Measurement of distal forearm bone mineral density: can different forearm segments be used interchangeably ?
Many different forearm sites have been used for the measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) and prediction of risk of future fracture among community dwelling populations. In populations where bone densitometry of peripheral sites may be the most cost effective and practical means of measuring BMD, such as the nursing home population, knowing the characteristics of forearm BMD measures would be beneficial. The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship of four common commercially available measures to each other and to estimate the inter- and intrarater reliability of the measures in a sample of nursing home residents as a first step toward identifying appropriate forearm measurement sites. These sites were the distal radius, the distal ulna, a composite of the distal radius and distal ulna, and the ultra distal radius. BMD measurements on 48 nursing home patients were obtained using single X-ray absorptiometry. Inter- and intrarater reliability was excellent at all four sites (interclass correlation coefficients > 0. 85). Moderate to high correlations (0.84-0.91) between the distal radius and ultra distal radius sites of the forearm suggest that these measures may be interchangeable. Although not directly assessed here, differences in bone composition among forearm sites may partially explain moderate rather than high correlations between sites and may affect the ability of each site to predict future fractures. Thus, different forearm sites may be used interchangeably for diagnostic purposes; however, the prognostic value of each site remains unknown.