PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J E Frisch

Publications and source records attributed to J E Frisch.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Using genetics to control cattle parasites-the Rockhampton experience.

Ever since their accidental introduction, cattle ticks, gastrointestinal nematodes and buffalo flies have been major parasites of cattle in northern Australia. Enormous effort and resources have been directed at chemical control of these parasites but the problem persists in undiminished form. The principal control measure remains the use of breeds that have some degree of parasite resistance. No breed is completely resistant and all are at times adversely affected by parasites. Complete resistance is the ultimate solution but has been generally ignored as a commercial reality. Studies at Rockhampton have demonstrated that completely resistant lines can be developed by genetic means within a commercially acceptable timeframe from even the most parasite-susceptible breeds. Genetic changes in tick and worm resistance over 15 years in response to selection for increased tick resistance in the Belmont Adaptaur (Bos taurus) line are reported. Costs and benefits of achieving increased tick resistance are examined and the applicability of the results to other breeds is discussed. Breed differences in resistance to buffalo flies and their effects on live weight are also reported and the possibility of selecting for increased buffalo fly resistance is explored.

Animals↗

Towards a permanent solution for controlling cattle ticks.

Acaricides are essential in the short-term but do not offer a permanent solution to tick control. This situation will not change without a change of approach. A vaccine against Boophilus microplus confers partial long-term control but has little immediate effect on tick burdens. The effectiveness of acaricides and vaccination is greatest for breeds of high tick resistance. High host resistance is the key to effective long-term tick control with total resistance the ultimate aim. While improvements to acaricides and vaccines are continuously pursued, improvements to the most important single factor controlling ticks, host resistance, have been neglected. Resistance is as heritable as milk yield or growth and in tropical breeds can be increased to very high levels by selection. Despite this there are no current examples of sustained selection for tick resistance. Temperate breeds have low resistance but because of high production potentials are favoured for crossbreeding with tropical breeds. This perpetuates the need for reliance on acaricides. Selection to increase polygenic resistance of temperate breeds is impractical. However, a quantum increase can be achieved by introgressing major resistance genes. Such a gene occurs in the Belmont Adaptaur and in suitable genetic backgrounds confers 100% resistance. Total resistance is achievable and provides a permanent solution to ticks.

Animals↗

Classification of the southern African sanga and east African shorthorned zebu.

Humped African cattle, which are differentiated into zebu and sanga types, have traditionally been classified as Bos indicus. This paper discusses existing evidence and presents new evidence supporting the classification of southern African sangas as Bos taurus and East African zebus as 'taurindicus'. Classification is based on karyotype, frequencies of DNA markers and protein polymorphisms. The Boran, an East African zebu, has an acrocentric Y chromosome typical of Bos indicus. The southern African sanga breeds have a submetacentric Y chromosome typical of Bos taurus. Frequencies of four DNA markers support the hypothesis that the Tuli, a southern African sanga, had taurine ancestors and the Boran had both taurine and indicine ancestors. Frequencies for several protein polymorphisms strongly suggest that southern African sangas have more in common with taurine than with indicine breeds, while East African zebus are an admixture of African taurine and Asian indicine breeds.

Africa, Eastern↗

Calving rates in a tropical beef herd after treatment with a synthetic progestagen, norgestomet, or a prostaglandin analogue, cloprostenol.

Maiden heifers and lactating cows of known ovarian status and of several breeds were treated with a synthetic prostaglandin, cloprostenol, or a synthetic progestagen, norgestomet, at the start of an artificial insemination (AI) program. Animals in the cloprostenol treatment received 2 injections 10 days apart. Over the next 26 days those animals that showed oestrous behaviour were inseminated. Synchronisation rates and calving rates to insemination over the first 7 days were calculated. Those in the norgestomet treatment received an implant of norgestomet plus an injection of norgestomet and oestradiol valerate. The implant was removed 10 days later and the animals were given an injection of pregnant mare serum gonadotrophin (PMSG). They were inseminated at 48 h (maiden heifers) or 56 h (lactating cows) after implant removal. Calving rates to fixed-time insemination were recorded. After completion of the AI program the animals in both treatments were joined with bulls. Overall calving rates (AI plus bulls) were calculated. By day 7 of the program, 82% of the maiden heifers and 76% of the lactating cows in the cloprostenol treatment had been detected in oestrus. By day 21 the respective figures were 99% and 81%. Norgestomet treatment had an immediate and a prolonged effect on ovarian activity in those females classified as having inactive ovaries at the start of the AI program. Calving rates of those females to fixed-time AI and overall were similar to those of the females with active ovaries in both treatments. Their calving rates to fixed-time insemination, and overall calving rates for the lactating females, were significantly higher than the corresponding values of their contemporaries treated with cloprostenol and inseminated on observed oestrus over 7 days. For those females classified as having active ovaries at the start of the AI program, calving rates to first insemination and overall were similar for both treatments. Overall calving rates of lactating cows of each breed were, with one exception, higher in the norgestomet treatment than in the cloprostenol treatment. Although norgestomet treatment was more expensive than cloprostenol treatment, the advantage in calf crop resulted in an overall monetary advantage to the norgestomet treatment.

Animals↗

The comparative incidence of foot rot in Bos taurus and Bos indicus cattle.

Data on incidence of foot rot were collected over 2 years in a mixed herd of both Bos taurus and Bos indicus breed types. The level of infection was significantly higher in the Bos taurus breeds than in the Bos indicus breeds and raises the possibility of using resistant breeds where foot rot constitutes a major economic problem.

Animals↗