PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J Gilmour

Publications and source records attributed to J Gilmour.

8 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1992

Disease conditions affecting common seals (Phoca vitulina) around the Scottish mainland, September-November 1988.

Common seal populations around the Scottish coast were less severly devastated by phocine distemper than those on the Continent. Nevertheless, over a 4-month period, 59 common seals were examined postmortem. The macroscopic and histopathological lesions are described. Forty-two per cent of these seals were considered to be suffering from phocine distemper. Serology on 29 of the 59 seals was undertaken and the results are discussed in relation to the histopathological findings. Bordetella bronchiseptica proved to be an important secondary invader in phocine distemper virus infected seals. Verminous pneumonia was shown to be a frequent problem, particularly in juveniles.

Animals↗
PubMed1986

T cell activation via CD2 [T, gp50]: the role of accessory cells in activating resting T cells via CD2.

Monoclonal antibody (MAb) GT2 defines a unique epitope on the CD2 molecule. GT2 triggers T cell mitosis in combination with any MAb directed against 9.6/T11(1) or D66, two previously defined CD2 epitopes. We have shown already that accessory cells (AC) are required for plenary T-PBL activation by any pair of Ab directed against D66 + 9.6/T11(1). In this study, we further investigated their role and found it to vary with the anti-CD2 pair used. When purified T-PBL preparation is used, the level of [3H]TdR incorporation observed with anti-(GT2 + 9.6/T11(1)) Ab was not significant; however, it did prove significant, although greatly reduced, with the other anti-CD2 pairs tested. This was due to qualitative differences in the process of T-PBL activation, and the role of AC, because: anti-(GT2 + 9.6/T11(1)) did not induce IL 2-R expression on purified T-PBL, whereas the other anti-CD2 pairs tested did; anti-(GT2 + 9.6/T11(1)) did not induce detectable IL 2 secretion from purified T-PBL, whereas the other anti-CD2 pairs tested induced a low amount; and anti-CDw18 Ab inhibited the mitogenic effect of anti-(GT2 + 9.6/T11(1)) on PBMC by preventing both IL 2-R expression and IL 2 secretion, whereas anti-CDw18 Ab enhanced the mitogenic effect of the other anti-CD2 pairs tested. Paraformaldehyde-fixed AC fully restored, and recombinant IL 1 partially restored purified T-PBL mitosis triggered by all anti-CD2 pairs tested. To induce IL 2 synthesis, the necessity to cross-link anti-CD2 Ab was demonstrated by coupling one Ab on Sepharose beads and adding the second Ab in the soluble phase: under these circumstances, anti-CD2 pairs were mitogenic solely in the presence of AC. These data can be interpreted as follows. Most anti-CD2 pairs require minimal contact between AC and T-PBL to induce plenary levels of IL 2 synthesis. When anti-(GT2 + 9.6/T11(1)) are used, additional contact is necessary, both for IL 2-R expression and IL 2 synthesis, which would include CDw18 for stabilization. We believe these differences could be related to different conformational changes on the CD2 molecule, depending on the epitope on which the antibodies bind, and could account for different signaling to T cells.

Animals↗