Biomedical subjects

J Cholewa

Publications and source records attributed to J Cholewa.

17 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1996

Long-term stability of atrophic ridges reconstructed with hydroxylapatite: a prospective study.

PURPOSE: This article reports the results of an investigation of the long-term efficacy and stability of reconstructive surgery of atrophic ridges using dense hydroxylapatite (HA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Subperiosteal HA was used as a first stage of reconstruction in 678 ridges, 645 mandibular and 35 maxillary, followed after 4 to 5 weeks by a total lowering of the floor of the mouth, vestibuloplasty, and skin graft in the mandible: a same-stage submucous vestibuloplasty was done in the maxilla. Patients were followed for an average of 5.3 +/- 2.7 years by the same surgical and prosthodontic team. The presence of severe or moderate radiographic change was analyzed in relation to gender, age, severity of atrophy, postoperative complications, clinical changes, patient satisfaction, and type of HA particles used alone or with a binder. RESULTS: Seventy-seven percent of cases had no observable radiographic changes, 13% had moderate changes, and 10% had severe changes, of which fewer than half also had severe clinical changes. Relationships were established between the presence of radiographic change and certain parameters, especially postoperative delay in healing, severe or moderate clinical changes, and type of HA particles used. CONCLUSION: Hydroxylapatite, when used alone or with binding agents, and in association with basic techniques of reconstructive surgery and soft tissue handling, is a predictable and stable biomaterial for ridge reconstruction.

Age Factors↗

PubMed1992

A comparative study of the efficacy and morbidity of five techniques for ridge augmentation of the mandible.

Severely atrophic mandibles were augmented in 254 patients using five different surgical procedures, followed by total lowering of the floor of the mouth, vestibuloplasty, and skin graft. Patients were evaluated on a long-term basis to compare efficacy of treatment subjectively by recording patient complaints and by objectively assessing ridge form clinically and radiographically. Patients, in general, were pleased with the short- and long-term results of all five procedures. The ideal ridge form, comma-shaped, was obtained at a much higher rate with the three procedures using hydroxylapatite (HA) alone or in combination with collagen (HA-PFC). Ridge height loss both anteriorly and posteriorly was more severe in the two visor groups with bone graft or with HA than in those with only the alloplast. Labial sensory alterations more frequently occurred in the visor bone graft group, and wound dehiscence and lack of skin graft take were seen most often in the HA-PFC groups. Despite great differences in the quality of ridges obtained and in the number of complications between the visor groups and the alloplast groups, general patient satisfaction with any of the five procedures could be explained by the severity of the original complaints and because muscle interference has been eliminated in all cases by lowering of the floor of the mouth.

Alveolar Ridge Augmentation↗

PubMed1989

Surgical and prosthodontic residual ridge reconstruction with hydroxyapatite.

The ultimate goal of a ridge augmentation procedure is to form a bearing surface for the denture that will provide stability, retention, and support. Residual ridge reconstruction with an implanted material must be based on an understanding of the variations of ridge atrophy. A problem-oriented classification describes the different forms of residual ridges. This classification of similar types of resorbed residual ridges can be used to establish a rational plan of treatment. The proper placement of hydroxyapatite is critical to obtain the desired reconstructed residual ridge. In the mandible, a lingualized placement of the alloplast is suggested. Careful use of an anatomic matrix to support and contain the hydroxyapatite particles eliminates the need for a splint. The surgical stage includes vestibuloplasty and skin grafting to provide the patient with an increased denture-bearing surface. The ridge created in the form of a comma posteriorly enhances retention and stability. The broad residual ridge with an improved interarch relation also enhances the support and provides a better foundation for balanced occlusion.

Alveolar Process↗

PubMed1987

Long-term results of mandibular ridge augmentation by visor osteotomy with bone graft.

Visor osteotomies of various designs, supplemented with illiac bone grafts, were used to augment 63 cases of severely atrophic mandibles. The rate of resorption measured on lateral cephalograms was 28% after four years, with the best performance by the full visor with peripheral bone graft (PA), and the worst by the short visor with onlayed bone graft posteriorly (PO). Ridge forms were usually inverted V-shaped or inverted U-shaped, but occasionally comma-shaped, the best form for providing retentive qualities for the denture. Only 39% were free of neurosensory problems. It was concluded that indications for such a procedure should be viewed in the light of frequent nerve injuries, adverses patterns of resorption for denture retention and newer and more effective methods for ridge augmentation using hydroxylapatite.

Alveolar Ridge Augmentation↗

PubMed1982

Mandibular ridge augmentation and resorption with various visor procedures.

Modifications of the visor osteotomy for ridge augmentation are presented. Cases treated by these methods were studied for bone augmentation and resorption by measurements made on lateral cephalometric headplates, and compared with other procedures using interpositional or rib onlay techniques. It was found that the modified visor procedures fulfilled the criteria for the ideal ridge augmentation technique better than the other methods. Their main advantage is that they use the bone available from the mandible itself, with only a secondary role for the bone graft material in most instances.

Alveolar Ridge Augmentation↗

PubMed1981