PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J Hore

Publications and source records attributed to J Hore.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Comparison of kinematics in skilled and unskilled arms of the same recreational baseball players.

We examined mechanisms of coordination that enable skilled recreational baseball players to make fast overarm throws with their skilled arm and which are absent or rudimentary in their unskilled arm. Arm segment angular kinematics in three dimensions at 1000 Hz were recorded with the search-coil technique from the arms of eight individuals who on one occasion threw with their skilled right arm and on another with their unskilled left arm. Compared with their unskilled arm, the skilled arm had: a larger angular deceleration of the upper arm in space in the forward horizontal direction; a larger shoulder internal rotation velocity at ball release (unskilled arms had a negative velocity); a period of elbow extension deceleration before ball release; and an increase in wrist velocity with an increase in ball speed. It is suggested that some of these differences in arm kinematics occur because of differences between the skilled and unskilled arms in their ability to control interaction torques (the passive torque at one joint due to motion at adjacent joints). It is proposed that one reason unskilled individuals cannot throw fast is that, unlike their skilled counterparts, they have not developed the coordination mechanisms to effectively exploit interaction torques.

Acceleration↗
PubMed2005

Braking of elbow extension in fast overarm throws made by skilled and unskilled subjects.

A previous computer simulation study of overarm throws in 2D showed that reversal of elbow torque by antagonist muscle action late in the throw led to increased wrist flexion velocity and to increased ball speeds. We tested the hypothesis that the skill of making fast overarm throws in 3D involves deceleration (braking) of elbow extension before ball release, and that this is an active mechanism. Skilled and unskilled throwers were instructed to throw baseballs at a fast speed. Arm segment angular positions in 3D at 1,000 Hz were recorded with the search-coil technique (which records angular motions). In skilled throws, but not in unskilled throws, there was a period (mean 17 ms) of rapid elbow extension deceleration before ball release. However, there was relatively little biceps EMG activity associated with the very large magnitude of elbow deceleration. This finding and other work suggests that elbow extension deceleration results in part from interaction torques associated with late-occurring shoulder rotations, and only in part from elbow flexor contraction. During the period when elbow extension was decelerating, the forearm in space was undergoing angular acceleration (because of internal rotation at the shoulder) which would be expected to produce a torque at the wrist in the extensor (not flexor) direction. The results show that elbow extension deceleration occurs before ball release in fast (skilled) 3D throws, and that it does not produce forearm angular deceleration. Whether it produces forearm translational deceleration, which could increase wrist flexion velocity, remains to be determined.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Timing of ball release in overarm throws affects ball speed in unskilled but not skilled individuals.

We tested the hypothesis that variability in the timing of ball release in overarm throws affects ball speed. Nine unskilled and six skilled throwers made 30 throws fast and accurately from a sitting and standing position. Angular positions of finger and arm segments were recorded with search-coils at 1000 Hz; ball speed was measured with a radar gun. The time of ball release from the fingertips was measured with respect to seven arm kinematic reference points. Mean timing windows for ball release were 28 ms for unskilled throwers and 7 ms for skilled throwers. Mixed-model analyses of variance showed that a there was a statistically significant relationship between ball speed and the timing of ball release in unskilled throwers, but not in skilled throwers. This was presumably due to the difference in variability of the timing of ball release between the two groups. In contrast, skilled throwers showed a relationship between ball speed and peak forearm angular velocity (one measure of arm speed). We conclude that although variability in the timing of ball release can affect ball speed, this is only a major factor in unskilled throwers. When skilled throwers throw fast, variability in ball speed is due to variability in arm speed.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Kinematics of wrist joint flexion in overarm throws made by skilled subjects.

Previous studies of multijoint arm movements have shown that the CNS holds arm kinematics constant in different situations by predictively compensating for the effects of interaction torques. We determined whether this was also the case for wrist joint flexion in natural overarm throws performed by skilled subjects in 3D, a situation where large passive torques can occur at the wrist. Specifically, we investigated whether wrist flexion amplitudes are held constant in throws of different speeds. Joint rotations were recorded at 1,000 Hz with the search-coil technique. Contrary to a previous study on constrained 2D throwing, indirect evidence was found that in fast throws passive torques associated with forearm deceleration were exploited to increase wrist flexion velocity. This increase in wrist flexion velocity was associated with constant wrist flexion amplitudes at ball release (mean 27 degrees) for throws of different speeds. Furthermore, final wrist flexion positions after ball release were similar for a particular subject irrespective of the speed of the throw. This was associated in faster throws with increased magnitudes of wrist flexor and wrist extensor EMG activity which damped passive torques associated with forearm angular deceleration. It is concluded that wrist flexion in overarm throws of different speeds is produced by central signals which precisely control net joint torque by both exploiting and damping passive torques during different parts of the throw to keep wrist joint angular position parameters constant. As such the results show that control strategies for natural 3D throwing are different from those for constrained 2D throwing.

Arm↗
PubMed2003

Overarm throwing speed in cerebellar subjects: effect of timing of ball release.

Cerebellar subjects cannot throw fast and show variability in ball speed from throw to throw. One possible reason is that they release the ball at times when arm speed is not at its maximal value. Therefore, we investigated the hypothesis that the slow and variable speeds of throws made by cerebellar subjects are caused by their known large variability in the timing of ball release. Eight cerebellar subjects and matched controls were instructed to make overarm throws fast and accurately. Angular positions of arm segments were recorded with search coils at 1,000 Hz. Timing of ball release was measured with respect to the time of occurrence of seven arm kinematic reference points. All cerebellar subjects showed strong relations between ball speed and the timing of ball release, with faster ball speeds associated with late ball release. In agreement, faster ball speeds were also associated with longer hand paths to ball release, and with balls which went low on the target. However, when timing of ball release was optimal for achieving maximal ball speed in the cerebellar subjects, their fastest ball speeds were on average only 67% those of controls. Similarly, peak forearm angular velocity (one measure of arm speed) in the cerebellar group was 58% that of the control group. It is concluded that the large variability in timing ball release in cerebellar subjects contributes to their variability in ball speed, but is only a minor factor in their inability to throw fast. The major reason why cerebellar subjects do not throw fast is that they do not generate fast arm speeds.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Disorders in timing and force of finger opening in overarm throws made by cerebellar subjects.

Although there is agreement that an important sign of cerebellar dysfunction is disorder in timing of movement, it appears that authors who study different behaviors mean different things when they use the term "timing," and that the underlying mechanisms are likely to be different. For overarm throwing, skilled throwers can time ball release with a precision of less than 7 ms, whereas cerebellar subjects show a large variability of 50 ms or more in this timing. Furthermore, cerebellar patients show a larger variability in the amplitude of finger opening which could either reflect a disorder in force, or result indirectly from the increased variability in timing. To determine whether timing and force of finger opening were dependent variables, the time of ball release was plotted against the amplitude of finger opening. In control subjects these two parameters were related, with early (mistimed) throws having smaller finger amplitudes. However, in cerebellar subjects the increased variability in finger amplitude could not be accounted for by the increased variability in timing. Similarly, the increased timing windows could not be explained by disorder in force at the fingers. It is concluded that the abnormal finger opening that occurs in cerebellar patients when making overarm throws results from increased variability in both the timing and force of finger extension. Whether the increased variability in timing is a disorder in triggering finger opening at the right moment, or is due to a failure to combine finger opening appropriately with the hand trajectory, remains to be determined.

Arm↗
PubMed2001

Control of finger grip forces in overarm throws made by skilled throwers.

In an overarm throw, as the hand opens and the ball rolls along the fingers, the ball exerts a back force on the fingers. Previous studies suggested that skilled throwers compensate for this back force by producing an appropriate finger flexor torque to oppose the back force, but it was unclear how this is controlled by the CNS. We investigated whether the increase in finger flexor torque is timed precisely to occur late in the throw as the fingers open or whether the increase occurs throughout the throw to anticipate the increase in hand acceleration. Recreational ball players threw balls of different weights and diameters at different speeds from both a sitting and standing position while arm joint rotations were recorded with the search-coil technique. Force transducers were taped to the distal and middle phalanges of the middle finger and subjects released the ball from this finger. Passive forces on the finger were also recorded in "fake" throws in which the ball was taped to the finger and subjects did not grip the ball. These skilled throwers correctly anticipated the magnitude of the back force from the ball on the finger because the mean amplitude of finger extension did not increase in throws made with a large range of increasing back forces. This was achieved by subjects gripping the ball during the backswing with a force proportional to ball weight and intended ball speed (acceleration) and progressively increasing the grip force throughout the backswing and forward throw. The magnitude of this grip force during the forward throw was not affected by ball texture. After ball release from the fingertip, the finger flexed in proportion to the peak force on the finger before ball release. It is concluded, in a skilled fast overarm throw where large, fast-changing forces on the fingers result from the sum of motions at all arm joints, that finger flexor torque is progressively increased throughout the throw in an anticipatory (predictive) fashion to counteract the progressively increasing back force from the ball.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Increased variability in finger position occurs throughout overarm throws made by cerebellar and unskilled subjects.

We investigated the ability of cerebellar patients and unskilled subjects to control finger grip position and the amplitude of finger opening during a multijoint overarm throw. This situation is of interest because the appropriate finger control requires predicting the magnitude of back forces from the ball on the finger throughout the throw and generating the appropriate level and rate of change of finger flexor torque to oppose the back force. Cerebellar patients, matched controls, and unskilled subjects threw tennis balls and tennis-sized balls of different weights. In all cases angular positions of five arm segments in three dimension were recorded at 1,000 Hz with the search-coil technique as subjects threw from a seated position. When the hand was stationary, cerebellar patients showed a normal ability to grip the ball and open the fingers and drop the ball. In contrast, in overarm throws where a back force occurred on the fingers, cerebellar patients showed an abnormally large variability in amplitude of the change in finger position when gripping, in amplitude of finger opening, and in amplitude of the change in finger position 10 ms after ball release. This was not due to more trial-to-trial variation in throwing speed. When throwing balls of increasing weights, both controls and cerebellar patients had increasing finger flexions after ball release that indicated that, on average, both scaled finger force in proportion to ball weight during the throw. Unlike skilled controls, cerebellar patients showed a small (<20 degrees ) increase in the amplitude of finger opening with balls of increasing weight. However, neither the increase in variability of finger position nor the increase in finger amplitude with balls of increasing weight were unique cerebellar signs because both were observed to various degrees in unskilled throwers. It is concluded that in the absence of either normal cerebellar function or skill, the central neural activity that controls finger opening in throwing can increase finger flexor force to oppose an increase in back force from heavier balls and can open the fingers but cannot control finger force or finger opening precisely and consistently from throw to throw. These results fit with the idea that cerebellar disorders are greater in multijoint than single-joint movements because control of force is more complicated. They are also consistent with the hypothesis that the cerebellum produces skill in movement by reducing variability in the timing and force of muscle contractions.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Causes of left-right ball inaccuracy in overarm throws made by cerebellar patients.

Cerebellar patients throw inaccurately in the left-right direction but the cause of this multijoint ataxia is unclear. We tested whether it was due, as originally proposed, to variable left-right directions of the hand path, or, alternatively, to variable timing of ball release occurring on a right to left curved hand path. We also examined the cause of the variability in hand path direction per se. Six right-handed cerebellar patients and six control subjects were instructed to throw tennis balls at a slow, medium and fast speed from a seated position while angular positions in 3D of five arm segments were recorded at 1000 Hz with the search-coil technique. Compared to controls, cerebellar patients threw slower and less accurately, had more variable timing of ball release occurring on a right to left curved hand path and had more variable left-right directions of hand paths at a fixed point in front of the sternum. In all cerebellar patients, ball left-right inaccuracy was related both to timing of ball release and to hand path direction at the fixed point. The cause of the increased variability in hand path direction varied between patients and could not be explained by disorder in a single joint rotation. No evidence was found that it resulted from variable stabilization at the shoulder during elbow extension. Instead, the more variable left-right direction of the hand path was related to the initial pattern of joint rotations occurring early in the throw before the onset of elbow extension, and to the amplitudes of radioulnar pronation and wrist abduction occurring late in the throw. The results emphasize that in the presence of a cerebellar lesion, ball left-right inaccuracy in overarm throws cannot be explained by a single disorder. Rather ball inaccuracy was likely due to disorders in central commands to proximal joint rotations that produced the hand path and in central commands to distal joints that controlled the timing of finger opening.

Arm↗
PubMed1999

Finger opening in an overarm throw is not triggered by proprioceptive feedback from elbow extension or wrist flexion.

Accuracy in an overarm throw requires great precision in the timing of finger opening. We tested the hypothesis that finger opening in an overarm throw is triggered by proprioceptive feedback from elbow extension or wrist flexion. The hypothesis was tested in two ways: first, by unexpectedly perturbing elbow extension or slowing wrist flexion and determining whether changes occurred in finger opening, and second, by measuring the latency from the start of these joint rotations to the start of finger opening. Subjects threw balls fast and accurately from a sitting or standing position while joint rotations were recorded with the search-coil technique. Elbow extension was unexpectedly blocked near the start of forward motion of the hand by a rope attached to the wrist that passed through a catch mechanism located behind the subject. In spite of a slowing or complete block of elbow extension, and in some cases a replacement of elbow extension by elbow flexion, finger opening always occurred and at the same latency as for normal throws. Wrist flexion was slowed in seven of eight subjects when subjects changed from throwing with a light ball (14 g, 70 mm diam.) to a heavy ball (210 g, 65 mm diam.). For the first throw with the heavy ball, this slowing was neither fully anticipated by the subject nor compensated for by the changed proprioceptive feedback associated with the slowing. Consequently, the timing of finger opening was unchanged and (to the surprise of the thrower) the ball went high. Furthermore, in unperturbed throws with tennis balls, the latency from onset of wrist flexion or elbow extension to onset of finger opening was too short for either to have triggered finger opening (across subjects means were 4 ms for wrist flexion and 21 ms for elbow extension). In additional analysis, no relation was found between the time of onset of earlier occurring rotations at the shoulder and the time of onset of finger opening. We concluded that, although a role for all proprioceptive feedback in triggering finger opening cannot be disproved by these experiments, it can be ruled out for feedback arising from elbow extension and wrist flexion, and it seems unlikely for feedback arising from events occurring very early in the throw. The more likely possibility is that finger opening in an overarm throw is triggered by a central command based on an internal model of hand trajectory.

Biomechanical Phenomena↗
PubMed1999

Failure of cerebellar patients to time finger opening precisely causes ball high-low inaccuracy in overarm throws.

We investigated the idea that the cerebellum is required for precise timing of fast skilled arm movements by studying one situation where timing precision is required, namely finger opening in overarm throwing. Specifically, we tested the hypothesis that in overarm throws made by cerebellar patients, ball high-low inaccuracy is due to disordered timing of finger opening. Six cerebellar patients and six matched control subjects were instructed to throw tennis balls at three different speeds from a seated position while angular positions in three dimensions of five arm segments were recorded at 1,000 Hz with the search-coil technique. Cerebellar patients threw more slowly than controls, were markedly less accurate, had more variable hand trajectories, and showed increased variability in the timing, amplitude, and velocity of finger opening. Ball high-low inaccuracy was not related to variability in the height or direction of the hand trajectory or to variability in finger amplitude or velocity. Instead, the cause was variable timing of finger opening and thereby ball release occurring on a flattened arc hand trajectory. The ranges of finger opening times and ball release times (timing windows) for 95% of the throws were on average four to five times longer for cerebellar patients; e.g., across subjects mean ball release timing windows for throws made under the medium-speed instruction were 11 ms for controls and 55 ms for cerebellar patients. This increased timing variability could not be explained by disorder in control of force at the fingers. Because finger opening in throwing is likely controlled by a central command, the results implicate the cerebellum in timing the central command that initiates finger opening in this fast skilled multijoint arm movement.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Prediction and compensation by an internal model for back forces during finger opening in an overarm throw.

Previous studies have indicated that timing of finger opening in an overarm throw is likely controlled centrally, possibly by means of an internal model of hand trajectory. The present objective was to extend the study of throwing to an examination of the dynamics of finger opening. Throwing a heavy ball and throwing a light ball presumably require different neural commands, because the weight of the ball affects the mechanics of the arm, and particularly, the mechanics of the finger. Yet finger control is critical to the accuracy of an overarm throw. We hypothesized that finger opening in an overarm throw is controlled by a central mechanism that uses an internal model to predict and compensate for movement-dependent back forces on the fingers. To test this idea we determined whether finger motion is affected by back forces, i.e., whether larger back forces cause larger finger extensions. Back forces were varied by having subjects throw, at the same fast speed, tennis-sized balls of different weights (14, 55, and 196 g). Arm- and finger-joint rotations were recorded with the search-coil technique; forces on the middle finger were measured with force transducers. Recordings showed that during ball release, the middle finger experienced larger back forces in throws with heavier balls. Nevertheless, most subjects showed proximal interphalangeal joint extensions that were unchanged or actually smaller with the heavier balls. This was the case for the first throw and for all subsequent throws with a ball of a new weight. This suggests that the finger flexors compensated for the larger back forces by exerting larger torques during finger extension. Supporting this view, at the moment of ball release, all finger joints flexed abruptly due to the now unopposed torques of the finger flexors, and the amplitude of this flexion was proportional to ball weight. We conclude that in overarm throws made with balls of different weights, the CNS predicts the different back forces from the balls and adjusts finger flexor torques accordingly. This is consistent with the view that finger opening in overarm throws is controlled by means of an internal model of the motor apparatus and the external load.

Adaptation, Physiological↗
PubMed1996

Finger flexion does not contribute to ball speed in overarm throws.

The aim of this study was to determine whether, in overarm throws made by recreational ball players, the fingers undergo flexion movement before ball release and thereby contribute to the generation of ball speed. To obtain the high resolution needed to answer this question, the magnetic-field search-coil technique was used and the data were sampled at 1000 Hz. The subjects, who were either seated or were standing, threw tennis balls at different speeds at a target 3 m away. Angular positions in three dimensions were simultaneously recorded of the distal phalanx of the middle finger and hand and, in additional experiments to determine the mechanism of ball release in more detail, three middle finger phalanges and the hand. Different phases of ball release were determined by pressure-sensitive microswitches on the proximal and distal phalanges of the middle finger. Irrespective of whether the subjects were seated or were standing, for all throws at all speeds, finger flexion did not occur before ball release. That is, up until final release of the ball, the fingers only underwent extension associated with hand opening. For fast throws, at the instant of final ball release the fingers began to flex, presumably as a result of reactive forces associated with release of the ball. Thus, in overarm throws made by recreational ball players, finger flexion movement does not appear to contribute to the generation of ball speed.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Errors in the control of joint rotations associated with inaccuracies in overarm throws.

1. Accurate overarm throwing requires precise control of joint rotations so that the ball is released at the appropriate time on the appropriate hand trajectory. Inaccuracy in throws, in turn, must result from errors in the control of joint rotations. But do high and low throws result from disorders in the joint rotations that produce the hand trajectory or in those that cause ball release? Are they due to error at a particular joint or to accumulation of errors across a number of joints? The objective was to answer these questions and thereby to gain insight into the CNS control of joint rotations in a skilled arm movement task. 2. Ten subjects--male, right-handed recreational ball players, all accurate throwers--sat with a fixed trunk and threw tennis balls at a 9 x 9 grid of 6-cm target squares 1.5 or 3 m away. Rotations of five arm segments in three dimensions were measured at 1,000 Hz with the magnetic-field search-coil technique. Hand trajectory (translation) was computed from these rotations. 3. The cause of ball high-low inaccuracy was investigated by determining its relation with hand kinematic parameters that could potentially affect it. No statistically significant relation was found between height of ball impact on the target and height of the hand trajectory. In contrast, statistically significant relations appeared between height of ball impact on the target and both hand trajectory length at ball release (for 8 of 10 subjects) and finger and hand orientation in space at ball release (for all 10 subjects). 4. Three hypotheses were proposed to explain the variable finger and hand orientations in space at ball release, i.e., that they resulted from errors in velocity of rotation at one or more proximal joints (wrist, elbow, shoulder), timing of onset of rotation at one or more proximal joints, or timing of ball release (due to incorrect velocity or timing of onset of finger opening). All three mechanisms could result in inappropriate finger and hand orientations in space at ball release, but the pattern of joint space trajectories would be different in each case. 5. High and low throws did not follow the joint space paths predicted by the first two hypotheses. Instead, as predicted by the third hypothesis, a separation of traces occurred when finger extension was plotted against wrist flexion or against elbow extension, e.g., for a given amplitude of wrist flexion, finger extension was large for the high throws and small for the low throws. 6. In agreement, when all throws were considered, a statistically significant (P < 0.005) relation was found between ball impact height on the target and the amplitude of finger extension, for a fixed amplitude of wrist flexion (10 subjects), and for a fixed amplitude of elbow extension (8 subjects). Only two subjects showed a statistically significant relation between ball impact height and the amplitude of wrist flexion, for a fixed amplitude of elbow extension. 7. The separation of finger extension-wrist flexion traces in joint space for high and low throws was due to a difference in the timing of onset of finger rotation with respect to the wrist rather than to an inappropriate velocity of the finger (or the wrist). 8. As expected, all 10 subjects showed statistically significant relations between the time of onset of finger extension and both finger orientation in space at ball release and height of ball impact on the target. 9. It is concluded that in fast arm-only throws made by male recreational ball players, high and low throws do not primarily result from variability in the height of the hand trajectory or from variability in the amplitude of one or more proximal joints due to errors in the velocity or timing of onset of these joint rotations. Instead, in most cases, they result from inappropriate timing of onset of rotation of the fingers with respect to the rotations of the other joints and thus to inappropriate timing of ball release. These findings emphasize the im

Arm↗
PubMed1996

Overarm throws with the nondominant arm: kinematics of accuracy.

1. Overarm throws made with the nondominant arm are usually less accurate than those made with the dominant arm. The objective was to determine the errors in the joint rotations associated with this inaccuracy, and thereby to gain insight into the neural mechanisms that contribute to skill in overarm throwing. 2. Overarm throws from both left and right arms were recorded on different occasions as six right-handed subjects sat with a fixed trunk and threw 150 tennis balls at about the same speed at a 6-cm square on a target grid 3 m away. Joint rotations at the shoulder, elbow, wrist, and finger, and arm translations, were computed from recordings of arm segment orientations made with the magnetic-field search-coil technique. 3. All subjects threw less accurately in this task with the left (nondominant) arm. For throws made with the left arm, the height of ball impact on the target grid was related to hand trajectory length and to hand orientation in space at ball release, but not to hand trajectory height. 4. Two hypotheses were proposed to explain the decreased ball accuracy in the high-low direction during throwing with the nondominant arm: that it was caused by increased variability in the velocity or timing of onset of rotations at proximal joints (which determine the path of the hand through space) or increased variability in the velocity or timing of onset of finger extension (which determine the moment of ball release). 5. A prediction of the first hypothesis was that proximal joint rotations should be more variable in throws with the left arm. This was the case for the majority of proximal joint rotations in the six subjects when variability was examined in joint space. However, some proximal joint rotations were more variable in the right arm. 6. The first hypothesis was directly tested by determining whether hand angular position in space (which represents the sum of all proximal joint rotations) was related to ball impact height on the target grid at a fixed translational position in the throw. No relation was found between these variables for throws with the left arm in four subjects, whereas a weak relation was found for two subjects. It was concluded that, considering all subjects, the first hypothesis could not explain the results. 7. In contrast, in agreement with the second hypothesis, a strong relation (P < 0.001) was found in all subjects between ball impact height on the target grid and time of ball release for throws with the left arm, and with time of onset of finger extension. 8. Across all six subjects the timing precision (windows) for 95% of the throws was (for ball release) right arm, 9.3 ms; left arm, 22.5 ms; (for onset of finger extension) right arm, 13.7 ms; left arm, 26.7 ms. 9. Timing of onset of finger extension was no less accurate than timing of onset of other joint rotations for both left and right arms. However, simulations of throws showed that, for the same error in timing, finger extension had twice as large an effect on ball direction as any other joint rotation. Timing errors at the fingers have a greater effect than errors at other joints because finger errors are scaled by the higher angular velocity of the hand in space rather than by the smaller angular velocities of the individual joints. 10. It is concluded that although rotations were in general more variable at both proximal and distal joints of the nondominant (left) arm, the major cause of its decreased throwing accuracy was increased variability at the distal joints, i.e., in the timing of onset of finger extension. This may be due to a lack of precision in the commands from the right hemisphere to the left fingers in right-handed throwers.

Arm↗
PubMed1996

Motor control, excitement, and overarm throwing.

Although motor control has historically been an important discipline, it runs the risk of being overshadowed by other newer areas of neuroscience. One response would be to generate increased excitement in motor control, e.g., by more clearly defining the big questions, by discussing them in new audience-friendly formats, and by promoting them, perhaps in the context of applied motor control. One recent exciting development has been a shift to the study of natural multijoint movements in three dimensions. We are currently investigating one such multijoint movement, overarm throwing. The question we are asking is, What causes inaccuracies in overarm throws? Is it errors in the timing or in the velocity of joint rotations that produce the hand trajectory? Surprisingly, inaccuracies (high and low throws) do not result from errors in rotations of proximal joints; instead they result from variability in the timing of onset of finger opening. It remains to be determined whether the decreased accuracy in throwing in cerebellar patients is caused by an increase in this error or from disorder in some other multijoint coordinating mechanism.

Arm↗
PubMed1995

Timing of finger opening and ball release in fast and accurate overarm throws.

How precisely does the CNS control the timing of finger muscle contractions in skilled movements? For overarm throwing, it has been calculated that a ball release window of less than 1 ms is needed for accuracy in long throws. The objective was to investigate the timing precision of ball release and finge opening for 100 overarm throws made using only the arm. Subjects sat with a fixed trunk and threw balls fast and accurately at a 6-cm-square target when it was 1.5, 3.0 and 4.5 m away. Three-dimensional angular positions in space of the clavicle, upper arm, forearm, hand and distal phalanx of the middle finger were simultaneously recorded at 1000 Hz using the magnetic-field search-coil technique. Ball release was determined by pressure-sensitive microswitches on the proximal and distal phalanges of the middle finger (proximal and distal triggers). Variability of ball release, defined in terms of the standard deviation (SD) of the means of release times, was different when synchronized to different hand kinematic parameters. It was highest to the start of movement (when the hand started rotating vertically forward and up around a space-fixed horizontal axis) and was lowest when synchronized to the moment near ball release when the hand was vertical. These values did not depend on target distance. When throws were synchronized to vertical hand position, and SDs were averaged across the 10 subjects, the average interval for 95% of the throws (4xSD) was 9.6 ms for ball release and 10.0 ms for onset of finger opening. Thus, two independent measures of timing precision gave similar results. It is concluded that for 100 fast and accurate throws made by male recreational ball players, timing of finger opening and ball release was controlled precisely but not to fractions of a millisecond.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Arm position constraints when throwing in three dimensions.

1. Overarm throwing is a skilled multijoint movement with potentially many degrees of freedom. Considering only the arm > or = 7 degrees of freedom are involved (shoulder 3, elbow 2, wrist 2). For each arm segment 3 degrees of freedom are potentially required to specify its angular position (orientation) at any moment during a throw. Simplification of the control problem for the CNS would occur if there were constraints on these degrees of freedom. The objective was to determine whether such constraints exist at ball release when throwing at targets in different directions using only the arm. 2. The angular positions in three dimensions of the distal phalanx of the middle finger, the hand, the forearm, and the upper arm were simultaneously recorded with search coils as subjects sat with a fixed trunk and threw balls at nine targets in an approximate +/- 40 degree work space. Ball release was signaled by microswitches on the proximal and distal phalanges of the middle finger (proximal and distal triggers). 3. On throwing at any one target the hand at ball release adopted a similar orientation for each throw, i.e., for a particular vertical and horizontal angular position the hand adopted a similar torsional position. On throwing at targets throughout the work space, angular position (rotation) vectors describing hand positions in space at ball release were confined to a two-dimensional surface rather than a three-dimensional volume. This constraint in hand torsion occurred near and at ball release but not throughout the entire throw. It was not due to mechanical factors because such a surface was not obtained when subjects deliberately twisted their arms when throwing. Thus at ball release during a "natural" throw the hand was constrained to 2 of its possible 3 angular degrees of freedom. 4. The same constraint was also found for finger, forearm, and upper arm angular positions in space at ball release as determined at both the proximal and distal triggers. A consequence is that at ball release the entire arm was constrained to 2 of its possible 7 degrees of freedom. 5. The two-dimensional position vector surface for each arm segment was similar to that obtained when pointing with a straight arm at the same targets. In both cases they showed torsion and were twisted like the surface obtained by rotations around the horizontal and vertical axes of a Fick gimbal. However, in some subjects the throwing surfaces were tilted from the vertical.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Adult↗