PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J E Gallant

Publications and source records attributed to J E Gallant.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Time to initiating highly active antiretroviral therapy among HIV-infected injection drug users.

OBJECTIVE: Studies have shown that HIV-infected injection drug users (IDUs) are less likely to receive antiretroviral therapy than non-drug users. We assess factors associated with initiating highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in HIV-infected IDUs. METHODS: A cohort study of IDUs carried out between 1 January 1996 and 30 June 1999 at a community-based study clinic affiliated to the Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland. The participants were a total of 528 HIV-infected IDUs eligible for HAART based on CD4+ cell count. The main outcome measure was the time from treatment eligibility to first self-reported HAART use, as defined by the International AIDS Society-USA panel (IAS-USA) guidelines. RESULTS: By 30 June 1999, 58.5% of participants had initiated HAART, most of whom switched from mono- or dual-combination therapy to a HAART regimen. Nearly one-third of treatment-eligible IDUs never received antiretroviral therapy. Cox proportional hazards regression showed that initiating HAART was independently associated with not injecting drugs, methadone treatment among men, having health insurance and a regular source of care, lower CD4+ cell count and a history of antiretroviral therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported initiation of HAART is steadily increasing among IDUs who are eligible for treatment; however, a large proportion continues to use non-HAART regimens and many remain treatment-naive. Although both groups appear to have lower health care access and utilization, IDUs without a history of antiretroviral therapy use would have more treatment options available to them once they become engaged in HIV care.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Proliferative responses to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) antigens in HIV-1-infected patients with immune reconstitution.

Cell-mediated immunity is affected early in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection. HIV-1-specific CD4+ T cell proliferative responses are not measurable in most patients but have been reported in long-term nonprogressors and in patients treated with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) during primary infection. However, treatment with HAART generally does not restore HIV-1-specific CD4+ T cell responses in chronically infected patients. In this study, HIV-1-specific CD4+ T cell responses in 10 HIV-1-infected patients who began HAART with low CD4 cell count nadirs and experienced significant immune reconstitution were studied. Surprisingly, 5 of these patients had proliferative responses to > or =1 HIV-1 gene product, compared with 0 of 8 chronically infected patients who started HAART when their CD4 cell counts were still relatively high. These results suggest that, in some patients with advanced HIV-1 infection, treatment with HAART can lead not only to significant increases in CD4 cell counts but also to the restoration of HIV-1-specific responses.

Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active↗
PubMed2000

Safety, tolerability, and antiretroviral effects of ritonavir-nelfinavir combination therapy administered for 48 weeks.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety, tolerability, and anti-HIV activity of ritonavir-nelfinavir (RTV-NFV). DESIGN: Single-site, open-label, nonrandomized, multiple-dose trial of RTV combined with two doses of NFV in protease inhibitor (PI)-naive, HIV-infected patients. METHODS: Mean baseline HIV RNA was 39,500 copies/ml; mean baseline CD4 count was 323 cells/mm3. All patients received RTV at a dosage of 400 mg twice daily. Cohorts I (N = 10) and II (N = 10) received NFV at a dosage of 500 mg and 750 mg twice daily, respectively, for the initial 12 weeks of the study before allowing intensification with reverse transcriptase inhibitors. RESULTS: The commonest effects of RTV-NFV therapy were study drug-related moderate-to-severe diarrhea (9 patients in cohorts I and II) and drug-related moderate-to-severe nausea (4 patients in cohorts I and II). HIV RNA was suppressed in a biphasic manner. At 48 weeks in cohort I, mean HIV RNA reduction was 2.82 log10 copies/ml (standard error [SE] =.61; p =.001; N = 4); mean CD4 cell count increase was 236 cells/mm3 (SE = 67.1; p =.006; N = 4). In cohort II, mean HIV RNA reduction at Week 48 was 2.21 log10 copies/ml (SE =.430; p =. 001; N = 8); mean CD4 cell count increase was 120 cells/mm3 (SE = 47. 5; p =.03; n = 8). In cohort I patients, 2 of 4 completing Week 48 had HIV RNA <20 copies/ml; and 3 of 4 had HIV RNA <400 copies/ml. In cohort II, 2 of 8 patients completing Week 48 had HIV RNA <20 copies/ml and 4 of 8 had HIV RNA <400 copies/ml. In addition, 3 patients in cohort I withdrew because of virologic failure not thought to be related to poor compliance. Moreover, 15 patients elected to add new reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (RTIs) after week 12. CONCLUSIONS: RTV-NFV with concomitant reverse transcriptase inhibitors is a potential dual-PI option for PI-naive patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Comparative studies of two-times-daily versus three-times-daily indinavir in combination with zidovudine and lamivudine.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of two-times-daily versus three-times-daily indinavir in combination with zidovudine and lamivudine. DESIGN: Two multicenter, open-label, randomized 24-week studies. METHODS: Adults HIV-1 infection, HIV-1 RNA greater than 10000 copies/ml, and no prior lamivudine or protease inhibitor therapy were eligible. In a pilot study (Study A), patients received indinavir at 800 mg every 8 h, 1000 mg every 12 h, or 1200 mg every 12 h. In a subsequent study (Study B), patients received indinavir at 800 mg every 8 h or 1200 mg every 12 h. All subjects received zidovudine (300 mg) and lamivudine (150 mg) every 12 h. An intent-to-treat analysis was used. RESULTS: In Study A, which enrolled 88 patients, neither HIV-1 RNA nor CD4 cell responses differed significantly between treatment groups at 24 weeks when corrected for multiple comparisons. Study B enrolled 433 patients, but was prematurely discontinued when interim analysis suggested greater efficacy of three-times-daily indinavir. Of the first 87 patients reaching week 24, HIV-1 RNA was less than 400 copies/ml in 91% receiving three-times-daily versus 64% receiving two-times-daily indinavir (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Three-times-daily indinavir appears more efficacious than two-times-daily dosing when administered with zidovudine and lamivudine. Two-times-daily indinavir dosing should only be considered in situations characterized by favorable pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Strategies for long-term success in the treatment of HIV infection.

Highly active antiretroviral therapy has revolutionized the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, which can now be viewed as a chronic and manageable disease. However, HIV infection differs from other chronic diseases in that early treatment decisions can irrevocably alter the patient's response to future therapy. Despite the large number of approved antiretroviral agents, the number of sequential treatment regimens that will be effective for an individual patient is sharply limited by cross-resistance within the 3 drug classes. Because of the complexity of antiretroviral therapy, clinicians prescribing it require considerable expertise. Treatment should be deferred until the patient has been educated about the importance of strict adherence and has demonstrated willingness and motivation to begin therapy. Drug regimens should be chosen that the patient can tolerate and adhere to, and the consequences of resistance should be considered before therapy is begun. When treatment fails, the timing and choice of subsequent therapy can be critical in determining the magnitude and durability of response. Resistance testing can help guide the clinician in the choice of therapy. In patients who have been treated with numerous antiretroviral agents, it may be impossible to achieve significant viral suppression. Therapy may still be beneficial for such patients, but it should be tolerable and should not increase resistance to drugs that may become available in the near future. Drug resistance and treatment failure are not random events, but are the result of factors over which clinicians and their patients have some control. The treatment of drug-resistant patients is challenging; the best way to deal with resistance is to prevent it.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Antiretroviral therapy.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active↗
PubMed1999

Oropharyngeal candidiasis in patients with HIV: suggested guidelines for therapy.

The high frequency of oropharyngeal candidiasis in immunocompromised patients has led many institutions to develop protocols to guide the use of antifungal agents in the treatment of this opportunistic infection. However, few specific recommendations have been made for directing the management of oropharyngeal candidiasis in patients infected with HIV. To meet this need, a panel of experts representing a variety of disciplines met to formulate a consensus and devise a treatment strategy for clinical application. Among other recommendations, the algorithm calls for use of a topical agent for the treatment of initial and recurring oropharyngeal candidiasis in HIV-infected patients, provided there is no esophageal involvement, patients' CD4+ lymphocyte cell count is >50 cells/mm3, and they are currently receiving or expected to receive effective antiretroviral treatment. For episodes of oropharyngeal candidiasis with concurrent esophageal involvement or where patients have a CD4+ cell count of <50 cells/mm3, are not receiving or anticipating highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), and have a high viral load, the algorithm suggests a systemic oral azole as the more appropriate treatment choice. Acute treatment of all oropharyngeal candidiasis episodes is preferred. Chronic suppressive antifungal treatment is to be avoided in recognition of the potential for the development of drug-resistant infection.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗