Biomedical subjects

J Christoforakis

Publications and source records attributed to J Christoforakis.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2001

An individualized approach for the implantation of a humeral prosthesis with the proper retroversion in fractures.

We applied a new methodology in 7 patients with a fracture of the upper humeral head that required hemiarthroplasty, to implant a humeral prosthesis with an individualized posterior version. Our goal was to determine preoperatively the distance from the posterior edge of the bicipital groove where the lateral fin of the humeral prosthesis should sit, in order to reproduce the individual retroversion during surgery. Using three computed tomography scan sections of the upper humerus and image processing software, we estimated the above-mentioned distance in the sound humerus and implanted the prosthesis in each patient accordingly. The differences in retroversion between the left and right humeral heads permit a better approximation to normal applying this methodology than inserting the prosthesis in a standard retroversion.

Humans↗

PubMed2001

Posterior compact Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation for occipitocervical, cervical and cervicothoracic fusion.

The authors report on 32 consecutive patients with instability at the craniocervical, cervical and cervicothoracic regions suffering from various pathologies, who were treated with posterior instrumentation and fusion using the posterior hooks-rods-plate cervical compact Cotrel-Dubousset (CCD) instrumentation alone or, in three patients, in combination with anterior operation. The patients were observed postoperatively for an average of 31 months (range 25-44 months) and evaluated both clinically and radiographically using the following parameters: spine anatomy and reconstruction, sagittal profile, neurologic status, functional level, complications and status of arthrodesis. All patients but one (who died) achieved a solid arthrodesis based on plain and flexion/extension roentgenograms. Cervical lordosis (skull-C7) and cervicothoracic kyphosis (C7-T2) was improved by instrumentation towards a physiological lateral curve by an average of 33% (P<0.05) and 28% (P<0.05) respectively. Anterior vertebral olisthesis was reduced in the craniocervical and cervicothoracic region, by 73% and 90% respectively. At final follow-up there was an improvement of the neurologic Frankel status by an average of 1.2 grades and of myelopathy in 75% of the operated patients. Good to excellent functional results were seen in 77% of the operated patients, while acute and chronic pain was reduced by an average of 2.4 grades, on a scale of 0-3, in operated patients. No neurovascular or pulmonary complications arose from surgery. There was no significant change in lateral spine profile and olisthesis at the latest follow-up evaluation. There were no instrument-related failures. One patient requested hardware removal in the hope of reducing postoperative pain in the cervicothoracic region. The poor and fair results were related to the lack of improvement of neurologic impairment and myelopathy. The results of this study demonstrate that cervical CCD instrumentation applied in the region of the skull to the upper thoracic region for various disorders is a simple and safe instrumentation that restores lateral spine alignment, improves the potential for a solid fusion and offers sufficient functional results in the vast majority of the operated patients. However, the use of hooks in spinal stenosis is contraindicated.

Adult↗

PubMed1998

Simultaneous double interphalangeal dislocation in a finger.

A rare case of simultaneous dorsal dislocation of both interphalangeal joints in a finger is presented. Review of reported cases revealed that this injury usually occurs on the ulnar side of the hand of young male athletes and has a good outcome with conservative treatment.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

The bicipital groove as a landmark for orientation of the humeral prosthesis in cases of fracture.

We studied 45 dry cadaveric humeri to determine whether the bicipital groove of the humerus can be used as a landmark for a proper, individualized orientation of a humeral prosthesis, especially in the case of a fracture. We performed 3 computed tomography sections (at a level just below the lower portion of the head, at the middle of the humeral head, and at a distance 5 cm below the first section), and we used special software for 3-dimensional image processing. To reproduce the individual posterior version of the head, when a humeral prosthesis is implanted for fracture, the lateral fin of the prosthesis should be a mean distance 5.2 +/- 2.6 mm (-1.5 to 10.7 mm) from the posterior edge of the bicipital groove. If the lateral fin of the humeral prosthesis seats just behind the posterior edge of the bicipital groove, a difference of -6.3 degrees to 41.7 degrees from the normal posterior version occurs. A new, simple methodology for an individualized posterior version of a humeral prosthesis in cases of fracture is proposed. We applied this in 6 consecutive patients with fracture of the humeral head that required hemiarthroplasty.

Cadaver↗