Biomedical subjects

J E Leinweber

Publications and source records attributed to J E Leinweber.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1992

Health Care Financing Administration's new proficiency testing rules. Use of a statistical approach to predict long-term performance using the categories 'successful,' 'probation,' and 'suspended'.

Under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Act of 1967 (CLIA-67) and the Medicare Act, the Health Care Financing Administration's proficiency testing rules apply uniformly to all hospital and reference laboratories. We examined the relationship between internal laboratory performance as characterized by bias and coefficient of variation and proficiency testing performance, categorized as "successful," "probation," and "suspended." Under the March 14, 1990, final rule, a laboratory with suspended testing for even one analyte may be required to cease testing in the entire subspecialty, eg, routine chemistry, unless it ceases testing for that analyte. Analyzing this regimen as a Markov process, we obtained the steady-state solution for performance for one to 27 analytes. While 1.1% of laboratories testing for five analytes with internal or day-to-day coefficients of variation at 50% of the CLIA-67 proficiency testing limit would be suspended, 19.5% of laboratories having biases of 50% and coefficients of variation of 33% would be suspended. We conclude that after eight events, there will be an unacceptably high rate of suspensions.

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S.↗

PubMed1992

Intralaboratory performance requirements necessary to pass proficiency testing: CAP-1990 vs CLIA-1967 (March 14, 1990) formats compared.

The pre-1990 College of American Pathologists' (CAP) Proficiency Testing (PT) program used a two samples per analyte/four challenges per year format with performance or pass-fail grading criteria determined by the program. On Jan. 1, 1991, the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Act of 1967 (CLIA-67) final rules (March 14, 1990) mandated a revised PT format of five samples per analyte/four challenges per year, with the regulations specifying minimum performance criteria. Extending our previous analysis, we compare the maximum permissible intralaboratory imprecision at low bias compatible with passing external PT in the former CAP and current CLIA-67 formats. If a laboratory is able to reduce its internal coefficient of variation (CV) to less than 44% of the PT criterion for each analyte, its overall chance of adverse action for any of the 27 routine chemistry analytes specified in CLIA-67 will be less than 1% in a two-year (eight PT challenges or events) period. Consideration of actual interlaboratory CVs from CAP surveys suggest that a reduction of this magnitude may be difficult for the analytes total cholesterol and blood urea nitrogen, where intralaboratory imprecision comparable with the group standard deviation (SD) from 1990 CAP surveys would yield individual adverse action (PT failure) rates of 5% and 1%, respectively. Five other analytes have CLIA-67 performance limits dangerously close to CAP interlaboratory CVs.

Chemistry, Clinical↗

PubMed1990

1990 Medicare/CLIA final rules for proficiency testing: minimum intralaboratory performance characteristics (CV and bias) needed to pass.

On March 14, 1990, the Centers for Disease Control and the Health Care Financing Administration published criteria for defining minimum performance in proficiency testing (PT). Using our previously described computer modeling technique, we determined the likelihood of passing PT under the new rules. The model relates combinations of intralaboratory CV and bias to PT performance criteria. For example, a laboratory with a bias of zero and an internal CV of 5% will pass a 10% fixed-limit PT criterion (i.e., the criterion for glucose analyses) 98% of the time when five samples are used. The model provides similar analyses for all PT criteria and all relevant combinations of CV and bias. The probability of passing PT decreases as the number of analytes tested increases, i.e., from 98% to 37% as the number of analytes increases from 1 to 20. A laboratory's internal CV has a greater effect on the outcome of PT than do the corresponding bias values. We conclude that a laboratory that operates with methods that have internal CVs less than or equal to 33% and biases less than or equal to 20% of the PT criteria will have a greater than 99% chance of passing PT.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.↗