Biomedical subjects

J Greg Anson

Publications and source records attributed to J Greg Anson.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

The influence of advance information about target location and visual feedback on movement planning and execution.

This study was designed to determine if movement planning strategies incorporating the use of visual feedback during manual aiming are specific to individual movements. Advance information about target location and visual context was manipulated using precues. Participants exhibited a shorter reaction time and a longer movement time when they were certain of the target location and that vision would be available. The longer movement time was associated with greater time after peak velocity. Under conditions of uncertainty, participants prepared for the worst-case scenario. That is, they spent more time organizing their movements and produced trajectories that would be expected from greater open-loop control. Our results are consistent with hierarchical movement planning in which knowledge of the movement goal is an essential ingredient of visual feedback utilization.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Synergies in health and disease: relations to adaptive changes in motor coordination.

This article describes an approach to motor synergies that allows them to be quantified in people with atypical movement patterns during exercise or practice. Within this approach, motor variability may be classified with respect to a task-specific performance variable as "good" (not affecting the variable) or "bad" (changing the variable). The authors review studies of motor synergies in people with typical movement patterns, in people with Down syndrome, in patients after stroke, and in elderly people. Two stages of practice effects on motor synergies are described as being characterized by different changes in the synergy index: an increase followed by a drop in the index. Synergy changes with practice may be accompanied by plastic changes in both descending projections from the primary cortex and interhemispheric projections. The authors emphasize the importance--for practitioners in the area of motor disorders and rehabilitation--of being aware of the latest progress in motor control and coordination.

Adaptation, Physiological↗

PubMed2005

Does Joe influence Fred's action? Inhibition of return across different nervous systems.

Inhibition of return (IOR) refers to the slowing of responses to a target that appears in the same location as a previous event. Many researchers have speculated that IOR arises from inhibitory neural processes that have developed through evolution to facilitate efficient search patterns by biasing the action and/or attention of an individual towards novel locations. Throughout evolution, however, humans conducted searches as individuals as well as members of a group. In this context, we sought to determine if IOR could also be observed in the behavior of one individual after the observation of another's behavior. Consistent with our reasoning, there was no difference in the magnitude of the IOR effect found when participants followed their own response or the response of their partner. These results are discussed in the context of action-based attention and possible underlying neural mechanisms.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

Motor preparation in a memorised delay task.

The effect on reaction time (RT) and movement time (MT) of remembering which one of several targets to move to was investigated in 18 participants who completed 416 trials in each task. On each trial, participants moved their index finger from a central, illuminated switch (the stimulus) to one of eight targets located on the circumference of a 6 cm radius circle. A visual cue (illumination of the target) informed the participant of the appropriate target. In the memorised delay task, the cued target was lit for 300 ms followed by a variable (450-750 ms) foreperiod during which the participant was required to remember the location of the target until the stimulus light was extinguished. In the non-memorised delay task, the target remained lit during the entire foreperiod (750-1050 ms) until the response was completed. At the "go" signal (stimulus light extinguished) participants moved as quickly and accurately as possible to the cued target. Both RT and MT were significantly (p<0.05) longer in the memorised delay task. The increase in RT shows that remembering which target imposed a greater load on motor preparation even though all the information needed for preparing the response was presented in the cue at the beginning of each trial. The increase in MT raises the possibility that movement execution was also programmed during motor preparation.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Amplitude and target diameter in motor programming of discrete, rapid aimed movements: Fitts and Peterson (1964) and Klapp (1975) revisited.

The reports by Fitts and Peterson [J. Exp. Psychol. 67(2) (1964) 103-113] and Klapp [J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 104(2) (1975) 147-153] concerning the effects of movement amplitude and target diameter on reaction time present conflicting results. Fitts and Peterson reported that reaction time increased when movement amplitude was lengthened. Klapp reported an interaction in which target diameter effect on reaction time was moderated by movement length: for small targets, reaction time decreased with increasing movement length but reaction time remained unchanged (or increased modestly) when target diameter was large. Two experiments were conducted to replicate and examine the inconsistency in the reaction time results. For both experiments movement time results were in agreement with the predictions of Fitts' law. However, the results for reaction time were mixed: support was obtained for Klapp (1975) but not for Fitts and Peterson (1964). Further analysis identified several potential variables that could have influenced reaction time and explained the different effects on reaction time reported by Fitts and Peterson (1964) and Klapp (1975). The potential variables could include: limb posture at the start of a response; number of limb segments required to perform the task; and the effect of pooling reaction time data from targets located right and left of the start point, and from near and far targets.

Adult↗