PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J Eff

Publications and source records attributed to J Eff.

11 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1997

Effect of morning versus evening dosing of diltiazem on myocardial ischemia detected by ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring in chronic stable angina pectoris. Dilacor XR Ambulatory Ischemia Study Group.

Myocardial ischemia occurs frequently during daily life and has a circadian pattern similar to that reported for myocardial infarction and sudden death. Because of the increased risk of myocardial ischemia in the morning hours, it has been suggested that the administration of anti-ischemic medication before bedtime may be more effective than the traditional morning dosing. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study evaluated the effects of 480-mg/day diltiazem (given either in the A.M. or the P.M.) on myocardial ischemia using ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring in 68 patients with chronic stable angina and > or = 2 minutes of ischemia per 48 hours. During treatment with diltiazem, the duration and number of myocardial ischemic episodes were reduced by 45% (94 to 52 minutes, p <0.004) and by 40% (4.5 to 2.7 episodes, p <0.003), respectively. The duration and number of myocardial ischemic episodes during daytime (6 A.M. to 6 P.M.) hours were also reduced by 52% (74 to 36 minutes, p <0.002) and by 48% (3.1 to 1.6 episodes, p <0.001), respectively. There was no significant difference between A.M. and P.M. dosing. Morning ischemia (6 A.M. to noon), considered separately from daytime ischemia, was also significantly reduced by both A.M. and P.M. dosing regimens, with no difference between the regimens. The results of this study showed that both A.M. and P.M. dosing of long-acting diltiazem were equally effective in suppressing episodes of ambulatory myocardial ischemia at all times.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed1995

Dose-ranging study of a new, once-daily diltiazem formulation for patients with stable angina.

A double-blind safety and efficacy dose-ranging study was conducted with a new, once-daily, extended-release (XR) diltiazem hydrochloride formulation (Dilacor XR, Rhône-Poulenc Rorer, Collegeville, PA) in 189 patients with chronic stable angina pectoris. After a 2-week placebo lead-in phase, the patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 once-daily, fixed-dose treatment groups: placebo, XR diltiazem 120 mg, 240 mg, or 480 mg. Extended-release diltiazem, at 240-mg and 480-mg once-daily doses, significantly improved (P < .05) total exercise time during treadmill exercise tolerance testing after 2 weeks of treatment when assessed 24 hours after the previous dose. These increasing doses of XR diltiazem were associated with incremental improvements in exercise tolerance. Outpatient function, as assessed by frequency of anginal attacks, nitroglycerin use, and ambulatory electrocardiogram (Holter, Scole Engineering Culver City, CA) monitoring of ischemic events, was also improved by XR diltiazem. This extended-release diltiazem formulation can be clinically titrated within the 120- to 480-mg dosing range, permitting effective once-daily administration for treating chronic stable angina.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Conversion from immediate-release to extended-release diltiazem in angina pectoris.

This multicenter, open-label, single crossover study examined 195 patients taking an immediate-release diltiazem tablet as chronic stable angina therapy to determine if apparently logical methods of converting them to an extended-release, once-daily formulation were effective. Patients were converted from the immediate-release (Phase I) to an extended-release (Phase II) formulation of diltiazem on a mg-for-mg basis or, when a similar dose was not available, to the next higher 120 mg dose. Weekly angina occurrences and nitroglycerin use, exercise testing at the end of each phase, and ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring (AEM) during the week prior to the exercise study were evaluated. There was a statistically significant decrease in angina frequency and nitroglycerin consumption during Phase II. In the exercise studies, there was an insignificant increase in time to 1 mm ST-segment depression and total exercise time associated with a statistically significantly lower end-exercise blood pressure and heart rate in Phase II. In those patients who had ischemia during either phase on AEM, total ischemic duration and ischemic episodes were insignificantly lower in Phase II. All observations were similar in the subgroup of patients who were converted mg-for-mg. Adverse reactions were equal. Thus, in converting patients from an immediate- to an extended-release diltiazem formulation for the treatment of symptomatic coronary artery disease, it is reasonable to convert directly to the same or, if not available, the next higher available dose of the extended-release preparation.

Aged↗
PubMed1993

Comparative effects of atenolol versus celiprolol on serum lipids and blood pressure in hyperlipidemic and hypertensive subjects.

Antihypertensive drugs may affect serum lipoprotein levels in mixed populations but data in hyperlipidemic patients are scanty. Atenolol versus celiprolol effects on serum lipoproteins were compared in 159 hyperlipoproteinemic hypertensive patients. This was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, positive-controlled multicenter trial with centralized lipoprotein laboratory and diet constancy monitoring. Blood pressure reduction and serum lipoprotein and apoprotein levels were monitored for 3 months. Both drugs reduced systolic and diastolic blood pressures. Atenolol had greater effects than celiprolol on diastolic pressure, but effects on systolic blood pressure were not different. Patients receiving atenolol had lower serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and higher low-density lipoprotein/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratios, whereas patients treated with celiprolol showed no contrasting changes. These differences in lipoprotein levels between drug treatment groups were statistically significant at weeks 9 and 12. The difference between drug treatments was also significant if the values of the 9- and 12-week visits were averaged. Patients taking atenolol had statistically significantly higher serum levels of total cholesterol, triglycerides and apoprotein B at 9 weeks. These divergent directional changes were consistent throughout and statistically significantly different between drugs.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Sustained antihypertensive activity of diltiazem SR: double-blind, placebo-controlled study with 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

A new polymeric matrix technology provides a sustained-release formulation of diltiazem hydrochloride (diltiazem SR) suitable for once-daily therapy. The efficacy and safety of diltiazem SR were evaluated in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. After a single-blind, placebo lead-in period, 275 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension were assigned to receive placebo or diltiazem SR 120, 240, 360, or 480 mg once daily for 4 weeks. The efficacy evaluation was based on office and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Twenty-four hours after the last dose in the 4-week, double-blind treatment period, the mean reduction from baseline in supine diastolic blood pressure ranged from 5.1 to 10.6 mm Hg in the diltiazem SR 120- to 480-mg groups, resulting in a significant linear trend across all treatments (P less than .001). Reductions in systolic blood pressure were similar. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, performed in 138 patients, confirmed the dose-response relationship and showed consistent antihypertensive activity throughout the 24-hour dosing interval. The percentage of patients reporting adverse events was similar in the placebo- and active-treated groups. The results of this study indicate that diltiazem SR is well tolerated, lowers blood pressure in a dose-related manner, and provides sustained activity throughout the 24-hour dosing interval.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1991

Comparison of celiprolol and propranolol in stable angina pectoris. Celiprolol International Angina Study Group.

The comparative antianginal effects and safety of propranolol and celiprolol, a highly beta 1-selective adrenoceptor blocker with selective partial beta 2-adrenoceptor agonist activity, were assessed in an international multicenter, placebo run-in, active control, double-blind, randomized, titration-to-effect study of 140 patients with stable, exercise-induced angina pectoris. At baseline, all patients received placebo for 2 weeks, then titrated doses of once-daily celiprolol (200, 400, 600 mg) or twice-daily propranolol (total daily dose 80, 160, 320 mg) over 4 weeks, followed by a 2-week maintenance period. Heart rate and blood pressure, at rest and with exercise, weekly anginal attack frequency, nitroglycerin consumption and symptom-limited treadmill exercise times (modified Bruce protocol) were assessed. Compared with their respective baselines, both celiprolol and propranolol reduced anginal attack and nitroglycerin consumption rates to a comparable degree, while improving exercise tolerance (p less than 0.05). Treatment with propranolol compared with celiprolol, however, was associated with a significantly lower heart rate at rest (p less than 0.01). The double-product at the conclusion of exercise testing was significantly reduced by both drugs. Celiprolol and propranolol had similar effects on blood pressure, and were well tolerated. More symptomatic bradycardia occurred with propranolol. Despite the differences in their hemodynamic actions, once-daily celiprolol is as effective as twice-daily propranolol in the treatment of patients with stable angina pectoris.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed1986

Celiprolol in angina pectoris: a controlled study.

This double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel, multicenter study was designed to evaluate the anti-anginal and anti-ischemic effects of celiprolol in patients with stable, exercise-induced angina pectoris. The study began with a 4-week single-blind, placebo run-in, followed by 4 weeks of double-blind active treatment with celiprolol 200, 400, or 600 mg once daily or placebo, and 1 week of a placebo run-out. Patients studied had a history of chronic, stable angina pectoris and myocardial ischemia (greater than or equal to 1.0 mm ST segment depression) within 3-12 min of treadmill exercise (modified Bruce) after 3 and 4 weeks of placebo. After 2 weeks treatment, treadmill testing results indicated a mean time to myocardial ischemia for patients receiving placebo increased by 0.5 min (8%), whereas the increases for celiprolol 200, 400, and 600 mg were 0.8 min (11%), 2.1 min (33%), and 1.1 min (16%) respectively. Mean time to anginal symptoms for placebo patients was increased by 0.6 min (10%), and for celiprolol patients by 1.8 min (27%), 1.5 min (19%), and 1.0 min (14%) respectively at the 3 dose levels. The maximum exercise double product (heart rate X systolic BP) 24 h after medication, was increased by a mean of 373 (2%) after placebo, but decreased by 3301 (-15%), 3400 (-17%), and 3549 (-16%) for celiprolol 200, 400, and 600 mg respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1984

Indapamide, a new antihypertensive/diuretic agent, in the treatment of patients with edema.

A multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group study of 219 patients with pitting edema of various causes was undertaken to determine the efficacy and safety of indapamide, administered orally (PO) in a 2.5-, 5-, or 10-mg once-daily dose, as compared with hydrochlorothiazide, administered PO in a 100-mg once-daily dose. Efficacy was evaluated by determining each patient's weight and degree of pitting edema periodically during 12 weeks of active treatment. Lessening of edema was measured by changes in the depth of pitting in the pretibial area, ten to 14 inches below the patella. The depth of pitting was assigned an arbitrary number between 0 and 4, with 0 equivalent to no edema and 4 equivalent to more than 6 mm of pitting edema. After one week of treatment, the mean reduction of pitting edema from baseline, using the 0 to 4 scale, was 1.6 (30%) in both the indapamide (mean of the three groups) and hydrochlorothiazide groups. There were no significant differences among the three dosage levels of indapamide. After 12 weeks of treatment the mean decrease from baseline was 1.8 (34%), indicating a stable reduction of edema. The mean weight loss at one week was 2.5 kg for the three indapamide groups and 2.6 kg for the hydrochlorothiazide group; this loss was maintained for the 12 weeks of the study. The mean decreases in weight and pitting edema were clinically and statistically significant (P less than 0.05) for both medications.

Antihypertensive Agents↗
PubMed1983

Multi-centre clinical investigation of indapamide in the United States: a review.

Indapamide, a new indoline antihypertensive agent, has been the subject of a worldwide programme to develop this drug for general clinical use. The results are described of the multi-centre U.S. clinical programme demonstrating the effectiveness and tolerance of indapamide for the treatment of hypertension. All work was conducted under U.S. Federal Food and Drug Administration guidelines, and resulted recently in a New Drug Application. A total of 1891 subjects or patients participated in 27 separate studies conducted by 91 investigators. In controlled clinical trials comparing 2.5 mg indapamide once daily with 50 mg hydrochlorothiazide once daily for 40 weeks in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension, indapamide produced a reduction of supine blood pressure of -9.5/-14.3 mmHg as compared with -7.6/-11.4 mmHg for hydrochlorothiazide. In combination with methyldopa, propranolol, clonidine, guanethidine and hydralazine, indapamide consistently produced a greater decrease in arterial pressure than did those agents given alone. Indapamide added to these step-care agents did not result in a meaningful increase in adverse reactions. Indapamide has been the subject of a long-term safety study in which over 100 hypertensive patients have been followed up for 2 years or longer. During this period of time, indapamide was well tolerated and remained effective. No biochemical, electrocardiographic or ophthalmological changes were associated with its use. Other studies with indapamide are discussed describing the systemic and renal haemodynamic effects, pharmacokinetic properties and special safety studies conducted with this agent. The use of indapamide in patients with hepatic or renal impairment is reviewed in detail.

Antihypertensive Agents↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Multicenter evaluation of the efficacy and safety of sustained-release diltiazem hydrochloride for the treatment of hypertension.

In a double-blind study, patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension were randomly assigned to receive placebo or increasing daily doses of a new sustained-release formulation of diltiazem: 180 mg, 360 mg, and 540 mg, each once daily for two weeks. The numbers of evaluable patients were 26 in the placebo group and 81 in the diltiazem group at week 2, 24 and 75 at week 4, and 23 and 65 at week 6. Changes from baseline in mean supine trough (before drug administration) systolic/diastolic blood pressures were +1.3/-2.7 mmHg after placebo and -4.7/-6.1 mmHg after diltiazem at week 2; -0.1/-1.7 mmHg after placebo and -7.2/-9.3 mmHg after diltiazem at week 4; and +0.4/-1.7 mmHg after placebo and -6.7/-10.2 mmHg after diltiazem at week 6. The changes were significantly greater after diltiazem than placebo. Increasing the daily dose of diltiazem from 360 mg to 540 mg produced more than proportional increases in mean plasma diltiazem concentrations but only minimal further reductions in blood pressure. Similar rates of adverse experiences were reported by the diltiazem-treated and placebo patients. Treatment was withdrawn in two diltiazem-treated patients because of abnormal electrocardiographic (ECG) changes that were considered to be related to the drug: elevated ST segment in one and first-degree atrioventricular block in the other. No other treatment-related ECG changes were noted. It is concluded that this new once-daily formulation of diltiazem is safe and effective in the treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension.

Adolescent↗