Cytophotometric determination of nuclear non-histone protein in the pre-replicative phase of rat liver regeneration.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to J Gaub.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
In eight mouse mammary tumors with varying growth fractions DNA and non-histone nuclear protein (NHNP) were determined by absorption cytophotometry of Feulgen-Naphthol Yellow S stained, isolated cells. It was found that: 1. The mean NHNP content of cells with postmitotic DNA content (G0 + G1) increased with increasing growth fraction. 2. The mean NHNP content of S and G2 cells in the eight tumors did not vary significantly with growth fraction. 3. The frequency distributions of NHNP in G0/G1 cells were unimodal and right-skewed. The results are interpreted as follows: A) G0 cells differ from G1 cells by their lower content of NHNP. B). If it is assumed that the G0 and G1 compartments are arranged in series, the cells in the transition from G0 to late G1 may account for the unimodality and skewedness of the NHNP frequency distributions of postmitotic cells.
1. In isolated liver cells, fixed in 4 per cent formaldehyde (NFS) for Feulgen-Naphthol Yellow S (F-NYS) staining of DNA and protein, nuclear shrinkage increases the nuclear concentration of solids to 46 per cent (w/v) before the start of the NYS staining. 2. When a fixative mixture of methanol:acetic acid:formalin (85:5:10 by volume; MAF) is used, the concentration of nuclear solids during NYS staining remain at a physiological level of 19 per cent. 3. By exposing liver cells to NFS for 10 to 120 seconds before fixation in MAF, increasing nuclear shrinkage can be induced with increasing pretreatment in NFS. Nuclear NYS binding decreases in parallel with the decreasing nuclear volume in cells thus treated. As the shrinkage induced reduction in NYS binding may vary with the net charge of nuclear non-histone proteins, MAF fixation must be preferred for quantitative determinations of nuclear non-histone protein in F-NYS stained, isolated cells. 4. Fixation in MAF offers the same advantages as NFS fixation as regards the small loss of proteins during the Feulgen staining procedure and the excellent reproducibility of the F-NYS staining. Storage of MAF fixed cells in the fixative for a few days does not alter their F-NYS staining properties. 5. In MAF fixed, F-NYS stained cells there is no NYS binding to histone basic amino acid residues.
From rats fed ad libitum and kept under a 12 + 12 h light/dark regimen, the DNA dependent RNA polymerase activity of liver cell nuclei was determined avery four hours. From identical rats, nuclear non-histone protein and DNA, and cytoplasmic protein was determined by Feulgen-Naphthol Yellow S cytophotometry of isolated liver cells. The minimum: maximum ratio of the RNA polymerase activity is 0.77; the min:max ratio of nuclear non-histone protein is 0.84. These two parameters have identical time courses with a gradual decline during the light period and a sharp rise after the onset of the dark period. The variations in nuclear DNA content, estimated as the amount of Feulgen stain bound, closely parallel those of the RNA polymerase activity and nuclear non-histone protein content (min:max = 0.96). The amount of cytoplasmic protein per cell also varies throughout the day, but its time curve lags behind those of nuclear non-histone content and RNA polymerase activity. These results are consistent with the concept of nuclear non-histone proteins as de-repressors of the DNA template in differentiated, non-proliferating cells, and support the validity of using Feulgen-Naphthol Yellow S cytophotometry of nuclear non-histone proteins as an estimate of gene expression in such cells.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
A computerized method was developed to calculate the nuclear protein content of Feulgen-Naphtol Yellow S stained liver cells from cytophotometric data. After two consecutive scannings at 570 nm (DNA) and 435 nm (protein), the nuclear localization and shape are defined and nuclear protein is calculated by a method which corrects for the nuclear-cytoplasmic overlap at the nuclear periphery. The results obtained by the procedure are highly reproducible and are in accordance with the results of biochemical determinations of nuclear and total cell protein reported by others.