Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to J H Pemberton.
The most common cause of pouch dysfunction after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is pouchitis. Although low-grade dysplasia in the mucosa of the pouch has been recently described in the presence of pouchitis, there has been no report of carcinoma arising in the pouch itself. We describe a patient who developed a large-cell lymphoma of the ileal pouch after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.
OBJECTIVE: To document our evolving surgical management of colonoscopic perforation and examine factors crucial to the improvement of patient care. DESIGN: We conducted a computer-based retrospective analysis of medical records (1980 through 1995). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Among 57,028 colonoscopic procedures performed, 43 patients (0.075%, or 1 perforation in 1,333 procedures) had a colonic perforation. Two additional patients were treated after colonoscopy performed elsewhere. The outcomes analyzed included surgical morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Twenty-six women and 19 men who ranged in age from 28 to 85 years (median, 69) were treated for colonic perforation. More than 80% of perforations occurred during the latter half of the study period because of the increased volume of colonoscopic procedures (8 perforations among 12,581 examinations from 1980 through 1987 versus 35 perforations among 44,447 colonoscopies from 1988 through 1995). Emergency laparotomy was performed in 42 patients (93%). Perforations occurred throughout the colon: right side = 10; transverse = 9; and left side = 23. Three patients without evidence of peritoneal irritation fared well with nonoperative management. Most patients underwent primary repair or limited resection in conjunction with end-to-end anastomosis. In 14 patients (33%), an ostomy was created. One patient underwent laparotomy without further treatment. Intra-abdominal contamination ranged from none (31%) to local soiling (48%) to diffusely feculent (21%). Postoperative complications occurred in 12 patients and were associated with older age (P = 0.01), large perforations (P = 0.03), and prior hospitalization (P = 0.04). No postoperative deaths occurred. CONCLUSION: Despite a consistently low risk of colonic perforation, the increasing use of colonoscopy in our practice has resulted in an increased number of iatrogenic colonic perforations. In order to minimize morbidity and mortality, prompt operative intervention is the best strategy in most patients. Non-operative management is warranted in carefully selected patients without peritoneal irritation.
The length of ileum used rather than pouch configuration per se is related to eventual functional outcome: A pouch constructed from 15- to 20-cm limbs is ideal. One-stage procedures appear feasible in those patients who are not malnourished or taking steroids and in whom a tension-free anastomosis may be achieved. Because most of our patients do not satisfy these criteria, single-stage IPAA is rarely used at the Mayo Clinic. The decision to excise the ATZ should relate to the risk of developing subsequent neoplasia. All patients with FAP should have a mucosectomy performed. Patients with CUC who do not have a mucosectomy should have life-long surveillance. Indeed, an argument can be made that all patients should undergo surveillance after IPAA. The decision to staple the anastomosis impacts little on eventual functional outcome but does preserve the ATZ with the attendant risk of recurrent disease, polyps, and neoplasia. When cancer is a presenting feature, the decision to perform IPAA should be based on the stage of the tumor and the subsequent need for radiation therapy. Patients with early-stage tumors not requiring adjuvant radiation therapy attain long-term function comparable to that of patients who have had an IPAA for benign disease.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study is to compare the results of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) in patients in whom the anal mucosa is excised by handsewn techniques to those in whom the mucosa is preserved using stapling techniques. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is the operation of choice for patients with chronic ulcerative colitis requiring proctocolectomy. Controversy exists over whether preserving the transitional mucosa of the anal canal improves outcomes. METHODS: Forty-one patients (23 men, 18 women) were randomized to either endorectal mucosectomy and handsewn IPAA or to double-stapled IPAA, which spared the anal transition zone. All patients were diverted for 2 to 3 months. Nine patients were excluded. Preoperative functional status was assessed by questionnaire and anal manometry. Twenty-four patients underwent more extensive physiologic evaluation, including scintigraphic anopouch angle studies and pudendel never terminal motor latency a mean of 6 months after surgery. Quality of life similarly was estimated before surgery and after surgery. Univariate analysis using Wilcoxon test was used to assess differences between groups. RESULTS: The two groups were identical demographically. Overall outcomes in both groups were good. Thirty-three percent of patients who underwent the handsewn technique and 35% of patients who underwent the double-stapled technique experienced a postoperative complication. Resting anal canal pressures were higher in the patients who underwent the stapled technique, but other physiologic parameters were similar between groups. Night-time fecal incontinence occurred less frequently in the stapled group but not significantly. The number of stools per 24 hours decreased from preoperative values in both groups. After IPAA, quality of life improved promptly in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Stapled IPAA, which preserves the mucosa of the anal transition zone, confers no apparent early advantage in terms of decreased stool frequency or fewer episodes of fecal incontinence compared to handsewn IPAA, which excises the mucosa. Higher resting pressures in the stapled group coupled with a trend toward less night-time incontinence, however, may portend better function in the stapled group over time. Both operations are safe and result in rapid and profound improvement in quality of life.
OBJECTIVE: The objective was to review the early and late results of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) done for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Patients with FAP will have colorectal adenomas develop and die of colorectal cancer if left untreated. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis removes all disease-bearing mucosa while preserving transanal passage of stools. METHODS: Between 1981 and 1994, 187 patients with FAP, 11 to 59 years of age with a mean follow-up of 60 months (range, 5-170 months) had proctocolectomy and IPAA at Mayo Medical Center in Rochester, Minnesota. All patients had a proximal anal canal mucosal excision and a hand-sewn anastomosis of the pouch to the anal canal at the dentate line. A temporary ileostomy was used in 85% of the patients. RESULTS: No early postoperative deaths occurred, although two patients died later of metastatic colorectal carcinoma present at their initial operation. More important, no patient had a new cancer develop after IPAA. The overall morbidity after operation was 24%, with small bowel obstruction being the most common complication (13%). Patients had four bowel movements/24 hours and good fecal control, which continued during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The IPAA eradicates the risk of colorectal cancer in patients with FAP. It can be performed with low mortality, acceptable morbidity, and good functional results over the long term.
It is the goal of this review to discuss the increasingly common problem of anorectal motility disorders and their potential surgical management. Perhaps the most important goal in patients with anorectal motility disorders is to categorize them accurately into etiologic groups. The reason is that approaches to medical and surgical therapy are highly dependent on accurate categorization of these patients with motility disorders. This review is written from the perspective of a surgical practice which sees a high volume of patients with anorectal motility disorders and has a very logical, nearly algorithmic approach to the evaluation and management of these patients. The review is not exhaustive, nor does it include all possible alternatives. It is meant to be a relatively practical guide to physicians and surgeons who deal with patients with anorectal motility disorders and is based on the experience of surgeons and gastroenterologists who see large numbers of these patients.
The surgical management of locally recurrent rectal cancer may involve major procedures and is not for the faint-hearted. Nevertheless, such treatment is preferable to chemotherapy and radiotherapy; the latter will fail over a period of months during which the patient is likely to experience intractable pain. Radical surgery offers good palliation and a better quality of life. Survival is prolonged by such operations which may be curative in up to one-third of patients. Nevertheless, surgeons must be realistic in their assessment of and discussions with patients.
Crohn's disease (Granulomatous Colitis) is often accompanied by perianal lesions which can be difficult to treat. Different management modalities have been tried with variable results, these included; surgery, medical therapy, and diet. There has been few prospective controlled trials of treatment performed, and from most studies it is difficult to draw any definitive conclusions because of the variations in disease severity and treatment. The aim of this review is to clarify the position of different modalities of management with emphasis on the results, and complications.
Anorectal tests need to be tailored to the presentation of the individual patient. Clearly the tests are most useful when they identify anatomic or physiologic abnormalities for which there are successful treatments. For the incontinent patient, anal manometry is the most useful test. Sphincter injuries should be repaired, whereas neurogenic incontinence is best treated initially with biofeedback. Three tests are more useful for the constipated patient: colonic transit time, degree of pelvic floor descent on straining, and balloon expulsion. Colonic inertia responds to total colectomy and pelvic floor dysfunction to biofeedback. Meanwhile, patients with irritable bowel syndrome require rereferral back to their physicians.
The purpose of this article is to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of surgical procedures designed to eliminate the risk of colorectal cancer, the surgical treatment of extracolonic polyps, and the management of desmoid tumors.
OBJECTIVES: Colonic motor mechanisms deranged in constipation are not understood completely. Our aim was to measure left colonic motility and tone, during fasting and postprandially in patients with chronic constipation. METHODS: During 1 h fasting and 2 h postprandially, we measured pressures (multilumen manometry) and tone (barostat) in the left colon of 15 healthy controls and 40 patients with chronic constipation associated with slow (n = 15) or normal colonic transit (n = 12) or outlet obstruction (n = 13). RESULTS: Fasting tone was similar in all groups, and all demonstrated a significant increase in motor activity to food. There was lower postprandial tone (p < 0.05) in the slow transit and outlet obstruction groups. There were no differences in the timing of the tonic response or the number or amplitude of high-pressure propagated contractions. The slow transit group had lower postprandial phasic responses in the rectosigmoid (p < 0.05) and descending (p < 0.1) colon; the outlet obstruction group had lesser descending (p < 0.05) and rectosigmoid (p < 0.1) colon phasic motility. CONCLUSIONS: Colonic intraluminal measurements alone do not discriminate subgroups of chronic constipation more accurately than transit and pelvic floor tests, and currently have a limited role in clinical practice. However, manometry and tone measurements may be helpful in confirming a diagnosis of slow transit constipation (colonic inertia) in patients considered candidates for surgical treatment.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
PURPOSE: This study was designed to determine functional outcomes and rates of survival and recurrence of coloanal anastomosis in rectal cancer patients. METHODS: Between 1981 and 1991, 117 patients underwent coloanal anastomosis. Fifteen percent of the patients had a J-pouch; the rest had a straight coloanal anastomosis. Thirty-eight percent had no diverting stoma. Median distance of the tumor from the anal verge was 6.7 cm. RESULTS: Local recurrence rate was 7 percent. Five-year survival was fully 69 percent. Satisfactory fecal continence was achieved by 78 percent of patients; no J-pouch patient had frequent incontinence. Sixty-two percent of the patients had major (anastomotic leak = 18 percent) or minor complications; complications were not mitigated by a diverting stoma or worsened by adjuvant therapy. CONCLUSION: Although coloanal anastomosis is associated with a high chance of complications, the long-term outcome, in terms of disease-free survival and satisfactory function, is excellent.
UNLABELLED: Uncertainty persists concerning the long-term results of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed for indeterminate colitis. PURPOSE: This study was designed to compare functional outcomes of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with typical chronic ulcerative colitis and indeterminate colitis. METHOD: Seventy-one ileoanal pouch patients were identified with a diagnosis of indeterminate colitis. Mean follow-up was 56 months. Outcomes were compared with 1,232 chronic ulcerative colitis patients after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Mean follow-up was 60 months. RESULTS: (mean +/- SD) There was no difference in the frequency of daily bowel movements (indeterminate colitis, 7 +/- 3, vs. chronic ulcerative colitis, 7 +/- 2). Daytime and nighttime incontinence rates were likewise similar. Prevalence of pouchitis was identical (33 percent). However, failure rate was higher in the indeterminate colitis group (indeterminate colitis, 19 percent, vs. chronic ulcerative colitis, 8 percent; (P = 0.03)). CONCLUSIONS: At a mean of nearly five years after surgery, failure appears to occur more frequently in patients with indeterminate colitis than in patients with chronic ulcerative colitis. However, the great majority of indeterminate colitis patients (> 80 percent) have long-term functional results identical to those of patients with chronic ulcerative colitis.
Construction of an ileal reservoir changes the fecal bacterial flora and the fecal composition of bile acids and short-chain fatty acids. We examined the relationships between pouch inflammation (pouchitis) and pouch content, as assessed by analysis of fecal bacteria, bile acids, and short chain fatty acids. Four groups were studied: ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis with pouchitis (N = 10), IPAA without pouchitis (N =5), IPAA for familial adenomatous polyposis without pouchitis (N = 5); and Brooke ileostomy for ulcerative colitis, which served as controls (N = 5). Pouchitis was defined as > or = 7 points on an 18-point pouchitis disease activity index. Aerobic and anaerobic bacteria were quantitatively cultured. Total aqueous-phase bile acids were measured by thin-layer chromatography and an enzymatic 3 alpha-OH hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase method. Fecal short chain fatty acids were measured by gas liquid chromatography. All patients with an IPAA had higher ratios of anaerobes/aerobes and concentrations of anaerobic gram-negative rods than did patients with an ileostomy. There were no other differences between patient groups with respect to bacteria, aqueous-phase total bile acids, or fecal short-chain fatty acids. Fecal concentrations of bacteria, bile acids, and short-chain fatty acids were similar in patients with and without pouchitis, indicating that these factors can not be the sole cause of pouchitis.
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to assess how often "outlet obstruction" was the cause of constipation in a tertiary referral population. METHODS: We retrospectively audited the case records of 70 consecutive patients referred to a single gastroenterologist in a tertiary referral motility clinic. Patients were classified by physiological tests of colonic transit, as well as tests of anorectal and pelvic floor function. A subset of 28 patients also underwent a battery of tests to assess the autonomic nervous system supply. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients had symptoms suggestive of a rectal outlet obstruction syndrome. Thirty seven percent of patients had pelvic floor dysfunction, 27% had slow transit constipation, and 8% had anismus. Fully 55% of those with pelvic floor dysfunction had slow transit in addition. The remaining patients (23%) had at least two of Manning's criteria suggestive of the irritable bowel syndrome. Only four patients had documented abnormalities of autonomic function. CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic floor dysfunction is the most common cause of severe constipation in a tertiary referral motility clinic; slow transit constipation and irritable bowel syndrome occur equally. An algorithmic approach to evaluating patients using clinical features, anorectal functions tests, and assessment of colonic transit facilitates selection of management strategies. Autonomic dysfunction occurs rarely.
PURPOSE: To review current management of intractable constipation. DATA SOURCES: Original articles and reviews published in the English-language literature between 1965 and 1993 identified by MEDLINE search. Verbal feedback from attendees after presentation of the document as a clinical symposium at the 14th International Symposium on Gastrointestinal Motility in September 1993. STUDY SELECTION: Key words included constipation, epidemiology, colonic inertia, pseudo-obstruction, pelvic floor dysfunction, and results of therapeutic interventions, particularly the effects of biofeedback training and subtotal colectomy. RESULTS: In most patients, constipation is usually due to lack of dietary fiber and responds to simple measures to correct these factors, often without consulting a physician. In some, probably fewer than 10% of patients who consult their physicians, structural diseases of the colon and rectum, systemic disease, or medications that slow gut transit should be excluded, and regular exercise, dietary fiber, and an osmotic laxative prescribed. In a series of 277 highly selected patients from a tertiary referral center who had intractable constipation, only 29% had a definable abnormality; identification of abnormal transit facilitates selection of patients for further investigations identifying colonic inertia or pelvic floor dysfunction. CONCLUSION: An algorithmic approach can carefully select patients with intractable constipation for behavioral modification and biofeedback; the long-term outcome is excellent, with at least 75% success in several series. In a minority of patients with slow transit constipation unresponsive to medical treatment, subtotal colectomy with ileorectostomy is indicated and effective.