PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J H Hendriks

Publications and source records attributed to J H Hendriks.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

The presence of an extensive intraductal component following a limited excision correlates with prominent residual disease in the remainder of the breast.

Previous studies of patients with infiltrating ductal breast cancer treated with conservative surgery (ie, limited excision) and radiotherapy have indicated that the presence of an extensive intraductal component (EIC) in the excision specimen is highly associated with subsequent breast recurrence. The reason for this association is not clear, but possible explanations include the presence of more extensive disease in the breast or increased radiation resistance among tumors with an EIC (EIC+) compared with those without (EIC-) tumors. To investigate this association further, we related the presence or absence of an EIC in the primary tumors of 214 women who underwent mastectomy to the likelihood of finding additional foci of cancer in their mastectomy specimens using a correlated pathologic-radiologic mapping technique. Primary tumors that were EIC+ were significantly more likely to have carcinoma in the remainder of the breast than those which were EIC--(74% v 42%; P = .00001). This difference was primarily due to the presence of residual intraductal carcinoma. Seventy-one percent of EIC+ patients had residual intraductal carcinoma compared with 28% of EIC-patients (P less than .00001). In particular, 44% of EIC+ patients had "prominent" residual intraductal carcinoma compared with 3% of EIC-patients (P less than .00001). We conclude that patients whose tumors contain an EIC more frequently have a large subclinical tumor burden in the remainder of the breast compared with patients whose tumors do not contain an EIC. This observation may explain the association between EIC and subsequent breast recurrence when patients are treated with a limited excision before radiotherapy.

Breast↗

Breast cancer screening in women over age 50. A critical appraisal.

Breast cancer screening with mammography is strongly advocated by some and rejected by others. Discussions in the medical literature focus on the beneficial and unfavourable effects of breast cancer screening. Among the latter are the suggested excess mortality rate of screen-detected breast cancer patients, the high number of unnecessary biopsies, the possibility of overdiagnosis and subsequent unnecessary treatment, and the occurrence of interval breast cancer cases. It is concluded that screening can to a certain extent prevent women from dying of breast cancer but some negative effects are unavoidable. However, adequate training of the screening team can minimize the number of unnecessary biopsies and the occurrence of interval cancers. Research is needed to evaluate the natural course of so-called 'minimal' lesions, and to optimize screening tests. The search for new (imaging) techniques is needed to detect lobular cancers in dense breasts.

Biopsy↗

The cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening.

The costs and effects of different invitation schedules of breast cancer screening are compared. The effect estimates are based on trials from the USA, Sweden and the Netherlands. The cost estimates use registration data, file studies and organization charts. The calculations were performed with the MISCAN computer simulation package, which is developed especially for the evaluation of mass screening programmes. Screening women of 50-70 years at 2-yearly intervals is a relatively cost-effective schedule. In a real population, it will reduce breast cancer mortality by 12%. Screening of women under 50 is probably far less cost-effective. Screening induces a considerable shift towards breast-conserving therapy. Although a 12% mortality reduction may seem low, in absolute numbers this represents more than the total mortality from, e.g., cervical cancer. Moreover, cost per death prevented or per life-year saved is much lower than for most other medical interventions for which cost-effectiveness ratios are known, screening for cervical cancer included.

Aged↗

Screening for breast cancer in Nijmegen. Report of 6 screening rounds, 1975-1986.

A population-based screening programme for breast cancer was initiated in Nijmegen in 1975 with mammography as the only screening procedure. Up to January 1987, 6 screening rounds were carried out with a 2-year screening interval. Rates of attendance, referral, biopsy and detection were calculated and numbers of interval cancers are presented in order to give a clear view of what repeated screening can accomplish in a population. At the first screening round the attendance rate was 87% for women under age 50 and 83% for women aged 50-64. For women aged 65 or over the initial attendance rate was 40%. Rates of attendance declined in subsequent years. Detection rates were highest for elderly women at their first examination: 9.5 per 1,000 screened women. Corresponding rates were 5.6 and 2.3 per 1,000 for women aged 50-64 and below 50 respectively. The positive predictive value for referral was, on average, 20% for women under age 50 and 50% for elderly women, although a sharp increase was seen in the last 2 screening examinations for all age-groups. Predictive values for biopsy were higher: 30% on average for women aged under 50 and 60%-70% for elderly women, again with a sharp increase in the last 2 screening rounds. Interval cancer rates, calculated as the number of cancers occurring within 2 years among negatively screened women at risk, showed no particular trend and varied between 0.9-1.3 per 1,000 woman-years after each screening round. Compared to screen-detected cancers, interval cancers occurred more frequently in younger women. In women under age 50, the ratio between screen-detected and interval cancer was about 1:1, while it was about 2:1 for elderly women.

Adult↗

The occurrence of interval cancers in the Nijmegen screening programme.

Since January 1975 a population-based screening programme for the early detection of breast cancer has been carried out in the city of Nijmegen. During five interscreening periods of 2 years each a total of 158 so-called interval cancers were diagnosed. Careful revision of all screening and diagnostic mammograms was executed. Of all interval cancers 26% were 'missed' at the previous screening examination (due to technical or observer error), 16% were radiographically occult at the time of diagnosis and 58% were 'true' interval cancers. Interval cancers were regarded as 'true' when an obvious lesion was observed on the diagnostic mammogram while no suspect signs were seen on the previous screening mammogram. The prevalence of 'missed' cancers did not decline in the course of the screening programme. Radiographically occult tumours were localised, mostly in Wolfe's P2/DY breast parenchyma (83%), 33% were lobular invasive and 25% ductal non-invasive. 'True' interval cancer cases (58%) showed the same overall survival as control breast cancer patients, diagnosed in a non-screening situation. Shortening the screening interval would reduce interval cancer rates and probably further decrease breast cancer mortality in a screened population. However, from the present series of interval cancers 63% would not have been prevented by an annual screening examination. As regards women under age 50 annual screening would still leave 66% of all interval cancers in this age group undetected. Probably more benefit will be gained by searching for new imaging techniques to reduce numbers of 'missed' cancers and to detect lobular invasive and ductal non-invasive cancers in dense breast parenchyma.

Aged↗

Evaluation of overdiagnosis of breast cancer in screening with mammography: results of the Nijmegen programme.

After 12 years of screening for breast cancer in Nijmegen (1975-86), during which period six mammographic examination rounds were carried out, the extent of overdiagnosis was evaluated. Overdiagnosis is defined as a histologically established diagnosis of invasive or intraductal breast cancer that would never have developed into a clinically manifest tumour during the patient's normal life expectancy if no screening examination had been carried out. The whole 12-year period shows an excess of 11% of breast cancer cases in Nijmegen, compared with the neighbouring city of Arnhem, where no mass screening was performed. The incidence of breast cancers in Nijmegen in the period 1975-78 is higher, compared with the incidence rates in Arnhem; the rate ratio is 1.30. For the time-intervals 1979-82 and 1983-86 the rate ratios are 1.03 and 1.01 respectively with (0.89; 1.18) and (0.86; 1.16) as 95% confidence intervals. This leads to the conclusion that there is no evidence that screening programmes using modern mammography constitute a significant risk for overdiagnosis of breast cancers.

Adult↗

Treatment and survival of female patients with nonpalpable breast carcinoma.

Since 1971, 151 nonpalpable breast cancers (100 invasive carcinomas, 39 in situ ductal carcinomas, and twelve lobular carcinomas in situ) have been diagnosed and treated at the St. Radboud University Hospital. Of the 100 clinically occult invasive carcinomas, 53 had pathologic diameters of more than 10 mm, 29 were of sizes between 6 and 10 mm, and 18 were tumors of 5 mm or less. Residual tumor outside the "excisional" biopsy cavity was encountered in 76 of the 118 mastectomy specimens (64.4%) fully capable of evaluation. Invasive residual tumor would have been left behind in 34 of 86 mastectomy specimens (39.5%). Of 27 axillas studied, no patient with in situ carcinoma had evidence of axillary lymph node metastases. Invasive carcinoma, however, showed axillary lymph node involvement in 7.7% of mastectomy specimens when the size of the primary tumor was not more than 5 mm, in 12.5% when the size was between 6 and 10 mm, and in 29.5% when the primary tumor was more than 10 mm in diameter. The 10-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) of patients with clinically occult invasive carcinomas greater than 10 mm in size was 71.9% and differed significantly from the 90.9% for patients with the invasive tumors less than or equal to 5 mm, as well as from the 100% RFS of patients with invasive tumors of between 6 and 10 mm and noninvasive tumors. Although the 10-year RFS was 92.6% for the patients with negative axillary nodes and 80.0% for the patients with positive axillary nodes, this difference did not reach statistical significance. However, the disease-specific overall survival after 10 years was significantly different between node-negative patients (96.4%) and node-positive patients (78.8%). Multivariate analysis disclosed that the relationship between size of the primary tumor and RFS was independent of the presence of axillary lymph node metastases. In conclusion, the validity of the concept of minimal breast cancer has been re-enforced. However, the results of this study suggest that the upper limit of the original definition of minimal breast cancer is too narrow and should be extended, so that, apart from the noninvasive tumors--regardless of their size--all invasive tumors having a maximum diameter less than or equal to 10 mm should be regarded as minimal breast cancers.

Actuarial Analysis↗

Localization and excision of nonpalpable breast lesions. A surgical evaluation of three methods.

Three methods of excising nonpalpable breast lesions have been evaluated: (1) "blind" method, using mammographic coordinates; (2) preoperative localization with the Frank needle; and (3) Frank needle localization aided by a multiperforated compression plate. Successful removal at first attempt occurred in about 80% with any method. The size of the biopsy specimens did not differ significantly among the three groups and is most probably a function of the breast volume. The failure rate was seven (2.1%) of 332 biopsies. Since three of the six repeated biopsies yielded specimens with malignancy, the persistence of a radiographically suspicious lesion on follow-up mammogram of the operated-on breast is an urgent indication for reoperation.

Adult↗

The predictive value of positive test results in screening for breast cancer by mammography in the Nijmegen programme.

After 10 years of screening for breast cancer by mammography in Nijmegen, the predictive value of positive screening results (PV+) was evaluated. The percentage of women with breast cancer in the group of referred women (PV+) for women under age 50 was 16-26%, regardless of the number of screening examinations they had. The percentage of women with breast cancer in the group of women who were biopsied was 25-40%, regardless of the number of examinations. For women aged 50 and over the predictive value was 34-57% and 58-90% respectively. It was further evaluated whether characteristics such as age, Quetelet index, parity, and Wolfe-classification could be used to increase the PV+ in women who were identified as positive by mammography. A logistic regression model analysis showed that true-positive and false-positive cases differ significantly only in terms of age and breast complaints. Although the model had a good fit, it could not be used to distinguish false-positive from true-positive test results.

Age Factors↗

Mammographic and histopathologic correlation of nonpalpable lesions of the breast and the reliability of frozen section diagnosis.

During a period of ten years, 118 (32.9 per cent) instances of carcinoma were found in 359 specimens taken at biopsy for nonpalpable mammographic lesions. In recent years, the positive predictive value has increased from 68 per cent due to the development of magnification mammography and the use of a mammographic grid. Correlating mammographic and histopathologic data, the rate of malignant disease was 12.7 per cent for instances of a circumscribed or nodular mass, 32.4 per cent for clustered microcalcifications as the only suspect finding, 28.6 per cent when a mass with microcalcifications was present and 66.7 per cent when a stellate-shaped mass was found. Of 188 instances of carcinoma, 40 were noninvasive: 32 instances of ductal carcinoma (27.1 per cent) and eight of lobular carcinoma in situ (6.8 per cent). The possibility of frozen section diagnosis was studied retrospectively by comparison with the paraffin section reports. A correct diagnosis, whether benign or malignant, was achieved in 68 per cent. No frozen section examination was done in 17.3 per cent and the diagnosis was deferred to results of paraffin section in 12.2 per cent. False-negative results were encountered in seven patients (1.9 per cent) and false-positive results in two (0.6 per cent). Both of these patients had florid sclerosing adenosis. Although frozen section diagnosis is feasible in nonpalpable lesions of the breast, it is recommended that this method not be used in instances of pure microcalcifications and tiny solid masses of 5 millimeters or less.

Adult↗

Histologic multifocality of Tis, T1-2 breast carcinomas. Implications for clinical trials of breast-conserving surgery.

Breast cancer multifocality was studied in mastectomy specimens by correlated specimen radiography and histologic techniques. The patients chosen for study were comparable to those eligible for breast-conserving surgical therapy. Two study groups, one with 282 invasive cancers (T1-2) and the other with 32 intraductal cancers, were selected from a group of 399 consecutive cases by omitting patients who were clearly, or very probably, not candidates for breast-conserving surgical therapy according to current trial criteria. Omitted patients included those with clinically and/or radiologically multifocal cancers and patients with tumor extension into the chest wall or skin (7%). Also excluded were the so-called diffuse invasive cancers (8%), the clinically and radiologically occult tumors (3%), and the invasive cancers larger than 5 cm (3%). Of the 282 invasive cancers, 105 (37%) showed no tumor foci in the mastectomy specimen around the reference mass. In 56 (20%) tumor foci were present within 2 cm, and in 121 (43%) tumor was found more than 2 cm from the reference tumor. In 75 (27%) the tumor foci beyond 2 cm were histologically noninvasive cancers, and in 46 cases (16%) they contained invasive cancers as well. A comparison between the group with reference tumors less than 2 cm and the group with reference tumors more than 2 cm in size showed no significant difference between the groups in terms of presence or absence of tumor foci or distance of tumor foci from the reference tumor. If the 264 invasive cancers in this series that were 4 cm or less in diameter had been removed with a margin of 3 to 4 cm, 7% to 9% of the patients would have had invasive cancer left in the remaining breast tissue, and 4% to 9% would have had foci of noninvasive cancer left in the remaining breast tissue. On the basis of the data on the distribution of tumor at different distances from the reference tumor, the current study estimates the expected rates of local recurrences after breast-conserving surgical procedures relative to the extensiveness of the excision. The possible impact of postoperative local radiation therapy on the rates of expected local recurrence is discussed.

Adult↗