PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J García-Armengol

Publications and source records attributed to J García-Armengol.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

A prospective audit of the complications of loop ileostomy construction and takedown.

AIM: A prospective review of the complications of ileostomy construction and takedown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty-seven consecutive patients undergoing construction of a loop ileostomy were included in a prospective nonrandomized computer database. Complications of the loop ileostomy were assessed prior to and after closure. Three closure techniques were performed [enterotomy suture (25.7%), resection and hand sewn (31.2%) or stapled anastomosis (43.1%)] and compared. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-seven (73 male, 54 female) patients, mean age 54 years were included from 1992 to 2002. Seventy-two patients underwent anterior resection for low rectal carcinoma, 30 an ileoanal pouch for ulcerative colitis and 25 for miscellaneous conditions. Fifty-nine pre-takedown complications occurred in 50 (39.4%) patients. The most common were dermatitis (12.6%) and erythema (7.1%). The most severe were dehydration in 1 patient and stomal prolapse in 4 patients. Closure was associated with a complication rate of 33.1% and a mortality rate of 0.9%. Wound infection occurred in 18.3% and small bowel obstruction in 4.6%. Anastomotic leak requiring reanastomosis occurred in 2.8% and enterocutaneous fistula treated conservatively in 5.5%. There were no statistically significant differences in morbidity between closure techniques (p = 0.892). There were no statistically significant differences in complications (p = 0.516) between patients with ulcerative colitis and those with neoplasia (39.29% vs. 32.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Loop ileostomy construction and takedown is associated with considerable morbidity, mostly minor. No differences exist between technique used for closure or the baseline pathology of the patient.

Colonic Pouches↗
PubMed2001

Impact of surgeon organization and specialization in rectal cancer outcome.

PURPOSE: The present study was designed to assess the differences in the outcome of patients with rectal cancer treated by a group of surgeons before and after being organized as a Coloproctology Unit at the same University Department of Surgery. METHODS: Comparison of two periods of rectal cancer surgery: I (1986-91) and II (1992-95). Period I: 94 patients were operated on by 14 general surgeons. Period II: 108 patients were operated on by only 4 surgeons of the same group organized as a Colorectal Surgery Unit after visiting referral centres abroad, adopting techniques such as total mesorectal excision (TME) for middle and low rectal cancer and washout of rectal stump. Mean follow-up during periods I and II was 69.1 and 42.0 months, respectively. A prospective data base analysis was used. Survival and local recurrence rates were calculated by the actuarial method. For comparison between groups the log rank method was used. RESULTS: The two groups were comparable with respect to mean age, gender, TNM and rectal tumour location. A significant increase in radical resectability and a decrease of the Abdominoperineal resection (APR)/Low anterior resection (LAR) ratio were observed in the second period. The overall pelvic recurrence rate was 25% in the first period and 11 in the second (P < 0.01). Significant differences were also found when the patients with LAR were compared between both periods, 30% vs 9% (P < 0.01) and specially when the 10 cm anal verge distance was considered to divide the LAR groups. No differences were found regarding the APR procedures in both periods. There was improved cancer-specific survival for the LAR group in the second period (P=0.03). CONCLUSION: Specialization and centralization influence the quality of rectal cancer surgery, mainly local recurrence rates and survival after low anterior resection.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1998

Anal endosonographic evaluation after closed lateral subcutaneous sphincterotomy.

PURPOSE: The present study was undertaken to evaluate anal endosonographic results of the transverse and longitudinal extent of internal anal sphincter division after closed lateral subcutaneous sphincterotomy and its relationship to outcome with respect to anal fissure recurrence and postoperative anal incontinence. METHODS: Ten patients selected for symptomatic anal fissure recurrence (mean follow-up, 10.9 months) and 41 asymptomatic control patients (mean follow-up, 15.5 months) were reviewed by anal endosonography after closed lateral subcutaneous sphincterotomy. Clinical evaluation was focused on anal fissure recurrence and postoperative anal incontinence. The anal endosonographic study involves serial radial images of the distal, proximal, and midanal canal. RESULTS: In 32 patients in whom a complete internal sphincter defect was identified, 31 (75.6 percent) were from the control group and only 1 patient (10 percent) was from the recurrence group (P < 0.001). In 19 patients, an incomplete internal sphincter defect was identified; 10 (24.4 percent) were from the control group (residual median size, 1.8 mm; contralateral, 2.5 mm) and 9 patients (90 percent) were from the recurrence group (P = 0.001; residual median size, 1.4 mm; contralateral, 2.2 mm). Ten patients (19.6 percent) were incontinent for gas and three patients (5.9 percent) for liquid feces, without significant differences between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Anal endosonography is a useful method for evaluating the anatomic effectiveness of closed lateral subcutaneous sphincterotomy. An incomplete sphincterotomy is associated with significant symptomatic anal fissure recurrence.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Anorectal function in patients with complete rectal prolapse. Differences between continent and incontinent individuals.

AIMS: A study is made of the alterations in anorectal physiology among rectal prolapse patients, evaluating the differences between fecal continent and incontinent individuals. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients with complete rectal prolapse were divided into two groups: Group A (8 continent individuals) and Group B (10 incontinent women), while 22 healthy women were used as controls (Group C). Clinical exploration and perineal level measurements were performed, along with anorectal manometry, electrophysiology, and anorectal sensitivity to electrical stimuli. RESULTS: The main antecedents of the continent subjects were excess straining efforts, while the incontinent women presented excess straining and complex deliveries. Pathological perineal descent was a frequent finding in both groups, with a hypotonic anal canal at rest (p < 0.001 vs controls) and at voluntary squeezing (p < 0.001 vs controls). In turn, the incontinent patients exhibited a significantly lower anal canal pressure at rest than the continent women (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between Groups A and C in terms of pudendal motor latency, though latency was significantly longer in Group B than in the controls (p < 0.01). Moreover, pudendal neuropathy was more common, severe and often bilateral in Group B. There were no differences in rectal sensation to distention or in terms of the volumes required to relax the internal anal sphincter. In turn, both prolapse groups exhibited diminished anal canal and rectal sensitivity to electrical stimuli. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with rectal prolapse exhibit a hypotonic anal canal at rest, regardless of whether they are continent to feces or not. Continent patients have less pudendal neuropathy and therefore less pressure alterations at voluntary sphincter squeeze than incontinent individuals.

Adolescent↗