PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J F Sheils

Publications and source records attributed to J F Sheils.

11 recordsLinked to original sources

The estimated costs and savings of medical nutrition therapy: the Medicare population.

OBJECTIVES: To measure the potential savings from medical nutrition therapy (MNT) and to estimate the net cost to Medicare of covering these services for Medicare enrollees. This includes developing an estimate of the cost of providing medical nutrition services to the Medicare population and estimating the savings in hospital and other spending resulting from the use of these services. DESIGN: Analysis of longitudinal data from the Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound (Seattle, Wash) for persons aged 55 years and older who have coverage for MNT services. SUBJECTS/SETTING: Persons aged 55 years and older who had diabetes (n = 12,308), cardiovascular disease (n = 10,895), or renal disease (n = 3,328) and who were covered under the Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, including Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in the plan's Medicare risk contract program. Extrapolation to the US Medicare population is based on data for persons served by the Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound. INTERVENTION: The use of MNT. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURE: Differences in health care utilization levels of persons with diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and renal disease who do and do not receive MNT. Differences in utilization were estimated for hospital discharges per calendar quarter, physician visits per quarter, and other outpatient visits per quarter. STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: Multivariate regression models of changes in utilization for persons after they receive MNT services. RESULTS: Our analysis showed that MNT was associated with a reduction in utilization of hospital services of 9.5% for patients with diabetes and 8.6% for patients with cardiovascular disease. Also, utilization of physician services declined by 23.5% for MNT users with diabetes and 16.9% for MNT users with cardiovascular disease. The net cost of covering MNT under Medicare is estimated to be $369.7 million over the 1998 through 2004 period. The total cost of benefits is estimated to be $2.7 billion over this period. This would be partially offset by estimated savings of $2.3 billion resulting in net costs of $369.7 million. The program would actually yield net savings after the third year of the program, which would continue through 2004 and beyond. CONCLUSION: After an initial period of implementation, coverage for MNT can result in a net reduction in health services utilization and costs for at least some populations. In the case of persons aged 55 years and older, the savings in utilization of hospital and other services will actually exceed the cost of providing the MNT benefit. These results suggest that Medicare coverage of MNT has the potential to pay for itself with savings in utilization for other services.

Aged↗

Paying more and losing ground: how employer cost-shifting is eroding health coverage of working families.

This report describes the decline in employer-based health coverage between 1989 and 1996 and the underlying causes of that decline--including rapidly rising worker premiums and other economic variables. The analysis combines data from a variety of sources, including the U.S. Census Bureau's Current Population Survey, the National Medical Expenditures Survey for workers with employer coverage, and annual KPMG Peat Marwick Surveys. The authors employed regression analysis to determine the relative importance of economic factors on an individual's probability of having employer-based coverage--as either a worker or dependent. In addition to providing a basis for measuring the impact of various factors on the level of coverage of workers and dependents during the 1989 to 1996 period, these models also allowed projection of coverage levels in future years under alternative assumptions about premium growth, employee contribution shares, and other economic factors.

Adult↗

The public cost of expanding coverage.

The 103d Congress considered several health care reform bills that would encourage voluntary expansions of coverage through insurance market reforms, new tax deductions for premiums, and direct premium subsidies for low-income persons. We found that insurance reforms alone will do little to expand coverage. We also found that most of the proposed tax deductions would go to persons who already have insurance and would have little impact on coverage. Premium subsidies for low-income persons would greatly increase coverage. However, coverage would change little for those who would have to pay all or part of the premium.

Costs and Cost Analysis↗

Potential public expenditures under managed competition.

This DataWatch estimates the public cost of providing universal coverage under a managed competition model. First, a uniform benefit package is specified; next, the lowest-cost premium for this coverage is estimated, based on average costs in a well-managed health maintenance organization (HMO). Based on these estimates, the cost of premium subsidies and tax revenue effects are determined. It is estimated that if coverage is extended to currently uninsured persons using these estimates and assumptions, spending for these persons will increase 73.9 percent over current levels. The authors estimate a net increase of $47.9 billion in 1993 health spending under a managed competition program with low patient cost sharing. This includes savings of $4.5 billion from wider use of managed care and $11.2 billion in administrative cost savings.

Competitive Medical Plans↗