PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J D Brannan

Publications and source records attributed to J D Brannan.

16 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2007

Response to mannitol in asymptomatic subjects with airway hyper-responsiveness to methacholine.

BACKGROUND: Bronchial provocation using methacholine, a cholinergic agonist, causes airway narrowing directly by contraction of bronchial smooth muscle. While methacholine has a high sensitivity for identifying airway hyper-responsiveness (AHR), it does not have a high specificity to diagnose asthma and false-positive responses may be observed in non-asthmatics. Mannitol is an osmotic stimulus that acts indirectly to cause airway narrowing by release of endogenous bronchoconstricting mediators. OBJECTIVES: We tested the hypothesis that subjects with asymptomatic AHR to methacholine would not have AHR to mannitol. METHODS: Sixteen subjects with a methacholine PD(20) <8 micro mol were challenged with mannitol. A positive response to mannitol was defined as a 15% decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) after <635 mg (PD(15)). Expired nitric oxide (eNO) and blood eosinophils were also measured. RESULTS: The GM PD(20) for methacholine was 2.25 micro mol [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.19-5.29], the mean eNO was 14.7 p.p.b. (CI: 10.1-19.4) and the eosinophil count was 0.20 x 10(-9)/L (CI: 0.14-0.27 x 10(-9)/L). Only one subject (a smoker, 10 pack-years, FEV(1) 76% pred, non-allergic rhinitis, normal eNO and eosinophil count) also had a mild positive response to mannitol (PD(15): 451 mg). CONCLUSIONS: The response to mannitol was within the normal range in asymptomatic subjects with AHR to methacholine. Further evidence on the responsiveness to mannitol compared with methacholine in a random population sample is required to elucidate whether mannitol is a more specific test for diagnosing asthma.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Inhibition of mast cell PGD2 release protects against mannitol-induced airway narrowing.

Mannitol inhalation increases urinary excretion of 9alpha,11beta-prostaglandin F2 (a metabolite of prostaglandin D2 and marker of mast cell activation) and leukotriene E4. The present study tested the hypothesis that beta2-adrenoreceptor agonists and disodium cromoglycate (SCG) protect against mannitol-induced bronchoconstriction by inhibition of mast cell mediator release. Fourteen asthmatic subjects inhaled mannitol (mean dose 252+/-213 mg) in order to induce a fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of > or = 25%. The same dose was given 15 min after inhalation of formoterol fumarate (24 microg), SCG (40 mg) or placebo. Pre- and post-challenge urine samples were analysed by enzyme immunoassay for 9alpha,11beta-prostaglandin F2 and leukotriene E4. The maximum fall in FEV1 of 32+/-10% on placebo was reduced by 95% following formoterol and 63% following SCG. Following placebo, there was an increase in median urinary 9alpha,11beta-prostaglandin F2 concentration from 61 to 92 ng.mmol creatinine(-1), but no significant increase in 9alpha,11beta-prostaglandin F2 concentration in the presence of either formoterol (69 versus 67 ng.mmol creatinine(-1)) or SCG (66 versus 60 ng.mmol creatinine(-1)). The increase in urinary leukotriene E4 following placebo (from 19 to 31 ng.mmol creatinine(-1)) was unaffected by the drugs. These results support the hypothesis that the drug effect on airway response to mannitol is due to inhibition of mast cell prostaglandin D2 release.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Relationship between airway hyperresponsiveness to mannitol and adenosine monophosphate.

BACKGROUND: Assessment of airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) to indirect bronchoconstrictor stimuli is a useful noninvasive tool in the evaluation of asthma and its treatment. We investigated the putative relationship in AHR between inhaled adenosine monophosphate and mannitol. METHODS: Fifteen mild-to-moderate atopic asthmatics were evaluated. On two separate screening days, the threshold AMP concentration and threshold mannitol dose to provoke a given fall in FEV1 were measured. RESULTS: For AMP PC20vs. mannitol PD15, the Pearsons correlation coefficient was 0.80, P < 0.001. For AMP PC15vs. mannitol PD15 and AMP PC10vs. mannitol PD10 corresponding values were 0.83, P < 0.001 and 0.68, P = 0.005. CONCLUSIONS: There was a highly significant association between the threshold concentration of AMP and dose of mannitol causing a given fall in FEV1. Further studies are required to evaluate the relationship between inhaled mannitol and other surrogate inflammatory markers.

Adenosine Monophosphate↗
PubMed2003

Effects of mediator antagonism on mannitol and adenosine monophosphate challenges.

BACKGROUND: Airway hyper-responsiveness (AHR) to indirect stimuli is a useful non-invasive surrogate inflammatory marker in the evaluation of asthma, while histamine and cysteinyl leukotrienes are important inflammatory mediators. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate AHR to indirect bronchoconstrictor stimuli and time taken to recover following single doses of montelukast 10 mg and desloratadine 5 mg in combination, montelukast 10 mg alone and placebo. METHODS: Fifteen mild-to-moderate persistent asthmatics completed a randomized, double-blind, cross-over study. Patients received encapsulated montelukast 10 mg/desloratadine 5 mg combination, montelukast 10 mg alone and placebo, 10-14 h prior to challenge on two separate occasions. The mannitol threshold dose, AMP threshold concentration and recovery times after challenge were measured along with lung function. RESULTS: Compared to placebo, montelukast/desloratadine conferred improvements (P < 0.05) in adenosine monophosphate (AMP) threshold concentration and mannitol threshold dose: a 3.2-fold (95% CI 2.2-4.6) and 2.4-fold (95% CI 1.7-3.3) difference, respectively, while compared to montelukast this amounted to a 2.0-fold (95% CI 1.2-3.4) and 1.5-fold (95% CI 1.1-2.4) improvement, respectively. Montelukast was not significantly different from placebo. Both montelukast/desloratadine and montelukast compared to placebo, shortened recovery following both challenges (P < 0.05): a 27-min (95% CI 17-37) and 29-min (95% CI 20-36) reduction, respectively, for AMP, and a 27-min (95% CI 17-37) and 26-min (95% CI 17-35) reduction, respectively for mannitol. CONCLUSION: The dissociated effects of single doses of montelukast alone but not montelukast/desloratadine combination on AHR and recovery time, highlights the relative roles of histamine in initiating the bronchoconstrictor response and cysteinyl leukotrienes in sustaining it. Similar improvements in AHR and recovery time were observed following both indirect bronchoconstrictor stimuli.

Acetates↗
PubMed2003

Evidence of mast cell activation and leukotriene release after mannitol inhalation.

The aim of this study was to investigate if mannitol inhalation, as a model of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB), causes mast cell activation and release of mediators of bronchoconstriction. Urinary excretion of previously identified mediators of EIB was investigated in association with mannitol-induced bronchoconstriction. Twelve asthmatic and nine nonasthmatic subjects inhaled mannitol and urine was collected 60 min before and for 90 min after challenge. The urinary concentrations of leukotriene (LT)E4, the prostaglandin (PG)D2 metabolite and the mast cell marker 9alpha,11beta-PGF2 were measured by enzyme immunoassay. N(tau)-methylhistamine was measured by radioimmunoassay. In asthmatic subjects, inhalation of a mean+/-SEM dose of 272+/-56 mg mannitol induced a reduction in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of 34.5+/-2.1%. This was associated with increases in urinary 9alpha,11beta-PGF2 (91.9+/-8.2 versus 66.9+/-6.6 ng x mmol creatinine(-1), peak versus baseline) and LTE4 (51.3+/-7.5 versus 32.9+/-4.7). In nonasthmatic subjects, the reduction in FEV1 was 1.0+/-0.5% after inhaling 635 mg of mannitol. Although smaller than in the asthmatics, significant increases of urinary 9alpha,11beta-PGF2 (68.4+/-6.9 versus 56.0+/-5.8 ng x mmol creatinine(-1)) and LTE4 (58.5+/-5.3 versus 43.0+/-3.3 ng x mmol creatinine(-1)) were observed in the nonasthmatic subjects. There was also a small increase in urinary excretion of N(tau)-methylhistamine in the nonasthmatics, but not in the asthmatics. The increased urinary levels of 9alpha,11beta-prostaglandin F2 support mast cell activation with release of mediators following inhalation of mannitol. Increased bronchial responsiveness to the released mediators could explain the exclusive bronchoconstriction in asthmatic subjects.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Use of aerosols for bronchial provocation testing in the laboratory: where we have been and where we are going.

Bronchial provocation testing with pharmacological agents that act directly on airway smooth muscle has important limitations. These include the inability to identify exercise-induced asthma (EIA), to differentiate the airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) of airway remodelling from the AHR of active inflammation and to differentiate between doses of steroids. Recent studies show that tests that act indirectly to narrow airways are more sensitive than pharmacological agents for identifying airway inflammation and response to treatment. Adenosine monophosphate (AMP) is an indirect challenge that acts on mast cells to cause release of mediators. Hypertonic saline is another and, since its development in the 1980s, has become widely used in Australia. Hypertonic (4.5%) saline is used to identify those with active asthma, those with EIA and those who wish to enter certain occupations or sports (e.g., diving). The recent development, again in Australia, of a test that uses dry powder mannitol has promise for use in the laboratory, the office, or for testing in the field. AHR to mannitol identifies people with EIA and is an estimate of its severity. The mannitol response is modified by drugs used to prevent EIA, implying that similar mediators are involved. A mannitol test can be used to monitor response to steroids and is more sensitive than histamine for identifying persistent airway hyperresponsiveness in asthmatics well controlled on steroids. These findings suggest that indirect challenges give more useful clinical information about currently active asthma and the response to treatment than direct challenge and they will become more widely used.

Aerosols↗
PubMed2001

Laboratory protocol for exercise asthma to evaluate salbutamol given by two devices.

PURPOSE: As new delivery devices and formulations are being introduced for drugs given by inhalation, there is a need to evaluate their equivalence with old preparations. One way to do this is to investigate their equivalence in protecting from exercise-induced asthma (EIA). METHODS: We used a protocol for EIA to compare the protective effect of salbutamol delivered by the pressurised metered dose inhaler (pMDI) and the new Diskus dry powder device. Twenty-seven asthmatic subjects with moderately severe EIA completed an exercise test on four separate days at two study centers. Exercise was performed by cycling for 8 min while inhaling dry air (0% RH, 20-24 degrees C). The target workload in W was predicted as (53.76 x predicted FEV1) - 11.07 and 95% of this target was achieved at 4 min of exercise. This target was chosen in order to achieve ventilation between 50 and 60% of predicted maximum in the last 4 min. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the workload, ventilation, or heart rate achieved on the study days. The severity of EIA was measured as the % fall in FEV1. EIA severity was similar on the placebo and control day and the coefficient of variation was 19.4%. The mean +/- SD % fall on the control, placebo, salbutamol by Diskus, and pMDI were 42.0% +/- 15, 39.4% +/-17.6, 13.4% +/- 13.2, and 8.5% +/- 13.8, respectively. Salbutamol significantly inhibited the % fall in FEV1 after exercise, and there was no difference between the preparations. CONCLUSION: The protocol described here is suitable for evaluating equivalence of salbutamol preparations in protecting against EIA and could be used to evaluate the protective effect of other medications.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2001

Predictive markers of asthma exacerbation during stepwise dose reduction of inhaled corticosteroids.

To determine predictors for failed reduction of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), in 50 subjects with well-controlled asthma (age 43.7 [18-69]; 22 males) taking a median dose of 1,000 microg ICS/d (100-3,600 microg/d), ICS were halved every 8 wk. Airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) to a bronchial provocation test (BPT) with histamine was measured at baseline. AHR to BPT with mannitol, spirometry, exhaled nitric oxide (eNO), and, in 31 subjects, sputum inflammatory cells were measured at baseline and at monthly intervals. Thirty-nine subjects suffered an asthma exacerbation. Seven subjects were successfully weaned off ICS. Using a Kaplan- Meier survival analysis, the significant predictors of a failure of ICS reduction were being hyperresponsive to both histamine and mannitol at baseline (p = 0.039), and being hyperresponsive to mannitol during the dose-reduction phase of the study (p = 0.02). Subjects older than 40 yr of age tended to be at greater risk of ICS reduction failure (p = 0.059). Response to mannitol and percentage sputum eosinophils were significantly greater before a failed ICS reduction than before the last successful ICS reduction, whereas there were no significant differences in symptoms, spirometry, or eNO. These findings suggest that documentation of patient's AHR or sputum eosinophils may be useful in guiding the reduction of ICS doses.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Fexofenadine decreases sensitivity to and montelukast improves recovery from inhaled mannitol.

We studied, separately, the effects of the histamine antagonist, fexofenadine hydrochloride, and the leukotriene antagonist, montelukast sodium, and their placebos on airway sensitivity to and recovery from inhaled mannitol in subjects with asthma. Two 180-mg doses of fexofenadine were taken over 14 h, and three 10-mg doses of montelukast over 36 h, with the last dose 5 h before challenge. Fexofenadine reduced sensitivity to mannitol and the PD(15) was (mean [95% confidence interval] 138 [95, 201]) mg versus placebo (51 [25, 106] mg) (p < 0.001). The final percent reduction in FEV(1) with fexofenadine was 20.8 +/- 5.4% and not different from placebo (20.1 +/- 5.3%) (p = 0.7); however, recovery was slower with fexofenadine compared with placebo (p < 0.001). By contrast, montelukast had no effect on sensitivity to mannitol and the PD(15) was 71 [36, 144] mg versus placebo (87 [51, 148] mg (p = 0.35). The total dose of mannitol delivered and the final percent reduction in FEV(1) with montelukast were 171 +/- 142 mg and 21 +/- 4% and for placebo were 182 +/- 144 mg and 20 +/- 5% (p = 0.35, p = 0.59, respectively). However, recovery of FEV(1) to baseline was faster with montelukast, with the area under the percent reduction FEV(1)-versus-time curve reduced (220 +/- 121% change.min) compared with placebo (513 +/- 182% change.min) (p < 0.001). We conclude that whereas histamine is important for the initial airway response, leukotrienes are important in sustaining the airway response to inhaled mannitol.

Acetates↗
PubMed2001

Markers of airway inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness in patients with well-controlled asthma.

In steroid-naive asthmatics, airway hyperresponsiveness correlates with noninvasive markers of airway inflammation. Whether this is also true in steroid-treated asthmatics, is unknown. In 31 stable asthmatics (mean age 45.4 yrs, range 22-69; 17 females) taking a median dose of 1,000 microg inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) per day (range 100-3,600 microg x day(-1)), airway responsiveness to the "direct" agent histamine and to the "indirect" agent mannitol, lung function (forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), peak expiratory flow (PEF)), exhaled nitric oxide (eNO), and number of inflammatory cells in induced sputum as a percentage of total cell count were measured. Of the 31 subjects, 16 were hyperresponsive to mannitol and 11 to histamine. The dose-response ratio (DRR: % fall in FEV1/cumulative dose) to both challenge tests was correlated (r=0.59, p=0.0004). However, DRR for histamine and DRR for mannitol were not related to basic lung function, eNO, per cent sputum eosinophils and ICS dose. In addition, NO was not related to basic lung function and per cent sputum eosinophils. In clinically well-controlled asthmatics taking inhaled corticosteroids, there is no relationship between markers of airway inflammation (such as exhaled nitric oxide and sputum eosinophils) and airway responsiveness to either direct (histamine) or indirect (mannitol) challenge. Airway hyperresponsiveness in clinically well-controlled asthmatics appears to be independent of eosinophilic airway inflammation.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Inhaled mannitol identifies methacholine-responsive children with active asthma.

Inhaled mannitol has been developed for bronchial challenge testing in adults. This study determined if mannitol could identify children with active asthma and responsive to methacholine, and whether mannitol challenge was faster to complete than methacholine challenge. Twenty-five children (aged 6-13 years) responsive to methacholine and 10 nonasthmatic children unresponsive to methacholine were studied. The methacholine challenge (Cockcroft protocol) was followed by a mannitol challenge on separate days. Twenty-one asthmatic children were positive to mannitol. Three taking inhaled corticosteroids with borderline methacholine responsiveness did not respond to mannitol, and one could not complete the mannitol challenge due to cough. The geometric mean (GM) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for PD(15) for mannitol was 39 mg (19, 78), and PC(20) for methacholine was 0.6 mg/mL (0.35-1.02) (r(p) = 0.75, p < 0.001, n = 21). Responses to mannitol were repeatable: GM PD(15) for the first challenge was 29 mg (CI: 17,50), and for the second challenge, 33 mg (CI: 20, 55) (P = 0.44, n = 9). Mannitol was faster to administer than methacholine (median (range)) 14 min (5-32) vs. 29 min (19-49), respectively (P < 0.001). Time to recover to baseline FEV(1) spontaneously and after bronchodilator administration was similar for both challenges. There were no significant falls in arterial oxygen saturations. During mannitol challenge, the mean (SD) fall in FEV(1) in nonasthmatic children was 3.1% (2.9). We conclude that mannitol identifies children with airway hyperresponsiveness and is faster to perform than the methacholine challenge.

Asthma↗
PubMed2000

Nedocromil sodium inhibits responsiveness to inhaled mannitol in asthmatic subjects.

Nedocromil sodium inhibits the response to exercise-induced asthma (EIA). Mannitol given as a powder by inhalation is an osmotic stimulus that identifies EIA. We studied the acute effect of nedocromil on airway responsiveness to mannitol in 24 asthmatic subjects. After a control day, nedocromil (8 mg) or its placebo was administered randomized, double blind, 10 min before a challenge with progressively increasing doses of mannitol. Nedocromil inhibited the response to mannitol and there was a significant increase in the dose of mannitol required to cause a 15% reduction in FEV(1) (PD(15)) after nedocromil 409 (316,503) mg compared with placebo 156 (106,229) mg (p < 0.001). In the presence of nedocromil 12 subjects no longer recorded a 15% decrease in FEV(1) in response to mannitol. The remaining 12 required a significantly greater dose of mannitol to achieve a 15% decrease in FEV(1) after nedocromil. Following nedocromil, a plateau in responsiveness to mannitol was observed in 14 subjects. Nedocromil significantly inhibits the responsiveness to inhaled mannitol in asthmatic subjects.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed1998

Responsiveness to mannitol in asthmatic subjects with exercise- and hyperventilation-induced asthma.

We investigated airway responsiveness to mannitol, a new hyperosmolar challenge, in persons hyperresponsive to airway drying. We studied 36 asthmatic subjects, 18 to 40 yr of age, responsive to exercise (n = 23) and eucapnic hyperventilation (n = 28) defined by a 10% fall in FEV1. Fifteen subjects performed both challenges. All subjects performed a challenge with dry powder mannitol, encapsulated and delivered via a Dinkihaler until a 15% decrease in FEV1 was documented or a cumulative dose of 635 mg was delivered. All subjects responsive to eucapnic hyperventilation and all but one subject responsive to exercise were responsive to mannitol. Sixty-nine percent of subjects had a positive response to mannitol after less than 155 mg (6 capsules) and 94% less than 320 mg (10 capsules). The provoking dose of mannitol required to cause a 15% fall in FEV1 (PD15) was related to the severity of the response to exercise (Pearson's correlation coefficient [rp] = 0.68, p < 0.01) and eucapnic hyperventilation (rp = 0.68, p < 0.01) in subjects who were not taking inhaled corticosteroids. The mean (+/- SD) maximum percent fall in FEV1 after mannitol was 24.4 +/- 6.2% and recovery to bronchodilator occurred within 10 min in most subjects. The mannitol test is simple, inexpensive, faster to perform than hyperpnea with dry air and could become an office-based test. Further studies are now required to determine the sensitivity of mannitol to identify exercise-induced asthma in a random population.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

Inhalation of dry-powder mannitol increases mucociliary clearance.

Inhalation of hypertonic saline stimulates mucociliary clearance (MCC) in healthy subjects and those with obstructive lung disease. We investigated the effect of inhaling the osmotic agent mannitol on MCC. We used a dry-powder preparation of mannitol British Pharmacopea (BP) which was encapsulated and delivered using a Dinkihaler. MCC was measured for 75 min in six asthmatic and six healthy subjects on two occasions before and after the mannitol inhalation or its control, using 99mTc-sulphur colloid and a gamma camera. The inhaled dose of mannitol was 267+/-171 mg (mean+/-SD) and 400 mg and the percentage fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) was 22+/-3 and 4+/-2% in the asthmatic and healthy subjects, respectively. The total clearance in the whole right lung for the 60 min from the start of inhalation of mannitol was greater by 263+/-11.9% in the asthmatic and 18.1+/-4.9% in the healthy subjects compared to the control. The total clearance over 75 min was 54.7+/-9.6% and 33.6+/-9.4% on the mannitol and control day (p<0.002), respectively, in the asthmatic subjects and 40.5+/-7.1% and 24.8+/-7.8% (p<0.002) in the healthy subjects. In conclusion, inhalation of dry-powder mannitol increases mucociliary clearance in asthmatic and healthy subjects and may benefit patients with abnormal mucociliary clearance.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A computer simulation for the entry-level RN: enhancing clinical decision making.

Staff development educators struggle to prepare today's entry-level RN for effective decision making in a new healthcare climate that demands both skill and expertise with patients with high acuity levels. The clinical decision making simulator is an innovative approach to teaching and learning decision-making skills. The authors discuss the development and use of a computer simulation that provides repeated opportunities for clinical decision making for the newly licensed nurse without jeopardizing patient safety.

Clinical Competence↗