PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J D Briggs

Publications and source records attributed to J D Briggs.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

The epidemic of aging in renal replacement therapy: an update on elderly patients and their outcomes.

BACKGROUND: In the past 2 decades, a rapid growth has occurred in the number of patients over 65 years of age accepted for renal replacement therapy (RRT) with an increasing need for dialysis resources as a consequence. The aim of this study is to describe the trends in incidence, treatment and outcome of RRT of these elderly patients included in the new ERA-EDTA Registry database. METHODS: Data from 6 national renal registries have been included for the period 1985 - 1999, comprising data of 18,920 elderly patients starting RRT. We used Cox-proportional hazards regression to predict patient and technique survival. RESULTS: The incidence and prevalence of RRT showed a 4- to 5-fold increase over the period, resulting in 48% of the new patients being older than 65 years in 1999. However, the rates varied considerably between countries. The 2-year patient survival was 51% in dialysis patients. Mortality due to social causes increased with age. Multivariate analysis showed no change with time in patient survival on dialysis, but the risk of death following a first renal allograft between 1995 and 1999 was reduced by 31%, compared with the 1985 - 1989 time period (RR 0.69; 95% CI: 0.54 - 0.90). The relative risk of peritoneal dialysis technique failure was more than doubled in the 1995 - 1999 cohort compared to the 1985 - 1989 cohort (RR 2.38; 95% CI: 1.89 - 3.01), with the highest technique failure rate in the first 2 years of the 1995 - 1999 cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The number of elderly patients receiving RRT is rising rapidly. Patient survival on dialysis has been stable over the last 15 years, whereas transplant outcome has improved. The increased peritoneal dialysis technique failure and the high mortality due to social causes in the elderly age groups require further investigation. The challenge of the years ahead is to provide this life-prolonging therapy to all patients who need it in such a way that it improves quality of life and at a cost that a society can afford.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2002

Biocompatible membranes do not promote graft recovery following cadaveric renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Controversy surrounds the role of biocompatible membrane dialyzers in treatment of acute renal failure. Studies that have shown a benefit have involved critically ill patients where renal recovery and patient mortality are influenced by other comorbid disease. The aim of the present work is to clarify this issue in a more homogeneous population of patients with acute renal failure following cadaveric renal transplantation. METHODS: All patients with delayed graft function between January 1996 and February 1998 were randomized to receive either a biocompatible (BCM, polysulfone) membrane or bioincompatible (BICM, cuprophane) membrane for dialysis until onset of graft function. RESULTS: Forty-one patients were randomized, 23 to receive BCM and 18 BICM. Five patients (2 BCM, 3 BICM; p = NS) with primary non-function of graft were excluded from analysis, leaving 36 cases of acute tubular necrosis (ATN). Patient and donor characteristics were similar in both groups. The BCM group had significantly longer periods of dialysis dependency compared to the BICM group (14 vs 10 days; p = 0.03). There was a tendency towards higher serum creatinine levels in the short term in the BCM group (318 vs 164 micromol/l at 1 month (p = 0.1), 190 vs 169 micromol/l at latest visit (p = 0.07)) and a greater number of acute rejection episodes in the BCM group (3.7 vs 1.7 episodes per 100 days of dialysis dependency, p = 0.1). With an intention-to-treat analysis of all 41 patients originally randomized, there was no significant difference in time to graft recovery between the 2 groups (p = 0.18). CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of ARF posttransplantation, we have found no evidence to support the use of biocompatible membranes for dialysis. Rather, our study provides argument against a large benefit for the use of BCM in the recovery of ARF, as suggested by earlier studies.

Acute Kidney Injury↗
PubMed2001

The impact of late acute rejection after cadaveric kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Acute graft rejection (AR) following renal transplantation results in reduced graft survival. However, there is uncertainty regarding the definition, aetiology and long-term graft and patient outcome of AR occurring late in the post-transplant period. AIM: To determine if rejection episodes can be classified by time from transplantation by their impact on graft survival into early acute rejection (EAR) and late acute rejection (LAR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 687 consecutive adult renal transplant recipients who received their first cadaveric renal transplant at a single centre. All received cyclosporine (CyA)-based immunosuppression, from 1984 to 1996, with a median follow-up of 6.9 yr. Details were abstracted from clinical records, with emphasis on age, sex, co-morbid conditions, HLA matching, rejection episodes, patient and graft survival. ANALYSIS: Patients were classified by the presence and time to AR from the date of transplantation. Using those patients who had no AR (NAR) as a baseline, we determined the relative risk of graft failure by time to rejection. The characteristics of patients who had no rejection, EAR and LAR were compared. RESULTS: Compared with NAR, the risk of graft failure was higher for those patients who suffered a rejection episode. A much higher risk of graft failure was seen when the first rejection episode occurred after 90 d. Thus, a period of 90 d was taken to separate EAR and LAR (relative risk of 3.06 and 5.27 compared with NAR as baseline, p<0.001). Seventy-eight patients (11.4%) had LAR, 271 (39.4%) had EAR and 338 (49.2%) had NAR. The mean age for each of these groups differed (LAR 39.6 yr, EAR 40.8 yr compared with NAR 44 yr, p<0.003). The 5-yr graft survival for those who had LAR was 45% and 10-yr survival was 28%. HLA mismatches were more frequent in those with EAR vs. NAR (zero mismatches in HLA-A: 36 vs. 24%, HLA-B: 35 vs. 23% and HLA-DR: 63 vs. 41%, p<0.003). There was no difference in mismatching frequency between NAR and LAR. CONCLUSIONS: AR had a deleterious impact on graft survival, particularly if occurring after 90 d. AR episodes should therefore be divided into early and late phases. In view of the very poor graft survival associated with LAR, it is important to gain further insight into the main aetiological factors. Those such as suboptimal CyA blood levels and non-compliance with medication should be further investigated with the aim of developing more effective immunosuppressive regimens in order to reduce the incidence of LAR.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2001

Renal replacement therapy in Europe: the results of a collaborative effort by the ERA-EDTA registry and six national or regional registries.

BACKGROUND: In June 2000 a new ERA-EDTA Registry Office was opened in Amsterdam. This Registry will only collect core data on renal replacement therapy (RRT) through national and regional registries. This paper reports the technical and epidemiological results of a pilot study combining the data from six registries. METHODS: Data from the national renal registries of Austria, Finland, French-Belgium, The Netherlands, Norway, and Scotland were combined. Patients starting RRT between 1980 and 1999 (n=57371) were included in the analyses. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to predict survival. RESULTS: The use of different coding systems for ESRD treatment by the registries made it difficult to merge the data. Incidence and prevalence of RRT showed a continuous increase with a marked variation in rates between countries. The 2-, 5- and 10-year patient survival was 67, 35 and 11% in dialysis patients and 90, 81 and 64% after a first renal allograft. Multivariate analysis showed a slightly better survival on dialysis in the 1990-1994 (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.90-0.98) and the 1995-1999 cohort (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.84-0.92) compared to the 1980-1984 cohort. In contrast, there was a much greater improvement in transplant-patient survival, resulting in a 56% reduction in the risk of death within the 1995-1999 cohort (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.39-0.50) compared to the 1980-1984 cohort. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides support for the feasibility of a "new style" ERA-EDTA registry and the collection of data is now being extended to other countries. The improvement in patient survival over the last two decades has been much greater in transplant recipients than in dialysis patients.

Austria↗
PubMed2000

Renal transplantation in the UK and Republic of Ireland.

RENAL TRANSPLANT OUTCOME: Analysis of 5-year transplant survival in the UK showed a number of significant factors influencing outcome of adult cadaveric renal transplantation. Data from 5,963 first grafts and 1,078 regrafts carried out between 1990-1997 showed year of graft, recipient age and diabetes, donor age, kidney exchange between centres and HLA matching to influence 5-year outcome. The most important prognostic factor was donor age: the risk of transplant failure within 5 years for grafts using kidneys from donors aged 60 years and over was double that of grafts using donors aged 18-34 years. Unlike the effect of donor age, the influence of HLA matching would appear to be diminishing with time. In contrast to transplants in the 1980's, the difference in 5-year transplant survival between 000 mismatched and favourably matched (100, 010 or 110 mismatched) transplants is no longer significant. An analysis of posttransplant survival for first grafts in different epochs (0-3 months, 3 months to 3 years and beyond 3 years) showed that one factor affected short-term outcome (exchange of kidneys between centres), whereas others affected outcome throughout the epochs (most notably donor age, recipient age and recipient diabetes). RECIPIENT AND DONOR AGE MATCHING: The mean recipient age in the UK and Republic of Ireland increased by 5 years between 1981-1990 but has remained at approximately 45 years since then. The mean donor age increased by 7 years to 42.5 years (s.e. 0.5) between 1981-1991 and since then has increased at a slower rate to 43.4 years (s.e. 0.5) in 1998. The mean donor-recipient age difference for more than 15,000 transplants carried out between 1990-1998 has decreased, primarily due to increasing donor age over this time. However, the introduction of a new Kidney Allocation Scheme in the UK in July 1998, part of which is aimed at minimising age differences, has increased the likelihood that recipients aged over 60 years will be allocated grafts from donors closer to their own age than previously. The new UK Kidney Allocation Scheme also gave children increased access to well-matched adult organs leading to an increased mean age difference for this group between July-December 1998. DONOR AND RECIPIENT HLA MATCHING: Modifications to the Kidney Allocation Scheme introduced in January 1997 with the aim of increasing the number of well-matched transplants has led to a rise in 000 mismatched grafts from 5% to 7% and favourably matched (100/010/110 mismatches) from 29% to 36% between 1990-1992 and 1996-1998. Over this same time the proportion of 2 DR-mismatched grafts has decreased from 10% to 4%. The revised Kidney Allocation Scheme implemented in July 1998 gave a further increase in priority to 000 mismatches, increasing the proportion of these transplants to 12% for the last half of 1998, a level which has been maintained since then.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Analysis of factors that affect outcome of primary cadaveric renal transplantation in the UK. HLA Task Force of the Kidney Advisory Group of the United Kingdom Transplant Support Service Authority (UKTSSA)

BACKGROUND: In the UK, kidneys are exchanged between centres on the basis of matching for HLA. We analysed various factors that might affect graft outcome to establish whether exchange of kidneys on this basis remains valid. METHODS: 6363 primary cadaveric renal transplants carried out in 23 centres in the UK between 1986 and 1993 were used in the analysis. 6338 (99.6%) patients who underwent transplantation were followed up at 1 year. 5-year follow-up data were available for 2907 (97.8%) of the 2972 patients who survived to 5 years. We made random checks to validate the data. A multifactorial analysis with Cox's proportional hazards models was used to analyse factors that had a possible effect on graft outcome. To ensure that the analysis of matching was constant during the 8-year study, our analysis was based on the HLA antigens used for organ exchange (11 A locus antigens, 27 B locus antigens, and 12 DR locus antigens). We assessed overall outcome at 5 years and during three periods after transplantation at: 0-3 months, 3-36 months, and after 36 months. FINDINGS: The following factors were significantly associated with graft outcome in the multifactorial analysis: year of graft, age of donor, age of recipient, whether the recipient had diabetes, cause of donor's death, cold ischaemic time, transport of kidneys, transplant centre, and matching for HLA. The best outcome was achieved with kidneys that had no mismatches at HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-DR loci (000 mismatches). The next most favourable outcome was achieved with one mismatch at either A or B loci or one mismatch at both the A and B , but no mismatch at the DR locus (100, 010, or 110 mismatches). Age of the donor and recipient had a significant effect on transplant outcome: older age was associated with increased risk of graft failure. INTERPRETATION: Various factors affect the outcome of primary cadaveric renal transplantation, particularly the age of the donor and the recipient. However, the effect of matching for HLA remains a strong one and fully justifies the continuing policy in the UK of exchanging kidneys on the basis of HLA matching, especially to recipients when there is a 000 mismatch for HLA between donor and recipient. On the basis of this analysis, a new allocation scheme for kidneys was introduced in the UK in 1998. During the first 9 months of the scheme, there has been a doubling of the number of HLA-000 mismatched kidneys transplanted.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Early graft function and patient survival following cadaveric renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The influence of events that occur early following renal transplantation such as delayed graft function (DGF) and acute rejection on long-term graft survival has been widely reported, but its association with patient survival has received less attention. METHODS: We studied 589 patients who received their first cadaveric transplants between 1984 and 1993, all of whom received cyclosporine-based immunosuppression and who had a median follow-up of seven years. The following factors were identified, and both univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine their association with long-term patient and graft survival: age, sex, duration of pretransplant dialysis, primary renal disease, immediate graft function (IGF), DGF, primary nonfunction (PNF), acute rejection, and serum creatinine at 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: Patients with PNF had a poorer survival than those with DGF and IGF (P = 0.01), but there was no difference in survival between DGF and IGF (P = 0.54). Good graft function (serum creatinine of less than 200 mumol/liter) at three months was predictive of better long-term patient survival (P = 0.03). Other factors associated with poor patient outcome were older age, diabetes, adult polycystic kidney disease, male gender, and acute rejection. Cardiovascular disease was the most common cause of death (51.8%). Good graft function at three months (P < 0.001) and an absence of rejection episodes (P = 0.01) were associated with better graft survival. CONCLUSION: Patients with poor levels of early graft function (but not DGF) and those with either acute rejection episodes or early graft loss are at an increased risk of early death. These high-risk groups should be targeted for interventional studies in an attempt to improve patient survival.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Deaths within 90 days from starting renal replacement therapy in the ERA-EDTA Registry between 1990 and 1992.

BACKGROUND: Patients who die within 90 days of commencing renal replacement therapy (RRT) may be recorded by some centres and not others, and hence data on mortality and survival may not be comparable. However, it is essential to compare like with like when analysing differences between modalities, centres and registries. It was decided, therefore, to look at the incidence of deaths within 90 days in the ERA-EDTA Registry, and to try to define the characteristics of this group of patients. METHODS: Between 1 January 1990 and 31 December 1992, 78 534 new patients started RRT in 28 countries affiliated to the ERA-EDTA Registry. Their mean age was 54 years and 31% were over 65 years old. Eighty-two per cent of the patients received haemodialysis (HD), 16% peritoneal dialysis (PD) and 2% had preemptive transplantation as first mode of treatment. RESULTS: From January 1990 to March 1993 the overall incidence of deaths was 19% and 4% of all patients died within 90 days from the start of RRT. Among those dying within 90 days 59% were over 65 years compared to 53% over 65 years in those dying beyond this time (P<0.0001). The modality of RRT did not influence the distribution of deaths before and after 90 days. Vascular causes and malignancy were more common in those dying after 90 days, while there were more cardiac and social causes among the early deaths. Mortality from social causes was twice as common in the elderly, who had a significantly higher chance of dying from social causes within 90 days compared to those aged under 65 years. The overall incidence of deaths within 90 days was 3.9% but there was a wide variation between countries, from 1.8% to 11.4%. Finally, patient survival at 2 years was markedly influenced in different age groups when deaths within 90 days were taken into account. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of deaths within 90 days from the start of RRT was 3.9%, with a marked variation between countries ranging from 1.8% to 11.4%, which probably reflects mainly differences in reporting these deaths, although variable selection criteria for RRT may contribute. Deaths within 90 days were significantly more frequent in elderly patients with more early deaths resulting from cardiac and social causes, while vascular causes of death and malignancy were more common in those dying after 90 days. Patient survival analyses should take into account deaths within 90 days from the start of RRT, particularly when comparing results between modalities, countries and registries.

Adolescent↗