PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J F Crespo

Publications and source records attributed to J F Crespo.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2004

[Post-transplant diabetes mellitus associated with acute hepatitis C virus infection in a renal transplant recipient].

There are some controversial reports about the pathogenic role of hepatitis C virus infection on diabetes mellitus in renal graft recipients. We report a case of a renal transplanted who developed diabetes mellitus post-transplantation during an acute hepatitis C virus infection. We discuss the multifactorial etiology of post-transplant diabetes mellitus, and the possible interaction between tacrolimus and an acute virus C infection on its pathogenesis.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2002

Reactivity to potential cross-reactive foods in fruit-allergic patients: implications for prescribing food avoidance.

BACKGROUND: Prescribing therapeutic elimination diets in patients with fruit allergy should include recommendations on which other foods of the same family or group may be safely consumed. Evidence-based data on the management of fruit allergy are lacking; therefore, advice may vary from just avoiding the offending fruit, to overly restrictive diets of the entire botanical family. The aims of this investigation were to assess clinical reactivity to potential cross-reactive foods in fruit-allergic patients, and the implications for prescribing specific therapeutic elimination diets. METHODS: Sixty-five adults diagnosed with clinical allergy to one or more fruits were evaluated for IgE-mediated allergy to other related foods, which might share cross-reactive antigens. Those with actual allergy to some Rosaceae fruit (including peach, apple, apricot, plum, and almond) underwent skin prick testing (SPT), food-specific IgE assessment by the Pharmacia CAP-FEIA system, and oral challenges with the entire group. For those with allergy to other fruits (chestnut, melon, banana, kiwi, or avocado) immunologic and clinical reactivity to all five were evaluated. Since a number of people in the study also had proven clinically allergy to some nut or legume (peanut, sunflower seed, walnut, pistachio, or hazelnut), the reactivity to the entire set was investigated. RESULTS: Thirty-four of those tested (52%) were found to be clinically allergic to more than one fruit, so 125 allergic reactions occurred in the 65 patients. Peach, melon, kiwi, apple, and banana accounted for 72% of allergic reactions. Forty-two (65%) had sensitization to pollens, causing seasonal allergic rhinitis and/or asthma, and 18 (28%) were sensitized to latex. The 65 with IgE-mediated fruit allergy underwent 351 additional SPT and food-specific IgE determinations with potential cross-reactive foods considered in this study; 223 (64%) of these results were positive. The routine challenges with potential cross-reactive foods uncovered 18 further reactions in 14 (22%) out of 65 (to avocado in seven; apricot in three; plum in one; almond and peanut in one; banana and hazelnut in one; avocado, banana and kiwi in one). Only 8% (18/223) of positive results for SPT, or food-specific IgE levels of greater than 0.35 kU(A)/l to potential cross-reactive foods investigated in this study, were clinically relevant. CONCLUSION: Elimination diets that rely on total group avoidance, or only on the results of allergy testing, might have resulted in unnecessary restriction of 205 foods in the 65 people studied. The lack of routine oral challenges with related fruits--before prescribing dietary restriction--may have allowed 18 food reactions in one-fifth (14/65) of patients to be overlooked.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Occupational IgE-mediated allergy after exposure to lupine seed flour.

The ingestion of lupine seed flour (LSF) has been reported as a cause of allergic reactions, particularly in patients sensitized to peanut, but there is little evidence of its allergenic potential after inhalation. We sought to evaluate the clinical and immunologic reactivity to lupine in employees working with this seed flour. An occupational history was obtained in 7 subjects (median age, 35 years) working with LSF at an agricultural research center. Three subjects (1, 6, and 7) reported work-related allergy symptoms immediately after being exposed to lupine. Skin prick test results with LSF extract were positive in these 3 patients with work-related symptoms. Moreover, lupine-specific IgE antibodies were detected in subjects 6 and 7. In subject 6, the controlled exposure to LSF elicited immediate naso-ocular symptoms without changes in FEV(1). In subject 7, a bronchial provocation with LSF extract elicited an immediate fall (25%) in FEV(1). Double-blinded, placebo-controlled LSF oral challenge results were positive in subjects 6 and 7. Immunologic reactivity to other legumes was detected in subjects 6 and 7, but specific inhalation testing and oral challenge results were negative. Thus, the inhalation of lupine flour could be an important cause of allergic sensitization in exposed workers and might give rise to occupational asthma and food allergy.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Isolation and characterization of barley lipid transfer protein and protein Z as beer allergens.

Beer has recently been implicated as the causative agent of contact urticaria and severe IgE-mediated anaphylaxis. However, no allergen from beer has as yet been isolated and characterized. Two major components of 45 kd and 9 kd were detected in crude protein preparations from beer. Both components were purified; they were identified as barley protein Z(4) (45 kd) and lipid transfer protein 1 (LTP1; 9 kd). Protein Z(4) was recognized by the 4 individual sera tested but provoked weak positive responses to skin testing in 2 of 4 beer-allergic patients. Purified LTP1 showed reactivity with 3 of 4 individual sera and induced strong positive skin prick responses in all 4 patients tested. Barley LTP1 and protein Z(4) have been identified as the main beer allergens.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Detection and quantitation of raw fish aeroallergens from an open-air fish market.

BACKGROUND: IgE-mediated hypersensitivity to fish is a clinically relevant problem, particularly in several European countries. Although most allergic reactions to fish are caused by ingestion, occupational exposures to seafood allergens by inhalation have been correlated with respiratory symptoms. In Madrid, patients with fish allergy have exhibited respiratory symptoms after visits to an open-air fish market. OBJECTIVE: We sought to study the possibility of passively aerosolized fish allergen in an open-air fish market through air sampling and a competitive IgE immunoassay. METHODS: Air samples were collected on polytetrafluoroethylene filters by using air samplers. Samples were collected on 41 different days from both an open-air fish market and an outdoor residential area. Fish allergens were specifically quantified by competitive IgE immunoassay by using pooled sera from fish-sensitive individuals. A raw fish extract (10 mg of dry weight/mL) was used as the reference standard. RESULTS: Allergen was quantified in all 39 fish market air samples (2-25 ng/m(3)). The residential air samples contained no detectable allergen. The analytic limit of detection was 2 ng, allowing detection of 0.4 ng/m(3) for the air volumes collected. A concentrated (30-fold) pool of fish market air samples was tested in serial dilutions and demonstrated an identical regression line to that of the raw fish standard. CONCLUSION: By using air sampling and an immunochemical analytic technique, fish allergen is detectable in the air of an open-air fish market. Avoidance of a food allergen, such as fish, should include preventing exposure to aerosolized particles through inhalation in relevant environments.

Air Pollution↗
PubMed2000

Asthma and rhinitis induced by exposure to raw green beans and chards.

BACKGROUND: Although the vast majority of IgE-mediated allergic reactions to foods occurs through ingestion, a few cases of unexpected allergic reactions to foods may occur through the exposure to airborne food allergen particles. METHODS: Case reports. Skin prick tests and serum-specific IgE (CAP-FEIA) were used to identify specific IgE antibodies. Bronchial provocation tests were performed to determine the clinical relevance of inhaled exposure to raw and cooked green beans and raw chards. After demonstrating specific reactivity to them, SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting of raw and cooked green beans were carried out to identify relevant antigens. RESULTS: Three women developed bronchial asthma and rhinitis after exposure to raw green beans, and one of them also when exposed to raw chards. All women tolerated ingestion of green beans. Patients reported multiple episodes while handling these vegetables for cooking activities. Allergy to green beans and chards was demonstrated by skin testing and serum-specific IgE. Bronchial challenge test with these allergens showed positive responses to raw, but not cooked, green beans and chards. Oral food challenges with green beans (raw and cooked) and chards were negative in all patients. In order to further characterize the allergenic components of these extracts, SDS-PAGE and electroblotting studies were also performed. Immunoblots of raw and cooked green beans extract showed two IgE-binding bands with apparent molecular weights of 41.1 and 70.6 kD. Interestingly, a 47-kD IgE-binding protein was detected only in raw green bean extracts. CONCLUSIONS: We report three patients who developed asthma and rhinitis caused by exposure to raw, but not to cooked, green beans and chards in a non-occupational environment. Only minor differences of IgE reactivity between nitrocellulose-blotted raw and boiled green bean extract were found.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Food allergy and intolerance in children and adolescents, an update.

Epidemiological surveys demonstrate that rapid increase in allergic diseases is a real phenomenon. In developed countries they are about the commonest chronic diseases, reaching between 15% and 30% of the population. Adverse reaction to food can be divided into toxic reaction and non-toxic reactions. The non-toxic reactions are divided into non-immune mediated and immune mediated, these are considered food allergic reactions. We showed our experience in a 4 y survey, individualized by food allergens during the first two years of life. In Spain egg white protein is the most common allergen followed by cow's milk and peanuts. These three food items represent half of the sensitizations in children under 2 y of age. After 4 y sensitivities to vegetable allergens such as nuts, fruits and legumes are most frequent. The diagnosis of food allergy is still problematic, even in the case of atopy or IgE mediated hypersensitivity. There is a lack of standardized diagnostic procedures; the only test accepted as 'gold standard' for confirmation of food allergy and in general for food intolerance, is a properly performed double blind placebo-controlled oral food challenge. Negative results should be always followed by an open food challenge. This test should only be conducted in patients with a good medical condition and in a clinic or hospital setting, and only if trained personal and equipment for treating systemic anaphylaxis are present. Contraindications to a challenge test are limited to those situations that can be hazardous for the patient in relationship to the studied food. The treatment of food allergy and intolerance is avoiding the implicated food as long as necessary, until tolerance appears. Prevention of food allergy is the first goal of every pediatric allergologist. Controlled trials of food allergy prevention have been performed only in high allergic risk children.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Clinical cross-reactivity among foods of the Rosaceae family.

BACKGROUND: Foods from the Rosaceae botanical family have been increasingly reported as causes of allergic reaction. Patients frequently have positive skin tests or radioallergosorbent test results for multiple members of this botanical family. OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to investigate the clinical cross-reactivity assessed by double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) of Rosaceae foods (apricot, almond, plum, strawberry, apple, peach, and pear). METHODS: Thirty-four consecutive adult patients complaining of adverse reactions to Rosaceae were included in the study. Skin prick tests and CAP System (FEIA) were performed with Rosaceae foods in all patients. Clinical reactivity to Rosaceae was systematically evaluated by open food challenges (OFCs), unless there was a convincing history of a recent severe anaphylaxis. Positive reactions on OFCs were subsequently evaluated by DBPCFCs. RESULTS: Twenty-six and 24 patients had positive skin prick tests and CAP FEIA with Rosaceae, respectively; from these 88% and 100% had positive tests with >/=2. No evidence of clinical reactivity was found in 66% percent of positive skin prick tests and 63% of positive specific IgE determinations to fruits. A total of 226 food challenges (including OFC and DBPCFC) were performed in the 28 patients with positive skin prick tests or CAP System FEIA. Of 182 initial OFCs carried out, 26 (14%) reactions were confirmed by DBPCFCs. Overall, 40 reactions were considered positive in 22 patients with positive skin tests or CAP FEIA. Thirty-eight reactions had been previously reported, the remaining two were detected by systematic challenges. Most reactions were caused by peach (22 patients), apple (6), and apricot (5). Ten patients (46%) were clinically allergic to peach and other Rosaceae. CONCLUSION: Positive skin test and CAP System FEIA should not be taken as the only guide for multi-species dietary restrictions. Nevertheless, the potential clinical allergy to other Rosaceae should not be neglected. If the reported reaction is confirmed, current tolerance to other Rosaceae should be precisely established unless there has been ingestion without symptoms after the reaction.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Randomized, double-blind, crossover challenge study in 53 subjects reporting adverse reactions to melon (Cucumis melo).

BACKGROUND: Few studies have evaluated IgE-mediated hypersensitivity to melon with details of clinical reactions confirmed by double-blind, placebo-controlled, food challenges (DBPCFCs). OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate clinical features (type and severity of reactions, age at onset, results of skin prick and in vitro tests, and incidence of other allergic diseases and associated food allergies) of acute allergic reactions to melon confirmed by DBPCFCs. METHODS: Fifty-three consecutive adult patients complaining of adverse reactions to melon were included in the study. Skin prick tests and detection of specific IgE were performed in all patients with melon, avocado, kiwi, banana, chestnut, latex, pollen, and other offending foods. Patients first underwent an open food challenge, unless they had a convincing history of severe anaphylaxis. Positive open food challenge reactions were subsequently evaluated by DBPCFCs. RESULTS: Actual clinical reactivity was confirmed in 19 (36%) of 53 patients. The most frequent symptom was oral allergy syndrome (n = 14), but two patients experienced life-threatening reactions, including respiratory symptoms and hypotension. The positive predictive value for a skin prick test was 42%, and that for specific IgE measurement was 44%. Forty-five reactions to 15 other foods were confirmed in 18 patients. The most common foods associated with melon allergy were avocado (n = 7), banana (n = 7), kiwi (n = 6), watermelon (n = 6), and peach (n = 5). Onset of melon-induced allergic symptoms occurred from 6 to 45 years (median, 20 years), preceded by seasonal rhinitis, asthma, or both in 88% (15/17). CONCLUSION: About one third of reported reactions to melon are confirmed by means of DBPCFC, which has been proven to be the most reliable procedure in the diagnosis of clinical fruit allergy. Isolated melon allergy is rare, with most patients either having allergic rhinitis, asthma, or both and associated food allergies.

Adolescent↗