PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J F Solsona

Publications and source records attributed to J F Solsona.

12 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Withdrawing and withholding life support in the intensive care unit: a Spanish prospective multi-centre observational study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine how frequently life support is withheld or withdrawn from adult critically ill patients, and how physicians and patients families agree on the decision regarding the limitation of life support. DESIGN: Prospective multi-centre cohort study. SETTING: Six adult medical-surgical Spanish intensive care units (ICUs). PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: Three thousand four hundred ninety-eight consecutive patients admitted to six ICUs were enrolled. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Data collected included age, sex, SAPS II score on admission and within 24 h of the decision to limit treatment, length of ICU stay, outcome at ICU discharge, cause and mode of death, time to death after the decision to withhold or withdraw life support, consultation and agreement with patient's family regarding withholding or withdrawal, and the modalities of therapies withdrawn or withheld. Two hundred twenty-six (6.6%) of 3,498 patients had therapy withheld or withdrawn and 221 of them died in the ICU. Age, SAPS II and length of ICU stay were significantly higher in patients dying patients who had therapy withheld or withdrawn than in patients dying despite active treatment. The proposal to withhold or withdraw life support was initiated by physicians in 210 (92.9%) of 226 patients and by the family in the remaining cases. The patient's family was not involved in the decision to withhold or withdraw life support therapy in 64 (28.3%) of 226 cases. Only 21 (9%) patients had expressed their wish to decline life-prolonging therapy prior to ICU admission. CONCLUSIONS: The withholding and withdrawing of treatment was frequent in critically ill patients and was initiated primarily by physicians.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Are auditory warnings in the intensive care unit properly adjusted?

The purpose of this study was to determine whether auditory warnings in the intensive care unit (ICU) were properly adjusted. An intervention study (before- and-after assessment) was conducted in a 12-bed medical-surgical ICU of an acute-care teaching hospital in Barcelona, Spain. A total of 100 patients with stable haemodynamic and respiratory parameters were included. In the first 3-month phase of the study, minimum and maximum alarm parameters of breathing rate, expired volume/min, airway pressure, SaO(2), arterial blood pressure and heart rate were recorded. In the second 12-month phase of the study, the same alarm parameters were recorded every 4 hours in the patient's medical record. In the third 3-month phase of the study, alarm readings were recorded again as in the first phase. The change throughout coefficient of variation (CV) and the 95% confidence interval (CI) for each alarm were calculated. Following the intervention, there was a statistically significant improvement in alarm readings for expired volume, heart rate and systolic blood pressure, so that alarms had been more properly adjusted to the patient's real value. Nursing staff should be aware that auditory warnings in ICU stable patients are frequently set very far from suitable values. Recording of alarm parameters in the patient's medical record as a routine daily activity was an effective intervention for improving adjustment of auditory warnings.

Calibration↗
PubMed1997

Extubation outcome after spontaneous breathing trials with T-tube or pressure support ventilation. The Spanish Lung Failure Collaborative Group.

A 2-h T-tube trial of spontaneous breathing was used in selecting patients ready for extubation and discontinuation of mechanical ventilation. However, some doubt remains as to whether it is the most appropriate method of performing a spontaneous breathing trial. We carried out a prospective, randomized, multicenter study involving patients who had received mechanical ventilation for more than 48 h and who were considered by their physicians to be ready for weaning according to clinical criteria and standard weaning parameters. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo a 2-h trial of spontaneous breathing in one of two ways: with a T-tube system or with pressure support ventilation of 7 cm H2O. If a patient had signs of poor tolerance at any time during the trial, mechanical ventilation was reinstituted. Patients without these features at the end of the trial were extubated. Of the 246 patients assigned to the T-tube group, 192 successfully completed the trial and were extubated; 36 of them required reintubation. Of the 238 patients in the group receiving pressure support ventilation, 205 were extubated and 38 of them required reintubation. The percentage of patients who remained extubated after 48 h was not different between the two groups (63% T-tube, 70% pressure support ventilation, p = 0.14). The percentage of patients falling the trial was significantly higher when the T-tube was used (22 versus 14%, p = 0.03). Clinical evolution during the trial was not different in patients reintubated and successfully extubated. ICU mortality among reintubated patients was significantly higher than in successfully extubated patients (27 versus 2.6%, p < 0.001). Spontaneous breathing trials with pressure support or T-tube are suitable methods for successful discontinuation of ventilator support in patients without problems to resume spontaneous breathing.

Aged↗
PubMed1996

[Fibrinolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction: analysis of delay].

BACKGROUND: The delay time from the onset of symptoms to the initiation of intravenous fibrinolytic treatment in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is herein described. METHODS: A study was carried out of the consecutive AMI diagnosed in the Medical Area of the Emergency Department of the Hospital del Mar in Barcelona, Spain, with a 24-hour follow up from 15 May 1993 to 14 January, 1994. All the patients under the age of 80 years with transmural AMI of any localization and evolution of under 6 hours were considered to receive fibrinolytic treatment. The following delay times were analyzed: total delay time, extrahospitalary delay time and intrahospitalary delay time, which included assistance delay time, delay in fibrinolytic treatment indication and delay time in performance of the same. RESULTS: During the study period 18,316 patients were attended in the Emergency Medical Area, of which 80 corresponded to AMI. Fibrinolytic treatment was initiated with intravenous streptokinase in 33 patients (41.3%). The total delay time was 287.2 +/- 202.6 (mean +/- SD) minutes; the extrahospitalary and intrahospitalary delays were 159.8 +/- 151.7 and 126.8 +/- 161.7 minutes, respectively. The delay time for assistance was 8.5 +/- 12.7 minutes, the delay time in treatment indication was 78.8 +/- 101.8 minutes and in performance it was 39.5 +/- 52.6 minutes. This latter time was analyzed on the basis of the administration site, with statistically significant differences (p < 0.005) if the fibrinolytic treatment was performed in the Emergency Medical Area (12.5 +/- 0.7 minutes), in the observation room (41.4 +/- 50.7 minutes) or in the Intensive Care Unit (61.4 +/- 75.8 minutes). CONCLUSIONS: Most of the intrahospitalary delay in the administration of fibrinolytic treatment is due to decision delay in regards to carrying out this therapy.

Aged↗
PubMed1995

A comparison of four methods of weaning patients from mechanical ventilation. Spanish Lung Failure Collaborative Group.

BACKGROUND: Weaning patients from mechanical ventilation is an important problem in intensive care units. Weaning is usually conducted in an empirical manner, and a standardized approach has not been developed. METHODS: We carried out a prospective, randomized, multicenter study involving 546 patients who had received mechanical ventilation for a mean (+/- SD) of 7.5 +/- 6.1 days and who were considered by their physicians to be ready for weaning. One hundred thirty patients had respiratory distress during a two-hour trial of spontaneous breathing. These patients were randomly assigned to undergo one of four weaning techniques: intermittent mandatory ventilation, in which the ventilator rate was initially set at a mean (+/- SD) of 10.0 +/- 2.2 breaths per minute and then decreased, if possible, at least twice a day, usually by 2 to 4 breaths per minute (29 patients); pressure-support ventilation, in which pressure support was initially set at 18.0 +/- 6.1 cm of water and then reduced, if possible, by 2 to 4 cm of water at least twice a day (37 patients); intermittent trials of spontaneous breathing, conducted two or more times a day if possible (33 patients); or a once-daily trail of spontaneous breathing (31 patients). Standardized protocols were followed for each technique. RESULTS: The median duration of weaning was 5 days for intermittent mandatory ventilation (first quartile, 3 days; third quartile, 11 days), 4 days for pressure-support ventilation (2 and 12 days, respectively), 3 days for intermittent (multiple) trials of spontaneous breathing (2 and 6 days, respectively), and 3 days for a once-daily trial of spontaneous breathing (1 and 6 days, respectively). After adjustment for other covariates, the rate of successful weaning was higher with a once-daily trial of spontaneous breathing than with intermittent mandatory ventilation (rate ratio, 2.83; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.36 to 5.89; P < 0.006) or pressure-support ventilation (rate ratio, 2.05; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.04 to 4.04; P < 0.04). There was no significant difference in the rate of success between once-daily trials and multiple trials of spontaneous breathing. CONCLUSIONS: A once-daily trial of spontaneous breathing led to extubation about three times more quickly than intermittent mandatory ventilation and about twice as quickly as pressure-support ventilation. Multiple daily trials of spontaneous breathing were equally successful.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1988

Empyema caused by Kingella denitrificans and Peptostreptococcus spp. in a patient with bronchogenic carcinoma.

Empyema caused by Kingella denitrificans and Peptostreptococcus spp. was diagnosed in a patient with bronchogenic carcinoma. This appears to be the third report providing evidence of a pathogenic role for K. denitrificans, and the first concerning infection in the pleural space and in a patient with underlying immunosuppressive disease. K. denitrificans should be added to the list of fastidious gram-negative bacteria associated with opportunistic infections in the compromised host.

Actinomycetales Infections↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Variability in working systems in intensive care units].

INTRODUCTION: Patients attended in Intensive Medicine Services (IMS) require a high therapeutic support. To do so, each IMS elaborates a work system (monitoring of constants, insertion of catheters,...) aiming to respond to these high necessities of therapy. The objective of this study is to describe the variability among different IMS. METHODS: The study was performed in 15 hospitals in Catalonia between April and May 1995. In the end two of them did not participate in the study. In each hospital 180 pieces of data were collected referring to their material and human resources, graphics of data collection, monitoring of respiratory system (mechanical ventilator, aspirations of secretions, tracheostomy care), techniques of catheterization of artery and venous via vesical probing, prevention of pressure ulcers , hygiene of patients, nutrition, family treatment and data about medical orders and nursing courses. Similarly, the fact whether the work system was justified by studies from the same IMS, other centres, or whether it was simply unknown, was also evaluated. RESULTS: There was a great variability among the IMS studied, oscillating significatively according to assigned resources, frequency of action and cost. According to the procedure 61% of IMS did not justify the work systems depending on scientific data. CONCLUSION: it is necessary to unify the different work systems. To do so, and in our opinion, scientific societies should establish common norms, guidelines and protocols so as to obtain a higher efficiency of IMS.

Humans↗