PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J J Crosbie

Publications and source records attributed to J J Crosbie.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

The influence of bladder filling on anorectal function.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop a technique to simultaneously evaluate bladder and anorectal function. In particular, this study was designed to determine if anal sphincter resting pressure, anal sphincter squeeze pressure and rectal sensation change with bladder filling. PATIENT AND METHODS: A pilot study of ten female patients who presented to the pelvic physiology unit for assessment of urinary symptoms was performed. All patients completed a symptom questionnaire and quality of life assessment form. Following informed consent a baseline urodynamic test was performed with the bladder empty and subsequently followed by an anorectal manometric test. Changes in anal sphincter resting pressure, squeeze pressure and rectal pressure were recorded over a ten-minute period. With the patient lying in the left lateral position, the bladder was then filled with isotonic saline at room temperature at a constant rate of 30 ml/min. A continuous assessment of changes in anal sphincter resting pressure during bladder filling was made. Anal sphincter squeeze pressure and rectal sensation were measured at fixed intervals during bladder filling (50, 100, 150 ml etc.) and at fixed intervals relative to bladder capacity (25, 50, 75 and 100% capacity) by stopping bladder filling at the appropriate level. RESULTS: There was no significant change in anal sphincter resting pressure (Mean difference(s.d.) between bladder full and empty = 2.7(5.6) P = 0.92*), squeeze pressure (Mean(s.d.) difference = 9.5(26.3) P = 0.86*) and rectal sensation (Mean difference(s.d.) first sensation 10(15.2) P = 0.958; Mean difference(s.d.) urgency = 10(17.8) P = 0.07*) on bladder filling. CONCLUSION: Under normal physiological circumstances, bladder filling does not influence anorectal function. * STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Wilcoxon signed rank sum test. P < 0.05 considered significant. Units = mmHg

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Possible role of Helicobacter pylori serology in reducing endoscopy workload.

We validated a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), Helico-G, in diagnosing H. pylori in 129 patients (mean age 50 years, range 15-86). We analysed the results of endoscopy against serology to see whether there was a possibility of adopting the strategy of not endoscoping dyspeptic subjects under the age of 45. H. pylori infection was considered present if either histology and/or culture were positive. The ELISA had a sensitivity of 88%, specificity of 72%, positive predictive value of 85%, negative predictive value of 77% and accuracy of 82% in detecting H. pylori. In a subgroup of 52 subjects aged 45 or less (mean age 35 years, range 15-45), 17 out of 25 patients with positive endoscopic findings were H. pylori seropositive while 16 out of 27 patients had normal endoscopic findings. Eighteen out of the 52 patients (35%) were H. pylori seronegative and normal endoscopically except for five patients (10%) who had mild to moderate oesophagitis and two who had non-erosive gastritis (4%). All patients with duodenal ulcer disease (7) were seropositive giving predictive values of positive and negative serology for a diagnosis of duodenal ulcer disease as 28% and 100%, respectively. Therefore adopting a strategy of endoscoping subjects under the age of 45 only if they were H. pylori seropositive would have saved 35% of endoscopies in this age group but missed oesophagitis in 10%. Negative serology would tend to exclude duodenal ulcer disease while positive serology discriminates poorly for it. Serology may be a useful adjunct in screening to reduce endoscopy workload provided that patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms are excluded.

Aged↗