PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J G Gunderson

Publications and source records attributed to J G Gunderson.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2000

Risk factors associated with the dissociative experiences of borderline patients.

The objective of this study was to identify the risk factors associated with the dissociative symptomatology of borderline patients. The Dissociative Experiences Scale--a 28-item self-report measure that has well documented reliability and validity--was administered to 290 criteria-defined borderline patients and 72 axis II comparison subjects. Semistructured interviews pertaining to difficult childhood experiences and adult experiences of being a victim of violence were administered to these patients blind to diagnostic status. In the sample of borderline patients alone, multiple regression analyses revealed that four risk factors were found to be significantly associated with the level of dissociation reported by these 290 patients: inconsistent treatment by a caretaker, sexual abuse by a caretaker, witnessing sexual violence as a child, and adult rape history. In the combined sample of axis II patients, the borderline diagnosis joined these four "traumatic" factors as a significant predictor of the overall level of dissociation reported by these 362 personality-disordered inpatients. The results of this study suggest that both sexual trauma and something intrinsic to the borderline diagnosis itself are risk factors for dissociative phenomena among borderline patients.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Violence in the lives of adult borderline patients.

The purpose of this study was to assess the experiences of adult violence reported by a sample of criteria-defined borderline patients and axis II controls. The experiences of having had a physically abusive partner and/or having been raped reported by 362 personality-disordered inpatients were assessed blind to diagnostic status using a semistructured research interview. Forty-six percent of borderline patients reported having been a victim of violence since the age of 18. Borderline patients (N = 290) were significantly more likely than axis II controls (N = 72) to report having had a physically abusive partner, having been raped, having been raped multiple times, having been raped by a known perpetrator, and having been both physically assaulted by a partner and raped. Female borderline patients were significantly more likely than male borderline patients to have been physically and/or sexually assaulted as adults (50% vs. 26%). However, a significantly higher percentage of borderline patients of both genders reported experiences of adult violence than controls of the same gender. Four risk factors were found to significantly predict whether borderline patients had an adult history of being a victim of violence: female gender, a substance use disorder that began before the age of 18, childhood sexual abuse, and emotional withdrawal by a caretaker. The results of this study suggest that both male and female borderline patients are at substantial risk for being physically and/or sexually victimized as adults.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Making the case for psychoanalytic therapies in the current psychiatric environment.

A variety of political, economic, and scientific forces have caused psychoanalytic therapies to become marginalized in psychiatry. These therapies are given short shrift in recently developed treatment guidelines, which are based largely on notions of empirical validation narrowly construed. Questions about the efficacy of psychoanalytic therapy can be meaningfully addressed by systematic assessment of available knowledge and potential data bases and by explicit efforts to locate the role of psychoanalytic therapies alongside other modalities. Several steps that might lend the psychoanalytic therapies greater credibility are proposed: (1) define the distinguishing features; (2) identify clear indications and contraindications; (3) systematically collect case histories of successfully treated mentally ill (diagnosable) patients; (4) increase vigilance (together with the patient) toward assessing progress in treatment.

Humans↗
PubMed1999

Co-occurrence of mood and personality disorders: a report from the Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study (CLPS).

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship of subtypes and particular clinical features of mood disorders to co-occurrence with specific personality disorders. Five hundred and seventy-one subjects recruited for the Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study (CLPS) were assessed with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I) and the Diagnostic Interview for DSM-IV Personality Disorders (DIPD-IV). Percent co-occurrence rates for current and lifetime mood disorders with personality disorders were calculated. Logistic regression analyses examined the effects of clinical characteristics of depressive disorders (e.g., age at onset, recurrence, symptom severity, double depression, and atypical features) on personality disorder co-occurrence. In comparison with other DSM-IV personality disorders, avoidant, borderline, and dependent personality disorders (PDs) were most specifically associated with mood disorders, particularly depressive disorders. Severity and recurrence of major depressive disorder and comorbid dysthymic disorder predicted co-occurrence with borderline and to a lesser extent research criteria depressive personality disorders. The results are consistent with the view that a mood disorder with an insidious onset and recurrence, chronicity, and progression in severity leads to a personality disorder diagnosis in young adults.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Reliability and validity of depressive personality disorder.

OBJECTIVE: Depressive personality disorder was introduced into DSM-IV's appendix amid controversy. While that disorder appears to be a reliable and valid one, the authors offer new data about its relationship to major depression, dysthymic disorder, and other personality disorders. METHOD: The authors assessed 54 subjects with early-onset, long-standing mild depressive features for depressive personality disorder, axis I and axis II disorders, family history, and treatment history; they conducted follow-up interviews 1 year after the baseline assessment. Subjects with (N=30) and without (N=24) depressive personality disorder were characterized and compared in terms of those variables. RESULTS: Although depressive personality disorder and dysthymia co-occurred in some subjects, 63% of subjects with depressive personality disorder did not have dysthymia, and 60% did not have current major depression. Although subjects with depressive personality disorder were more likely than the mood disorder comparison group to have another personality disorder, 40% had no such disorder. Contrary to study hypotheses, mood disorder was not more common in first-degree relatives of subjects with depressive personality disorder than in relatives of the comparison group. Subjects with and without depressive personality disorder had similar rates of past treatment with medication and psychotherapy; however, the duration of psychotherapy was significantly longer for subjects with than for those without depressive personality. The depressive personality diagnosis was relatively stable over the 1-year follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Depressive personality disorder appears to be a relatively stable condition with incomplete overlap with axis I mood disorders and personality disorders. Further studies are needed to better characterize its treatment response and relationship to axis I mood disorders.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Personality dimensions associated with depressive personality disorder.

Depressive personality disorder (DPD) is a historically important construct that requires empirical attention. This study compares 26 subjects with this disorder to 20 non-DPD subjects who have similar histories of longstanding early-onset depression on three personality measures, the Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire (TPQ), NEO-Five Factor Inventory, and Defense Style Questionnaire (DSQ). The samples were demographically similar and had similar rates of comorbid depression and dysthymia. They differed in that DPD subjects scored significantly higher on Harm Avoidance and Neuroticism, and significantly lower on Novelty Seeking, Extroversion, and Adaptive defense mechanisms. Implications for clinical care and nosology are discussed.

Adaptation, Psychological↗
PubMed1997

Families of borderline patients: a psychoeducational approach.

The development of the psychoeducational form of treatment described in this article has been prompted by changes in our understanding of borderline psychopathology and changes in the health care system in which these patients are treated. After reviewing these background changes, the authors describe the treatment itself, its form, its purpose, and the preliminary suggestions of its effectiveness.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

The borderline patient's intolerance of aloneness: insecure attachments and therapist availability.

OBJECTIVE: This article describes the clinical and theoretical significance of intolerance of aloneness for patients with borderline personality disorder. It is intended to make their treatment more effective and less burdensome. METHOD: Clinical observations from the author's more than 9,000 hours of psychotherapeutic work and 500 psychotherapy consultations with borderline patients are synthesized with findings of relevant empirical studies and attachment theory. RESULTS: Intolerance of aloneness is a deficit that is associated with the borderline patient's typical clinging and attention-seeking or detached forms of attachment. Suggestions are given for ways in which clinicians can respond to these dysfunctional attachment behaviors to diminish the patient's feared aloneness without encouraging unnecessary regressions. A framework for understanding the long-term attachment processes required to correct this deficit is offered. CONCLUSIONS: Intolerance of aloneness is a core deficit in borderline patients that can become less handicapping with reliable, but not excessive, responsiveness of the therapist.

Anxiety, Separation↗
PubMed1995

Changes in self-destructiveness of borderline patients in psychotherapy. A prospective follow-up.

Thirty-seven female inpatients with borderline personality disorder were followed prospectively for up to 5 years to assess changes in two forms of self-destructiveness: suicidal behavior/ideation, and self-harm behavior/ideation. It was found that suicidal behavior declined significantly at 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year follow-up; self-harm behavior showed trends but no significant decline over 5 years. Ideation (both suicidal ideation and self-harm) did not decline notably. Three alternate courses of self-harm behavior are identified: "fluctuating," "consistently low," and "steadily declining." The majority of patients fell in the fluctuating category. The fluctuating group showed higher baseline dysphoria than did the consistently low group, while the latter reported higher baseline drug use. Intercorrelations showed that self-harm behavior and suicidal behavior were not associated, nor were suicidal behavior and suicidal ideation. Clinical and research implications are discussed.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1994

Building structure for the borderline construct.

This article overviews the development of the borderline personality disorder construct. In the past 25 years, the borderline personality diagnosis has grown remarkably in clinical usage even as its construct has undergone dramatic shifts in the process. It originated as a type of intrapsychic personality organization that reflected psychoanalytic observations and the hope for long-term curative therapies. It was transformed by descriptive observations into a syndrome whose boundaries with first schizophrenia and then affective disorders became the subject of intense study. More recently, it is recognized as a specific type of personality disorder that communicates substantial information about pathogenesis and that helps guide clinical planning and prognostication. The context dependency of the borderline patient's presentation explains why the diagnosis can often elude recognition.

Borderline Personality Disorder↗
PubMed1994

The Diagnostic Interview for Depressive Personality.

OBJECTIVE: The development of a new structured interview for depressive personality disorder is described. METHOD: A literature search yielded 32 traits associated with depressive personality; these traits were then used to develop the interview. Interrater reliability for the interview was tested in an initial group of 16 patients with longstanding depressive personality traits. Data from a second group of 67 subjects--54 with a possible clinical diagnosis of depressive personality and 13 normal volunteers--were used to examine the interview's psychometric properties and to modify its content. Factor analysis of the traits in the interview and modification of the instrument's structure was carried out on the basis of data from a third group of 526 subjects who were participating in a large epidemiologic study of mood disorders. RESULTS: The Diagnostic Interview for Depressive Personality, which emerged from this process, assess 30 personality traits that were shown to have satisfactory interrater reliability (kappa = 0.67), test-retest reliability (kappa = 0.41), and diagnostic reliability (kappa = 0.62). A cutoff score of 42 (from a total possible score of 60) on the interview offers a useful threshold for diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: This interview provides a reliable method for assessing depressive personality traits and establishing the diagnosis of depressive personality disorder.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

The phenomenological and conceptual interface between borderline personality disorder and PTSD.

OBJECTIVE: The authors explore the conceptual and phenomenological interface between posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and borderline personality disorder as well as the therapeutic and research implications of this interface. METHOD: They systematically review the relevant empirical, conceptual, and clinical literature. RESULTS: These seemingly separate disorders are related. Borderline personality disorder is often shaped in part by trauma, and individuals with borderline disorder are therefore vulnerable to developing PTSD. CONCLUSIONS: The authors draw a distinction between the enduring effects that traumas can have on formation (or change) of axis II personality traits (including those found in borderline personality disorder) and acute symptomatic reactions to trauma, called PTSD, that are accompanied by specific psychophysiological correlates. They describe the implications of these conclusions for DSM-IV, therapy, and future research.

Adaptation, Psychological↗
PubMed1991

The face validity of the DSM-III and DSM-III-R criteria sets for borderline personality disorder.

OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this study was to determine the congruence between DSM-III and DSM-III-R diagnoses of borderline personality disorder derived through the use of semistructured research interviews or given by experienced clinicians after lengthy consultations with an interdisciplinary team. METHOD: The presence of the DSM-III and DSM-III-R criteria sets for borderline personality disorder was assessed in a study group of 253 patients with personality disorders (148 inpatients and 105 outpatients) by raters who were blind to clinical diagnoses and who used information from two semistructured interviews of proven reliability. These diagnoses were then compared with "longitudinal expert all data" (LEAD) standard clinical diagnoses provided by therapists specifically asked to base their diagnoses on DSM criteria. RESULTS: Both criteria sets were found to be overinclusive when compared with the LEAD standard. Most criteria were also found to lack specificity. However, the three DSM-III-R criteria that are new or revisions of DSM-III criteria were found to be more specific, and raising the cutoff on the DSM-III-R criteria from five to six improved specificity. CONCLUSIONS: Both the DSM-III and DSM-III-R criteria sets for borderline personality disorder as assessed by semistructured interview lack face validity because they are nonspecific when compared with a rigorous but representative clinical standard, and the results of studies using these criteria sets may prove misleading to researchers and clinicians because they seem to define a nonspecific type of serious character pathology.

Adolescent↗