PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J F Harryhill

Publications and source records attributed to J F Harryhill.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Progressing prostate carcinoma.

In the Karnell Cancer Center Grand Rounds, we present a patient who underwent radical prostatectomy with bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy, but had positive margins and subsequently developed local recurrence and then systemic disease. Pathologic and radiologic aspects of his disease are discussed. Therapeutic options at different stages of the disease are examined from the point of view of the urologist, radiation oncologist, and medical oncologist. The surgical portion of the discussion focuses on the selection of initial therapy. Both the selection of surgical candidates and choice of pre- or post-operative therapy in patients can be aided by prognostic tools looking at several variables, including prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, Gleason score of the tumor, seminal vesicle invasion, extracapsular invasion, and lymph node involvement. Low-risk patients can be treated with monotherapy, such as radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, prostate brachytherapy, or cryosurgical ablation of the prostate. Higher risk patients may require adjuvant and possibly neoadjuvant therapy in addition. The radiation portion of the discussion focuses on the use of radiation therapy as salvage for relapsing disease. Of particular importance is the point that treating high-risk patients whose PSA levels have started to rise but are less than 1 ng/ml results in a long-term PSA control rate as high as 75%, but that limiting the use of salvage radiation therapy to patients with high PSA levels or biopsy confirmation of local recurrence in the face of a negative bone scan results in biochemical long-term control of less than 40%. In the medical oncology part of the discussion, the major focus is on the use of chemotherapy to treat patients whose disease has become resistant to hormonal therapy. Mitoxantrone plus a corticosteroid has been found to offer significant palliation for such patients. Combination therapy with estramustine plus taxanes, other microtubule inhibitors, or other agents such as topoisomerase II inhibitors, has been found to cause shrinkage of measurable soft tissue disease and diminution of serum PSA levels. The development of effective hormonal and chemotherapeutic drugs for treatment of metastatic disease has led to new interest in adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy of high-risk patients.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Extraperitoneal laparoscopic urethropexy with Marlex mesh.

OBJECTIVES: Extraperitoneal laparoscopic urethropexy (ELU) has recently been developed as a minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Use of the laparoscopic stapling device and Marlex mesh in the extraperitoneal space may allow for a technically easier procedure and shorter operative times compared with other laparoscopic techniques without compromising long-term efficacy. We present our initial results and 2.5-year interim analysis with this alternative method of laparoscopic urethropexy. METHODS: Twenty-four consecutive patients with urodynamically demonstrated genuine SUI underwent attempted ELU at a single institution from December 1994 to December 1995. Operative data were collected from the patient chart, and follow-up data were obtained by telephone interview. Treatment was considered successful if, at last follow-up, a patient was using one or fewer pads daily and would recommend the procedure to a friend. RESULTS: ELU was completed in 22 of 24 patients. In 1 patient with a prior history of pelvic surgery, the preperitoneal space was not accessible. Of the 22 patients, 20 were available for follow-up. The mean operative time was 69 minutes. There were no intraoperative complications. At initial follow-up (mean 10.5 months), 18 (90%) of 20 patients reported subjective cure of SUI (one or fewer pads daily). At a mean follow-up of 29 months (range 23 to 34), 16 (80%) of 20 patients had subjective cure of SUI. Six patients would not recommend the procedure to a friend, all of whom had de novo urgency and/or urge incontinence. Thus, using our strict criteria, ELU was successful in 14 (70%) of 20 patients at a mean follow-up of 2.5 years. No patient has had permanent urinary retention. CONCLUSIONS: ELU can be performed rapidly and safely in patients without previous pelvic surgery. De novo urgency incontinence may be problematic. Future analysis of this subset of patients will determine whether this procedure is durable in the long term.

Adult↗