PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

J G Wilpon

Publications and source records attributed to J G Wilpon.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Voice-processing technologies--their application in telecommunications.

As the telecommunications industry evolves over the next decade to provide the products and services that people will desire, several key technologies will become commonplace. Two of these, automatic speech recognition and text-to-speech synthesis, will provide users with more freedom on when, where, and how they access information. While these technologies are currently in their infancy, their capabilities are rapidly increasing and their deployment in today's telephone network is expanding. The economic impact of just one application, the automation of operator services, is well over $100 million per year. Yet there still are many technical challenges that must be resolved before these technologies can be deployed ubiquitously in products and services throughout the worldwide telephone network. These challenges include: (i) High level of accuracy. The technology must be perceived by the user as highly accurate, robust, and reliable. (ii) Easy to use. Speech is only one of several possible input/output modalities for conveying information between a human and a machine, much like a computer terminal or Touch-Tone pad on a telephone. It is not the final product. Therefore, speech technologies must be hidden from the user. That is, the burden of using the technology must be on the technology itself. (iii) Quick prototyping and development of new products and services. The technology must support the creation of new products and services based on speech in an efficient and timely fashion. In this paper I present a vision of the voice-processing industry with a focus on the areas with the broadest base of user penetration: speech recognition, text-to-speech synthesis, natural language processing, and speaker recognition technologies. The current and future applications of these technologies in the telecommunications industry will be examined in terms of their strengths, limitations, and the degree to which user needs have been or have yet to be met. Although noteworthy gains have been made in areas with potentially small user bases and in the more mature speech-coding technologies, these subjects are outside the scope of this paper.

Automation

Considerations in applying clustering techniques to speaker-independent word recognition.

Recent work at Bell Laboratories has demonstrated the utility of applying sophisticated pattern recognition techniques to obtain a set of speaker-independent word templates for an isolated word recognition system [Levinson et al.,IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. ASSP-27 (2), 134--141 (1979); Rabiner et al., IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process.(in press)]. In these studies, it was shown that a careful experimenter could guide the clustering algorithms to choose a small set of templates that were representative of a large number of replications for each word in the vocabulary. Subsequent word recognition tests verified that the templates chosen were indeed representative of a fairly large population of talkers. Given the success of this approach, the next important step is to investigate fully automatic techniques for clustering multiple versions of a single word into a set of speaker-independent word templates. Two such techniques are described in this paper. The first method uses distance data (between replications of a word) to segment the population into stable clusters. The word template is obtained as either the cluster minimax, or as an averaged version of all the elements in the cluster. The second method is a variation of the one described by Rabiner [IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. ASSP-26 (3), 34--42 (1978)] in which averaging techniques are directly combined with the nearest neighbor rule to simultaneously define both the word template (i.e., the cluster center) and the elements in the cluster. Experimental data show the first method to be superior to the second method when three or more clusters per word are used in the recognition task.

Humans