PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J J G H M Bergman

Publications and source records attributed to J J G H M Bergman.

9 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Use of sedation for routine diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Survey of National Endoscopy Society Members.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Sedation rates may vary among countries, depending on patients' and endoscopists' preferences. The aim of this survey was to investigate the rate of using premedication for routine diagnostic upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy in endoscopy societies, members of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). METHODS: We evaluated a multiple-choice questionnaire which was e-mailed to representatives of national endoscopy societies, which are members of the ESGE. The questionnaire had 14 items referring to endoscopy practices in each country and the representatives' endoscopy units. RESULTS: The response rate was 76% (34/45). In 47% of the countries, less than 25% of patients undergo routine diagnostic UGI endoscopy with conscious sedation. In 62% of the responders' endoscopy units, patients are not asked their preference for sedation and do not sign a consent form (59%). Common sedatives in use are midazolam (82%), diazepam (38%) or propofol (47%). Monitoring equipment is not available 'in most of the endoscopy units' in 46% (13/28) of the countries. Though they were available in 91% of the national representatives' endoscopy units, they are rarely (21%) used to monitor unsedated routine diagnostic UGI endoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: In about 50% of ESGE-related countries, less than 25% of patients are sedated for routine diagnostic UGI endoscopy. Major issues to improve include availability of monitoring equipment and the use of a consent form.

Procedural Sedation↗
PubMed2006

[Guideline 'Diagnosis and treatment of oesophageal carcinoma'].

An evidence-based guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of oesophageal carcinoma was developed on the initiative of the Netherlands Society of Gastroenterohepatology in cooperation with the Dutch Institute for Healthcare Improvement (CBO) and the Dutch Association of Comprehensive Cancer Centres. If a patient with oesophageal carcinoma is eligible for treatment with curative intent, they should undergo thoracic and abdominal CT, ultrasound investigation of the supraclavicular region and endoscopic ultrasonography for staging purposes. Endoscopic therapy is the preferred treatment for high-grade dysplasia or early cancer in Barrett's oesophagus confined to the mucosa. Surgical resection is indicated if the tumour invades the submucosa. If resection of the oesophageal carcinoma is performed with curative intent, one should aim for radical resection. The type and extent of the resection depends on the location of the tumour. There is evidence that the mortality rate following surgery can be reduced by performing it in centres with ample experience with oesophageal cancer surgery. Preoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy may improve survival in patients with oesophageal carcinoma. Palliative treatment for oesophageal carcinoma should be considered in cases of local invasion of surrounding organs, metastases, poor physical condition of the patient or recurrent disease after previous curative treatment. Psychosocial support is an important element in the follow-up of patients with oesophageal carcinoma.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2006

Latest developments in the endoscopic management of gastroesophageal reflux disease and Barrett's esophagus: an overview of the year's literature.

The development of endoscopic techniques for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease has come to an abrupt halt after some of the most widely disseminated and best evaluated techniques were withdrawn from the market. This underlines the importance of conducting high-quality endoscopic research before techniques are adopted in routine practice. The endoscopic surveillance of patients with Barrett's esophagus needs to be improved in order to be cost-effective. Alternative techniques for tissue sampling are being explored (e. g., brush cytology, imaging cytometry), as well as the use of molecular markers, to select patients who are at risk and to improve compliance by patients. New endoscopic imaging techniques (such as autofluorescence endoscopy) may improve the detection of early neoplasia in those Barrett's patients who are at risk for malignant degeneration. Subsequent endoscopic treatment should primarily consist of an endoscopic resection technique with restricted use of ablative therapies. Future studies should focus on the development of endoscopic resection techniques that allow en-bloc resection of Barrett's lesions, stepwise complete resection of the whole Barrett's segment, and/or easier and safer tissue ablation. Finally, histopathological studies are needed in order to detect risk factors for an adverse outcome after endoscopic treatment for early neoplasia in Barrett's patients.

Barrett Esophagus↗
PubMed2005

Gastroesophageal reflux disease and Barrett's esophagus.

Several articles have been published during the last year that may affect the management of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and/or Barrett's esophagus in the near future. A new method of measuring esophageal pH has been introduced that does not require an indwelling transnasal catheter and may allow a more physiological assessment of esophageal acid exposure. Several articles discussed the use of endoscopic antireflux procedures, and a sham-controlled randomized study was published concerning the Stretta procedure. A long-term follow-up study and a decision analysis study have again fueled the debate concerning the relevance of surveillance of Barrett's patients, whereas other studies focused on techniques that may improve the detection of specialized intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia within the Barrett's segment. Finally, several studies have reported promising results with the endoscopic treatment of Barrett's metaplasia and early neoplasia using ablation techniques or endoscopic resection modalities. This review summarizes the most important articles in the field of GERD and Barrett's esophagus that have been published in peer-reviewed journals during the last year that are relevant to the practicing endoscopist.

Barrett Esophagus↗
PubMed2005

New developments in the endoscopic surveillance of Barrett's oesophagus.

Patients with a Barrett's oesophagus are at risk for developing an adenocarcinoma of the distal oesophagus. Therefore, many patients undergo endoscopic surveillance to detect dysplasia and/or cancer at an early and curable stage. However, early neoplastic lesions are difficult to identify with standard endoscopy. In addition, the low incidence of these lesions, currently estimated at 0.5% per year, reduces the cost effectiveness of the surveillance strategy. New developments, aimed at improving the efficacy of Barrett's surveillance, focus on two areas: 1) improvement of the endoscopic detection of early neoplastic lesions; and 2) the use of alternative techniques for tissue sampling combined with molecular markers to identify patients at risk for malignant degeneration.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2005

A "crackleware" oesophagus.

This case report describes a 70 year old woman with excessive diffuse keratinisation of the oral cavity and oesophagus harbouring a squamous cell carcinoma. This excessive diffuse keratinisation of normally non-keratinised squamous epithelium could not be identified in normally non-keratinised epithelia in other parts of the body (the vagina), arguing against a genetic basis for this disorder. The term "crackleware" oesophagus was used to describe this entity, which has not been described previously in the English literature.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

A prospective randomized study of hydrophilic polymer-coated polyurethane versus polyethylene stents in distal malignant biliary obstruction.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Hydrophilic polymer-coated polyurethane (HPCP) stents have a low friction coefficient and a hydrophilic layer, which may reduce biofilm formation and increase the period of stent patency. We compared the patency rates with this new stent with the standard Amsterdam-type polyethylene (PE) stent in a prospective randomized trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred patients with an unresectable distal malignant bile duct stricture without a previous drainage procedure were randomly assigned to receive either a HPCP stent or a PE stent. The diameter (10 Fr), length (9 cm) and stent design (Amsterdam type) were similar in both stents. Nine patients were excluded. Forty-four patients received an HPCP stent and 47 patients a PE stent. The diagnoses included carcinoma of the pancreas (n = 78), papilla (n = 1), bile duct (n = 10), and metastases (n = 2). RESULTS: Stent insertion was successful in all patients. Stent dysfunction occurred in 27 of the HPCP stents and 20 of the PE stents, with median stent patency periods of 77 days (95 % CI, 53-101 days) for HPCP stents and 105 days (95 % CI, 42-168 days) for PE stents. The patency period was significantly longer for the PE stent (P = 0.04). Early complications occurred in four patients (4%), one in the HPCP group and three in the PE group. CONCLUSION: Hydrophilic polymer-coated polyurethane stents do not prolong the patency period of biliary stents. In fact, the current standard treatment using polyethylene stents in patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction showed a significantly longer patency period.

Aged↗