PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J E Buring

Publications and source records attributed to J E Buring.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Intake of vegetables rich in carotenoids and risk of coronary heart disease in men: The Physicians' Health Study.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies of diet and coronary heart disease (CHD) have focused on intake of nutrients rather than whole foods. Because of the findings that dietary fibre, folate and antioxidants may be protective for CHD, increased intake of vegetables has been recommended. However, due to the chemical and physical complexity of vegetables, the effects of individual nutrients may differ if eaten as whole foods. Moreover, little is known about the direct association between vegetable intake and risk of CHD. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated the relation between vegetable intake and CHD risk in the Physicians' Health Study, a randomized trial of aspirin and beta-carotene among 22 071 US male physicians aged 40-84 years in 1982. In this analysis, we included 15 220 men without heart disease, stroke or cancer at baseline who provided information on their vegetable intake at baseline, and in the 2nd, 4th and 6th years of follow-up using a simple semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire including eight vegetables. We confirmed 1148 incident cases of CHD (387 incident cases of myocardial infarction and 761 incident cases of coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty) during 12 years of follow-up. RESULTS: After adjusting for age, randomized treatment, body mass index (BMI), smoking, alcohol intake, physical activity, history of diabetes, history of hypertension, history of high cholesterol, and use of multivitamins, men who consumed at least 2.5 servings/day of vegetables had a relative risk (RR) of 0.77 (95% CI : 0.60-0.98) for CHD, compared with men in the lowest category (<1 serving/day). Adjusting for the same covariates in an analysis of the overall trend that considered intake of vegetables as a continuous variable, we found a RR of 0.83 (95% CI : 0.71-0.98) for risk of CHD for each additional serving/day of vegetables. The inverse relation between vegetable intake and CHD risk was more evident among men with a BMI > or =25 (RR = 0.71, 95% CI : 0.51-0.99) or current smokers (RR = 0.40, 95% CI : 0.18-0.86) comparing highest to the lowest categories of intake. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest an inverse association between vegetable intake and risk of CHD. These prospective data support current dietary guidelines to increase vegetable intake for the prevention of CHD.

Adult↗

Time urgency and risk of non-fatal myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Inconsistencies in the literature linking Type A behaviour pattern (TAB) to coronary heart disease (CHD) may be due to differences in the effects of various components of TAB, namely aggressiveness, hostility, ambitiousness, competitive drive, and a chronic sense of time urgency. METHODS: We investigated the association between sense of time urgency/impatience and non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) in a study of 340 cases and an equal number of age-, sex-, and community-matched controls. RESULTS: A dose-response relation was apparent among subjects who rated themselves higher on the four-item time urgency/impatience scale (P-value for trend <0.001), with a matched odds ratio (OR) for non-fatal MI of 4.45 (95% CI : 2.20-8.99) comparing those with the highest rating to those with the lowest. After further adjustment for family history of premature MI, physical activity, body mass index, occupation, cigarette smoking, total caloric intake, per cent calories from saturated fat, alcohol intake, lipid levels, treated hypertension and diabetes, the dose-response relation remained (P-value for trend = 0.015) and the adjusted OR for MI was 3.99 (95% CI : 1.32-12.0) comparing those with the highest rating to those with the lowest. CONCLUSION: In these data, a sense of time urgency/impatience was associated with a dose-response increase in risk of non-fatal MI, independent of other risk factors. Prospective cohort studies of time urgency/impatience and incident CHD events are needed to confirm or refute these observations from a case-control study.

Adult↗

Serologic evaluations of women exposed to breast implants.

OBJECTIVE: There continues to be uncertainty whether women with silicone breast implants experience activation of their immune system and show increased prevalence of serologic markers of connective tissue diseases. We conducted laboratory tests in a large number of women with and without breast implants, and in diabetic patients with presumed silicone exposure via insulin syringes. METHODS: Subjects were chosen from women enrolled in the run-in phase of the Women's Health Study (WHS, a randomized trial testing aspirin and vitamin E in preventing cardiovascular disease and cancer), and included 298 women without breast implants, 298 women with breast implants, and 52 diabetic patients diagnosed before age 30. Comparison groups were matched on age, race, date of blood provided to the WHS, and randomization status. We compared the proportion with abnormal results in 16 serologic tests among the 3 groups of women, stratifying by the matching factors. We also tested for monoclonal immunoglobulins by electrophoresis. RESULTS: For 14 of the 16 serologic tests, the proportions with abnormal results among the 3 groups of women were not significantly different. Of the remaining tests, C3 levels were decreased in 8 (2.7%) women without breast implants and 22 (7.4%) women with breast implants (p = 0.003). C4 levels were decreased in 31 (10.4%) women without breast implants and 48 (16.1%) women with breast implants (p = 0.03). Women without breast implants and diabetic patients did not differ significantly in the proportions having decreased C3 and C4 levels. Women with breast implants did not have higher frequency of monoclonal immunoglobulins detected by electrophoresis. CONCLUSION: We found little evidence for activation of the immune system in women with breast implants. The clinical significance of isolated reductions in C3 and C4 levels, in the absence of other abnormalities such as elevated levels of antinuclear antibody, is unknown.

Antibodies, Antinuclear↗

Smoking cessation and risk of age-related cataract in men.

CONTEXT: Although cigarette smoking has been shown to be a risk factor for age-related cataract, data are inconclusive on the risk of cataract in individuals who quit smoking. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between smoking cessation and incidence of age-related cataract. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study conducted from 1982 through 1997, with an average follow-up of 13.6 years. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 20,907 US male physicians participating in the Physicians' Health Study I who did not have a diagnosis of age-related cataract at baseline and had reported their level of smoking at baseline. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incident age-related cataract defined as self-report confirmed by medical record review, diagnosed after study randomization and responsible for vision loss to 20/30 or worse, and surgical extraction of incident age-related cataract, in relation to smoking status and years since quitting smoking. RESULTS: At baseline, 11% were current smokers, 39% were past smokers, and 50% were never smokers. Average reported cumulative dose of smoking at baseline was approximately 2-fold greater in current than in past smokers (35.8 vs 20.5 pack-years). Two thousand seventy-four incident cases of age-related cataract and 1193 cataract extractions were confirmed during follow-up. Compared with current smokers, multivariate relative risks (RRs) of cataract in past smokers who quit smoking fewer than 10 years, 10 to fewer than 20 years, and 20 or more years before the study were 0.79 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64-0.98), 0.73 (95% CI, 0.61-0.88), and 0.74 (95% CI, 0.63-0.87), respectively, after adjustment for other risk factors for cataract and age at smoking inception. The RR for never smokers was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.54-0.76). The reduced risk in past smokers was principally due to a lower total cumulative dose (RR of cataract for increase of 10 pack-years of smoking, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.04-1.10). A benefit of stopping smoking independent of cumulative dose was suggested in some analyses. Results for cataract extraction were similar. CONCLUSION: These prospective data indicate that while some smoking-related damage to the lens may be reversible, smoking cessation reduces the risk of cataract primarily by limiting total dose-related damage to the lens. JAMA. 2000;284:713-716

Adult↗

Alcohol consumption and risk of coronary heart disease by diabetes status.

BACKGROUND: An inverse association between moderate alcohol consumption and coronary heart disease (CHD) has been observed in several epidemiological studies. To assess whether a similar association exists among diabetics, we examined the relation between light to moderate alcohol consumption and CHD in men with and without diabetes mellitus in a prospective cohort study. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 87 938 US physicians (2790 with diagnosed diabetes mellitus) who were invited to participate in the Physicians' Health Study and were free of myocardial infarction, stroke, cancer, or liver disease at baseline were followed for an average of 5.5 years for death with CHD as the underlying cause. During 480 876 person-years of follow-up, 850 deaths caused by CHD were documented: 717 deaths among nondiabetic men and 133 deaths among diabetic men. Among men without diabetes at baseline, the relative risk estimates for those reporting rarely/never, monthly, weekly, and daily alcohol consumption were 1.00 (referent), 1.02, 0. 82, and 0.61 (95% CI 0.49 to 0.78; P for trend <0.0001) after adjustment for age, aspirin use, smoking, physical activity, body mass index, and history of angina, hypertension, and high cholesterol. Among men with diabetes at baseline, the relative risk estimates were 1.00 (referent), 1.11, 0.67, and 0.42 (95% CI 0.23 to 0.77; P for trend=0.0019). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that light to moderate alcohol consumption is associated with similar risk reductions in CHD among diabetic and nondiabetic men.

Alcohol Drinking↗

Self-selected posttrial aspirin use and subsequent cardiovascular disease and mortality in the physicians' health study.

BACKGROUND: The randomized aspirin component of the Physicians' Health Study (PHS) was terminated early, after 5 years, primarily because of the emergence of a statistically extreme (P<.00001) 44% reduction of first myocardial infarction (MI) among those assigned to aspirin. As a result, there were insufficient numbers of strokes or cardiovascular disease (CVD)-related deaths to evaluate these end points definitively. METHODS: Data on self-selected aspirin use were collected until the beta carotene component ended as scheduled after 12 years. Posttrial use of aspirin was assessed at the 7-year follow-up among 18 496 participants with no previous reported CVD. Randomized and posttrial observational results in the PHS were compared, and differences between those self-selecting aspirin and those not were examined. RESULTS: At 7 years, 59.5% of participants without CVD reported self-selected aspirin use for at least 180 d/y, and 20.8% for 0 to 13 d/y. Use was significantly associated with family history of MI, hypertension, elevated cholesterol levels, body mass index, alcohol consumption, exercise, and use of vitamin E supplements. In multivariate analyses, self-selected aspirin use for at least 180 vs 0 to 13 d/y was associated with lower risk for subsequent MI (relative risk [RR], 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55-0.95), no relation with stroke (RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.74-1.39), and significant reductions in CVD-related (RR, 0.65; CI, 0.47-0.89) and total mortality (RR, 0.64; CI, 0.54-0.77). CONCLUSION: These associations between self-selected aspirin use and CVD risk factors increase the likelihood of residual confounding and emphasize the need for large-scale randomized trials, such as the ongoing Women's Health Study, to detect reliably the most plausible small to moderate effects of aspirin in the primary prevention of stroke and CVD-related death.

Adult↗

C-reactive protein and other markers of inflammation in the prediction of cardiovascular disease in women.

BACKGROUND: Since inflammation is believed to have a role in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular events, measurement of markers of inflammation has been proposed as a method to improve the prediction of the risk of these events. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, nested case-control study among 28,263 apparently healthy postmenopausal women over a mean follow-up period of three years to assess the risk of cardiovascular events associated with base-line levels of markers of inflammation. The markers included high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), serum amyloid A, interleukin-6, and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule type 1 (sICAM-1). We also studied homocysteine and a variety of lipid and lipoprotein measurements. Cardiovascular events were defined as death from coronary heart disease, nonfatal myocardial infarction or stroke, or the need for coronary-revascularization procedures. RESULTS: Of the 12 markers measured, hs-CRP was the strongest univariate predictor of the risk of cardiovascular events; the relative risk of events for women in the highest as compared with the lowest quartile for this marker was 4.4 (95 percent confidence interval, 2.2 to 8.9). Other markers significantly associated with the risk of cardiovascular events were serum amyloid A (relative risk for the highest as compared with the lowest quartile, 3.0), sICAM-1 (2.6), interleukin-6 (2.2), homocysteine (2.0), total cholesterol (2.4), LDL cholesterol (2.4), apolipoprotein B-100 (3.4), HDL cholesterol (0.3), and the ratio of total cholesterol to HDL cholesterol (3.4). Prediction models that incorporated markers of inflammation in addition to lipids were significantly better at predicting risk than models based on lipid levels alone (P<0.001). The levels of hs-CRP and serum amyloid A were significant predictors of risk even in the subgroup of women with LDL cholesterol levels below 130 mg per deciliter (3.4 mmol per liter), the target for primary prevention established by the National Cholesterol Education Program. In multivariate analyses, the only plasma markers that independently predicted risk were hs-CRP (relative risk for the highest as compared with the lowest quartile, 1.5; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.1 to 2.1) and the ratio of total cholesterol to HDL cholesterol (relative risk, 1.4; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.1 to 1.9). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of the measurement of C-reactive protein to screening based on lipid levels may provide an improved method of identifying persons at risk for cardiovascular events.

Analysis of Variance↗

Light-to-moderate alcohol consumption and mortality in the Physicians' Health Study enrollment cohort.

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the relationship between light-to-moderate alcohol consumption and cause-specific mortality. BACKGROUND: Previous studies suggest a J-shaped relation between alcohol and total mortality in men. A decrease in cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality without a significant increase in other causes of mortality may explain the overall risk reduction at light-to-moderate levels. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study of 89,299 U.S. men from the Physicians' Health Study enrollment cohort who were 40 to 84 years old in 1982 and free of known myocardial infarction, stroke, cancer or liver disease at baseline. Usual alcohol consumption was estimated by a limited food frequency questionnaire. RESULTS: There were 3,216 deaths over 5.5 years of follow-up. We observed a U-shaped relationship between alcohol consumption and total mortality. Compared with rarely/never drinkers, consumers of 1, 2 to 4 and 5 to 6 drinks per week and 1 drink per day had significant reductions in risk of death (multivariate relative risks [RRs] of 0.74, 0.77, 0.78 and 0.82, respectively) with no overall benefit or harm detected at the > or =2 drinks per day level (RR = 0.95; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.79 to 1.14). The relationship with CVD mortality was inverse or L-shaped with apparent risk reductions even in the highest category of > or =2 drinks per day (RR = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.57 to 1.01). We found no clear harm or benefit for total or common site-specific cancers. For remaining other cancers, there was a nonsignificant 28% increased risk for those consuming > or =2 drinks per day. CONCLUSIONS: These data support a U-shaped relation between alcohol and total mortality among light-to-moderate drinking men. The U-shaped curve may reflect an inverse association for CVD mortality, no association for common site-specific cancers and a possible positive association for less common cancers.

Adult↗

Effects of beta-carotene supplementation on cancer incidence by baseline characteristics in the Physicians' Health Study (United States).

OBJECTIVES: The Physicians' Health Study (PHS) was a randomized trial of beta-carotene (50 mg, alternate days) and aspirin in primary prevention of cancer and cardiovascular disease among 22,071 US male physicians. This report updates results for beta-carotene and examines effect modification by baseline characteristics. METHODS: Beta-carotene's effect on cancer over nearly 13 years was examined overall and within subgroups defined by baseline characteristics using proportional-hazards models. RESULTS: 2667 incident cancers were confirmed, with 1117 prostate, 267 colon, and 178 lung cancers. There were no significant differences with supplementation in total (relative risk (RR) = 1.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.9-1.0); prostate (RR = 1.0, 95% CI = 0.9-1.1); colon (RR = 0.9, 95% CI = 0.7-1.2); or lung (RR = 0.9, 95% CI = 0.7-1.2) cancer, and no differences over time. In subgroup analyses, total cancer was modestly reduced with supplementation among those aged 70+ years (RR = 0.8, 95% CI = 0.7-1.0), daily drinkers of alcohol (RR = 0.9, 95% CI = 0.8-1.0), and those in the highest BMI quartile (RR = 0.9, 95% CI = 0.7-1.0). Prostate cancer was reduced with supplementation among those in the highest BMI quartile (RR = 0.8, 95% CI = 0.6-1.0), and colon cancer was reduced among daily drinkers of alcohol (RR = 0.5, 95% CI = 0.3-0.8). CONCLUSIONS: The PHS found no overall effect of beta-carotene on total cancer, or the three most common site-specific cancers. The possibility of risk reduction within specific subgroups remains.

Adult↗

Fruit and vegetable intake and risk of cardiovascular disease: the Women's Health Study.

BACKGROUND: Prospective data relating fruit and vegetable intake to cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk are sparse, particularly for women. OBJECTIVE: In a large, prospective cohort of women, we examined the hypothesis that higher fruit and vegetable intake reduces CVD risk. DESIGN: In 1993 we assessed fruit and vegetable intake among 39876 female health professionals with no previous history of CVD or cancer by use of a detailed food-frequency questionnaire. We subsequently followed these women for an average of 5 y for incidence of nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, coronary artery bypass graft, or death due to CVD. RESULTS: During 195647 person-years of follow-up, we documented 418 incident cases of CVD including 126 MIs. After adjustment for age, randomized treatment status, and smoking, we observed a significant inverse association between fruit and vegetable intake and CVD risk. For increasing quintiles of total fruit and vegetable intake (median servings/d: 2. 6, 4.1, 5.5, 7.1, and 10.2), the corresponding relative risks (RRs) were 1.0 (reference), 0.78, 0.72, 0.68, and 0.68 (95% CI comparing the 2 extreme quintiles: 0.51, 0.92; P: for trend = 0.01). An inverse, though not statistically significant, trend remained after additional adjustment for other known CVD risk factors, with RRs of 1.0, 0.75, 0.83, 0.80, and 0.85 (95% CI for extreme quintiles: 0.61, 1.17). After excluding participants with a self-reported history of diabetes, hypertension, or high cholesterol at baseline, the multivariate-adjusted RR was 0.45 when extreme quintiles were compared (95% CI: 0.22, 0.91; P: for trend = 0.09). Higher fruit and vegetable intake was also associated with a lower risk of MI, with an adjusted RR of 0.62 for extreme quintiles (95% CI: 0.37, 1.04; P: for trend = 0.07). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that higher intake of fruit and vegetables may be protective against CVD and support current dietary guidelines to increase fruit and vegetable intake.

Age Factors↗

A prospective study of physical activity and risk of prostate cancer in US physicians.

BACKGROUND: Exercise can suppress androgen production and may thus decrease the risk of prostate cancer. However, findings from epidemiological studies assessing physical activity and risk of prostate cancer are inconsistent. METHODS: We prospectively examined the association between physical activity and prostate cancer risk in the Physicians' Health Study (PHS), a randomized trial of low-dose aspirin and beta-carotene among 22,071 men aged 40-84 without self-reported myocardial infarction, stroke and cancer. At baseline in 1982, men were asked about the frequency of exercise vigorous enough to work up a sweat. Physical activity was assessed in a similar fashion again at 36 months of follow-up. RESULTS: During 11.1 years of follow-up (258 779 person-years), 982 cases of prostate cancer occurred and were confirmed by medical record review. After adjustment for potential confounding factors (including age, height, randomized treatment assignment, smoking status, alcohol intake, use of multivitamins, history of diabetes, history of hypertension and history of high cholesterol), the relative risks for prostate cancer associated with exercise vigorous enough to work up a sweat were 1.0 (referent) for frequency less than once per week, 1.02 (95% CI: 0.82-1.26) for once per week, 1.07 (95% CI: 0.90-1.27) for 2-4 times per week, and 1.11 (95% CI: 0.90-1.36) for 5+ times per week. Across all subgroups of men categorized by age, body mass index, smoking status, alcohol intake, use of multivitamins, history of diabetes, history of hypertension and history of high cholesterol, there were no significant associations between frequency of exercise vigorous enough to work up a sweat and prostate cancer risk. After excluding cases of prostate cancer that occurred during the first 36 months of follow-up, again, there was no significant association. Combining physical activity assessments at baseline and at 36 months also yielded no significant association with prostate cancer risk. CONCLUSIONS: These observational data from the Physicians' Health Study do not support the hypothesis that increased physical activity reduces the risk of prostate cancer.

Adult↗

Demographic predictors of eye care utilization among women.

BACKGROUND: Visual impairment may be preventable or treatable with timely intervention. Differences in the use of eye care services may play a role in fostering the racial and socioeconomic gap in the burden of visual impairment in the United States. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine the frequency of eye examinations in women and how this varies with age, race, marital status, geographic region, profession, education, and income. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We used logistic regression models to examine data obtained by mailed questionnaires from 39,876 female health professionals participating in the Women's Health Study. RESULTS: Most women (83%) had an eye examination within the past 2 years. The likelihood of having an eye examination in the past 2 years increased with age (odds ratio [OR] = 2.59 for age > or =75 years versus those <50 years; P [trend] <0.0001), higher education (OR = 1.27 for master's degree versus licensed nurse training; P [trend] = 0.0004), and higher household income (OR = 1.85 for > or =$100,000 versus <$10,000; P [trend] <0.0001). Women from the south were less likely to have had an eye examination than those from the west (OR = 0.92; P = 0.03). Compared with whites, Asian/Pacific Islanders were less likely (OR = 0.76; P = 0.02) and blacks more likely (OR = 1.27; P = 0.02) to have had an eye examination within 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Age, education, income, race/ethnicity, and region of residence were independent predictors of having had an eye examination in the past 2 years. Known medical and ocular problems appeared to explain the association with age but not the other findings, although the clinical significance of these associations was not determined in the present study. Additional research on determinants of eye care-seeking behavior could help in devising new strategies to encourage preventive behaviors, especially among groups at higher risk of visual impairment.

Age Factors↗

Aspirin in the treatment and prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Randomized trials of aspirin have been conducted in three main populations: patients with evolving acute myocardial infarction (MI), patients with a history of cardiovascular disease and apparently healthy subjects. Initiating aspirin therapy within 24 h after the onset of symptoms of an acute MI results in conclusive reductions in the risk of nonfatal reinfarction, nonfatal stroke and total cardiovascular death. In a wide range of patients with prior occlusive cardiovascular disease, aspirin reduces the risks of nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke and vascular death. In primary prevention trials, aspirin has been shown to reduce the risk of a first MI in men; limited data make it difficult to draw conclusions regarding its effect on stroke and total cardiovascular death. Randomized data from studies in women and other populations are lacking. Until more data are available, the decision to use aspirin in primary prevention should be based on the clinical judgment of the physician and it should be used as an adjunct in the management of other cardiovascular disease risk factors.

Acute Disease↗

Baseline self-reported cataract and subsequent mortality in Physicians' Health Study I.

PURPOSE: To examine whether a reported history of cataract, a possible marker of aging, is associated with future mortality. METHODS: Participants were 18,669 of the 22,071 U.S. male physicians enrolled in the Physicians' Health Study I who had complete information at study entry, including self-report of presence or absence of baseline cataract. Participants were without a previous history of myocardial infarction, stroke, transient cerebral ischemia, or cancer (except non-melanoma skin cancer). Reported deaths were confirmed by an End Points Committee of physicians. RESULTS: A total of 581 participants reported a personal history of cataract at baseline. During an average of 12.4 years of follow-up, there were 1,514 deaths including 496 due to cardiovascular (CV) and 1,018 due to non-CV causes. After adjustment for differences in age, men who reported cataract at baseline had a non-significant 9% increased risk of death from any cause compared to men who did not report cataract (RR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.91-1.30). The RRs were 1.03 (95% CI, 0.75-1.41) for CV death and 1.12 (95% CI, 0.90-1.40) for non-CV death. Adjustment for other risk factors had little effect on these estimates. Similar results were obtained in analyses conducted separately among those with and without self-reported diabetes at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: These results from a population of generally healthy physicians indicate that a report of a history of cataract is not associated with any material increase in mortality after adjustment for differences in age between men with and without cataract. Additional investigation of this cohort is in progress to determine whether incident age-related cataracts as well as their subtypes, confirmed by medical record review, are associated with increased mortality.

Adult↗

Beta-carotene supplementation and incidence of cancer and cardiovascular disease: the Women's Health Study.

BACKGROUND: In observational studies, individuals with high intakes of fruits and vegetables containing beta-carotene experience lower risks of developing cancer. However, the few randomized trials of beta-carotene supplementation show no overall benefits; some even suggest harm. This trial was designed to test the effects of beta-carotene supplementation in women. METHODS: The Women's Health Study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial originally testing aspirin, vitamin E, and beta-carotene in the prevention of cancer and cardiovascular disease among 39 876 women aged 45 years or older. The beta-carotene component was terminated early after a median treatment duration of 2.1 years (range = 0.00-2. 72 years). Statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Among women randomly assigned to receive beta-carotene (50 mg on alternate days; n = 19 939) or placebo (n =19 937), there were no statistically significant differences in incidence of cancer, cardiovascular disease, or total mortality after a median of 4.1 years (2.1 years' treatment plus another 2.0 years' follow-up). There were 378 cancers in the beta-carotene group and 369 cancers in the placebo group (relative risk [RR] = 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.89-1. 18). There were no statistically significant differences for any site-specific cancer or during years 1 and 2 combined and years 3 and up combined. For cardiovascular disease, there were no statistically significant differences for myocardial infarction (42 in the beta-carotene group versus 50 in the placebo group), stroke (61 versus 43), deaths from cardiovascular causes (14 versus 12), or the combined end point of these three events (116 versus 102; among women with more than one event, only the first was counted). Deaths from any cause were similar in the two groups (59 versus 55). Among smokers at baseline (13% of all women), there were no statistically significant differences in overall incidence of cancer (RR = 1.11; 95% CI = 0.78-1.58) or cardiovascular disease (RR = 1.01; 95% CI = 0. 62-1.63). CONCLUSION: Among apparently healthy women, there was no benefit or harm from beta-carotene supplementation for a limited period on the incidence of cancer and of cardiovascular disease.

Aged↗

Light-to-moderate alcohol consumption and the risk of stroke among U.S. male physicians.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown U- or J-shaped relations between alcohol consumption and the risk of stroke. We evaluated the effect of light-to-moderate alcohol intake on the risk of stroke, with separate analyses of ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke. METHODS: Our analyses were based on a prospective cohort study of 22,071 male physicians, 40 to 84 years old, who were participating in the Physicians' Health Study. At base line, the participants reported that they had no history of stroke, transient ischemic attack, or myocardial infarction and were free of cancer. Alcohol intake, reported by 21,870 participants at base line, ranged from none or almost none to two or more drinks per day. RESULTS: During an average of 12.2 years of follow-up, 679 strokes were reported. As compared with participants who had less than one drink per week, those who drank more had a reduced overall risk of stroke (relative risk, 0.79; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.66 to 0.94) and a reduced risk of ischemic stroke (relative risk, 0.77; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.63 to 0.94). There was no statistically significant association between alcohol consumption and hemorrhagic stroke. The overall relative risks of stroke for the men who had one drink per week, two to four drinks per week, five or six drinks per week, or one or more drinks per day were 0.78 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.59 to 1.04), 0.75 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.58 to 0.96), 0.83 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.62 to 1.11), and 0.80 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.64 to 0.99), respectively, in an analysis in which we controlled for major risk factors for stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Light-to-moderate alcohol consumption reduced the overall risk of stroke and the risk of ischemic stroke in men. The benefit is apparent with as little as one drink per week. Greater consumption, up to one drink per day, does not increase the observed benefit.

Adult↗

Beta-carotene supplementation for patients with low baseline levels and decreased risks of total and prostate carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The Physicians' Health Study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial using a 2x2 factorial design including supplementation with beta-carotene (50 mg every other day) in the primary prevention of cancer among 22,071 U.S. male physicians ages 40-84 years at randomization. Before randomization, the authors collected baseline blood specimens to determine whether any benefit was greater among or confined to those with low baseline levels of beta-carotene. METHODS: Baseline blood samples were collected from 14,916 participants. These samples were assayed, according to a nested case-control design, from 1439 men subsequently diagnosed with cancer over 12 years of follow-up (631 with prostate carcinoma) and 2204 controls matched by age and smoking habits. RESULTS: Men in the lowest quartile for plasma beta-carotene at baseline had a marginally significant (P = 0.07) increased risk of cancer compared with those in the highest quartile (relative risk [RR] = 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98-1.74). Men in the lowest quartile assigned at random to beta-carotene supplementation had a possible but nonsignificant decrease in overall cancer risk (RR = 0.83, 95% CI, 0.63-1.09) compared with those assigned to placebo. This was primarily due to a significant reduction in the risk of prostate carcinoma (RR = 0.68, 95% CI, 0. 46-0.99) in this group. After the first 2 years of follow-up were excluded, the results were virtually unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: These prespecified subgroup analyses appeared to support the idea that beta-carotene supplementation may reduce risk of prostate carcinoma among those with low baseline levels. Further follow-up of this population will help determine whether these findings are valid.

Adult↗