PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J G O'Grady

Publications and source records attributed to J G O'Grady.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Randomized controlled trial of tacrolimus versus microemulsified cyclosporin (TMC) in liver transplantation: poststudy surveillance to 3 years.

The 1-year results of the tacrolimus versus microemulsified cyclosporin (TMC) study found a benefit with tacrolimus immunosuppression after primary liver transplants in adults with respect to freedom from graft loss and immunological failure. The integrity of the randomization process was preserved for a further 2 years for poststudy surveillance. The data after 3 years confirms the significant difference between tacrolimus and cyclosporin with tacrolimus less likely to meet the composite primary endpoint (log rank p = 0.01; relative risk 0.75; 95% CI 0.60-0.95; p = 0.016). However, freedom from death or retransplantation no longer achieves statistical significance (relative risk 0.79; 95% CI 0.62-1.02; p = 0.065). A total of 62.1% of patients randomized to tacrolimus were alive at 3 years with their original graft and still on their allocated study medication, as compared with only 41.6% in the cyclosporin limb (p < 0.001). No difference was detected between tacrolimus and cyclosporin in hepatitis-C-positive patients with the available data. The TMC study confirms after 3 years of follow-up the benefits of tacrolimus-based immunosuppression over cyclosporin using C(0) monitoring.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Liver transplantation alcohol related liver disease: (deliberately) stirring a hornet's nest!

Outcomes after liver transplantation for alcohol related liver disease compare very favourably with those documented for other causes of cirrhosis. Despite this, 5% or less of patients with advanced alcohol related liver disease are considered for transplantation. The reasons for this are complex but include professional reluctance to refer these patients for formal assessment as well as a limited and dwindling number of organs available for transplantation. Demonstrating abstinence from alcohol consumption remains central to the assessment of candidates for transplantation. Return to alcohol consumption after transplantation can follow a pattern of abuse with consequences for health and survival but may also be controlled and of little clinical significance. A better understanding of the issues influencing these outcomes should decrease the tension that currently exists between patient expectations, professional opinion, and the attitude of the general public who gift organs for donation.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed2005

Long-term outcome of immunosuppression withdrawal after liver transplantation.

Eighteen liver transplant recipients were followed up for 10 years after a trial of immunosuppression withdrawal. Three groups were identified according to the early outcome of complete (group A, n = 5), partial (group B, n = 9), and unsuccessful (group C, n = 4) withdrawal of immunosuppression. The indications for liver transplantation (LT) (August 1983-December 1988) were as follows: primary biliary cirrhosis (n = 3), primary sclerosing cholangitis (n = 3), Budd-Chiari syndrome (n = 3), acute liver failure (n = 3), hepatitis C virus (HCV) cirrhosis (n = 1), HCV and autoimmune hepatitis (n = 1), HCV and alcohol-related cirrhosis (n = 1), HCV and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (n = 1), cystic fibrosis (n = 1), and liver metastases from testicular teratoma (n = 1). Immunosuppression was based on cyclosporine. All patients experienced 1 or more complications of prolonged immunosuppression (median, 7 years; range, 5-11). Thirteen patients (72%) are alive at a median interval of 17 years (range, 16-21) after LT. Of the 5 patients in group A, 2 currently have normal graft function with no rejection episodes, and 3 have restarted immunosuppression following late low-grade acute rejection (n = 1), retransplantation for chronic rejection (n = 1), and kidney transplantation (n = 1). Of the 9 patients in group B, 5 died. The deaths were due to ruptured arterial pseudoaneurysm following retransplantation, HCC recurrence, cardiac failure, renal failure, and posttransplant lymphoma at 5, 7, 7, 14, and 17 years after LT, respectively. All 4 patients in group C are alive on a full immunosuppressive regimen. Long-term follow-up of 18 LT recipients withdrawn from immunosuppression has shown that at a median of 17 years 10% of patients remain off all immunosuppression.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Immunosuppression withdrawal after auxiliary liver transplantation for acute liver failure.

BACKGROUND: The potential for immunosuppression withdrawal is the rationale for auxiliary liver transplantation (AUX) in patients with acute liver failure (ALF). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-four AUX were performed in 28 adults and 16 children with ALF secondary to seronegative hepatitis (n = 20; 45%), paracetamol hepatotoxicity (n = 14; 32%), acute viral hepatitis (hepatitis B virus [HBV] n = 3, Epstein-Barr virus n = 1; 9%), drug-induced hepatitis (n = 3; 7%), autoimmune hepatitis (n = 2; 5%), and mushroom poisoning (n = 1; 2%). All patients fulfilled the King's College Hospital transplant criteria for ALF. After partial hepatectomy, 38 patients received a segmental auxiliary graft and six, a whole auxiliary graft. Immunosuppression was based on calcineurin inhibitors and steroids. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients (77%) are alive after a median follow-up of 30 months (range 4 to 124). Eight adults and two children died of sepsis (n = 6; 14%) at a median interval of 30 days (range 2 to 66), intraoperative cardiac failure (n = 1), brain edema on postoperative day 8 (n = 1), sudden death on day 35 (n = 1), and multiple organ failure associated with HBV recurrence 4 years after transplantation (n = 1). Three patients underwent retransplantation for small-for-size graft syndrome with sepsis on postoperative day 15 (n = 1) and for ductopenic rejection 4 and 15 months after AUX (n = 2). In 10/31 (32%) survivors (6/18 adults and 4/13 children) immunosuppression was completely withdrawn after a median of 19 months. CONCLUSION: Complete immunosuppression withdrawal can be achieved in a significant proportion of patients after AUX for ALF.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Anti-interleukin 2 receptor antibodies and mycophenolate mofetil for treatment of steroid-resistant rejection in adult liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Steroid-resistant rejection (SRR) results in significant morbidity and mortality from the adverse effects of rescue therapy and in graft loss from chronic rejection. In our knowledge, the efficacy and safety of anti-interleukin (IL) 2r antibodies (daclizumab and basiliximab) for the treatment of SRR in adult liver transplantation has not previously been evaluated. METHODS: Twenty-five patients received either daclizumab or basiliximab as rescue therapy for SRR. Outcome and biochemical parameters were recorded before and after treatment with an anti-IL-2r antibody. RESULTS: The median time from transplantation to SRR was 25 days. Secondary immunosuppression included mycophenolate mofetil in 18 patients. Twelve patients (48%) had complete resolution of SRR. Aspartate transaminase levels normalized at a median of 37 days (range, 1-168 days). In 13 patients (52%) progressive hepatic dysfunction developed. Four of these patients received another transplant, and 6 patients had chronic rejection. Three patients died with graft failure. Of 16 patients with acute cellular rejection, 12 (75%) had resolution, 2 had chronic rejection, 1 required a repeat transplantation, and 1 died with graft failure. In contrast, all 9 patients with established chronic rejection in their pretreatment biopsy continued to have significant graft dysfunction, with 4 having persistent chronic graft dysfunction, 3 requiring repeat transplantation, and 2 dying with graft failure. CONCLUSION: Twelve (48%) of 25 patients who received an anti-IL-2r antibody because of SRR were successfully treated. All successfully treated patients had ongoing acute cellular rejection at liver biopsy (75%), whereas patients with histologic evidence of chronic rejection responded poorly.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Acute liver failure.

Acute liver failure is a complex multisystemic illness that evolves quickly after a catastrophic insult to the liver leading to the development of encephalopathy. The underlying aetiology and the pace of progression strongly influence the clinical course. The commonest causes are paracetamol, idiosyncratic drug reactions, hepatitis B, and seronegative hepatitis. The optimal care is multidisciplinary and up to half of the cases receive liver transplants, with survival rates around 75%-90%. Artificial liver support devices remain unproven in efficacy in acute liver failure.

Humans↗
PubMed2002

Tacrolimus versus microemulsified ciclosporin in liver transplantation: the TMC randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Calcineurin inhibitors are the most commonly used immunosuppressive drugs in liver transplantation, but the optimum initial immunosuppression regimen is not known. The aim of our study was to compare tacrolimus with microemulsified ciclosporin, in a regimen with standardised concomitant immunosuppressive therapy. METHODS: In all liver transplant centres in the UK and Republic of Ireland, 606 patients undergoing a first orthotopic liver transplantation were randomly assigned open-label tacrolimus or microemulsified ciclosporin. Primary outcome was the combined frequency (whichever occurred first) of death, retransplantation, or treatment failure for immunological reasons, analysed by intention to treat. FINDINGS: 96% of patients received the treatment allocated to them. The primary outcome was reached in 62 (21%) of 301 patients in the tacrolimus group versus 99 (32%) of 305 allocated microemulsified ciclosporin (relative risk 0.63 [95% CI 0.48-0.84], p=0.001; time-to-event analysis log-rank test p=0.002): deaths (50 [17%] vs 72 [24%]); retransplantations (11 [4%] vs 31 [10%]) treatment failure for immunological reasons (6 [2%] vs 12 [4%]). The relative risk for the composite outcome was in favour of tacrolimus. The main causes of death in both trial groups were sepsis and multiple organ failure (31 [10%] vs 30 [10%]), and the main cause for retransplantation was hepatic artery thrombosis (6 [2%] vs 17 [6%]). Renal dysfunction and the need for antihypertensive therapy were much the same in both groups. Tacrolimus was more diabetogenic. INTERPRETATION: Clinical outcome at 1 year was better with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression than with microemulsified ciclosporin during the first year after liver transplantation. Tacrolimus should be the first choice of calcineurin inhibitor for patients receiving their first liver graft.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2001

Randomized trial of lamivudine versus hepatitis B immunoglobulin for long-term prophylaxis of hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The long-term prophylaxis of hepatitis B after liver transplantation requires further optimization. In a randomized trial we investigated a regimen where the initially given hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg) is replaced by long-term lamivudine treatment. METHODS: Twenty-four liver transplant recipients (all HBsAg-positive/HBV DNA-negative before transplantation), who had received HBIg for at least 6 months without HBV recurrence, were randomized to receive lamivudine (n = 12) or HBIg (n = 12) for 52 weeks. The efficacy criteria involved seronegativity for HBsAg and undetectable HBsAg/ HBcAg in the liver. RESULTS: Twenty-one of 24 patients completed the study without hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence (11 on HBIg, ten on lamivudine), while three patients became HBsAg-positive. Amongst those without HBV recurrence HBV DNA was detectable only by polymerase chain reaction, intermittently in serum and lymphocytes, and in liver specimens from six of eight patients receiving HBIg and five of seven receiving lamivudine. YMDD variant was found in four cases with no viral antigen expression. Eight patients continued lamivudine after the study and during an additional 6-22 months remained HBsAg-negative with normal graft function. CONCLUSIONS: Substitution of HBIg with lamivudine is effective for prevention of HBV recurrence in low-risk liver transplant recipients and offers a convenient and cost-effective alternative for long-term HBV prophylaxis.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Graft dysfunction mimicking autoimmune hepatitis following liver transplantation in adults.

In children, a type of graft dysfunction associated with autoimmune features has been described. We have identified 7 adult liver-transplant (LT) recipients from a series of over 1,000 consecutive transplant recipients who presented between 0.3 years and 7.2 years following transplantation with characteristic symptoms, autoantibody profiles, and histologic findings of autoimmune disease. The indications for transplantation were Ecstasy overdose, alcohol-related cirrhosis, primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) (2), primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), hepatitis C cirrhosis, and cryptogenic cirrhosis. Two patterns of de novo autoantibody development were noted; anti-liver-kidney-microsome (LKM) antibody development at high titer in association with an aspartate transaminase (AST) > 500 and antinuclear (ANA) and antismooth muscle (AMA) antibody development at titers >1/80 with lower AST levels. All cases had elevated IgG. Liver biopsies showed changes of an autoimmune-type hepatitis with portal and periportal hepatitis in association with a marked infiltrate of plasma cells, lymphocytes, and bridging collapse. Two patients lost their grafts because of the disease. Patients were treated with reintroduction of steroids and azathioprine in cases in which it had been withdrawn. Major histocompatibility class I and II mismatching did not incur risk. Eight of 12 liver allografts were acquired from either DRB*0301- or DRB*0401-positive donors, and 4 recipients were DRB*0301-positive. This series illustrates that both symptoms and histologic findings of graft dysfunction compatible with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) exist in adult LT recipients. Graft loss may be a consequence. This entity may represent a specific type of rejection that should currently be classified as "graft dysfunction mimicking autoimmune hepatitis."

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Management and outcome of pregnancy in autoimmune hepatitis.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data in the literature on the risks associated with, and optimal management of, pregnancy in patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). AIMS: To assess maternal and fetal outcomes in relation to clinical management of pregnancy in a large cohort of patients with well defined AIH. METHODS: A review of all known pregnancies in 162 females with definite AIH attending our clinics between 1983 and 1998, with respect to treatment, natural history, and outcome. RESULTS: Thirty one live births (one twin) resulted from 35 pregnancies in 18 women (seven with cirrhosis). Median age at conception was 28 years (range 18-36). Two patients presented with AIH de novo during pregnancy. At conception, in 15 pregnancies patients had been receiving azathioprine alone or (in nine) with prednisolone, in seven prednisolone alone, and in one cyclosporin. Fetal loss at > or =20 weeks' gestation occurred in two instances. Flares in disease activity occurred during four pregnancies and within three months of delivery in a further four. Among the 31 children born (median follow up 10 years) only two abnormalities have been identified: Perthes' disease in one and severe mental and physical handicap in a second who was born prematurely following decompensation of the mother's liver disease. Neither mother was receiving azathioprine. CONCLUSIONS: Successful completion of pregnancy is a realistic expectation for patients with well controlled AIH. Treatment options vary, but azathioprine appears to be generally safe and without adverse outcomes for mother or baby. Vigilance is required, however, and patients need to be monitored carefully during pregnancy and for several months post partum.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Fulminant hepatitis in patients with chronic liver disease.

The changing epidemiology of hepatitis A virus (HAV) in the UK has led to a decline in natural immunity against the virus. It is estimated that in the UK, HAV is responsible for 10%-20% of cases of liver failure, and an overall mortality rate of 0.1%. It is clear that certain factors predispose patients to more severe HAV disease and increased mortality, although the reasons for this have yet to be elucidated. The age at which infection occurs clearly influences the outcome, with the risk of severe hepatitis increasing sharply after the age of 40 years. Intravenous drug users, homosexual men, individuals with an excessive alcohol intake or patients with chronic liver disease are also at increased risk of severe disease. An analysis of data from King's College Hospital was performed to determine the factors that influence the outcome or clinical course of HAV infection in at-risk patients. Data compiled from 1991 to 1998 revealed 187 cases with confirmed HAV, 45 of whom developed severe hepatitis. Outcomes were varied, eight (17.7%) patients developed acute liver failure and two (4.4%) died.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Treatment options for other hepatic malignancies.

1. Resection rates for cholangiocarcinoma (unrelated to primary sclerosing cholangitis) have increased to 54% to 79%, and the subsequent 5-year survival rates are 24% to 31%. 2. Multimodality approaches involving various combinations of chemotherapy, irradiation, and surgery increasingly are being used to treat cholangiocarcinoma. 3. The role of liver transplantation in the management of cholangiocarcinoma is limited by the perception that it is inappropriate to use scarce organs when 5-year survival rates are 25%. 4. Liver transplantation is an important intervention in patients with tumors that remain unresectable after chemotherapy. The role of liver transplantation in patients with extrahepatic disease that responds to chemotherapy is controversial. Careful timing of surgery is required to avoid secondary drug resistance. 5. Liver transplantation has been successfully applied to a range of rare hepatic malignancies, but small numbers preclude strong recommendations on the appropriateness of this practice.

Bile Duct Neoplasms↗
PubMed1999

Liver transplantation for malignant disease.

For many patients with malignant disease of the liver, liver transplantation offers the only opportunity for clinical cure or prolonged palliation. As a result of organ scarcity, patients are increasingly selected on the basis of tumour stage and with the predictable likelihood of prolonged survival in mind. Consequently, 3- and 5-year survival rates of 72% and 68% respectively have been described for patients transplanted with hepatocellular carcinoma for tumours measuring less than 5 cm in diameter or up to three in number. Moreover, many centres are developing adjuvant and neo-adjuvant therapeutic protocols to minimize the risks of disease recurrence following transplantation for malignancy. In this chapter, we review the current knowledge in relation to transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma, fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, metastatic neuroendocrine tumours, secondary solid tumours and other rarer malignancies.

Carcinoma, Hepatocellular↗
PubMed1999

Regional bone mineral density after orthotopic liver transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: Although there is a fall in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) after liver transplantation, little is known about femoral neck or total body BMD. Therefore we determined: (a) the proportion of patients with preexisting hepatic osteopenia before transplantation and (b) the effects of transplantation on global and regional BMD. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of BMD measurements of patients before and up to 2 years after liver transplantation. METHODS: BMD was assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in 56 patients, before and at regular intervals after liver transplantation, for up to 24 months, to measure total body, lumbar spine (L2-L4) and femoral neck BMDs. RESULTS: Pre-transplant, 23% of patients had osteoporosis (a negative Z score > 2). Paired data before and after transplantation revealed no change in total body BMD. However, there was a fall in lumbar spine BMD (1.04+/-0.03 to 1.02+/-0.03 g/cm2; P < 0.04) at 1 month after transplantation. The reduction in lumbar spine BMD was seen up to 12 months, BMD at 18-24 months being similar to pre-transplant values. Femoral neck BMD also fell (0.96+/-0.06 to 0.83+/-0.04 g/cm2; P < 0.03), but only after 6-9 months, thereafter remaining below pre-transplant values until the end of the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Although osteopenia is common in patients with liver disease, total bone density does not fall after transplantation. Nonetheless regional lumbar spine and femoral neck bone density does fall after transplantation with a risk period for femoral neck fracture which may extend for up to 2 years.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗
PubMed1999

Temporary extracorporeal liver support for severe acute alcoholic hepatitis using the BioLogic-DT.

Patients with severe acute alcoholic hepatitis develop multiple organ failure which is associated with production of inflammatory cytokines and a poor prognosis. The aim of the present pilot study was to evaluate the effects of the BioLogic-DT sorption-suspension dialyser in patients with severe acute alcoholic hepatitis. Ten patients with encephalopathy (grade II-IV) were entered into the study, 5 received treatment with the BioLogic-DT for 6 hours daily for 3 days and 5 received conventional treatment as controls. The system was biocompatible with no adverse effects on blood pressure or platelet counts, factor V, fibrinogen or antithrombin III. No bleeding episodes were observed even with the use of small doses of heparin. After 3 days, blood ammonia was lower in the BioLogic-DT treated patients than in the controls, although blood lactate was higher. There were slight increases in plasma TNF and IL-8 during treatment over and above the higher levels present initially, possibly as a result of activation of white cells in the extracorporeal circuit. The further development of the BioLogic-DT dialyser with the addition of a plasma treatment module capable of removing cytokines would be worth evaluating in acute alcoholic hepatitis.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1998

Effects of orthotopic liver transplantation on body composition.

AIMS/BACKGROUND: The effects of orthotopic liver transplantation on body composition are unclear. We aimed to assess changes in body composition after transplantation using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and total body potassium. METHODS: Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and total body potassium counting to assess muscle mass were performed in 55 patients before and up to 24 months after liver transplantation and the results expressed as paired data before and at time intervals after transplantation. RESULTS: The results showed that total body weight fell by 3.6 +/- 1.3 kg (p < 0.02) at 1 month, with a maximal fall in lean tissue mass at 2-5 months of 4.8 +/- 1.2 kg (p < 0.003). Thereafter, no change in lean tissue mass was recorded, although there were increases at 12 and 24 months of total body weight (11.5 +/- 2.4 kg, 7.8 +/- 3.1 kg; p < 0.03, respectively) and fat mass (12.9 +/- 2.2 and 10.5 +/- 2.7 kg; p < 0.003). A fall in total body potassium was seen at 1 month (118 +/- 12 mmol; p < 0.003) and 2-5 months (176 +/- 9.9 mmol; p < 0.03), which mirrored the fall in lean mass. CONCLUSIONS: After liver transplantation there is an initial fall in body weight due to a loss of lean mass. Lean mass does not recover after transplantation, although there is an increase in fat mass that leads to the observed increase in total body weight.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗
PubMed1997

Clinical economics review: liver transplantation.

The economic assessment of liver transplantation is complex and involves the cost of the transplant procedure, the cost of alternative treatments and the positive economic contribution of successful outcomes. The one-year survival rates are currently in the order of 80-90% for elective transplants and 60-75% for emergency transplantation. The average cost of a liver transplant operation in the UK is between pounds 32,000 and pounds 45,000. Factors which have a major influence on costs are aetiology, patient status at the time of transplantation, retransplantation and duration of hospital stay. Rejection episodes, renal impairment and surgical complications are of intermediate importance. The cost of transplantation must be balanced against the cost of alternative treatments that would be required if the patient were not transplanted and the positive economic benefit derived from excellent rehabilitation in the majority of recipients.

Drug Costs↗