was also encouraged. PARTICIPANTS: Information was obtained from persons with the disease during the epidemic period, a sample of men requesting vaccination, and five community samples of gay men. MAIN RESULTS: The outbreak involved 376 gay men and the vaccine was distributed to approximately 10 000. Vaccinees were older than cases, but had many sex partners and comprised more food handlers. Special vaccination clinics at gay events were well attended but did not reach more high risk men than regular medical venues. A self reported vaccine coverage of 49% was achieved, but 26% of vaccinees already had anti-HAV antibodies. Disease incidence declined rapidly during the campaign. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention nearly tripled self reported hepatitis A vaccine coverage but its late start precludes proving that it caused the subsequent drop in incidence. However, it also increased hepatitis B vaccination and it is believed it improved links between gay men, public health, clinicians and community groups.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Evaluation of rubella screening in pregnant women.

BACKGROUND: The rationale for rubella vaccination in the general population and for screening for rubella in pregnant women is the prevention of congenital rubella syndrome. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the prenatal rubella screening program in Quebec. METHODS: A historical cross-sectional study was designed. Sixteen hospitals with obstetric services were randomly selected, 8 from among the 35 "large" hospitals in the province (500 or more live births/year) and 8 from among the 50 "small" hospitals (fewer than 500 live births/year). A total of 2551 women were randomly selected from all mothers of infants born between Apr. 1, 1993, and Mar. 31, 1994, by means of stratified 2-stage sampling. The proportions of women screened and vaccinated were ascertained from information obtained from the hospital chart, the physician's office and the patient. RESULTS: The overall (adjusted) screening rate was 94.0%. The rates were significantly different between large and small hospitals (94.4% v. 89.6%). Five large hospitals and one small hospital had rates above 95.0%. The likelihood of not having been screened was statistically significantly higher for women who had been pregnant previously than for women pregnant for the first time (4.8% v. 1.4%; p < 0.001). Of the 200 women who were seronegative at the time of screening (8.4%), 79 had been vaccinated postpartum, had a positive serological result on subsequent testing or did not require vaccination, and 59 had not been vaccinated postpartum; for 62, subsequent vaccination status was unknown. INTERPRETATION: Continued improvement in screening practices is needed, especially in small hospitals. Because vaccination rates are unacceptably low, it is crucial that steps be taken to address this issue.

Canada↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Evaluation of the effectiveness of immunization delivery methods.

Scientific evidence documenting the effectiveness of immunization delivery methods was summarized using the generic approach developed by the Community Health Practice Guidelines Working Group. The delivery methods examined were those for the adult and childhood vaccines of influenza, pneumococcal infection, hepatitis B, measles-mumps-rubella and diphtheria-pertussis-tetanus-polio. Based on a critical appraisal of 54 eligible comparative studies, the effects of different interventions were obtained and pooled effects were calculated for delivery methods oriented to the client, the provider and the system. The results indicate those interventions found to be most effective for each vaccine. This review of the scientific evidence of the effectiveness of immunization delivery methods provides a base for policy development and assists in the planning of resource allocation.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Practice survey of immunization in Canada.

A survey was undertaken in September 1991 to document current immunization practice across Canada. Information was obtained during interviews with provincial epidemiologists and key persons involved in immunization programs and recorded on standard data collection forms. Variations in practice are described in five areas: public/private health administration; legislation; monitoring system/coverage rates/surveillance; vaccine management and costs. As changes are being considered to immunization programs, a critical examination of issues such as standardization (in coding, in assessment of waste, in assessment of coverage), surveillance systems and the use of serosurveys would be beneficial.

Canada↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Immunization delivery methods: practice recommendations.

Immunization has unequivocally contributed to large-scale reductions in mortality and morbidity due to infectious diseases. In general, consensus on the scheduling of immunizations has been achieved at the national or international level by immunization advisory committees. However, immunization delivery methods are varied and numerous. Although specific methods have been proposed, compared and evaluated, the available evidence has not been comprehensively summarized for informed public health action. This paper integrates evidence based on scientific documentation, a Canada-wide practice survey and expert opinion to formulate practice recommendations for immunization delivery methods and to identify areas for further research.

Adult↗