Biomedical subjects

J Chiladakis

Publications and source records attributed to J Chiladakis.

13 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2002

Arrhythmia recurrences are rare when the site of radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway is medial or anterior to the coronary sinus os.

AIMS: The site of successful ablation of the slow atrioventricular (AV) nodal pathway may be located in the posteroseptal or midseptal area. We have previously shown that the site of successful radiofrequency (RF) ablation of the slow pathway, rather than residual slow pathway conduction correlates with AV nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) recurrences, with more recurrences noted in inferoposterior (to the coronary sinus os) locations. Accordingly, we have since modified our approach, and in a consecutive series of 105 patients we have performed slow pathway RF ablation exclusively at medial or anterior locations, with the objective of prospectively examining the recurrence rate of AVNRT incurred with this approach. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study included 40 men and 65 women, aged 42 +/- 18 years, having RF ablation for symptomatic AVNRT exclusively in anterior to the coronary sinus os locations. A combined anatomical and electrophysiological approach to slow pathway ablation was employed. This series of patients was compared with the previous series of 55 patients (historical group) with AVNRT undergoing RF ablation at both inferoposterior and anteromedial locations. The mean cycle length of the induced AVNRT was 329 +/- 48 ms. RF ablation was successful in all patients (100%). A mean of 7 +/- 6 lesions were applied. Persistent jump or echo beats were noted in 48 patients (46%). The procedure lasted for 2.1 +/- 1.0 h. Fluoroscopy time was 23 +/- 14 min. Procedures were complicated by heart block in two patients (1.9%). Over 26 +/- 19 months, there has been only one recurrence of AVNRT (1%). The historical group had similar age (37 +/- 18 years), gender (17 men/38 women), AVNRT cycle length (340 +/- 60 ms), number of RF lesions (9 +/- 6), or residual slow pathway conduction (42%), but longer fluoroscopy time (41 +/- 25 min) and procedure duration (4 +/- 1 h), and a significantly higher recurrence rate (seven patients/13%) (P=0.004) at a much shorter follow-up period of 12 +/- 8 months. CONCLUSION: AVNRT recurrences are rare (1%) when slow pathway RF ablation is performed in medial or anterior locations at the tricuspid annulus, rather than in inferoposterior sites, whereby a higher (13%) recurrence rate has been previously noted.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Radiofrequency ablation in pediatric and adult patients: comparative results.

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation has been widely and successfully employed to cure adult and pediatric patients of a variety of arrhythmias. Only limited data exist which compare the results in these two groups. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of RF catheter ablation in pediatric versus adult patients performed by an adult electrophysiology (EP) team. METHODS: The study group included 327 consecutive pediatric (n=47) and adult (n=280) patients, aged 7-82 years (mean 40+/-19), with symptomatic tachyarrhythmias, who underwent RF ablation during the last 6 years. All but ten patients underwent a full EP study during the same session. Procedures were performed in all but five patients with use of local anesthesia and deep or light sedation. The left heart was approached with use of transaortic (n=36) or transseptal (n=55) or both (n=6) techniques. RF ablation was performed for manifest or concealed accessory pathways in 132 patients, AV nodal slow pathway in 119, atrial tachycardia in 24, atrial flutter in 15, atrial fibrillation in one, ventricular tachycardia in 29, and AV node/His bundle in 7 patients. RESULTS: RF ablation was successful in 271 (96.8%) patients in the adult group and in all patients (100%) in the pediatric group, with a mean of 15+/-18 (median: 8) vs 12+/-10 (median: 8) RF applications respectively (P=NS). Complications occurred in four patients (1.4%) in the adult group and in one patient (2.1%) in the pediatric group (P=NS). Fluoroscopy time averaged 43+/-40 min vs 39+/-27 min and procedures lasted for 3.0+/-1.9 hours vs 2.8+/-1.4 hours respectively (P=NS). During long-term follow-up of 25+/-19 months, there were 12 (4.4%) recurrences among the adult patients, and three (6.4%) recurrences in children, with nine of them successfully treated with repeat RF ablation. Procedural variables were dependent on the type of arrhythmia ablated, rather than on patient's age. Patients with multiple accessory pathways or atrial flutter required the greatest number of RF applications and the longest fluoroscopy exposure and duration of the procedure; the lowest values of these variables concerned ablation of the slow AV nodal pathway or the AV node/His bundle. CONCLUSION: RF ablation in adult and pediatric patients performed by an adult EP team is equally efficacious and safe offering cure of symptomatic cardiac tachyarrhythmias in both patient populations.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2001

Ancillary tools in pacemaker and defibrillator lead extraction using a novel lead removal system.

A previous report described our preliminary experience with a highly successful pacing lead removal system (VasoExtor). Extending this experience, we found it necessary to use additional tools to enhance the success of percutaneous lead extraction with this system. In the present series, we used the standard locking stylets (S and K), and recently, one newer type of stylet (Magic) over the last 3 years in 34 patients to extract 48 pacemaker leads in 31 patients and 3 defibrillator (ICD) leads in 3 patients. Lead extraction was carried out in 23 men and 11 women (aged 64 +/- 17 years) because of pacemaker infection (n = 21), pacemaker (n = 8) or ICD (n = 3) lead malfunction, or prior to ICD implant (n = 2). Leads were in place for 3.5 +/- 3.7 years. Infections, involving pocket and lead(s), were due to S. epidermidis (n = 13), S. aureus (n = 6), S. aureus plus E. coli (n = 1), for fungi (n = 1). Of the 48 pacing leads, 31 were ventricular, 15 atrial, and 2 were VDD leads. The ICD leads were two double-coil leads (CPI) and one single-coil lead (Telectronics). Using the S (n = 12), K (n = 8), or Magic (n = 3) stylets, all pacing leads in 23 patients and the ICD leads in 2 patients were successfully removed from a subclavian approach using the locking stylets. However, in nine (26.5%) patients ancillary tools were required. In four patients, lead fragments were captured with use of a noose catheter, a pigtail catheter, and a bioptome from a right femoral approach. In two patients, locking could not be effected and a noose catheter from the right femoral vein was used, aided by a pigtail and an Amplatz catheter and a bioptome to remove three leads. In a patient with an ICD lead, a combined subclavian (stylet S) and right femoral approach (noose catheter) was required. In a patient with a dysfunctional ventricular lead 12 years old, a motor drive unit was used to facilitate the exchange of locking stylets, but extraction failed. In another patient, a fragment of a dysfunctional ventricular lead remained intravascularly despite resorting to a femoral approach. Finally, lead removal was completely (32/34, 94%) or partially (1/34, 3%) successful in 33 (97%) of 34 patients for 50 (98%) of 51 leads without complications. In conclusion, to enhance the success of pacing or ICD lead extraction with use of the VascoExtor locking stylets, an array of ancillary tools were required in more than one fourth of patients.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Initial experience with a newer generation coronary stent.

BACKGROUND: Recently, several newer generation stents have become available promising to improve upon the results of coronary angioplasty (PTCA) with its attendant acute and chronic complications. The aim of this study was to prospectively review the results of a preliminary experience with the newer generation R stent in a series of 56 patients. METHODS: This study included 47 men and 9 women, aged 57 +/- 10 years, who presented with stable angina and/or positive exercise testing (n = 12), unstable angina (n = 42), or acute myocardial infarction (n = 2). A consistent approach by a single operator for implantation of the R stent (Orbus Inc., The Netherlands) included stent oversizing (by 0.5 mm) and high pressure (> 12--16 bar) deployment. Dilated vessels comprised the left anterior descending (n = 37) including the diagonal branch in 2 patients, the right coronary artery (n = 17), the left circumflex (n = 13), or a saphenous vein graft (n = 1). The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 52 +/- 8% and the initial coronary artery stenosis was 85 +/- 8%. Stents were implanted for dissection and/or suboptimal PTCA result or electively. RESULTS: The procedure was successful in all 56 patients (100%). The residual stenosis was < 0--10%. Direct stenting without balloon predilation was performed in 21 patients. Single stents were used in 36 patients and > or = 2 stents in 20 patients. Abciximab (n = 22), eptifibatide (n = 8) or tirofiban (n = 1) was administered in 31 patients (55%). A stent-related complication was noted in one patient (stent misplacement). All patients were discharged alive without infarct or need for surgery. There were no events of subacute stent thrombosis; all patients received combined therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel, the latter for 1 month. In one patient who had received abciximab, severe thrombocytopenia (0 platelet count) was detected at 3 days after discharge but it was fully reversible with no sequelae. Over 5.2 +/- 2.8 (range, 1--11) months, there was one sudden death and two clinical restenoses; no other late complication occurred. CONCLUSION: Initial experience with 73 R stents in 56 patients and a consistent approach by a single operator of stent oversizing and high-pressure deployment resulted in high procedural success (100%), lack of stent thrombosis (0%), and a low stent-related complication rate (1.8%), while the design and profile of the R stent allowed for direct stenting in 37.5% of patients. One should be vigilant for the sporadic occurrence of severe thrombocytopenia with use of IIb/IIIa inhibitors.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Electrophysiologist-implanted transvenous cardioverter defibrillators using local versus general anesthesia.

With the advent of smaller biphasic transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) and the experience gained over the years, it is now feasible for electrophysiologists to implant them safely in the abdominal or pectoral area without surgical assistance. Throughout the years, general anesthesia has been used as the standard technique of anesthesia for these procedures. However, use of local anesthesia combined with deep sedation only for defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing might further facilitate and simplify these procedures. The purpose of this study was to test the feasibility of using local anesthesia and compare it with the standard technique of general anesthesia, during implantation of transvenous ICDs performed by an electrophysiologist in the electrophysiology laboratory. For over 4 years in the electrophysiology laboratory, we have implanted transvenous ICDs in 90 consecutive patients (84 men and 6 women, aged 58 +/- 15 years). Early on, general anesthesia was used (n = 40, group I), but in recent series (n = 50, group II) local anesthesia was combined with deep sedation for DFT testing. Patients had coronary (n = 58) or valvular (n = 4) disease, cardiomyopathy (n = 25) or no organic disease (n = 3), a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 35%, and presented with ventricular tachycardia (n = 72) or fibrillation (n = 16), or syncope (n = 2). One-lead ICD systems were used in 74 patients, two-lead systems in 10 patients, and an AVICD in 6 patients. ICDs were implanted in abdominal (n = 17, all in group I) or more recently in pectoral (n = 73) pockets. The DFT averaged 9.7 +/- 3.6 J and 10.2 +/- 3.6 J in the two groups, respectively (P = NS) and there were no differences in pace-sense thresholds. The total procedural duration was shorter (2.1 +/- 0.5 hours) in group II (all pectoral implants) compared with 23 pectoral implants of group I (2.9 +/- 0.5 hours) (P < 0.0001). Biphasic devices were used in all patients and active shell devices in 67 patients; no patient needed a subcutaneous patch. There were six complications (7%), four in group I and two in group II: one pulmonary edema and one respiratory insufficiency that delayed extubation for 3 hours in a patient with prior lung resection, both probably related to general anesthesia, one lead insulation break that required reoperation on day 3, two pocket hematomas, and one pneumothorax. There was one postoperative arrhythmic death at 48 hours in group I. No infections occurred. Patients were discharged at a mean time of 3 days. All devices functioned well at predischarge testing. Thus, it is feasible to use local anesthesia for current ICD implants to expedite the procedure and avoid general anesthesia related cost and possible complications.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2000

Two-coil versus single-coil transvenous cardioverter defibrillator systems: comparative data.

Two types of new-generation transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) systems, incorporating a two-coil (62 patients, group 1) versus single-coil (32 patients, group 2) lead system were compared among 94 consecutive patients. The two groups were comparable in age (58 +/- 13 vs 59 +/- 14 years), presenting arrhythmia (ventricular tachycardia versus ventricular fibrillation 77%/21% vs 84%/13%), cycle length of induced VT (294 +/- 4 vs 289 +/- 44 ms), number of unsuccessful antiarrhythmic drugs (1.7 +/- 0.8 vs 1.7 +/- 0.7), and left ventricular ejection fraction (35 +/- 12% vs 34 +/- 9%). Both systems were successfully implanted strictly transvenously in all patients. Biphasic shocks were used in all patients. Active shell devices were used in 79% and 84% patients of groups I and II, respectively (P = NS). Intraoperative testing revealed comparable defibrillation threshold (DFT) values (10.2 +/- 3.7 J in group 1 versus 9.3 +/- 3.6 J in group 2 system), and pacing threshold (0.7 +/- 0.3 vs 0.7 +/- 0.3 V), but R wave amplitude and lead impedance were lower in group 1 (13 +/- 5 vs 16 +/- 5 mV, P = 0.003; and 579 +/- 115 vs 657 +/- 111 ohms, P = 0.002, respectively). Lead insulation break requiring reoperation occurred in one patient with an Endotak lead, and two patients with Transvene leads had initially high DFT with a single one-lead/active can system, which was converted to a two- or three-endocardial-lead/inactive can configuration. We conclude that both single-coil and two-coil transvenous ICD systems were associated with high rates of successful strictly transvenous ICD implantation and a low incidence of lead-related complications. Significant differences were noted in the sensed R wave and lead impedance, probably reflecting the active fixation characteristics of the Transvene lead. However, in order to obviate the sporadic need for implantation of additional endocardial leads, as was the case in two patients in this series, a double-coil lead may be preferable.

Defibrillators, Implantable↗

PubMed1999

Radiofrequency ablation in older children and adolescents by an adult electrophysiology team.

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation has been widely and successfully employed to cure adult patients of a variety of arrhythmias. Only a few centers have a pediatric electrophysiology (EP) service available and have presented similar results in children. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of RF ablation in pediatric patients performed by an adult EP team. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study group included 33 consecutive pediatric patients, aged 7-18 years (mean 14.1 +/- 3.1), with symptomatic supraventricular tachyarrhythmias, who underwent RF ablation during the last 3 years. All but two patients underwent a full EP study during the same session. Procedures were performed in all but five patients with use of local anesthesia and deep or light sedation. The left heart was approached with use of transaortic (n = 3) or transseptal (n = 7) techniques. RF ablation was performed for manifest (n = 11) or concealed (n = 9) (9 left, 4 anteroseptal, 3 midseptal, and 4 posteroseptal) or right atriofascicular (Mahaim) (n = 1) accessory pathways in 19 patients, 12 slow AV nodal pathways and 2 atrial tachycardia foci in the other 14 patients. RESULTS: RF ablation was successful in all patients (100%) with 1-27 RF applications (mean: 10 +/- 7). There was one complication in a patient with 2 accessory pathways; after RF ablation of a posteroseptal accessory pathway, complete heart block occurred during successful ablation of a second midseptal accessory pathway. Fluoroscopy time averaged 35 +/- 23 min and procedure duration 2.8 +/- 1.4 hours. During long-term follow-up of 19 +/- 10 months, there was one AV nodal tachycardia recurrence at 2.5 months, successfully treated with repeat RF ablation. CONCLUSION: RF ablation in pediatric patients performed by an adult EP team is efficacious and safe offering cure of symptomatic cardiac tachyarrhythmias in this patient population.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1999

Percutaneous extraction of transvenous defibrillator leads using the VascoExtor pacing lead removal system.

In the implantable cardioverter defibrillator era the necessity for lead removal is not negligible. A specially designed extraction lead system for percutaneous removal of such leads is lacking, in contrast to the existing pacing lead extraction systems. We report the successful percutaneous extraction of four implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads in three patients because of lead malfunction using a novel pacemaker lead extraction system, the VascoExtor (VascoMed) system. Three leads were successfully removed in two patients using traction with special locking stylets from the superior approach. One lead was removed using the system's additional extraction tools through the femoral approach. There were no complications. This preliminary experience shows that the VascoExtor (VascoMed) pacemaker lead extraction system can also be used in implantable cardioverter defibrillator lead extraction safely and effectively. In addition to the locking stylets, adjunct percutaneous extraction tools may be needed in some cases.

Cardiovascular Surgical Procedures↗

PubMed1999

Pectoral cardioverter defibrillators: comparison of prepectoral and submuscular implantation techniques.

The purpose of this study was to compare the two techniques of pectoral ICD implantation, prepectoral and submuscular, performed by an electrophysiologist in the catheterization laboratory with use of general or local anesthesia in 45 consecutive patients. Over a period of 30 months, we implanted pectoral transvenous ICDs in 43 men and 2 women, aged 59 +/- 12 years, with use of general (n = 20) or local (n = 25) anesthesia in the catheterization laboratory. Patients had coronary (n = 30) or valvular (n = 4) disease, cardiomyopathy (n = 10) or no organic disease (n = 1), a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 31%, and presented with ventricular tachycardia (n = 40) or fibrillation (n = 5). One-lead ICD systems (18 Endotak, 10 Transvene/8 Sprint, 2 EnGuard) were used in 38 patients, 2-lead (5 Transvene, 1 EnGuard) systems in 6 patients, and 1 atrioventricular lead ICD system in 1 patient. The prepectoral technique was employed in 29 patients with adequate subcutaneous tissue, while the submuscular technique was used in 16 patients who had a thin layer of subcutaneous tissue. The defibrillation threshold averaged 9-10 J in both groups and there were no differences in pace/sense thresholds. All implants were entirely transvenous with no subcutaneous patch. Biphasic ICD devices were employed in all patients. Active or hot can devices were used in 39 patients. There were no complications, operative deaths, or infections. Patients were discharged at a mean of 3 days. All devices functioned well at predis-charge testing. Over 14 +/- 8 months, 20 patients received appropriate device therapy (antitachycardia pacing or shocks). No late complications occurred. One patient died at 3 months of pump failure; there were no sudden deaths. In conclusion, for exclusive pectoral implantation of transvenous ICDs, electrophysiologists should master both prepectoral and submuscular techniques. One can thus avoid potential skin erosion or need for abdominal implantation in patients with a thin layer of subcutaneous tissue. Finally, there are no differences in pacing or defibrillation thresholds between the two techniques.

Adult↗

PubMed1998

Successful percutaneous extraction of pacemaker leads with a novel (VascoExtor) pacing lead removal system.

A new pacing lead extraction system (VascoExtor, VascoMed, Germany) with a universally applicable locking stylet was used over a period of 12 months to extract 25 permanent pacemaker leads (mean implantation time 3.9 +/- 3.8 years) in 16 patients who had pacemaker infection (n = 13), lead dysfunction (n = 2), or before an automatic defibrillator implant (n = 1). With use of this system, we were able to successfully and safely remove 24 of 25 chronic pacing leads (96%) in 15 of 16 patients (93%) with sole use of the locking stylet in 81%, and with use of an array of ancillary tools in the remaining 19% of patients.

Aged↗

PubMed1998

Idiopathic long QT syndrome with late onset of bradycardia-dependent and short-coupled variant of torsade de pointes.

We report an idiopathic variant of the long QT syndrome in a 72 year old woman with a history of recurrent syncope over 3 years who presented with repeated episodes of cardiac arrest due to bradycardia-dependent torsade de pointes (TdP), which continued long after possible triggers were eliminated. During these episodes a short coupling interval of the first tacycardia beat was also observed. The patient's stormy course was only controlled with pacing. She received a permanent dual-chamber pacemaker and prophylactically a beta-blocker was added. Over the subsequent 14 months she has remained completely asymptomatic.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

PubMed1997

Transvenous defibrillator systems implanted by electrophysiologists in the catheterization laboratory.

BACKGROUND: A significantly lower perioperative mortality has established the nonthoracotomy approach as the preferred technique in implantable cardioverter defibrillation (ICD) implantation. With the currently available transvenous endocardial leads in combination with the expanded use of biphasic ICD devices, the need for use of an additional subcutaneous lead has almost been eliminated. Thus, implantation of these systems has been simplified and reports have appeared in the literature that the procedure can now be performed by an electrophysiologist alone without surgical assistance in the electrophysiology or catheterization laboratory. HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility and safety of ICD implantation by an electrophysiologist in a procedure performed entirely in the catheterization laboratory without the assistance of a surgeon. METHODS: Over a period of 28 months, we implanted transvenous ICDs in 40 consecutive patients with (n = 34) and without (n = 6) use of general anesthesia in the catheterization laboratory with minor surgical assistance in abdominal pocket fashioning for the first two cases and then working alone for the remainder. The study included 36 men and 4 women, aged 59 +/- 12.5 years, with coronary artery (n = 22) or valvular heart disease (n = 4), cardiomyopathy (n = 12), and long QT syndrome (n = 1) or idiopathic ventricular tachycardia (n = 1), and a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 34%, who presented with ventricular tachycardia (n = 30) or ventricular fibrillation (n = 10). RESULTS: One-lead ICD systems (Endotak, n = 21; Transvene, n = 8; or EnGuard, n = 1) were used in 30 patients, and 2-lead (EnGuard, n = 5 or Transvene, n = 5) systems in 10 patients. Generators were implanted in an abdominal (n = 17) or pectoral (n = 23) pocket. Active can devices were employed in 17 patients. The defibrillation threshold averaged 9 J. All implants were entirely transvenous with no subcutaneous patch. Biphasic ICD devices were employed in all patients. There were three complications (8%); one pulmonary edema that responded to drug therapy, one lead insulation break that required reoperation on the third day, and one pocket hematoma in a patient receiving anticoagulation, with no need for evacuation. There were no operative deaths and no infections. After implant, patients were discharged at a mean of 3 days. All devices functioned well at predischarge testing. During follow-up (12 +/- 8 months), 20 patients received appropriate and 5 patients inappropriate shocks. Three patients died of pump failure at 3, 7, and 19 months, respectively; they had received 0, 42, and 15 appropriate shocks, respectively, over these months. Another patient succumbed to a myocardial infarction at 9 months. At 6 months, one patient developed subacute subclavian vein thrombosis which resolved with anticoagulation therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Current transvenous biphasic ICD systems allow experienced electrophysiologists to implant them safely alone in the catheterization laboratory without surgical assistance, even for abdominal implants, with a high success rate and no need for use of a subcutaneous patch.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

Thrombogenicity of radiofrequency lesions: results with serial D-dimer determinations.

OBJECTIVES: By measuring plasma levels of D-dimer, a product of fibrin degradation, we sought to investigate whether the application of radiofrequency (RF) energy might activate endogenous thrombotic mechanisms. BACKGROUND: Quantitative determination of D-dimer, a bio-chemical marker of thrombus formation and reactive fibrinolysis, helps to diagnose activation of the coagulation system. It remains controversial whether endocardial lesions produced during RF catheter ablation of arrhythmogenic foci have a thrombogenic effect, and the issue of the need for antithrombotic therapy after RF ablation is still unresolved. METHODS: We made serial determinations of plasma D-dimer levels by enzyme immunoassay before insertion of catheters, after completion of electrophysiologic study (EPS) but before RF ablation, immediately after RF ablation and before discharge (at 48 h) from the hospital in 37 patients undergoing RF ablation (22 men, 15 women; mean [+/-SD] age 37 +/- 18 years, range 12 to 74; 16 +/- 16 lesions produced) of accessory (n = 17) or slow (n = 12) pathways, atrial (n = 4) or ventricular foci (n = 3) or the atrioventricular node (n = 1). D-dimer levels were also measured in 26 age-matched control subjects undergoing EPS only. RESULTS: In the RF ablation group, the mean D-dimer levels increased from a baseline value of 29 +/- 28 to 62 +/- 56 micrograms/liter after EPS (p < 0.0001). However, after RF ablation, D-dimer levels increased to much higher levels (188 +/- 138 micrograms/liter, p < 0.0001). There was no correlation of D-dimer levels with the number of RF lesions produced or the duration of the procedure. At 48 h after the procedure, D-dimer levels decreased (75 +/- 67 micrograms/liter) but still remained significantly elevated compared with baseline values (p = 0.0001). Three were no significant differences in baseline (25 +/- 21 micrograms/liter) and post-EPS (51 +/- 50 micrograms/liter) measurements between control subjects and patients. During RF ablation, intravenous heparin was given to nine patients who still demonstrated high plasma D-dimer levels after RF ablation. CONCLUSIONS: As reflected by elevated plasma D-dimer levels, RF ablation has a thrombogenic effect that persists through 48 h after the procedure. This effect needs to be taken into account when considering antithrombotic therapy in patients undergoing RF ablation.

Adolescent↗