[Experimental ischemic renal injury--effect of surgical technique and the protective effect of a nonpeptide angiotensin II antagonist (losartan)].
Experimental renal ischaemic injuries are typically produced by temporary closure of the renal artery. In rats, two different methods of such temporary closure of the renal artery were compared: snaring of the artery by tourniquet, and clamping by a microsurgical bulldog clamp. The consequences of ischaemic periods 60, 90 and 120 minutes were evaluated. In different experimental series, the potential protective effect of non-peptic AT1 angiotensin II receptor antagonist losartan on postischaemic renal injury was evaluated. The seven-day survival and the degree of functional renal damage (according to the plasma levels of creatinine and urea) were analyzed 24 hours and 7 days after experimental renal ischaemia. Ischaemia, produced by the tourniquet led to a more significant renal damage than ischaemia caused by clamping of the renal artery by a microclamp (higher 7-day mortality rate, higher postischaemic plasma levels of creatinine and urea). Losartan decreased the consequences of renal ischaemia caused by the tourniquet, but did not change the outcome of renal ischaemia produced by microsurgical bulldog clamps. We found, that not only the duration of ischaemia and pharmacology, but even the surgical technique of producing renal ischaemia are important factors in experimental studies evaluating ischaemic renal damage. These findings provide evidence of the role of angiotensin II in postischaemic renal injury by a renal tourniquet. This particular mechanism is probably not involved, when renal artery is gently temporarily closed by a bulldog microclamp.