PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J F Gehanno

Publications and source records attributed to J F Gehanno.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

How to select publications on occupational health: the usefulness of Medline and the impact factor.

OBJECTIVES: Publications in the field of occupational health appear in various journals, including those of other medical specialties. This complicates the follow up of literature for specialists in this field. On the basis of Medline and the impact factor, this diversity was assessed, and a cost effective method for selecting the most pertinent journals in the practice of occupational health was proposed. METHODS: A Medline search identified all the articles published in 1998 with occupational diseases or occupational exposures as the main topic. These articles were classified based on the journals in which they appeared. The journals were then compared according to their subject area, the number of articles that were published in the fields studied, and their impact factor. RESULTS: The search retrieved 2247 articles, published in 577 different journals in 1998. Each journal published between one and 105 articles during this period (mean 3.89). However, only 1.4% of the journals accounted for more than 25% of the total articles published. More than half of the articles were published in journals dealing with general practice or medical specialties other than occupational health. Only 66% of retrieved journals had an impact factor, and more than 80% of the articles were published in journals with an impact factor <2. CONCLUSION: Simply following up occupational health journals is not sufficient to meet the requirements of the occupational health professional. Moreover, the use of the impact factor cannot be considered as a reliable research tool to assess follow up. Two lists of eight and 38 journals were thus set up. They permit a literature coverage of 27% and 52% respectively in the specific fields studied, and this seems to be the optimal compromise between time and literature covered. Lastly, practical procedures are suggested to follow up literature and obtain abstracts from selected journals on the internet.

Bibliometrics↗

Usefulness of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis in assessing nosocomial transmission of pertussis.

During a 2-week period, three infants with a cough lasting at least 8 days with whoops, were admitted to the pediatric unit; Bordetella pertussis was isolated from nasopharyngeal aspirates collected from the three infants. Approximately 1 week later, a nurse working on the same unit developed influenza-like symptoms followed by whooping cough; B pertussis was isolated. Isolates from the nurse and from one of the infants were shown to be indistinguishable by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. These data demonstrate that B pertussis transmission to healthcare workers is possible and emphasize the need to use respiratory protection devices (Droplet Precautions) for healthcare workers having close contact with infected children.

Adult↗

Nosocomial pertussis in healthcare workers from a pediatric emergency unit in France.

OBJECTIVE: After pertussis was diagnosed in July 1997 in a 55-year-old nurse (case) from a pediatric emergency unit who had a respiratory illness and paroxysmal cough for 5 weeks, an epidemiological investigation was initiated to determine if other healthcare workers (HCWs) from the same unit also had pertussis. DESIGN: Interviews were conducted to assess symptoms occurring in the previous months. Two sera were collected 2 to 3 months apart for 59 of 61 HCWs of the unit. The IgG response to pertussis toxin was determined using Western blot assay. SETTING: Pediatric emergency unit (61 HCWs) of a 2,500-bed university hospital. RESULTS: There was a total of 10 (5 confirmed and 5 probable) cases of pertussis identified in this outbreak. Nine HCWs (15%) had results suggesting recent or acute pertussis. To avoid transmission to patients and other HCWs, all HCWs with cough were treated for 14 days with erythromycin, and those having acute cough were given a 5-day sick leave. Despite these measures, a new acute pertussis case was identified in a 41-year-old nurse, with a positive culture from nasopharyngeal aspirates. Thus, all HCWs in the unit were prescribed spiramycin for 10 days to prevent any further spread of pertussis. CONCLUSION: Pertussis should be considered a threat to HCWs who are in contact with children. For HCWs, diagnosis of pertussis should be made on a clinical basis, giving greater importance to sensitivity of diagnosis criteria, and on early bacterial identification by culture of the organism or by polymerase chain reaction. RECOMMENDATIONS: In case of pertussis in an HCW, all staff in the unit who have had unprotected and intensive contact with that person should be provided with macrolide treatment to stop any transmission to colleagues and to young patients. Furthermore, the possibility of providing these HCWs with acellular pertussis vaccines warrants further investigation.

Adult↗

Nosocomial meningococcemia in a physician.

We report the case of a pediatrician who developed meningococcal meningitis after performing endotracheal intubation without protection on a child who was suspected of having meningoencephalitis. This case emphasizes the necessity for healthcare workers who perform high-risk procedures to use personal protection devices (i.e., respirators and protective goggles). Unprotected healthcare workers with high exposure to Neisseria meningitidis should receive chemoprophylaxis.

Adult↗

Assessment of bibliographic databases performance in information retrieval for occupational and environmental toxicology.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficiency of the major bibliographic databases by assessing the percentage of references among the total literature available that can be retrieved from each database. We also evaluated the best database combinations to carry out an exhaustive search. METHODS: BIOSIS, EMBASE, MEDLINE, NIOSH-TIC, and TOXLINE were searched on two topics: allergy to latex and asbestos and mesothelioma, in the title, abstract, or keywords (textwords). This search was performed for the years 1994 and 1995. All the records were classified by journal and author's name and were verified for each record whether or not it was indexed in each database. Statistical analysis was performed with chi 2 test. RESULTS: 777 articles in 510 issues were found. The efficiency of each database (percentage of articles recovered) and of combinations varied between 11% and 63% for one database and between 42% and 86% for a combination of two databases. The reasons why these differences exist between databases, and within a database, between two different subjects or two different years are reported. CONCLUSION: Firstly, it is not advisable to assert that a bibliography is complete when only one database is searched. Secondly, the efficiency of the databases may be quite different. Finally, it is suggested that the best way to be as exhaustive as possible is to search two or more databases-for example, in EMBASE and TOXLINE, or to a lesser extent EMBASE and MEDLINE. This seems to be the best compromise solution between time consumed for searching and efficiency.

Asbestos↗