PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J Eisenhuth

Publications and source records attributed to J Eisenhuth.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

X-ray intensifying screen visible light detection meter.

A light meter has been designed and built for the purpose of measuring the light emitted from an intensifying screen during x-ray irradiation. The meter uses a photodiode detector with a minimal drift amplification system. The meter repeatability was better than 0.5% and was found to be linear. A significant x-ray induced signal was recorded during measurement which needed to be subtracted from readings to deduce the intensification screen light output. The energy response of four screen types was subsequently measured.

Radiometry↗

Retention of water-borne bacteria by membrane filters. Part III: Bacterial challenge tests on 0.1 micron rated filters.

Clear performance differences were observed between different 0.1 micron rated filters in terms of their microbial removal efficiency when challenged with naturally occurring waterborne bacteria from a water source. Penetration occurred with three 0.1 micron rated "sterilizing grade" filter types tested, from three different filter manufacturers, that did not have a specific high titer reduction claim for Acholeplasma laidlawii. Bacteria shown to penetrate these 0.1 micron rated filters were quite similar to those recovered downstream of 0.2.0.22 micron rated filters (described in Part II). All of the isolates identified via FAME analyses were common environmental or ubiquitous organisms, and some, such as Acidovorax sp. and Hydrogenophaga pseudoflava, have also been isolated from pharmaceutical water systems. In contrast, four different 0.1 micron rated "sterilizing grade" filter types from two different manufacturers, which had been qualified with both B. diminuta and A. laidlawii, consistently produced sterile effluents under similar test conditions. This study thus highlights the need for an industry or regulatory standard method of defining the microbial removal performance of 0.1 micron rated filters, and supports the use of functionally qualified 0.1 micron rated filters as sterilizing grade filters in pharmaceutical operations for enhanced sterility assurance.

Bacteria↗

Retention of water-borne bacteria by membrane filters. Part I: Bacterial challenge tests on 0.2 and 0.22 micron rated filters.

The results of bacterial challenge tests conducted on several 0.2 and 0.22 micron rated "sterilizing grade" filter cartridge types with bacteria from a natural water source are presented. Eight different 0.2/0.22 micron rated "sterilizing grade" filter types from four different filter manufacturers, claimed to be capable of retaining Brevundimonas diminuta at a challenge level of 10(7) CFU/cm2, were tested. The filters tested included nylon 6.6 and polyamide filters from two manufacturers, modified or hydrophilic PVDF filters from two manufacturers, modified or asymmetric PES filters from three manufacturers, and cellulose acetate filters from a single manufacturer. Consistent bacterial penetration was observed, over the 18-24 h challenge period, for all twenty-five integral 0.2 and 0.22 micron rated filter cartridges tested, at challenge levels of about 10(1)-10(4) CFU/cm2, indicating that natural waterborne bacteria were more penetrative than B. diminuta. The observed penetration was thus qualitatively independent of filter media type or manufacturer. These results add to the growing body of evidence that shows 0.2 and 0.22 micron rated filters may not remove all microorganisms under all conditions. These results further establish that bacterial penetration of 0.2/0.22 micron rated filters is not limited just to (1) specific membrane types, or (2) extended duration challenges (>> 24 h), or (3) extremely high challenge levels, or (4) bacteria that can only exist in a penetrative state in an artificial laboratory setting.

Culture Media↗

Retention of water-borne bacteria by membrane filters. Part II: Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) characterization of bacterial species recovered downstream of 0.2/0.22 micron rated filters.

The results of scanning electron microscopic (SEM) and fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) characterization of the bacterial species shown to penetrate conventional 0.2/0.22 micron rated "sterilizing grade" filters are presented. SEM data suggest that retention of bacteria by these filters appears to be strongly influenced by the morphology, and especially the width of bacteria and less so by length. When the bacterial cell width is small, less than 0.3 micron or so, the cell length does not appear to limit the ability to penetrate 0.2/0.22 micron rated filters. As the bacterial width increases, there is also a strong, almost exponential, decrease in the allowable length for penetration, with most penetrative cells tending to be coccoid beyond a width of 0.5 micron. Significant percentages of the bacteria (40-50%) that were observed downstream of these filters were larger than B. diminuta, the standard organism used to qualify 0.2/0.22 micron rated filters. The average sizes of natural waterborne bacteria that penetrated the filters tested were 20-40% larger in width, and 40-70% larger in length, compared to B. diminuta. These results indicate that size exclusion is not the sole mechanism governing bacterial retention. All isolates identified via FAME analyses were common environmental or ubiquitous organisms, and some, such as Acidovorax sp. and Hydrogenophaga pseudoflava, have also been isolated from pharmaceutical water systems. Most of the bacteria recovered downstream of 0.2/0.22 micron rated filters were gram negative, oxidase positive, motile, nonfermentors.

Bacteria↗

Method for qualifying microbial removal performance of 0.1 micron rated filters. Part I: characterization of water isolates for potential use as standard challenge organisms to qualify 0.1 micron rated filters.

Although 0.1 microm rated filters intended for pharmaceutical sterilization applications have been commercially available for at least 15 years, there is no industry-wide standard for qualifying the microbial removal performance of these filters. In this article, we report on the bacterial challenge methodology used to screen four bacterial species for potential utility as a standard challenge organism to qualify 0.1 microm rated filters. These isolates were, in their natural state, demonstrated to penetrate 0.2/0.22 microm rated filters in prior studies. In the screening challenges described in this study, three out of these four candidates tested demonstrated consistent penetration of one 0.22 microm rated filter type tested (when cultured in a low nutrient medium under standard laboratory conditions). These included 6204-22 (FAME ID Acidovorax avenae citrulli), 6266-15 (FAME ID Comamonas acidovorans), and 6266-34 (FAME ID Hydrogenophaga pseudoflava). Of these, H. pseudoflava (6266-34) was chosen for additional experiments with other 0.2 microm rated filter membranes. In total, seventeen 0.2 and 0.22 microm rated filter discs, spanning five different "sterilizing grade" filter types from three different filter manufacturers were tested. H. pseudoflava penetration was observed for every filter tested. Under the same challenge conditions, H. pseudoflava was consistently retained by a 0.1 microm rated hydrophilic PVDF (polyvinylidenefluoride) filter with a specified high titer reduction claim for Acholeplasma laidlawii. In order to ensure selection of the most stable penetrative phenotype (i.e., select for nonrevertants), H. pseudoflava was subjected to three rounds of "filter cloning," and these results are described herein. The advantages of using H. pseudoflava for qualifying the microbial removal performance of 0.1 microm rated filters are also discussed.

Acholeplasma↗

Method for qualifying microbial removal performance of 0.1 micron rated filters. Part II: preliminary characterization of Hydrogenophaga (formerly Pseudomonas) pseudoflava for use as a standard challenge organism to qualify 0.1 micron rated filters.

In this article, we report on the preliminary characterization of Hydrogenophaga (formerly Pseudomonas) pseudoflava for potential use as a standard challenge organism to qualify 0.1 microm rated filters. Filter-cloned H. pseudoflava (ATCC 700892) was easily cultured in a low nutrient broth (R2A broth) under standard laboratory conditions, reaching high titers of 10(8)-10(9) cfu/mL within 48-65 hours of incubation at 25+/-5 degrees C. Under these conditions, H. pseudoflava is a rod-shaped bacterium, averaging 0.25+/-0.03 microm by 1.65+/-0.35 microm, and appears to be smaller than Brevundimonas diminuta in width (0.31+/-0.03 microm), but somewhat longer in length (0.88+/-0.19 microm), which may partly explain the observed penetration. In total, thirty-five 0.2/0.22 microm rated filter discs, spanning five different "sterilizing grade" filter types from two different filter manufacturers were challenged with H. pseudoflava. In all cases, H. pseudoflava was shown to consistently penetrate every 0.2/0.22 microm rated filter disc tested. These tests also spanned three different challenge durations, including short-term challenges (30-40 minutes), and two different challenge fluids. The use of serial (double) 0.22 mm rated filters, which is a common industry practice to reduce the prefiltration bioburden to the final "sterilizing" filter, was also shown to be inadequate to fully retain H. pseudoflava under the challenge condition used. In contrast, two different 0.1 microm rated filter types functionally qualified with a specified high titer reduction claim for Acholeplasma laidlawii, were shown to consistently and fully retain H. pseudoflava, and retention by these two filter types was shown to be robust and independent of the challenge duration.

Acholeplasma↗

Method for qualifying microbial removal performance of 0.1 micron rated filters. Part III: bacterial challenge tests on 0.2/0.22 and 0.1 micron rated filter cartridges with Hydrogenophaga (formerly Pseudomonas) pseudoflava.

We have previously reported on the preliminary characterization of Hydrogenophaga (formerly Pseudomonas) pseudoflava for potential use as a standard challenge organism to qualify 0.1 microm rated filters. This article reports on the retention efficiencies of a large panel of 0.2/0.22 microm and 0.1 microm rated filter cartridges for H. pseudoflava (ATCC 700892) versus the retention capabilities of the same filters for Brevundimonas diminuta (ATCC 19146). A total of thirty-two 0.2/0.22 microm rated filter cartridges, spanning nine different "sterilizing grade" filter types from four different filter manufacturers, were challenged with H. pseudoflava at challenge levels exceeding 10(7) cfu/cm2. H. pseudoflava was shown to penetrate every 0.2/0.22 microm rated filter tested, with log titer reduction (LTR) values ranging from 3.5 to 7.7 logs. H. pseudoflava was shown to be more penetrative than B. diminuta under the same challenge conditions. B. diminuta was fully retained by nineteen of the twenty 0.2/0.22 microm rated filters that were challenged with both organisms. In the case of 0.1 microm rated filters, eighteen filter cartridges, spanning five different filter types from three manufacturers were tested. H. pseudoflava was consistently retained by four out of the five filter types tested, with LTR values in excess of 11.5 to 12.2 logs. The 0.1 microm rated filter type that was penetrated by H. pseudoflava has been previously demonstrated to be not fully retentive for naturally occurring bacteria. The data show that H. pseudoflava penetrates 0.2/0.22 microm rated filters just as readily as B. diminuta penetrates 0.45 microm rated filters. In addition, titer reductions provided by 0.2/0.22 microm rated filters for H. pseudoflava are comparable to those reported for A. laidlawii mycoplasma, albeit under different conditions. This study demonstrates that H. pseudoflava meets all criteria for use as a standard organism for qualifying the microbial removal performance of 0.1 microm rated filters for enhanced sterility assurance.

Acholeplasma↗