PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

J G Short

Publications and source records attributed to J G Short.

14 recordsLinked to original sources

Defining the cost of educating undergraduate medical students at the University of Virginia.

PURPOSE: To develop a model for calculating the cost of a four-year undergraduate medical education at the University of Virginia School of Medicine (UVA) in 1994-95. METHOD: All data were based on faculty contact hours (FCHs), the primary driver of cost. (An FCH was an hour during which a faculty member was actively teaching.) First- and second-year data were derived from a published curriculum schedule. Third-year data were derived from hours spent in each clerkship and a series of calculations to assess direct teaching time in each clerkship accurately. Fourth-year data were modeled on an artificial but typical program consisting of the required clerkship in neurology, a two-day course in advanced cardiac life support, and seven elective blocks; electives were chosen based on relative overall popularity. The number of full-time-equivalent (FTE) faculty required was calculated. The salary costs of UVA full-time faculty were calculated. Other total direct costs, including the costs of support and administrative services as well as the costs of the educational contributions of housestaff and contract faculty, were calculated. The overall cost, including direct and indirect costs, was calculated. An average of 139 students per year was assumed. RESULTS: The total number of FCHs was just under 100,000. The number of FTE faculty required was 223. UVA faculty salary and fringe benefits totaled $29,400,000. The costs of support and administrative services totaled $4,100,000; the costs of housestaff and contract faculty totaled $2,300,000. The overall educational costs totaled $49,600,000. CONCLUSION: The overall cost of a four-year medical education at UVA was $357,000 per student. Although the process of calculating this cost was complex and, at times, based on assumptions open to debate, the model developed can be applied to any medical education setting.

Clinical Clerkship

Measures of knowledge and attitude toward preventive cardiology.

In this paper, the authors describe the development and validation of an inventory of preventive cardiology at the University of Virginia. The inventory contains two instruments designed to measure medical students' preinstructional and postinstructional knowledge of and attitude toward preventive cardiology. The knowledge test subscales provide unique and significant information about knowledge in preventive cardiology and can discriminate among groups differing in level of instruction and expertise in preventive cardiology. The attitude survey provides information about two attitude factors: cardiovascular disease prevention and cardiovascular disease research priorities. In the study reported here, attitudes appeared not to differ among groups of students with different preventive cardiology instructional levels and expertise. Both instruments were demonstrated to be useful measures of medical students' knowledge and attitudes concerning preventive cardiology educational programs.

Adult

Perinatal outreach education. A continuation strategy for a basic program.

The Perinatal Continuing Education Program consists of a nine-month intervention with community hospital nurses, physicians, and support personnel. Components include a hospital self-inventory of resources, coordination by community hospital staff, a skills workshop, and self-instructional books. This article outlines a follow-up strategy to the basic program and describes changes in community hospital knowledge and care practices that occur between programs. The follow-up program presented includes a modified coordinators' workshop, identification of updated self-instructional materials for careful study by past participants, and a self-survey of "recommended routines" intended to facilitate change in hospital policies. Otherwise, except for the deletion of the resources inventory, the follow-up program is similar to the basic program. Testing of participants and detailed review of 1435 hospital charts at sequential time periods revealed a decline in mean knowledge scores between programs, higher scores by new participants before follow-up when compared to pre-basic program, a plateau of patient care quality between programs, and a further improvement in patient care quality after the follow-up program. We conclude that a follow-up program is best accepted after three years but that timing is not critical. Evaluation measures suggest that new knowledge and care practices become institutionalized as a result of this program and that altered care practices are not simply a result of improved performance by individuals.

Education, Medical, Continuing