PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J H Button

Publications and source records attributed to J H Button.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

Bilateral internal mammary artery grafts in reoperative and primary coronary bypass surgery.

Bilateral internal mammary artery grafting is recognized as a preferred method of myocardial revascularization. However, its efficacy in coronary bypass reoperation has not been clearly established. From January 1982 through June 1989, 88 patients underwent coronary bypass reoperation with bilateral internal mammary artery grafts. Results were compared with those for a subset of 88 patients receiving primary revascularization with bilateral internal mammary artery grafts who were computer matched for sex, age, left ventricular function, anginal classification, and left main coronary artery disease. In each group, 62.5% (55 patients) had unstable angina, 43.2% (38 patients) had reduced ejection fraction, and 21.6% (19 patients) in the reoperation group and 20.5% (18 patients) in the reference group had left main coronary artery disease. Hospital mortality for the reoperation group was 6.8% (6 patients) and for the reference group, 3.4% (3 patients). No significant difference was found in the incidence of reoperation for bleeding, sternal infection, or stroke in the two groups. The incidence of respiratory insufficiency in the reoperation group was 13.6% (12 patients) and in the reference group, 3.4% (3 patients) (p less than 0.015). Recurrent angina occurred in 13.7% (10 patients) of patients in the reoperation group and 13.3% (10 patients) in the reference group. The long-term survival at 5 years for the reoperation group was 85.3% +/- 5.6% (+/- standard error of the mean) and for the reference group, 91.6% +/- 3.1%. No significant difference was found in the equality of survival distribution for the two groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗

Seventeen-year experience with bilateral internal mammary artery grafts.

The internal mammary artery (IMA) is being recognized as the conduit of choice for myocardial revascularization. From January 1972 through June 1988, 1,087 patients received bilateral IMA and supplemental vein grafts. There were 917 men (84.4%) and 170 women (15.6%) with a mean age of 62.4 years (range, 29 to 84 years). Three hundred ninety-four patients (36.2%) had unstable angina, and 194 (17.8%) had left main coronary artery stenosis greater than 50%. In all, 3,741 coronary grafts were performed, with a mean of 3.4 per patient. Hospital mortality was 2.7% (29 patients). Hospital complications included reoperation for bleeding, 19 patients (1.7%); sternal infection, 16 patients (1.5%); respiratory failure, 35 patients (3.2%); perioperative myocardial infarction, 22 patients (2.0%); and stroke, 20 patients (1.8%). Post-operative arteriography in 53 patients (mean postoperative time, 53.0 months) showed that 92.1% (58/63) of the left IMA and 84.9% (45/53) of the right IMA grafts were patent. Follow-up was completed on 1,058 hospital survivors. There were 82 late deaths (7.8%). The actuarial survival for patients discharged from the hospital was 80.0 +/- 3.2% (plus or minus standard error of the mean) at 10 years and 60.0% +/- 5.0% at 15 years. At follow-up, 866 patients (90.3%) were asymptomatic and in New York Heart Association class I and 68 (7.1%) were in class II. This longitudinal analysis demonstrates that bilateral IMA grafting has a low operative risk and provides excellent long-term functional improvement and survival.

Adult↗

Wales today.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Capital Expenditures↗

An automated PSRO-utilization review system.

A set of computer programs collects, processes, and reports Professional Standards Review Organization (PSRO) and utilization data for all patients at the Miami Heart Institute. They help reduce the time spent by physicians in PSRO and utilization review activities and ease the clerical work load required to comply with rules and guidelines. Daily printed reports provide attending physicians with their patient census and inform them of the next scheduled PSRO review dates for each of their patients. Reports are produced also for the Utilization Review Committee and the Institute's PSRO office. This set of programs is part of a comprehensive automated hospital information system and has been designed to respond rapidly to the frequent changes in regulations and policies dictated by the administering agency. The PSRO subsystem had been in uninterrupted operation for over 6 years and has mitigated escalating clerical and, therefore, health care costs. Physicians' acceptance of this subsystem had been adequate; however, developmental and maintenance costs are high in comparison with other applications within the hospital information system. This article describes the methodology used in complying with PSRO requirements. It does not attempt to evaluate the impact of PSRO on quality of care or length of hospital stay.

Cardiac Care Facilities↗