Biomedical subjects

J Hesler

Publications and source records attributed to J Hesler.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1993

Visual performance and objectively measured grades of cataract. A correlation of methods designed for use in longitudinal trials.

Objective quantification of cataract and subjective assessment of visual performance are essential features of anticataract or cataractogenic drug trials. The constrains of a longitudinal trial require a compromise in contrast sensitivity measurement between sensitivity and speed. Such a system has been developed for use in longitudinal anticataract trials. An objective cataract assessment system has also been developed for these trials. Visual performance parameters and objectively measured grades of cataract using these systems were correlated in a group of patients with early lens opacities. Overall the correlation was poor in all three morphological types of cataract. Possible reasons for this and implications for future anticataract trials are discussed.

Aged↗

PubMed1989

The accommodative contribution to binocular vergence eye movements.

Forced vergence fixation disparity curves were generated for both with and without an accommodative stimulus (accommodative closed and open loop conditions respectively) for fifteen asymptomatic subjects. All subjects exhibited an exophoric shift in fixation disparity for the accommodative open loop condition at the forced convergence side of the curve. No corresponding bias was found at the forced divergence side of the curve. The findings are discussed in terms of the results of previous studies and the existing models of vergence eye movements.

Accommodation, Ocular↗

PubMed1988

Comparison of associated heterophoria measurements using the Mallett test for near vision and the Sheedy Disparometer.

The Mallett test for near vision and the Sheedy Disparometer are compared in terms of their ability to measure associated heterophoria. Twenty-two asymptomatic subjects were used. With the Disparometer, ten of these subjects, familiar with making prism vergence measurements, exhibited stable forced vergence fixation disparity curves, and the associated heterophoria values using both instruments were not significantly different. However, the twelve subjects not familiar with making such measurements generated fluctuating, unstable fixation disparity curves, and the associated heterophoria values were significantly different. Repeated trials with the randomly selected naïve subjects led to flatter, more stable fixation disparity curves and lower values for the x- and y-intercepts when using the Disparometer. The Mallett test, however, produced identical values for associated heterophoria in each successive trial. Therefore, the validity of measurements using the Disparometer in a clinical setting is questioned.

Adolescent↗