PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J H Smit

Publications and source records attributed to J H Smit.

38 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Does aspirin or other NSAIDs reduce the risk of cognitive decline in elderly persons? Results from a population-based study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the protective effect of NSAIDs and aspirin separately on cognitive decline in elderly subjects, controlling for consistent use of these agents over a prolonged period of time. METHODS: The study sample consisted of 1007 subjects, drawn from a population-based random sample of elderly individuals, 62-85 years old, who participated in a 3-year follow-up study. From this sample subjects were selected, who did use NSAIDs and completed all cognitive tests at both measurements (n=137), and subjects who did not use NSAIDs and completed all cognitive tests (n=475). Cognitive tests included the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), tests for episodic memory (Auditory Verbal Learning Test) and information processing speed (coding task). Cognitive decline was computed using Edwards-Nunnally method. Multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the association between NSAID (with and without aspirin) and decline in cognitive performance. Besides, the interaction of NSAIDs with age on cognitive decline was determined. RESULTS: The relative risk estimates of decline in episodic memory (immediate recall) adjusted for age, gender, education, baseline MMSE, vascular diseases, diabetes mellitus and (rheumatoid) arthritis for aspirin users only was more than three times reduced (OR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.09-0.82). The odds ratio for decline in memory of NSAID use without aspirin, adjusted for age, gender, education, baseline MMSE, vascular diseases, diabetes mellitus and (rheumatoid) arthritis was not significant (OR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.39-2.93). The effect of aspirin was significant only in persons of 75 years and over (OR: 0.10, 95% CI: 0.01-0.81), not in subjects younger than 75 years (OR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.14-1.96). NSAIDs did not have benefit on information processing speed. In 92% of aspirin users a low dose of 100mg daily or less was used. CONCLUSION: Low-dose aspirin might be protective for decline in memory in individuals of 75 years and over. The benefit of a low-dose aspirin does not support an anti-inflammatory effect, but suggests an antiplatelet effect. Therefore, a possible protective effect of low-dose aspirin on cognitive decline is likely only in subjects with aspirin use over a prolonged period of time.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Assessment of mental competency in community-dwelling elderly.

We studied the utility of a "vignette method" to assess mental competency for decision making on medical treatment and research participation. A vignette is a description of an imaginary situation in which the subject is asked to decide on a proposed treatment or on participation in research. His or her understanding of the situation and the quality of the reasoning underlying that choice are tested by a short series of questions. Subjects were participants in the Amsterdam Study of the Elderly (AMSTEL), a population-based study on cognitive decline and dementia. The sample consisted of elderly people (70-90 years), who were cognitively intact (n = 176) or had a dementia syndrome (n = 64; mostly Alzheimer disease). Dementia was diagnosed using the Cambridge Examination for Mental Disorders of the Elderly (CAMDEX) schedule. Two vignettes were used as competency assessment instruments. The answers to the vignette questions were summed to form a competency score. The reliability (internal consistency) of this score was 0.82 for both vignettes combined. After dichotomization into competent/incompetent (cutoff at the fifth centile of the control group), the agreement between the vignette method and a physician's judgment of competency was poor (kappa = 0.36) in the demented group. There was no agreement whatsoever when subjects with "minimal dementia" (n = 14) were left out of this analysis (kappa = 0.04). As expected, mean competency scores declined with increasing dementia severity. A multiple regression analysis showed that mental competency as measured by the vignette method was determined mainly by recent memory, expressive language, and abstract thinking. In the control group the competency score was only slightly related to education (r = 0.12) and verbal intelligence (r = 0.27). We conclude that the vignette method is a reliable and valid method for the assessment of mental competency in elderly people with cognitive decline. The vignette method is preferred over a physician's judgment, especially in patients with early dementia.

Aged↗