PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J Hohnsbein

Publications and source records attributed to J Hohnsbein.

12 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1992

The human frequency-following response (FFR): normal variability and relation to the click-evoked brainstem response.

The frequency-following response (FFR) was recorded from twenty human subjects (11 female and 9 male) over a frequency range of 128-832 Hz in order to study the normal variability of this evoked potential and its dependence on age and sex. Moreover the relation of the FFR to the click-evoked brain stem response (BER) was analyzed in order to contribute to the FFR source discussion. The FFR had a maximum amplitude of about 400 nV and a latency of about 6.4 ms for stimulus frequencies around 350 Hz; the inter-individual variance of the best frequency and of the shape of the frequency function was considerable. Large second harmonics were seen in the FFR to stimuli below about 200 Hz. The FFR amplitude tended to be larger in younger subjects, whereas no such effect was found for the BER. No significant sex effect was found for the FFR amplitude, whereas the BER waves IV and VI were larger for females than for males. There were no correlations between FFR and BER latencies. Significant correlations were found between the amplitudes of the FFR and BER components II, III and IV, but not of waves V and VI. The results support the notion that the FFR and the BER reflect different mechanisms. Moreover the results do not favor the common hypothesis that the inferior colliculus is the major source of the scalp-recorded human FFR, but rather point to lower brainstem levels.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1991

Effects of crossmodal divided attention on late ERP components. I. Simple and choice reaction tasks.

We studied several effects of dividing attention between visual and acoustic inputs on different processing stages. Simple and choice responses were required to single letter stimuli. RTs and P300 latencies were delayed for divided attention (variable stimulus modality) as compared to focused attention (constant stimulus modality). In all but one condition, RT and P300 delays were similar. The exception was choice tasks to auditory stimuli, in which the RT delay was far larger than the P300 delay. Since the amplitude of the late ERP was larger in choice tasks than in simple tasks, the differences between the ERPs of choice and simple tasks were computed. They revealed that an additional late positive wave ("P-CR") occurred in all choice ERPs. In the divided attention condition the auditory (but not the visual) P-CR showed a longer delay compared to focused attention. We interpret the P-CR to be time-related to the response selection process. Our results suggest that the division of attention causes a slight impairment of stimulus evaluation (shown in P300 latency) and, after auditory stimuli only, a strong impairment of response selection (shown in P-CR latency). We therefore conclude that the observed RT effects are due to a bias of processing resources towards the visual modality, which mainly affects response selection. The results are in accordance with the theory of visual dominance.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1991

Effects of crossmodal divided attention on late ERP components. II. Error processing in choice reaction tasks.

Reaction times and event-related potentials in correct and incorrect trials were studied in a bimanual choice reaction task. In a focused attention (FA) condition, the stimulus modality was constant (visual or auditory); in a divided attention (DA) condition, the modality was varied at random from trial to trial. Stimulus- and response-triggered averages were computed from the midline EEG leads. In error trials, the ERP amplitude was reduced in the P300 range (300-500 msec) and enhanced in the slow wave range (500-700 msec) compared to correct reaction trials. Difference plots between the ERPs (incorrect minus correct reaction trials) revealed a large fronto-central negativity ("NE") and a parieto-occipital "slow wave." These components appeared larger in the response-triggered averages. We believe that they reflect two different stages of error processing. After auditory stimuli the NE peaked much later for DA than for FA, which supports the idea of an asymmetrical allocation of processing resources to the disadvantage of the auditory modality in our DA condition.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1991

Selective directional sensitivity in visual motion perception.

We present two experiments demonstrating that: (i) the latency of perception of the position of a small visual target moving towards the fovea is shorter than that of the same target moving away from the fovea; (ii) the reaction time (RT) to onset of motion of the same type of target is also shorter when it moves towards the fovea; and (iii) the RT to onset of motion away from the fovea may be shorter when larger, textured stimuli are employed. The relation of the findings to the existence of two systems for visual motion information processing and to recent neurophysiological findings is discussed.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Perceptual constancy during ocular pursuit: a quantitative estimation procedure.

Perceptual constancy of visual motion is usually described as the degree of correspondence between physical and perceived characteristics of motion in the external world. To study it, one has to assess the relationship between physical motion, its retinal image, and its perception. We describe a quantitative estimation procedure for a measure K denoting the degree of perceptual constancy of background target motions noncollinear to the eye movements during ocular pursuit. The calculation of K is based on three vectors describing the target motion (1) as it is physically, (2) as it is mapped to the retina, and (3) as it is perceived, but only the direction of the perceptual motion vector has to be determined experimentally. K allows for quantitative comparison between experiments with a variety of parameters in visual motion displays.

Eye Movements↗
PubMed1990

Visual localization and estimation of extent of target motion during ocular pursuit: a common mechanism?

The ability to localize a visual target and to estimate the distance through which it moves was studied during ocular pursuit. In the first experiment observers had to localize the position of a visually tracked moving target when they heard an acoustic signal. The signal was sounded near the beginning or near the end of the motion. The distance between the perceived positions was shorter than the distance between the corresponding physical positions of the target. The 'shortening' became more pronounced with higher tracking velocity. In another condition the observers estimated the length of the motion path between two successive sound signals, one presented near the beginning and one near the end of the motion. The length of path travelled was underestimated, the effect being stronger with higher tracking velocity. In the second experiment this effect of velocity on the underestimation of distance was shown to exist only during ocular pursuit and not during steady fixation. The hypothesis that localization and estimation of distance during ocular pursuit share a common mechanism is discussed.

Acceleration↗
PubMed1989

The role of the adjacency between background cues and objects in visual localization during ocular pursuit.

Subjects used eye movements to pursue a light target that moved from left to right with a velocity of 15 deg s-1. The stimulus was a sudden five-fold decrease in target intensity during the movement. The subject's task was to localize the stimulus relative to either a single stationary background point or the midpoint between two points (28 deg apart) placed 0.5 deg above the target path. The stimulus was usually mislocated in the direction of eye movement; the mislocation was affected by the spatial adjacency between background and stimulus. When an auditory, rather than a visual, stimulus was presented during tracking, target position at the time of stimulus presentation was visually mislocated in the direction opposite to that of eye movement. The effect of adjacency between background and target remained the same. The involvement of processes of subject-relative and object-relative visual perception is discussed.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Improved amplitude evaluation of the frequency following response (FFR).

Three methods were combined to improve the evaluation of the amplitude of the frequency following response (FFR) in unfavorable signal-to-noise conditions. The first step was the application of a time-multiplex averager to reduce noise variance between amplitude values to be compared. The second step was the evaluation of amplitude in the frequency domain by means of a digital triangle filter. The third step was the correction of raw FFR amplitudes by an algorithm that takes into account several noise values.

Electrophysiology↗