Biomedical subjects

J D Chester

Publications and source records attributed to J D Chester.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Novel urothelium specific gene expression identified by differential display reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction.

PURPOSE: Understanding the molecular basis of differential gene expression among different tissues at various developmental stages and in neoplastic transformation is an important biological goal. The potential clinical applications of this improved understanding are more precise diagnosis of disease, prediction of prognosis, novel targeted therapies and prediction of response to therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Differential display reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction was used to compare gene expression in bovine urothelium to that in autologous lung, esophagus, liver and spleen. Products that appeared to have urothelial specific expression were sequenced and assessed for homology with known sequences. Ribonuclease protection assays were used to further confirm the expression pattern. RESULTS: A total of 32 discrete cDNAs were identified, including 3 products from genes known to be urothelium specific in their expression, 16 with significant homology to bovine, human or mouse expressed sequence tags and 5 with no sequence homology to any currently available sequence. Urothelium specific mRNA expression was confirmed for 3 genes by ribonuclease protection assays and one (Udd06) was further characterized as a urea transporter. CONCLUSIONS: The use of differential display reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and other complementary techniques for parallel gene expression analysis will permit the complete characterization of the urothelial transcriptome and help identify potential molecular targets for rationally targeted therapy.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Transcriptional control of the human urothelial-specific gene, uroplakin Ia.

The transcriptional control elements of tissue-specific genes may be exploited in the design of therapeutic constructs for use in human gene therapy. The uroplakins are a family of four proteins which form the asymmetric unit membrane of the urothelium. We have cloned the human uroplakin Ia gene and defined its genomic structure and transcriptional start site. Using quantitative RT-PCR in an extended panel of normal tissues, we have demonstrated highly urothelial-specific expression of this gene. A Dual-Luciferase assay was used to assess the transcriptional activity of a variety of promoter fragments of the human uroplakin Ia gene. A highly specific promoter fragment (consisting of 2147 bp of 5'-flanking sequence, intron 1 and the 5' UTR) was identified which regulated urothelial-specific expression in vitro. The human uroplakin Ia promoter identified has potential use in future gene therapy strategies to restrict transgene expression to the urothelium.

5' Flanking Region↗

PubMed2003

Adenovirus-mediated gene therapy for bladder cancer: efficient gene delivery to normal and malignant human urothelial cells in vitro and ex vivo.

Existing local therapies for superficial transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the bladder have limited success in preventing progression to life-threatening, muscle-invasive disease, and novel therapies are needed. Recent studies have raised doubts concerning the feasibility of adenovirus-mediated gene therapy for bladder cancer. We have therefore investigated adenoviral transduction of normal and malignant human urothelial cells, both as primary cultures and in intact epithelium. All 15 primary normal human urothelial cell lines tested were transduced in vitro by Adv-cmv-beta-gal at high efficiency, and better than most human TCC cell lines. Eight primary human TCC explants were also successfully transduced. In contrast, in intact normal urothelium, transduction efficiency was lower, and occurred only in superficial epithelial layers. Expression of the hCAR adenovirus receptor, however, occurred throughout the full thickness of urothelium. Transduction of human TCC biopsy specimens was at least as efficient as intact normal urothelium.We demonstrate for the first time that adenoviral transduction of both normal and malignant human urothelial cells is feasible. A physical barrier, rather than hCAR status, may be the main determinant of transduction of intact epithelium. Clinical trials of adenovirus-mediated gene therapy for superficial bladder cancer are warranted.

Adenoviruses, Human↗

PubMed2002

A 'modified de Gramont' regimen of fluorouracil, alone and with oxaliplatin, for advanced colorectal cancer.

The standard de Gramont (dG) regimen of fortnightly leucovorin, bolus fluorouracil and 22-h infusion of fluorouracil, d1+2, and the same regimen plus oxaliplatin, are effective but also cumbersome. We therefore present simplified 'Modified de Gramont' (MdG) regimens. Forty-six advanced gastrointestinal cancer patients entered a dose-exploring study of MdG, including an expanded cohort of colorectal cancer patients at optimum dose. Treatment (fortnightly) comprised: 2-h i.v.i. leucovorin (350 mg d,l-LV or 175 mg l-LV, not adjusted for patient surface area); bolus fluorouracil (400 mg m(-2)), then ambulatory 46-h fluorouracil infusion (2000-3600 mg m(-2), cohort escalation). Subsequently, 62 colorectal patients (25 unpretreated; 37 fluorouracil-resistant) received MdG plus oxaliplatin (OxMdG) 85 mg m(-2). Fluorouracil pharmacokinetics during MdG were compared with dG. The optimum fluorouracil doses for MdG alone were determined as 400 mg m(-2) bolus + 2800 mg m(-2) 46-h infusion. A lower dose of 400 mg m(-2) bolus + 2400 mg m(-2) infusion which, like dG produces minimal toxicity, was chosen for the OxMdG combination. Fluorouracil exposure (AUC(0-48 h)) at this lower dose is equivalent to dG. With OxMdG, grade 3-4 toxicity was rare (neutropenia 2.8% cycles; vomiting or diarrhoea <1% cycles), but despite this there were two infection-associated deaths. Oxaliplatin was omitted for cumulative neurotoxicity in 17 out of 62 patients. Objective responses in colorectal cancer patients were: 1st-line MdG (22 assessable): PR=36%, NC=32%, PD=32%. 1st-line OxMdG (24 assessable): CR/PR=72%; NC=20%; PD=8%; 2nd line OxMdG (34 assessable): PR=12%; NC=38%; PD=50%. MdG and OxMdG are convenient and well-tolerated. OxMdG was particularly active as 1st-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. Both regimens are being further evaluated in the current UK MRC phase III trial.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2001

Management of lymphoma patients in a cancer unit: an audit of 15 years' experience in a district general hospital.

The objectives were to analyse data obtained in a district general hospital medical oncology unit over a 15-year period, and to provide a comparator for standards of care for lymphoma patients in new cancer units. Prospectively collected data were analysed on 208 consecutive patients presenting with lymphoma, on an 'all-comers' basis, between 1981 and 1996. Treatment was with radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy, according to local protocols. The outcome measure was survival from the date of diagnosis. The 5-year actuarial survival was 72.7% for Hodgkin's disease and 55.7% for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Age and stage of disease were the only predictors of survival in a multivariate analysis. Histological classification was not a useful predictor of survival in this analysis. Survival figures comparable with those obtained nationally and across Europe are attainable in a cancer unit. Multiple pathways of referral of lymphoma patients operate in our region.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2000

Protracted infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with bolus mitomycin in 5-FU-resistant colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: MF (protracted infusion 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), 300 mg/m2/24 hours plus bolus mitomycin, 7 mg/m2 every 6 weeks, maximum 4 doses), was recently shown in a randomised trial to be superior to protracted 5-FU alone, as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (Ross et al. Ann Oncol 1997; 8: 995-1001 [5]). We have examined the same regimen in patients with 5-FU-resistant disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: MF was given to 24 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, median age 63 years. Two had progressed within four months of adjuvant 5-FU; the rest had already received palliative 5-FU, with progression during (11 patients), within four months (5 patients) or after four months of completion (6 patients). The prior 5-FU regimens were bolus 5-FU/FA (8 patients); 48 hour bolus + infusion 5-FU/FA (18 patients) or protracted 5-FU alone (3 patients). Five patients had received more than one prior 5-FU regimen. RESULTS: Three patients, 12.5%, achieved WHO partial response; seven others had minor response or stable disease (SD or better = 42%, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 22%-64%). Median failure-free survival (FFS) was 15 weeks; median overall survival was 9.0 months. No grade 3 or 4 drug toxicity occurred, but dose reduction and/or interruption for persistent grade 2 toxicity was required in eight patients (33%). Three patients (12.5%) had venous line problems (2 thrombosis; 1 dislodged). There were no toxic deaths. 12 patients (50%) went on to receive third-line therapy after MF, including irinotecan or oxaliplatin. CONCLUSIONS: MF is a low-cost, well-tolerated regimen in second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. The response rate and FFS obtained in this small group are similar to those reported for single agent irinotecan. Half our patients obtained a useful period of control with MF before moving on to further treatment with new agents such as irinotecan and oxaliplatin.

Adult↗