PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J E Keeffe

Publications and source records attributed to J E Keeffe.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Management of diabetic retinopathy by Australian ophthalmologists. Working Group on Evaluation of the NHMRC Retinopathy Guideline Distribution. National Health and Medical Research Council.

OBJECTIVE: To describe current management practices of diabetic retinopathy used by Australian ophthalmologists. SETTING: Two-page self-administered questionnaire mailed to 622 ophthalmologists listed with the Royal Australian College of Ophthalmologists. METHODS: The survey included questions about practice details such as size and location; specialty; current practice with regard to management of patients with diabetes; confidence in screening for diabetic retinopathy; and a number of patient scenarios related to screening, follow-up and treatment of diabetic retinopathy. RESULTS: Of the 577 eligible ophthalmologists, 475 (82%) completed the questionnaire. They had been practicing ophthalmology between 1 and 50 years (median 16 years) and 89 (19%) indicated that they had a subspecialty interest either in vitreo-retinal surgery or in medical retina. For 145 (30.5%) of the ophthalmologists, at least one of their practices was located in a country area. The estimated percentage of patients with diabetes ranged from 0.1 to 60% (mean = 9.9%). Retinal specialists perform between 0 and 750 macular focal photocoagulation procedures per year (mean = 94) compared with a range of 0-350 for nonretinal specialists (mean = 10.3) (t = 6.1, P < 0.001). The ophthalmologists were presented with a hypothetical patient with cataract requiring surgery and clinically significant macular oedema that would be difficult to treat (but not impossible) because of the cataract. Seventy-seven ophthalmologists (16%) said they would delay the macular laser therapy until after the cataract surgery had been performed. In multivariate logistic regression models, nonretinal specialists were 4.44 times as likely to perform the cataract surgery first (95%CL = 1.57, 12.6) and ophthalmologists who had been in practice more than 15 years were 2.50 times as likely to perform cataract surgery first (95%CL = 1.47, 4.26). There were other examples of practice that differed from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) guidelines in patient scenarios. The majority of ophthalmologists (60%) expressed a moderate or strong need to learn more about the management of diabetic retinopathy. DISCUSSION: The variability in the management of diabetic retinopathy by Australian ophthalmologists and the desire of ophthalmologists to learn more about diabetic retinopathy provide evidence to support the need for the NHMRC Guidelines for Diabetic Retinopathy. These data will be used to evaluate changes in practice as a result of the implementation of the guidelines.

Diabetic Retinopathy↗

Direct costs of blindness in Australia.

This study calculated the direct financial costs of blindness to the Australian government and community. Three case studies, representative of Australians with severely impaired vision, were used to calculate the annual costs associated with blindness. The costs include pensions, subsidies, concessions, equipment and services. Case I was a retired person with age-related macular degeneration, case 2 a working aged person with diabetic retinopathy, and case 3 a school student with congenital vision impairment. Sensitivity analysis was used to show the possible range of costs for each case. For case I, direct cost was $ 14686 with a range from $9749 to $22507. The cost for case 2 was $17701 ranging from $9669 to $26720. Costs associated with care and education of case 3 were $15948 ranging from $5106 to $23798. In addition to the social costs to a person who is blind, there are significant financial costs to the government and the community that will increase substantially with the ageing of the Australian population.

Aged↗

Examination compliance and screening for diabetic retinopathy: a 2-year follow-up study.

Early detection and timely treatment of diabetic retinopathy can preserve vision, yet many people with diabetes do not have their eyes examined regularly. The purpose of this study was to examine eye care practices of people with diabetes who had not previously accessed eye care services on a regular basis. Screening with non-mydriatic retinal photography for diabetic retinopathy was initiated in 1996, and targeted people with diabetes who did not access eye care services on a regular basis. Each test area was revisited 2 years after the initial screening. Patients that did not attend the biennial screening were followed up by mail survey. Although none of the participants in this study had been previously accessing eye care services on a regular basis, 87% did so after attending the screening. These results indicate that mobile screening with non-mydriatic photography, as an adjunct to current eye care services, has the potential to increase examination compliance for diabetic retinopathy and to achieve sustained behaviour change.

Diabetic Retinopathy↗

Detection of vision impairment in people admitted to aged care assessment centres.

Vision is not routinely tested when the health of older people is assessed, and the aim of this study was to detect older people with vision impairment for referral to appropriate eye care services. People admitted for assessment and or rehabilitation in three aged care assessment centres had distance and near visual acuity assessed with a simplified vision test. A pinhole test was used when necessary. Referral criteria were distance visual acuity of less than 6/12; near vision of less than N8, and people with diabetes who had not attended a dilated fundus examination in the last 2 years. Visual acuity results were obtained in 93% of patients (685/735). Those unable to perform the vision test were very ill or had severe cognitive impairment. Forty-three per cent of patients (266/646) had impaired vision and, of these, 70.6% (188/266) were referred to eye care specialists. Forty-five per cent were referred to ophthalmologists, 36% to optometrists and 20% to low vision services. This significant proportion of patients with poor vision suggests that vision screening is warranted.

Aged↗

A measure of handicap for low vision rehabilitation: the impact of vision impairment profile.

This study aims to further develop the Impact of Vision Impairment (IVI) profile into a practical, valid instrument for use in low vision rehabilitation. The IVI item pool was derived from focus groups of people with impaired vision, relevant content of existing quality of life questionnaires, and the administration of two trial versions. The second trial version of IVI was administered to 256 people who were vision impaired. Items were deleted if they were of little or no concern or were unable to be performed by most people, had moderate to high inter-item correlation, or did not contribute to a factor in the factor analysis. Two items were deleted due to floor and ceiling effects, 11 due to moderate to high inter-item correlation r> or =0.6. None were removed as a result of factor analysis. The first three factors explained 59% of the variance.This reduced version of the IVI, a tool able to determine rehabilitation needs for people who are vision impaired, will now undergo its final validation procedures.

Adult↗

Recruitment methods for community-based screening for diabetic retinopathy.

Regular screening of all people with diabetes is the most efficient and cost-effective way to detect early stages of diabetic retinopathy so that laser treatment can be performed at the optimal time. A major aim of the Program for the Early Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy was to increase compliance with guidelines for screening for diabetic retinopathy. This community-based screening program used non-mydriatic retinal photography and was initiated in four areas of Victoria, Australia from 1996-1998. Recruitment strategies included targeted mail-outs, provision of the program brochure in English and the main languages spoken in the areas and media promotion in ethnic newspapers and on ethnic radio stations. In Victoria, only 55% of the population with diabetes currently access eye care services at the recommended intervals. This program was able to increase compliance with guidelines to 70% among people with diabetes that had not had a recent eye examination. A total of 1,197 people with diabetes were screened for diabetic retinopathy. Of the 1,197 people who were screened, 620 (15% of the estimated number of people with diabetes) had not had their eyes examined in the past two years. This pilot study identified strategies to encourage people with diabetes to have their eyes examined at the recommended intervals.

Age Distribution↗

Management of diabetic retinopathy by Australian optometrists. Working Group on Evaluation of NHMRC Retinopathy Guideline Distribution. National Health and Medical Research Council.

PURPOSE: To describe current practices related to the management of diabetic retinopathy by Australian optometrists. SETTING AND METHODS: A two-page self-administered questionnaire was mailed to a random sample of 504 Australian optometrists. The survey included questions about the practice (such as size and location); current practice with regard to management of patients with diabetic retinopathy; barriers to use of dilating drops; and a number of patient scenarios related to screening, follow-up and treatment of diabetic retinopathy. RESULTS: Completed questionnaires were returned by 407 of the 473 eligible optometrists (86%). They had been practising optometry between 1 and 50 years (median 14). Of the 243 optometrists who provided details about the location of their practices, 145 (37%) had at least one of their practices in a rural area. The estimated percentage of patients with diagnosed diabetes ranged from 0.5 to 40% (median = 5.0%). Three-hundred and twenty-two optometrists (79%) reported that they would often or almost always ask new patients over the age of 40 whether they have diabetes. The majority of optometrists (n = 387, 95%) would often or almost always ask their new patients with diabetes about their control of blood glucose levels and the majority of optometrists (n = 330, 81%) would often or almost always tell their patients with diabetes about the importance of strict glucose control in delaying retinopathy. The most common barrier to dilated ophthalmoscopy was patients not wanting to be dilated, with 38.1% of optometrists reporting this to be a moderate or major barrier. The next most common barrier was fear of precipitating angle closure glaucoma; 17.1% of optometrists reported this to be a moderate or major barrier CONCLUSION: The National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) guidelines for the management of diabetic retinopathy are timely in relation to the expressed desire of Australian optometrists to learn more about management of diabetic retinopathy These data will be used prospectively to assess changes in management of patients with diabetic retinopathy as a result of the release of the NHMRC guidelines.

Australia↗

The need for cataract surgery: projections based on lens opacity, visual acuity, and personal concern.

AIM: To assess the projected needs for cataract surgery by lens opacity, visual acuity, and patient concern. METHODS: Data were collected as part of the Melbourne Visual Impairment Project, a population based study of age related eye disease in a representative sample of Melbourne residents aged 40 and over. Participants were recruited by a household census and invited to attend a local screening centre. At the study sites, the following data were collected: presenting and best corrected visual acuity, visual fields, intraocular pressure, satisfaction with current vision, personal health history and habits, and a standardised eye examination and photography of the lens and fundus. Lens photographs were graded twice and adjudicated to document lens opacities. Cataract was defined as nuclear greater than or equal to standard 2, 4/16 or greater cortical opacity, or any posterior subcapsular opacities. RESULTS: 3271 (83% response) people living in their own homes were examined. The participants ranged in age from 40 to 98 years and 1511 (46.2%) were men. Previous cataract surgery had been performed in 107 (3.4%) of the participants. The overall prevalence of any type of cataract that had not been surgically corrected was 18%. If the presence of cataract as defined was considered the sole criterion for cataract surgery with no reference to visual acuity, there would be 309 cataract operations per 1000 people aged 40 and over (96 eyes of people who were not satisfied with their vision, 210 eyes of people who were satisfied with their vision, and three previous cataract operations). At a visual acuity criterion of less than 6/12 (the vision required to legally drive a car), 48 cataract operations per 1000 would occur and people would be twice as likely to report dissatisfaction with their vision. CONCLUSIONS: Estimates of the need for cataract surgery vary dramatically by level of lens opacity, visual acuity, and patient concern. These data should be useful for the planning of health services.

Adult↗

Impact of vision impairment on functioning.

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to determine the impact of vision loss on the activities of adults. METHODS: Focus groups were conducted that were either disease specific, such as for people with age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, glaucoma or those with congenital vision impairment, or according to previous involvement in rehabilitation services. Discussions were recorded and transcribed. Because many people were retired, leisure activities and personal independence were paramount. RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS: Younger people were concerned with gaining or continuing in employment or with educational opportunities. The age at onset of vision loss and the cause and duration of vision loss influence its impact. There appears to be a greater level of handicap in people with comorbid eye disease and related disease, such as diabetes.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Screening for diabetic retinopathy using a non-mydriatic retinal camera in rural Victoria.

PURPOSE: To develop a screening programme for the early detection of diabetic retinopathy using non-mydriatic retinal photography. METHODS: A community based screening service was offered to all people with known diabetes mellitus in selected townships in the LaTrobe and Goulburn Valleys in Victoria. At the local examination centre, basic sociodemographic information was collected as well as details of previous use of eye care services for the early detection of diabetic retinopathy. The examination included visual acuity (VA), glycosylated haemoglobin level and Polaroid photographs of each fundus using a Canon CR5-45NM non-mydriatic retinal camera (Canon, Tochigiken, Japan). Dilating drops were not used. Photographs were subsequently reviewed and letters were sent to all participants (with copies to their general practitioners) with recommendations for appropriate follow up. RESULTS: A total of 1177 people with diabetes attended the screening service, which is estimated to be 40% of the total population with known diabetes in the study area. The mean age was 65 years (range 20-94 years); 559 (48%) people reported not having a dilated fundus examination within the past 2 years; 345 (29%) people had never had a dilated fundus examination. Of the 2354 eyes, 2126 (90%) of the photographs were gradable. A total of 704 people (60%) had normal VA and no evidence of diabetic retinopathy, 209 people (18%) had diabetic retinopathy, 101 people (9%) had evidence of other fundus pathology, 42 people (3%) had reduced acuity (< 6/18) in one or both eyes (with no fundus pathology evident) and 121 people (10%) had ungradable photographs in one or both eyes. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates the usefulness of a screening programme with non-mydriatic retinal photography as an adjunct to current eye care services for the early detection of diabetic retinopathy.

Adult↗

Use of focus groups to identify health promotion strategies for the early detection of diabetic retinopathy.

BACKGROUND: People with diabetes do not regularly utilise eye services for the early prevention of vision loss due to diabetic eye disease. A community-based screening program has been initiated in Victoria to address this issue. To encourage people to take preventive eye health care measures, the most effective health promotion strategies were identified. METHODS: Thirty-three health professionals were invited to attend focus groups. A sample of 35 people with diabetes was approached by their GPs or diabetes educators because of their motivation to participate in diabetes activities. Each group consisted of 10 members. Discussion points included the type of education messages available to people with diabetes; use of eye services among the participants with diabetes; and strategies required promoting the screening service. RESULTS: Five focus groups were conducted. The discussions highlighted that a great deal could be achieved by using local community networks to promote the benefits of early detection of diabetic retinopathy and local screening program. The group members recommended that particular attention be directed to general practitioners and their distribution of materials to patients. Key issues for planning and implementing the program were highlighted. The groups urged development of strategies to encourage people with diabetes in rural Victoria to participate in a program for the early detection of diabetic retinopathy.

Diabetic Retinopathy↗

[A simplified screening test for the identification of individuals with diminished vision in developing countries].

Simple but effective tests have been produced for screening subjects with low vision in developing countries. These tests of distance and near vision, based on the E test, were evaluated and validated in trials with people aged 4-90 years, and have been field tested in the health, education and rehabilitation services in 32 developing countries. Their sensitivity and specificity as screening tools for low vision have been calculated: sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 96% for the distance vision test, and sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 84% for the near vision test. The content and format of the tests have been demonstrated to be appropriate for developing countries, and their effectiveness for screening for low vision has been confirmed.

Adolescent↗

Diabetic retinopathy: examination practices and referral patterns of general practitioners.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate general practitioners' (GPs') examination and referral practices for diabetic retinopathy. METHODS: A questionnaire survey of a random stratified sample of 500 Victorian GPs. RESULTS: The response rate was 88%. 53% of GPs examined none or less than half of their patients with diabetes for diabetic retinopathy. Those who did examine for retinopathy rarely performed funduscopy through a dilated pupil and 65% reported that they never did. Only 37% had dilating drops in their surgery. Only 45% often or always tested visual acuity. 88% often or always referred patients at the recommended frequency to an ophthalmologist. CONCLUSIONS: Although most GPs do not perform dilated fundus examinations, they report referring their patients with diabetes for assessment by an ophthalmologist at an early stage to prevent vision loss. Referral chain breakdown may explain the discrepancy between GPs' reported referral rates and the lower rates of ophthalmic examination reported in the Melbourne Visual Impairment Project.

Clinical Competence↗

Referral to low vision services by ophthalmologists.

PURPOSE: People in need of low vision rehabilitation services often experience delays in referral to services. This study investigates referral criteria of Australian ophthalmologists, the frequency of referral of their patients with low vision and their perceptions of low vision services. METHODS: A survey was sent to a representative, random sample of 200 ophthalmologists. They were asked about criteria used for the referral of their patients with low vision. The survey included questions on the frequency with which they prescribed low vision devices (LVD) and referral of their patients to low vision and rehabilitation services and peer support groups. Perceptions of the quality and availability of low vision services were also investigated. RESULTS: The response rate was 82%. Approximately 11% of ophthalmologists' patients have low vision. It is uncommon for ophthalmologists to prescribe LVD but 67% refer most of their patients with low vision. It is less common for them to refer to rehabilitation services (29%) or peer support services (18%). The perceived local availability of services influences the rate of referral. Ophthalmologists who used the criteria of moderate low vision (< 6/21 to < 6/60) are more likely to refer more of their patients than those who use the criteria of severe low vision. CONCLUSIONS: Australian ophthalmologists refer most of their visually impaired patients to low vision services, but infrequently to rehabilitation services or peer support groups. Differences in perceived need for low vision services indicated by the criteria used for referral, and the perceived availability, influence the rate at which ophthalmologists refer their patients for services. Ophthalmologists are encouraged to refer patients with permanent visual loss to low vision services earlier.

Australia↗

Cataract surgery in Australia 1985-94.

BACKGROUND: Cataract surgery is the most common form of major ophthalmic surgery in Australia and a common surgical procedure among the elderly. The purpose of this report is to compile the numbers and rates of cataract extractions and implant of IOLs over the period 1985-94 for Australia. METHODS: Data were obtained for public and private cataract extractions and IOL implants from state and territory ministries of health and from the Health Insurance Commission. The data relating to cataract surgery were compared with the growth in the proportion of elderly people in the population. RESULTS: The number of cataract extractions has increased by 2.6 times over the ten-year period to 67,459 in 1994 and IOL implants have increased by 2.9 times over the same period to 70,084. The increase in the elderly population for the period was 1.3 times so that there is a relative doubling in the rate of surgery. The proportion of public patients has risen from 19% to 28% from 1985 to 1994. CONCLUSIONS: The numbers of cataract extractions and IOL implants was increased at double the rate expected from the growth in the elderly population. Advances in microsurgery and IOL technology have resulted improved outcomes and have created a greater patient demand. The improved outcomes have also lead to ophthalmologists recommending cataract surgery at better visual acuity levels than previously.

Aged↗

A simplified screening test for identifying people with low vision in developing countries.

Simple but effective tests have been produced for screening subjects with low vision in developing countries. These tests of distance and near vision, based on the E test, were evaluated and validated in trials with people aged 4-90 years, and have been field tested in the health, education and rehabilitation services in 32 developing countries. Their sensitivity and specificity as screening tools for low vision have been calculated; sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 96% for the distance vision test, and sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 84% for the near vision test. The content and format of the tests have been demonstrated to be appropriate for developing countries, and their effectiveness for screening for low vision has been confirmed.

Adolescent↗