[The Longo technique: should it be adopted?].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to J F Gravié.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: Stapled anopexy is a new approach for haemorrhoids requiring surgical treatment. This study reviews the available information concerning the present results of this procedure. METHODS: Medline and hand search of the literature was conducted to identify available information on the procedure, with a special interest for the on-going or published randomized clinical trials. RESULTS: The advantages of the stapled approach of haemorrhoids were analyzed in the different areas of concern, including postoperative pain reduction, length of hospital stay and sick-leave, postoperative wound care and type and rate of complications. Continence status, symptom cure and patient satisfaction following stapled anopexy are also reported. CONCLUSION: Stapled anopexy is probably less painful than conventional haemorrhoidectomy. Other advantages in the short term result from this new approach. Long term efficacy of the procedure is still unknown.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate postoperative pain and discomfort in 70 patients undergoing cholecystectomy. The choice of surgical approach was left to the surgeon. Accordingly, these patients were then divided in two groups: laparoscopic cholecystectomy (group I; n = 37); classic cholecystectomy (subcostal incision) (group II; n = 33). There was no significant difference between these groups concerning weight/height ratio, size and number of stones. Patients in group II were older (55 +/- 16 years) than those in group I (46 +/- 11 years) (P < 0.01). The mean duration of surgery was shorter in group II (96 +/- 31 min) than in group I (119 +/- 49 min) (P < 0.01). Postoperative discomfort was evaluated by (group I versus group II respectively): a) the mean length of hospital stay after surgery (3.7 +/- 1.5 versus 6.7 +/- 1.1 days, P < 0.02); b) the mean delay to return of intestinal motility (1.5 +/- 0.6 versus 2.0 +/- 0.6 days, P < 0.001); c) the mean perfusion time (1.4 +/- 0.6 versus 2.6 +/- 0.8 days, P < 0.001); d) intensity of postoperative pain which was evaluated daily. There was no significant difference between these two groups concerning the use of analgesics; however, a statistically significant difference was found in the visual and verbal scales, starting on the second postoperative day and in autonomy as early as the first postoperative day.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)